Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Role Reversal: Latin America Taunts US on Debt Woes
Worries about contagion; Brazil now a U.S. creditor
SAO PAULO - After three decades spent battling their own debt crises and getting constantly lectured about them by Uncle Sam, many Latin Americans are watching the countdown to a possible default in Washington with a mix of schadenfraude and fear of what a collapse might mean for them.
Bolivia's President Evo Morales is embraced by his Argentinian counterpart Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner during a ceremony at the Casa Rosada Presidential Palace in Buenos Aires June 30, 2011. "If they didn't spend money on military bases and keeping troops in other parts of the world, I think the United States could easily resolve its financial crisis," Morales said last week, according to state news agency ABI. (REUTERS/Marcos Brindicci) For everybody from presidents on down to street vendors, seeing U.S. politicians argue over where to make painful budget cuts has also been a reminder that those days are over in Latin America. For now, at least, as most of the region enjoys an era of economic prosperity and comparatively tiny deficits.
In Washington, lawmakers were working feverishly to combine elements of a plan to raise the U.S. debt ceiling with market-pleasing proposals to cut spending. Congress must approve an increase in the $14.3 trillion U.S. debt ceiling by Aug. 2 or the government will run out of money to pay its bills.
"When did the American dream become a nightmare?" gloated Argentina's President Cristina Fernandez, whose own country defaulted on about $100 billion in debt a decade ago.
In a speech at the Buenos Aires Stock Exchange on Monday, she contended that Argentina had prospered since then by focusing on exports and controlling financial speculation -- a lesson that Washington has yet to learn, she said.
The Americans "thought that money just reproduces by itself, and only in the financial sector, without having to produce any goods or services," Fernandez said.
Washington's biggest critics in the region, such as Venezuela's Hugo Chavez and Bolivia's Evo Morales, have also portrayed the crisis as an inevitable outcome for a country that failed to follow its own financial advice and overextended itself militarily -- in Latin America, and elsewhere.
"If they didn't spend money on military bases and keeping troops in other parts of the world, I think the United States could easily resolve its financial crisis," Morales said last week, according to state news agency ABI.
Memories are still fresh of the self-righteous tone that U.S. officials sometimes seemed to take when the shoe was on the other foot. One infamous example: As Argentina spiraled into crisis in 2001, then-U.S. Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill mocked the country for its debt struggles and said: "They like it that way. Nobody forced them to be what they are."
These days, Latin America's economy as a whole is expected to expand about 4.7 percent in 2011 -- almost twice the expected rate in the United States -- thanks to strong demand for the region's commodities and a decade of mostly prudent fiscal management, itself the product of many hard-learned lessons of the past.
WORRIES CONTAGION COULD SPREAD
It is, in fact, the risk of a U.S. default sparking an old-fashioned financial contagion throughout the Americas -- like the so-called "Tequila Crisis" that spread from Mexico in the 1990s -- that has tempered the triumphalism in some quarters and kept many policymakers up late at night.
Brazil, the region's economic powerhouse, which just a decade ago had to come to Washington to ask the International Monetary Fund for a bailout, is now the United States' fourth-biggest sovereign creditor -- holding about $211 billion in U.S. Treasury securities, according to U.S. data from May.
Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff has met with her team of economic advisers at least four times in the past week, primarily to discuss what a default in the United States or Europe might mean for Brazil, an official told Reuters.
"(Rousseff) starts every day reading the news out of Washington," the official said. "She's fascinated by it."
Even if President Barack Obama and the U.S. Congress manage a last-minute deal to avert a default, as most expect, the role reversal has left many rubbing their eyes in disbelief.
"If you're a survivor of the crises of the 80s and 90s, (this crisis) is unthinkable," wrote Miriam Leitao, one of Brazil's leading columnists, noting that Obama must now confront the kind of issues "that would have seemed like lunacy to us back in the days when they had a monopoly on power."
(Additional reporting by Frank Jack Daniel in Caracas and Hilary Burke and Helen Popper in Buenos Aires; Editing by Todd Benson and Cynthia Osterman)

52 Comments so far
Show AllPerhaps the US should do the same?
Nah, that won't work. All the experts tell me so!
Viva la Revolucion!
Viva la Revolución Bolivariana!
Morales is completely right of course.
***Attention Norte Americanos***
Begin learning Portuguese or Spanish now. (if you haven't already)
If anyone knows how someone who is over 50 and not a millionaire can do this, please let me know.
The paragraph break is not working in comments again...
You have to plug in the HTML tag:
< p >
with no spaces between the less than, the p, and the greater than symbols...
...then you get the line break.
The problem is when runaway, unregulated capitalism despoils and exploits the engines of democracy, like representative governance, the judiciary, education, and--most especially--a free and antagonistic press.
But since capitalism serves an elite at the expense of the many, the two are not really compatible.
Capitalists countries claiming to be democracies (US, UK etc) are skillfully managed to give a superficial appearance of democracy while in reality being plutocracies.
True socialism, on the other hand, serves the many while denying privilege to the few. There is a logical connection then between socialism and democracy.
Unfortunately this connection is sometimes not made, or long postponed, because of the necessity for a new socialist government to control counter-revolutionary activity bent on the overthrow of socialism and the reestablishment of capitalism.
Skillfully control of elections, by the capitalists, can quickly destroy the chances for success of a people tending toward socialism, or a newly formed socialist government .
Essentially I was emphasizing the importance of a society, any society, to be strictly monitored by its citizens--and its press. Without the vigilance of the people and objectivity of journalists, every type of society is bound to succumb to corruption.
"These days, Latin America's economy as a whole is expected to expand about 4.7 percent in 2011 -- almost twice the expected rate in the United States -- thanks to strong demand for the region's commodities and a decade of mostly prudent fiscal management, itself the product of many hard-learned lessons of the past."
One of the hard-learned lessons from the past is that if the U.S. is giving you economic advice hang onto your wallet with both hands -- you are about to get mugged.
The Amerikan ruling class is having a tougher time ripping off foreigners, which is one of the reasons it is turning the screws on Amerikans.
The economic 'shock therapy' cooked up by Friedman and his intellectual cohorts at the University of Chicago, tested on victims in fascist Chile and post-Soviet Russia, etc. is now 'good medicine' for Amerikans, too. (In Russia the economic team was from Harvard but same tribal affiliation.)
http://www.thenation.com/article/harvard-boys-do-russia
SOMEBODY has got to pay for bank bailouts, corporate socialism, and the military empire-- and it is certainly NOT going to be the owners if they can help it.
Unfortunately, that is a naive idea. Washing-town isn't planning on learning the lesson. Financial speculation is a pillar of USan prosperity in the view of Washing-town - not a monkey on its back at all. Washing-town will give it up only after the rest of the world has had enough of USan plunder, slavery and destruction.
FDR saved the capitalists from themselves by reining them in, making the parasite manageable for a while. This time around, Obama and the two factions of the Capitalist party have failed to do that and calamity is the inevitable result. Big Money capitalists are parasites who believe that they can kill their host without killing themselves. They're wrong. Their overreach will be their undoing.
We should save ourselves a lot of trouble by taking our money back from the banksters then killing the parasite. But we won't. The parasite is in control.
Can we trade Obomber for Evo Morales?
We'll happily throw in John Boehner, Eric Cantor, Harry Reid & 3 future number #1 draft picks, too!
They are the Fear States, Fear has controlled the USA since 9/11 when they lost 3000 people including many people from other countries including Canada. Not that the USA would consider nor mention other countries 'losses. These other countries never responded with such fear.
Bush needed the FEAR factor in order to get the 30, 40 year old, uneducated female population to vote for him. FEAR, Fear, Fear. Control, control, control, Loss of freedoms, Police States of America.
Greatest nation in the world? The US government is behaving like a guy who has maxed out all his credit cards and now intends to starve his family so that he can continue his spending habit.