EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Image of Gas Attack Against Lone Brazilian Woman Goes Viral
- Transcript: Today's Live Q&A With NSA Leaker, Edward Snowden
- 'Tip of the Iceberg': Senators Warn Far More Data May Not Be Safe
- Playing the Obama Bumper Sticker Game
- Intentional and Evil: Court Marshall Sexually Assaults Woman, Then Arrests Her When She Protests
- Transcript: Today's Live Q&A With NSA Leaker, Edward Snowden
- The Terror Con
- Remembering Satyajit Ray’s Hirok Rajar Deshe: On Edward Snowden, Resistance and Inverted Totalitarianism
- Pentagon Bracing for Public Dissent Over Climate and Energy Shocks
- Bank of America Lied to Homeowners and Rewarded Foreclosures, Former Employees Say
Popular content
Today's Top News
Pentagon Declares the Internet a Domain of War
The Pentagon released a long-promised cybersecurity plan Thursday that declares the Internet a domain of war.
The Pentagon released a long-promised cybersecurity plan Thursday that declares the Internet a domain of war. (photo: Reuters) The plan notably does not spell out how the U.S. military would use the Web for offensive strikes.
The Defense Department’s first-ever plan for cyberspace calls on the DoD to expand its ability to thwart attacks from other nations and groups, beef up its cyber workforce and expand collaboration with the private sector.
Like major corporations and the rest of the federal government, the military “depends on cyberspace to function,” the DoD plan says. The U.S. military uses cyberspace for everything from carrying out military operations to sharing intelligence data internally to managing personnel.
“The department and the nation have vulnerabilities in cyberspace,” the document states. “Our reliance on cyberspace stands in stark contrast to the inadequacy of our cybersecurity.”
Other nations “are working to exploit DoD unclassified and classified networks, and some foreign intelligence organizations have already acquired the capacity to disrupt elements of DoD’s information infrastructure,” the plan states. “Moreover, non-state actors increasingly threaten to penetrate and disrupt DoD networks and systems.”
Groups are capable of this largely because “small-scale technologies” that have “an impact disproportionate to their size” are relatively inexpensive and readily available.
The Pentagon plans to focus heavily on three areas under the new strategy: the theft or exploitation of data; attempts to deny or disrupt access to U.S. military networks; and any attempts to “destroy or degrade networks or connected systems.”
One problem highlighted in the strategy is a baked-in threat: “The majority of information technology products used in the United States are manufactured and assembled overseas.”
DoD laid out a multi-pronged approach to address those issues.
As foreshadowed by Pentagon officials’ comments in recent years, the plan etches in stone that cyberspace is now an “operational domain” for the military, just as land, air, sea and space have been for decades.
“This allows DOD to organize, train and equip for cyberspace” as in those other areas, the plan states. It also noting the 2010 establishment of U.S. Cyber Command to oversee all DOD work in the cyber realm.
The second leg of the plan is to employ new defensive ways of operating in cyberspace, first by enhancing the DoD’s “cyber hygiene.” That term covers ensuring data on military networks remains secure, using the Internet wisely, and designing systems and networks to guard against cyber strikes.
The military will continue its “active cyber defense” approach of “using sensors, software, and intelligence to detect and stop malicious activity before it can affect DOD networks and systems.” It also will look for new “approaches and paradigms” that will include “development and integration … of mobile media and secure cloud computing.”
The plan underscores efforts long underway at the Pentagon to work with other government agencies and the private sector. It also says the Pentagon will continue strong cyber R&D spending, even in a time of declining national security budgets.
Notably, it calls the Department of Homeland Security the lead for “interagency efforts to identify and mitigate cyber vulnerabilities in the nation’s critical infrastructure.” Some experts have warned against DOD overstepping on domestic cyber matters.
The Pentagon also announced a new pilot program with industry designed to encourage companies to “voluntarily [opt] into increased sharing of information about malicious or unauthorized cyber activity.”
The strategy calls for a larger DoD cyber workforce.
One challenge, Pentagon experts say, will be attracting top IT talent because the private sector can pay much larger salaries — especially in times of shrinking Defense budgets. To that end, “DOD will focus on the establishment of dynamic programs to attract talent early,” the plan states.
On IT acquisition, the plan lays out several changes, including: faster delivery of systems; moving to incremental development and upgrading instead of waiting to buy “large, complex systems”; and improved security measures.
Finally, the strategy states an intention to work more closely with “small- and medium-sized business” and “entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley and other U.S. technology innovation hubs.”
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



87 Comments so far
Show AllExactly right. This is more proof of the saying, "When you are a hammer, everything looks like a nail".
We already know that the FBI, in true 1984 Orwellian fashion, targets any organization with the word "Peace" in their name, as well as animal rights and defense of ecology organizations. This DoD move is just the next logical step in the dysfunctional clusterfuck known as the US war machine.
Observe the conditions in a dysfunctional family where the father is violent, arrogant, impatient, expects and demands to be kowtowed to, becomes indignant and angry if any family member doesn't celebrate his every fart and has the whole bunch under him cringing at his every move while pretending to worship the ground he walks on and you will understand what the DoD end game is.
These people are sick. Their mindset is all about domination ("domain" of war, my ass!).
Dysfunctional families, because they are unproductive and end up being targeted by functional families, always end in tragedy, not just for the psychopath in charge, but for many of the innocent victims as well.
The Pentagon is based on a 'logic' of power defined as domination, or power over. This is built upon a paranoia which leads to ever greater attempts to control every possible contingency...which of course inevitably eventuates in fascism, which is what we have seen.
How does it end? Revolution or collapse. We are well on our way to the latter situation. Basically, it ends when the world gets tired of putting up with a rogue nation and its denationalized transnationals dominating the planet and pushing everyone around who gets in their way.
It begins to completely unravel when the dollar is abandoned as a reserve currency, and when the people of the US become so impoverished that there is no more funding base for the war machine.
Thank you. I've been thinking about how a nation gets into this kind of mess and I believe that, aside from the secrecy culture using "national security" as a dodge for all kinds of destructive and antisocial behavior (see the Manhattan project morphing into the MIC after WWII), there is another required condition.
The elite population must become sufficiently large and isolated from common people in their comings and goings as to live in an alternate (i.e. false) reality. These elite echo chambers then convince themselves that we (the working class) are a "problem". The DoD and all "law enforcement" agencies then become a tool to direct at the "problem".
As Maslow might have said, the elite feel no pressure to treat the working class well as per the "peer group acceptance" area of the human hierarchy of needs because they do not consider us part of their peer group.
Considering that the upper 2% income bracket in the USA is now more numerous than the white population of the 13 English colonies in 1776, it is little wonder that the working class has become the new "native American savages" to these evil elite parasites.
As you pointed out, this will end badly.
Well said. And why has NOBODY out there (except Sibel Edmonds maybe) asked the extent of US intelligence agency penetration in the Murdoch news empire? It is folly to believe this info gathered by phone hackers doesn't go to the spooks as well as the press. Blackmail is always favored by the spooks over wet work.
I copied your insertion so I can just paste it at the end of a paragraph.
Now, let's see if it works.
It does!
Here's some more tricks (remember to remove the spaces):
< h1 - 5 > huge text to tiny text.
This is < h2 >
This is < h3 >
This is < h4 >
This is < h3 > with italics < i >
Have fun.
Pentagon seeks to dominate all internet technologies.
Common Dreams resistance fighters have to teach each other HTML tags.
Yes,
yes,
yes,
yes
and yes! < h2 >< span style="color:green" >< span style="background-color:orange" > and yes!< /span >< /p >
Colors used above: black, yellow, blue ,white ,orange and green.
Copy and paste the above into a wordpad document. Label it HTML stuff or something like that.
You then remove the spaces in the document and can use it as a template for posting here.
I recommend using the word "test" in the "text to be printed" part of your template so you remember where to put your text comment.
YIKES, YOU ARE ON TO MY HENIOUS PLOT!
TIME FOR MY CYANIDE PILL SO THE SECRET IS KEPT SAFE.
GOODBYE, CRUEL WORLD.
;>)
Thankee sir, thankee!
Now, perhaps, we can emphasize things without caps!
Dipping back into my ancient memory, you can cancel any of these by putting a / before the code. Italic < i > end italic < /i > (without the spaces) < b > should bold text and < /b > should cancel bold, etc.
You are welcome.
De emphasis is, as you pointed out with the < / "char" > is as important asemphasis.
Oops, posted the last one before I saw the additional posts below. Thanks :-)
I'm back just for a short while. How is everything?
I was amazed at your postings the last few days and meant to ask you about different fonts sizes. How did you get the "yellow" color and how about red color?
Take care brother. :-)
< span style="color:black" >< span style="background-color:yellow" > YOUR TEXT GOES HERE< /span >< /p >
Everywhere you see a "<" or a ">", you must remove the space (after in the "<" and before in the ">").
For color red use, just replace "color:black" with "color:red". The same deal goes for background color. Kapish?
Enjoy, > Enjoy. > Enjoy. ;>)
There will be all sorts of people in private companies with all sorts of access to all sorts of Pentagon software and data. The Pentagon can't even control its own operations, let alone those of private corporations, which are inherently less accountable. Their attempt to fortify their defenses in cyberspace will end up having the opposite effect. The Pentagon people setting this stuff up are asking for trouble, and putting us all at risk.
And with that, the free Internet's threat to the totalitarian superstructure of the DoD and Military Industrial Complex is quashed. In the controlled corporate media, the protests go unreported. The Orwellian psychotic atomic empire rolls on, with every possible scenario having been wargamed many times, the people being bled dry by the corporate vipers in the MIC.
Another example: History Will Not Absolve Us, about the JFK assassination and cover-up. I can't remember his first name but I believe his last name is Schotz or something like that. If you look that book up it is ridiculously high priced. Makes no sense. There is no way any bookseller would price a book that high and hope to sell it. There are other books I've come across like this, where I strongly suspect intelligence agencies have bought up the rights to the book and price it out of range of most people. Given the fact that intelligence agencies have a budget of $75 billion annually, they probably own several publishing houses of their own...
[To that end, “DOD will focus on the establishment of dynamic programs to attract talent early,” ]
Translation: Young feller, if you don't use your IT skills for the DoD, we'll publish that picture of you doing a goat all over the internet.
I fear you are right, Siouxrose, we are getting closer to a version of Kristallnacht and book burnings every day.
When I was a kid during WW-II I heard of concentration camps. With my childhood vocabulary, it sounded like a place to think. A little later, I learned it was a place to put the thinkers.
Bush had the KBR no-bid concentration camps built here, and a lot of old disused military bases also set up as cc's. I have never heard of any of those being dismantled here in the Obamanation, so I guess it is just a matter of time.
I wonder if the government will hire Xe to provide the cc guards?
What a different country this has become in my lifetime.
Get yourself a good firewall, use a proxy to browse the web to cover your tracks, don't keep ANY emails, financial data, passwords, or any other private information on your computer. Research some free downloadable apps that will assist you in "surfing anonymously," erasing everything you have done online, etc. Use TORBrowser, not I.E. or straight Mozilla. Etc, etc, etc.
Every little bit helps.