EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
US-Occupied Afghanistan 'Most Dangerous Place for Women'
Survey says war-torn nation worst place for women while Congo, which has "horrific levels of rape", is ranked second.
Afghanistan has been ranked as the world's most dangerous country for women, with Congo taking a close second position, a Thomson Reuters Foundation expert poll has said.
Ongoing conflict, US occupation, Nato airstrikes and cultural practices combined make Afghanistan a very dangerous place for women. (Photo: GETTY)
Violence, dismal healthcare and brutal poverty afflicts women in Afghanistan, while in Congo there are horrific levels of rape, the survey conducted by TrustLaw, an arm of Thomson Reuters, said on Wednesday.
Pakistan, India and Somalia ranked third, fourth and fifth respectively in the global survey of perceptions of threats ranging from domestic abuse and economic discrimination to female foeticide, genital mutilation and acid attacks.
"Ongoing conflict, NATO airstrikes and cultural practices combined make Afghanistan a very dangerous place for women," Antonella Notari, head of women change makers, a group that supports women social entrepreneurs around the world, said.
The survey asked 213 gender experts from five continents to rank countries by overall perceptions of danger as well as by six risks. The risks were health threats, sexual violence, non-sexual violence, cultural or religious factors, lack of access to resources and trafficking.
Some experts said the poll showed that subtle dangers such as discrimination that don't grab headlines are sometimes just as significant risks for women as bombs, bullets, stonings and systematic rape in conflict zones.
"I think you have to look at all the dangers to women, all the risks women and girls face," Elisabeth Roesch, who works on gender-based violence for the International Rescue Committee in Washington, said.
"If a woman can't access healthcare because her healthcare isn't prioritised, that can be a very dangerous situation as well."
Female rights
Afghanistan emerged as the most dangerous country for women overall and worst in three of the six risk categories: health, non-sexual violence and lack of access to economic resources.
Respondents cited sky-high maternal mortality rates, limited access to doctors and a near total lack of economic rights.
Afghan women have a one in 11 chance of dying in childbirth, according to UNICEF.
Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), still reeling from a 1998-2003 war and accompanying humanitarian disaster that killed 5.4m people, came second mainly due to staggering levels of sexual violence in the lawless east.
More than 400,000 women are raped in the country each year, according to a recent study by US researchers. The United Nations has called Congo the rape capital of the world.
"Statistics from DRC are very revealing on this: ongoing war, use of rape as a weapon, recruitment of females as soldiers who are also used as sex slaves," Clementina Cantoni, a Pakistan-based aid worker with ECHO, the European Commission's humanitarian aid department, said.
"The fact that the government is corrupt and that female rights are very low on the agenda means that there is little or no recourse to justice."
Rights activists say militia groups and soldiers target all ages, including girls as young as three and elderly women. They are gang-raped, raped with bayonets and have guns shot into their vaginas.
Pakistan ranked third largely on the basis of cultural, tribal and religious practices harmful to women. These include acid attacks, child and forced marriage and punishment or retribution by stoning or other physical abuse.
"Pakistan has some of the highest rates of dowry murder, so-called honour killings and early marriage," Divya Bajpai, reproductive health advisor at the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, said.
Some 1,000 women and girls die in honour killings annually, according to Pakistan's Human Rights Commission.
Trafficking of women
India ranked fourth primarily due to female foeticide, infanticide and human trafficking.
In 2009, India's then-Home Secretary Madhukar Gupta estimated that 100m people, mostly women and girls, were involved in trafficking in India that year.
"The practice is common but lucrative so it goes untouched by government and police," Cristi Hegranes, founder of the Global Press institute, which trains women in developing countries to be journalists, said.
India's Central Bureau of Investigation estimated that in 2009 about 90 per cent of trafficking took place within the country and that there were some 3m prostitutes, of which about 40 per cent were children.
In addition to sex slavery, other forms of trafficking include forced labour and forced marriage, according to a US state department report on trafficking in 2010. The report also found slow progress in criminal prosecutions of traffickers.
Up to 50m girls are thought to be "missing" over the past century due to female infanticide and foeticide, the UN Population Fund said.
Some experts said the world's largest democracy was relatively forthcoming about describing its problems, possibly casting it in a darker light than if other countries were equally transparent about trafficking.
Somalia ranked fifth due to a catalogue of dangers including high maternal mortality, rape and female genital mutilation, along with limited access to education, healthcare and economic resources.
"I'm completely surprised because I thought Somalia would be first on the list, not fifth," Maryan Qasim, the Somali women's minister said.
"The most dangerous thing a woman in Somalia can do is to become pregnant. When a woman becomes pregnant her life is 50-50 because there is no antenatal care at all. There are no hospitals, no healthcare, no nothing.
"Add to that the rape cases that happen on a daily basis, the female genital mutilation that is being done to every single girl in Somalia. Add to that the famine and the drought. Add to that the fighting (which means) you can die any minute, any day."
Poll respondents included aid professionals, academics, health workers, policymakers, journalists and development specialists.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

38 Comments so far
Show AllRead the book The Bookseller of Kabul, covering life in Afghanistan before and under the Taliban. The second half covers the life of one of the daughters of the bookseller. Not much seems to have changed since we invaded the country.
Bush and Obama and company only use their fake concern for women as an excuse to stay in Afghanistan forever. I have never taken their lies seriously.
Colombia would be at the top of the least desirable nation states if this survery worth any more than toilet paper it ought to be written on. Colombia is a dope pushing, kill crazy police state with levels of violence and killing that surpass any other, but it has US Government backing 100 per cent.
As to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the US Govenrmnet has for some time been seeking a regime change to get rid of the left wing government with the rebels using rape as weapon against the people.
>>Colombia is a dope pushing, kill crazy police state with levels of violence and killing that surpass any other, but it has US Government backing 100 per cent.<<
Colombia gave the US permission to develop seven large US military bases. Check a map. That country, bordering on Venezuela, Brazil, Ecuador and Peru is ideally located for a US base of operations for conquest of South America. It will at some point become necessary to bring democracy to Venezuela, and of course to those turncoats in Ecuador who kicked the US out a couple years ago.
Katrine: Is your contribution to this thread, the wish to discredit the work of an organization trying to open the world's eyes to the abundant horrors? Sure, make it about a statistical mistake in an effort to discredit those on the front lines who seek to make these horrors known... for it's only through outside humanitarian intervention (and I am hardly speaking of any fig leaf to grant military access) that these women can be saved from fates direct from Hell.
I have been pointing out to the CD forum that a number of people seem to visit the threads mostly to discredit the topic or its advocates. This is not something that happens here and there; nor do I believe it's merely the expression of diverse human opinions. I think it's a well-orchestrated campaign present on this site to invalidate the voices and platforms of people on the front lines, those who (for all their human imperfections) try to make a difference. It is also an attempt to control the conversation. For some reason, the horrors done unto so many of the world's women are whitewashed over. Very seldom is the subject discussed for what it is.
I'm sure you'll do your best to apprise me of the incorrectness of my view... however, by your making the subject of your comment about Al Jazeera, rather than the material herewith uncovered, you turn the conversation away from what needs to be spoken about, deflected into a political discussion about media.
At least thus far this thread hasn't morphed into examining all the horrors done unto men... even if they're devised BY men, through militarism which (in spite of evdence of late day women emulating this catastrophe in motion) is a PATRIARCHAL expression.
Katrine, Do you have a cell phone? and is it gang rape free? Illegal mining of rare earths that support our cutsy little toys are also seldom mentioned by left or right.
If you listen closely to your cell phone you can hear the women scream.
Just can't stand any expression of sympathy for male victims, can you?
Women victims are constantly given media exposure and foundation money flows generously to non-profits dealing with violence against women.
Men on the other hand, receive almost no coverage and I've yet to hear about the non-profit that focuses on male victims. Yet you bemoan any comment that mentions male victims and label it as a sexist hijacking,
Just because men may be mostly, but not always victims of other men, does not make them less deserving of empathy and concern, unless of course you're a hateful bigot.
Whether occupied by the military, the theocrats, the rich and powerful, or all together, any place where conservative psychopaths, superstitious morons and greedhead chickenhawks congregate is a dangerous place for the poor and defenseless
Notice that India is 4th, ahead of Somalia. I'm sure there will be howls of protest, but very little reflection.
And what about all the mass rapes and murders by the Amerikkkans in these places?
If that is the case then why in the name of hell are they going to send women to the front line in the army to go to Afghanistan.
I am not trying to downplay these reports but the biggest rapists and pillagers are the ones that turn their eyes and know whats happening and yet are immune to helping...American governments are one. American agencies are another.
Example...a American navy ship came to Australia a few years ago, a navy person was caught trying to solicit a 12 year old girl for sex...police and security were barred from going on the ship to get his computer...Americas response, they will deal with it...hey nothing ever got done...another pedophile walking around.
Guys the real deal is some are their own worst enemy.
Sorry for getting off track.
"The fact that the government is corrupt and that female rights are very low on the agenda means that there is little or no recourse to justice."
Give them some AK-47s if you want justice!
I hope that as we point a finger at the nations mentioned in this article we hold our noses with the other hand. In this country we are allowing women to die in childbirth, we force them to carry unwanted fetuses, we've legislated away their right to control and manage their own bodies, etc. We've allowed the state to interfere with women's reporductive process and we invade their privacy. Are we better than these other nations? No. We're just not to that level yet, but make no mistake, we are headed in that direction.
a qoute from the artical, "The survey asked 213 gender experts from five continents to rank countries by overall perceptions of danger as well as by six risks. The risks were health threats, sexual violence, non-sexual violence, cultural or religious factors, lack of access to resources and trafficking.
Some experts said the poll showed that subtle dangers such as discrimination that don't grab headlines are sometimes just as significant risks for women as bombs, bullets, stonings and systematic rape in conflict zones."
I have been to Afghanistan twice and will return in the next few weeks. The first time I went to Afghanistan I supervised mine clearing and also tough land mine awareness classes. Here are some statistics from those classes there were approximately 2200 boys under the age of 17 that were involved in non fatal mine strikes (they were taken to a medical center and treated) but there were less than 100 Girls under the age of 17 that were involved in non fatal mine strikes. Men over the age of 17 about 1400 and women less than 100. These statistics are April 99 to Dec 2000 Why are the Female rates so low? They are not, simply put Women are NOT TAKEN TO SEEK MEDICAL TREATMENT. Under the Taliban it was not allowed, Women could not be doctors and male doctors can not treat a woman because of cultural (I would use an obscene word here normally) bias
Any how it is not "American Occupation" as the article suggests that is the root of the women of Afghanistan being in danger, in fact even Code Pink changed its mind on Afghanistan http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-South-Central/2009/1006/p06s10-wosc.html as did ARAW
I will be back in Afghanistan this month, It is a very complicated country, there are no 'silver bullets' and the 'root' causes of problems are so varied that no one can point at any one thing. I can tell you this from personal experience, the state of women is much better with the presence of forces that influence the government of Afghanistan
There has been a concerted propaganda push in the MSM lately that calims a uS troop withdrawal would spell a disaster for women. Some women may fear a troop withdrawal nbut many others are vehemently against the US invasion:
"The Afghan politician and activist Malalai Joya has warned that "Obama's military buildup will only bring more suffering and death to innocent civilians." Another woman, who goes by the pseudonym Zoya, has appeared in various U.S. media calling for "withdrawal of the troops immediately." She is a member of the Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan, a Kabul-based political group that has fought for human rights and social justice since 1977. And Sakena Yacoobi, who founded a network of underground schools for Afghan women and girls, says "most foreign troops are not primarily focused on protecting women and children."
http://stopafghanwar.blogspot.com/2009/12/afghan-women-us-intervention-in.html
Protecting Afghani women has been a propaganda point in support of the US war under both Bush and Obama. It has little to do with why the US is in Afghanistan, and as this report points out, the US war has left Afghani womens rights in a terrible state.
Finally, it sounds as if you are a US soldier in Afghanistan and your position on this issue is incredibly self serving and must be a salve to your conscience if you have one.
Finally, it sounds as if you are a US soldier in Afghanistan and your position on this issue is incredibly self serving and must be a salve to your conscience if you have one.
is that default potion that some how I must salve my conscience?
I spent 21 months pulling land minds out of Afghanistan, that is something I feel really good about.
What about you, what have done? post to the internet? or have you gone to the other default position and donated 10 dollars to some NGO?
My default potion is until you meet me face to face, shake my hand in Afghanistan and then help me run a mine clearing operation or one of the medical operations I have supported then perhaps you should not accuse people of things you know nothing about
Are you serving with the US military or not? If so, then regardless of your good deeds, you are part of a brutal earth destroying juggernaut, the enemy of all the world's people.
If not, then I admire your courage.
Sorry but that's my opinion.
do you know any soldiers? I mean really know them, sat down to chi, or tea or coffee and talked with them?
some how I doubt it, some how i doubt you have even bothered to speak to one in an open and honest conversation. check my post history, yeah, i am a solider, and no, never destroyed the earth, and Juggernaut is a comic book character
Nope juggernaut is a reference to an overwhelming far right war machine in general and the Nazi war machine in particular.
As far as tea and chi, not as far as I remember. I do recall chugging Genesse beer with a nam vet in the cab of the truck of the town highway department, of which we were both employed.
He was tough as nails, but would react very strongly to anyone who rapped patriotic about nam. He had some very compelling stories about holding out until the helicopters arrived.
Then there were all my uncles, who were war veterans, and half of my small town boy neighbors ended up "in the service" One of the younger kids who looked up to me ended up guarding a President.
So despite the lack of tea or chai, yeah I know soldiers. I've heard ALL the stories.I tell all the boys I know not to become a soldier..
PEACE
I on the other hand encourage service, now on that note, the military is not the end all be all of 'civil service'
The US military is not civil service or public service. It's the imperial enforcer, the united bully boys for Wall Street.
How much do you understand about the US military. Ever read USMC General Smedley Butler's books?
Dreamjoehill: We or at least some of us are having an open discourses or debate. When you stoop to insults it cheapens what is a good board for people to discuss issues.
23 years so far, I think I understand who and what we are and what we do pretty well.
I have not "stooped to insults." You are distorting the exchange that occurred.
So you've been an imperialist enforcer for 23 years, and that makes you the ultimate judge of what the US military is doing?
I'd say that makes you incredibly biased and your arguments self serving. You can believe in the lie of the nobility of the US military. I won't join you in that misguided belief. May God have mercy on your soul.
Finally I'd note that you have not responded to any of my arguments; instead, you've focused on how insulted you are and what a rude poster I am.
I'd say that cheapens the discussion also.
Have you read Smedley Butler. maybe since he aws a general, you might actually give some credence to his arguments, rather, then dismissing him, as you have me, as someone who doesn't know what he's talkng about.
I am not know of either his books or arguments
and if you cannot see how words like bully boy and imperialist are at the very least provocative I do not see how you will understand that they are an insult. As for bias, of course I am bias, just as you are bias. Your quoting books (I do read quit a lot) , I am recounting experiences, my own and no one else's
I do not see how it can be logically asserted that the USA is not empire, thus imperialism, imperialist.
Bully Boy is an insult and I will withdraw it, as applied to you personally, as you are correct that I do not know your experiences in life. I will not withdraw it as an accurate label of US foriegn policy in the middle east.
Gen. Butler's wrote War Is A Racket
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smedley_Butler
Smedley Darlington Butler (July 30, 1881 – June 21, 1940), nicknamed "The Fighting Quaker" and "Old Gimlet Eye", was a Major General in the U.S. Marine Corps, and at the time of his death the most decorated Marine in U.S. history. During his 34-year career as a Marine, he participated in military actions in the Philippines, China, in Central America and the Caribbean during the Banana Wars, and France in World War I. By the end of his career he had received 16 medals, five of which were for heroism. He is one of 19 people to twice receive the Medal of Honor, one of three to be awarded both the Marine Corps Brevet Medal and the Medal of Honor, and the only person to be awarded the Brevet Medal and two Medals of Honor, all for separate actions.
I do not lack all respect for soldiers, but feel that the US military is a tool of the an international class of extremely wealthy families and corporations.
My last word of advice. Don't go back to Afghanistan. I feel this strongly.
The Smedley Butler Society has a website warisaracket.org "dedicated to eliminating US militray imperialism."
Thank you for the retraction of 'bully boy'
What I believe is that we ignored Afghanistan for years and that we (as individual Americans) have a moral obligation to aid those that have less. Charity begins at home but when people can not get medical care (hmmmm, sort of like here in the USA) it should be provided. If there is no rule of law in a country than we should help, not with a military action per-say but with providing means for a people to do so themselves. There are basic human rights most of the people in America have in plenty and the moral obligation is on the individual to share.
as for not going back, that horse is long sense out of the barn.
1. The US can't afford to police the entire world
2. It has no right to police the world and militarily impose its values on other nations.
3. Humanitarian concern is simple a way to try to portray this invasion as something other than self-serving imperialism.
I hope you get a chance to read General Butler's work. Most of this information on US imperialism has benn around for over a century. Of course it hasn't made much difference. The US continues on the imperial path.
Thanks for your comment. You point out that such situations are not as cut-and-dried as we distant observers believe. We ought to remember that the Taliban and the morals police were exceedingly busy before the occupation - their activities fed into the pretext for invasion. Yet you would have to provide evidence or examples that the forces present do offer services and influence the government of Afghanistan in a positive way.
Still, your comment stimulates reflection, that's a good thing.
Be careful out there. Check twice.
I can offer you as examples the things I have done. Starting in 2002 and 2003 clearing land mines in and around Bagram. In 2006 providing route clearance for medical missions to out laying communities. Now I work with various NGOs, IGOs, Afghan and other governments working to coordinate many of the relief efforts. (Duplication of effort by NGOs is a huge problem anywhere there is human suffering)
This is my point on this article, it was written in such a manner that blames the current crisis on the US Military when that is simply not the case. The threat to women's health pre dates 9-11 by decades. I will place most of this at the Taliban's feet, their rendition or rather miss-rendition of Islam prevented and would prevent again health care of most any kind for women. I also have my own experiences witnessing things that were done to women either intentionally or simply through neglect that caused them grotesque injury. A lot of this has to do with Pashtu culture, keep in mind that while in power the Taliban who are Pashtu, took this to extremes (and not just against women)
Afghanistan is a nation of infinite shades of gray and infinite combinations of culture, tradition shadowed over by geographic position in the world. It was once a nation that sat on the Silk Road and was important, when the Silk Road was supplanted by container ships and airlines it turned in to an unimportant country to ALL of the world and was only important as a chess piece. After the fall of the Soviet backed government it was ignored by everyone. One might as well have written 'Here there be dragoons' for all that people cared.
Finally I would like to offer this from Aljazeera. http://english.aljazeera.net/programmes/peopleandpower/2011/06/20116147412812990.html
I find Al Jazeera to be fine good reporting, people complain that they are anti-American I simply find them to be pro Middle East, and there is nothing wrong with that
Despite what may be good intentions on your part, you are spreading imperialist and militarist propaganda.
" A lot of this has to do with Pashtu culture, keep in mind that while in power the Taliban who are Pashtu, took this to extremes (and not just against women)"
Are you unaware that the Taliban was basically a creation of Carter & Reagan's anti-USSR policies? You engage in cultural imperialism when you imply that the anti-women forces in Afghanistan are solely homegrown. Anti-woman sentiment may have pre-dated the invasion but it was pumped up by American imperialist cold war military programs.
US out of the middle east!
dbl
dbl
can you have your cake and eat it too?
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2011/06/18-1
There are also many Afghans, among them women's and civil society activists, who fear talks with the insurgents could undo much of the progress they have made in the decade since the Taliban were swept from power.
"We should not give up 10 years of achievements in Afghan women's rights. If that happens, these peace talks will be incomplete and unjust," said Suraya Parlika, head of the All Afghan Women's Union and a senator in the Afghan parliament.
The US invaded Afghanistan and has aoccupied that nation for 10 years.
It's time to leave.
Appeals to woman's rigts do not justify the military occupation of another nation. It's still military imperialism, with a veneer of humanitariansim thrown in to try to justify what is eseentially unjustifiable.
General Smedley Butler, USMC: I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912 (where have I heard that name before?). I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China I helped to see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested. During those years, I had, as the boys in the back room would say, a swell racket. Looking back on it, I feel that I could have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents.