EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Human Impact on World's Rivers 'Threatens Water Security of 5 Billion'
Study on effect of all human intervention on water supplies finds water security and biodiversity severely damaged
The global study put together by institutions across the globe is the first to simultaneously look at all types of human intervention – from dams and reservoirs to irrigation and pollution – on freshwater. It paints a devastating picture of a world whose rivers are in serious decline. While developing countries are suffering from threats to both water security and biodiversity – particularly in Africa and central Asia – the authors said they were surprised by the level of threat posed to wildlife in rich countries.
An aerial view of the downstream area of the Bakun hydroelectric dam project in Sarawak on the Balui River. Nearly 80% of the world's rivers are so badly affected by humanity's footprint that the water security of almost 5 billion people, and the survival of thousands of aquatic species, are threatened, scientists warned today.
(AFP/HO/File/Sarawak Hidro) "What made our jaws drop is that some of the highest threat levels in the world are in the United States and Europe," says Prof Peter McIntyre, one of the lead authors, who began work on the project as a Smith Fellow at the University of Michigan. "Americans tend to think water pollution problems are pretty well under control, but we still face enormous challenges." Some of the worst threats to aquatic species in the US are in the south-eastern states, including the Mississippi river.
Prof Charles Vörösmarty of the City University of New York, lead author and an expert on global water, said the impact on wildlife in developed countries was the result of river systems that had been heavily engineered and altered by man.
"With all the protection the EU has in place for waterways, it was surprising to see it was a hotspot for biodiversity loss. But for a long time Europeans have altered their landscapes, including the removal of 90% of wetlands and floodplains, which are crucial parts of river ecosystems," he said.
Published in the journal Nature today, the international team behind the report looked at datasets to produce a map of how 23 different human influences – such as dams, the introduction of alien non-native fish and pollution – affect water security and biodiversity. Previous studies have tended to look at just one influence at a time.
Even the world's great rivers, such as the Yangtze, the Nile and the Ganges, are suffering serious biodiversity and water security stress, the map shows. Despite their size, more than 30 of the 47 largest rivers showed at least moderate threats to water security, due to a range of human impacts such as pollution and extracting water for irrigation.
Even the Amazon, which is considered to be relatively pristine, still has human fingerprints on it, said Vörösmarty. "While the Amazon is in generally good shape, in the upstream regions such as Peru, there are many high density areas of people that inject threat into the system. The legacy of that human threat passes downstream into the remote forested areas of the river."
Globally, between 10,000 and 20,000 aquatic wildlife species are at risk or face extinction because of the human degradation of global rivers, the report said.
The world's least affected rivers, the authors found, were those furthest from populated areas, such as remote parts of the tropics, Siberia and elsewhere in the polar regions.
Vörösmarty said he hopes the report highlights the need to address the root causes of the degradation of rivers. "We're spending trillions of US dollars to fix a problem we've created in the first place. It's much cheaper to treat the causes rather than the symptoms, which is what we do in the developed world today," he said.
In the UK, rivers have been getting cleaner over the past decade. But a report by the UK's Environment Agency last year admitted only five of 6,114 rivers in England and Wales are considered pristine and three-quarters were so polluted they are likely to fail new European quality standards.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

15 Comments so far
Show All"only five of 6,114 rivers in England and Wales are considered pristine and three-quarters were so polluted they are likely to fail new European quality standards."
Industrial societies are engines of mass destruction. We must phase them out.
yes...
let us say goodbye to industry on Global Start Date: September 22, 2012...
Great plan,, Phasing out the 5 billion that depend on the industrial infrastructure to bring then food, water, and removes their waste.
>^^<
I hear ya. I'm sure that Gates and Buffett are not in the hit list.
The 5 billion don't have to be dependent on industry to survive. In fact, it is that very dependence that threatens their existence.
"And I think in this empty world there was room for me and a mountain lion.
And I think in the world beyond, how easily we might spare a million or two humans
And never miss them.
Yet what a gap in the world, the missing white frost-face of that slim yellow mountain lion!" - D.H. Lawrence
John Aspinall: Aspinall rails against overpopulation as he fears that these creatures [animals] will soon have nowhere to go. He dismisses ideas about the sanctity of human life, 'because if anything it means the insanctity of species which are not human.'
Liberals always interpret this as proto-fascism, but that's because they still believe human rights always come before animals'. When they hear him say 'I would be very happy to see 3.5 billion humans wiped out from the face of the Earth within the next 150 years and I am quite prepared to go with them', they can only hear a hatred for humanity, not a love of animals. But as the threat to other species becomes ever more urgent we may have to abandon this paradign. Then there may be something to learn from John Aspinall. Amen, amen, amen!!!!
Clearly our global society is not sustainable as presently constituted. I think it's an open question as to which of Earth's natural systems will give out or be depleted first: atmospheric heating, oceanic life, oil, streams, lakes. Take your pick.
And all of this is happening as the world's only superpower careens towards fascism.
Jim Shea
A treat in Bay City, Michigan is Two-Headed Fish-on-a-Stick. Thank you Dow Chemical & Dow Corning.
What I recommend is constructing an elevated viaduct from Sanford, MI directly east to Lake Huron.
Michigan is the "northern" ground zero for Convective Available Potential Energy, CAPE, the source of power for thunderstorms (Florida is the southern version).
Abundant potential energy in the air, augmented and enhanced by contacting it with warmed sea or lake water, is easily convertible to electricity via Atmospheric vortex Engine.
vortexengine.ca
We could start by getting rid of Las Vegas: a worthless city of 1.6 million growing like a cancer in the middle of the desert.
Las Vegas is on the verge of running out of their Colorado River water supplies (due to drought possibly aggravated by global warming), hence the SNWD is launching a plan to pump heavily from aquifers hundreds of miles north in order to -- what? -- prolong the agony of watching that city metastasize for a few more decades while it sucks the remaining life out of springs and seeps and wetlands and the uniquely-evolved creatures that depend upon that scarce water across hundreds of square miles in central Nevada and Utah?
Before they THEN dry up??
Our society and our culture has gone stark raving mad. It's painful and tragic to watch.
I used to be cautiously hopeful that people would gradually wake up to the horrors of what we are doing to our planet, and for trivial, short-term gain. Now I'm just depressed.
It isn't growing anymore. It's drying up.
Nevermind climate change/global warming. What's the GOPers excuse for this?
It's not just the rivers and oceans, that are contaminated but the water tables in local communities. This is every where from the ranchers of Wyoming, where gas drilling has polluted all of the ground water, to California's Jet Propulsion Lab, which was contaminating the water tables since the 1950s. Jet fuel in your coffee anyone?
To their credit, JPL did an enormous amount of work to clean up the problem, but sad to say, I still won't drink my tap water. Does anyone know if JPL uses tap or bottled water? That would be a helpful answer to many in the community.
How could I NOT mention the coal states, and the devastation that king coal has poured upon humans and nature. Coal ash in your living room, or maybe an exploding ash pond onto the local school? Who could forget the people of Harriman TN? Apparently, many already have.
If coal is so clean, then I would like to see the corporations and their families ( in order to prove their statements) be required to import bottles of water from the very rivers that they have contaminated. Hey guys, if you and your families don't get very sick, then perhaps the natives would feel better about your statements of "clean coal."
The "river" has always been a symbol of the passing of time and the history of humanity; LIFE itself. How soon will it be before "Mr. Death," comes in liquid form, and river becomes a synonym for sickness and death?
PLEASE, let us not hear about privatization of water........because then DEATH will be coming to a CORPORATE tap soon near you ( if you can afford it!)
I think the article does a poor job of describing the problem. The problem is pollution in the water from industrial and agricultural chemicals, not fecal colliforms and biological natural waste. Big Agriculture and industries are the culprits. As to water for personal use, it's all about scaremongering. There is a machine that costs about a grand. If this was really mass produced. every single human family could have one for a personal or government subsidized cost of about $100 or less. The machine condenses water out of the air (only in extreme deserts is the relative humidity insufficient for this - NO - Las Vegas and Nevada are NOT extreme deserts - the machine works as long as you have at least 22% relative humidity) and stores it in a tank which periodically runs it under bacteria and fungus killing UV. The smallest one gets about 8 gallons a day. In Haiti the US Army used a train car sized one to produce water for thousands after the quake. The electricity to power it can be obtained from a solar panel. It lasts about 8 to ten years. Tap water is on the way out because they do not want replace millions of miles of plumbing. I have not gotten one of the machines yet but I plan to. I don't think we can fight this one. Plumbing is on the way out.
Google water generators
"Human Impact' retranslated to acually mean Corporate Top Brass Polluter Impact.