EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- One American Who Isn't For Sale
- Edward Snowden: Saving Us from the United Stasi of America
- Major Loss to Organic Farmers as Court Rules in Favor of Monsanto
- The Judicial Lynching of Bradley Manning
- Remembering Satyajit Ray’s Hirok Rajar Deshe: On Edward Snowden, Resistance and Inverted Totalitarianism
Popular content
Today's Top News
EPA Requests Feedback on Plan Analyzing Impact of Hazardous Waste on Disadvantaged Communities
Agency reaching out to environmental justice community
WASHINGTON - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is requesting public input on a precedent-setting effort to evaluate environmental justice concerns raised by a Bush-era loophole that stripped federal oversight of companies that handle 1.5 million tons of hazardous waste each year.
The waste is generated by steel, chemical and pharmaceutical companies and mostly affects low-income communities and communities of color where waste dumps are often situated.
EPA will discuss the preliminary plan for the environmental justice analysis with the National Environmental Justice Advisory Council at the council's national public meeting on Jan. 28 in New Orleans.
"This is the first time the agency will conduct a comprehensive environmental justice analysis -- although these reviews were first ordered by President Bill Clinton," said Abigail Dillen, an attorney for Earthjustice. "This process is likely to become a template for future analyses. We look forward to participating in this process and are pleased the EPA is involving important stakeholders and advocates for environmental justice."
Even though the EPA is reconsidering the Bush era rule change, it remains in effect in the interim and three states are already making use of it. According to an analysis by Earthjustice that will be presented in New Orleans, 23 facilities in Iowa, New Jersey and Pennsylvania are already operating under the exemption. A basic investigation of the facilities shows that at least six of them are chronic violators and 19 are in communities that are predominantly low-income or minority.
"Disadvantaged communities face an increased risk from exposure to this hazardous waste," said Dr. Robert Bullard, director of the Environmental Justice Resource Center at Clark Atlanta University. "Involving representatives of this community in the process is needed to create an unbiased plan that assesses the impact of this loophole on all communities."
"It is imperative that those who stand to be most directly affected by the operations of these hazardous waste recycling businesses are involved in analyzing and commenting on this draft policy," said Vernice Miller-Travis, vice chair of the Maryland Commission on Environmental Justice and Sustainable Communities. "A fundamental tenet of environmental justice is that these communities speak for themselves and voice their concerns directly to the federal government. This upcoming public dialogue is their opportunity to be heard."
Individuals unable to attend this dialogue in person in New Orleans on January 28th, may comment on the record via e-mail. Submit written comments to RCRA-docket@epa.gov, Attn: Docket ID EPA-HQ-RCRA-2009-0315. Interested stakeholders can also attend a second public meeting on the proposed environmental justice plan to be held on February 23, 2010 at the EPA Potomac Yard Conference Center in Arlington, VA.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



4 Comments so far
Show AllThanks to progressive Democrats.
ezeflyer: "Thanks to progressive Democrats." Exactly. The smallest possible "step in the right direction" is taken and a big CD headline is put over it. This piece emphasizes that the terrible and environmentally unjust waste disposal disposal projects already permitted by the Bush administration are continuing, as though Obama had not been President for a year and, just now, the EPA gets round to opening up a policy statement for a "hearing" from affected parties. Does it take a federal regulatory agency a year to begin the first steps toward a revised policy? For that matter, with a President who says he will "fight" for this and "fight" for that, why doesn't he take off his powder puff boxing gloves and sign an executive order that would close NOW these operations that are hazardous to the well being of the people in the places where they exist? The EPA's Obama-era performance on mountaintop removal doesn't give me any confidence that the people can depend on this agency which I call the Environmental "Protection" Agency.
So the whole DEM government's now confined baby steps like Billary brought US?
Ask the people of Bhopal about hazardous waste.