Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
US Plots Retaliatory Strikes Against al-Qaida in Yemen over Plane Bomber
The US is planning retaliatory strikes in Yemen against al-Qaida over its attempt to blow up a transatlantic flight on Christmas Day.
Members of the Yemeni counter-terrorism force. Yemen has seen, and will continute to see, increased US aid in support. American officials say intelligence efforts are focused on identifying and tracking down those who plotted to put Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab on the plane with enough explosive in his underwear to bring down the Northwest Airlines flight from Amsterdam. (AFP/Getty) American
officials say intelligence efforts are focused on identifying and
tracking down those who plotted to put Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab on the
plane with enough explosive in his underwear to bring down the
Northwest Airlines flight from Amsterdam. But they warn that finding
those responsible is unlikely to be swift and say that identifying
other "high-value" al-Qaida targets for retaliatory attack would also
be a priority.
"First we have to find out who put Abdulmutallab on the plane with the bomb," said a US official working alongside intelligence organisations. "He's providing some leads and we're not dealing with an unknown quantity here. We've been watching and listening to what goes on in Yemen and we may have pieces of the puzzle already and just need to fit it together.
"If and when we identify them then we plan how to deal with them. Who they are is one thing, where they are is another.If they're still in Yemen and we can get a lock on them then it won't be too difficult to know what to do. But they know who they are and won't be standing out. After that we can move with the president's authorisation. I don't think there's much doubt that authorisation will be forthcoming, but no one should think all of this is going to happen overnight."
The official acknowledged that there was likely to be political and public pressure on Barack Obama to strike back at al-Qaida, particularly with Republican opponents breaking with the usual solidarity on national security issues to accuse him of weakness and making America vulnerable to attack.
"The people we want are the ones who put Abdulmutallab on the plane. Until we can get them there are other high-value targets that will make the point that attacking America does not go unpunished," said the official.
But given the regular attacks against al-Qaida in Yemen, these may have a greater impact on American public opinion than on the extremist group.
The US has been conducting a covert assault with drone attacks on al-Qaida bases for about a year, while CIA agents inside the country help direct ground operations. American special forces have been training the Yemeni military and may have been involved in raids.
General David Petraeus, the American regional commander, and John Brennan, the president's counterterrorism adviser, both visited Yemen this year.
Joe Lieberman, chairman of the Senate's homeland security committee, who visited Yemen in August, described the country this week as a focus of the assault on al-Qaida. "Yemen now becomes one of the centres of that fight. We have a growing presence there - and we have to - of special operations, Green Berets, intelligence," he said.
Yesterday, Yemeni forces targeted Nasser Ahmed al-Ahdal, a former prisoner released after renouncing violence but believed to have renewed links to al-Qaida. One man was injured and captured but Ahdal and two others escaped.
Several al-Qaida members killed in raids by Yemeni forces in the past fortnight had been released or had escaped from prison. Others who have left jail to rejoin the fight include Nasser al-Wahayshi, the Yemeni leader of al-Qaida, who escaped along with 22 others from prison in Yemen in 2006. His deputy, Saeed al-Shihri, joined al-Qaida in Yemen last year after being released to Saudi Arabia from Guantánamo.
While intelligence officials plan how to hit back abroad, they are under pressure at home after Obama blamed intelligence failings for Abdulmutallab being allowed to board a plane to the US.
The president has ordered that a preliminary report be delivered to him explaining how the young Nigerian managed to smuggle the explosives on to the flight.
The criticism is focused on the CIA and the national counterterrorism centre (NCC) established after 9/11. The CIA is under scrutiny because it picked up intelligence from Yemen that a Nigerian was involved in a forthcoming attack at about the same time that Abdulmutallab's father told US diplomats in the Nigerian capital, Abuja, that his son had become radicalised in Yemen and was a possible threat. That information was shared with CIA officials in Abuja who passed it on to the NCC, but it was apparently not matched with the intelligence from Yemen. On Tuesday Obama condemned the failure to share information and other intelligence failings as "totally unacceptable".
CIA in the line of fire
First the finger was pointed at Janet Napolitano, the homeland security secretary, who blundered after the failure of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab's bombing attempt by saying "the system worked".
But with Barack Obama condemning intelligence failures as "totally unacceptable", attention is focused on the CIA and the national counterterrorism centre (NCC), set up after 9/11 to pool information and forestall the kind of plot that Abdulmutallab came close to completing.
The CIA is under pressure after it was revealed that it apparently had two important pieces of the puzzle that might have prevented the attack and did not put them together.
The New York Times said the agency picked up intelligence from Yemen that a Nigerian was at the forefront of a looming attack on American interests. At about the same time, the CIA was part of a briefing at the US embassy in Nigeria after Abdulmutallab's father warned American diplomats that his son was becoming radicalised, and was in Yemen. The CIA drew up a file, but then sat on it for five weeks.
For its part, the NCC was told by the state department about the warnings by Abdulmutallab's father, but then did not check whether the young Nigerian had a US visa. He did.
The president described the handling of the warning as a failure.
Richard Clarke, a former chief counter‑terrorism adviser on the US national security council, said that while Napolitano is feeling the heat for a political misstep,it was the CIA and NCC that should shoulder responsibility. "There does appear to be a failure here either at the CIA or the new national counterterrorism centre. Homeland security didn't get the information. I think the problem lies at the intelligence community and not at homeland security," he said.
- Posted in



45 Comments so far
Show AllOne wonders if anyone in Congress or in the corporate media will finally point out the obvious and that is, as one of my bumper stickers accurately notes:
"We are creating enemies faster than we can kill them."
"First we have to find out who put Abdulmutallab on the plane with the bomb," said a US official working alongside intelligence organisations.
Well, if these "intelligence organizations" are going to engage in true "intelligence" about the matter, I'd suspect they would have to pinpoint Langley, Virginia as an appropriate site for "retaliatory strikes." That's a place which "harbors" CIA agents who were very likely involved in putting Abdulmutallab on the plane with the bomb---or so my own inferior "intelligence" seems to indicate. Will the people of Langley get a chance to evacuate before they send the armed drones?
Just a new variation of the same old dog and pony show the CIA keeps dragging out for us. At least this time they didn't kill anyone.
My thoughts exactly, Jerry.
another example of the USA"s Disproportionate knee-jerk reaction.
Attacking more Muslim nations is not going to buy security, it will only create a new generation of Jihadis and further radicalization in the 2 billion strong Islamic world where anti-Americanism is on the rise from Turkey to Indonesia.
The US really needs to examine the long-term consequences of its short-sighted and completely counter-productive actions in this one nation race to the bottom. Since 2001, the US has engaged in endless wars from Somalia to now Pakistan and Yemen, and has accomplished NOTHING but draining its declining economy, creating insecurity and paranoia at home and accelerating the global economic and geo-strategic power shift to Asia. The rampant corruption in the war industry has perhaps siphoned off more than a third of the war costs so far. From 2001 onwards almost 40% of US manufacturing has moved overseas and 20 million have lost jobs. These job and economic losses are permanent. The only growth industry in the US is the export of global violence (wars and conflict) and domestic paranoia and police state. These trends do not auger well for the future.
Attacking Yemen, or any other nation is another step towards total insanity. Every action has a reaction, and this will further destabilize an already volatile and impoverished part of the world and the conflict will rapidly spread into shaky Saudi Arabia. Former South Yemen and the Zaidi Shia minority are already engaged in wars of seccession with the weak central government in Sanaa. Any US escalation will eventually require a ground troop commitment and a widen the zone of conflict. US troop over-extension will sooner or later require a draft. The pool of unemployed war recruits is already at breaking point.
The escalating cost of the $3 trillion lost wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have already bankrupted the dwindling US economy, a major conflict near the world's main energy and shipping routes will only ruin the US economy and hasten total collapse. China will be the biggest beneficiary again, as its energy sources are now guaranteed in Iran, Central Asia ane even Canada (recent purchases in Alberta's highly polluting tarsands). It has also secured a naval base in Aden and Gwader Pakistan.
I believe it is in the US best interest to seriously look at its rapidly deteriorating economic and geo-strategic positions and the counter-productive impact of these absurd wars. War is the ultimate ZERO SUM GAME.
Meanwhile the EMPEROR has now descended into nothing more than the OLD , BANAL, rhetoric so characteristic of the Mismanager in Chief George Bush and their fellow "american patriots" ignorami about the role of the USA in the world:
"OUR BRAVE PATRIOTS HAVE SACRIFICED TO KEEP US SAFE AND TO SECURE OUR FREEDOM AND LIBERTIES"........
HE MEANS of course the cia criminals of imperial expansion.......
"securing our freedom" OVER THERE thousands of miles away where the USA has no business meddling in the affairs of other regions.........
uh --- the OLD GAME is alive and well, including the Orwellian "up is down" "black is white".....WAR is PEACE mentality of the Imperial USA.
Forget ever convincing the Muslim world we aren't on a Crusade to get them. Millions more hating us and plotting terror attacks. Good work Barry!
Gary
"...Attacking more Muslim nations is not going to buy security, it will only create a new generation of Jihadis and further radicalization in the 2 billion strong Islamic world where anti-Americanism is on the rise from Turkey to Indonesia...."
in 2001... this kid was 15... impressionable... lonely... religous... looking for meaning...
how would his teen early adult years been influenced if 8 years ago... this group's (al quaida) leader (bin laden) had been brought in and tried and convicted... and sentenced...
the next generation is already here.
"...a major conflict near the world's main energy and shipping routes will only ruin the US economy and hasten total collapse."
I guess every cloud has a silver lining.
Emmanuel Goldstein did it.
Here's a headline I'd like to see:
"US Plots Retaliatory Strikes Against Christian Terrorists in
Kansas over Clinic Bomber"
"U.S. Plots Retaliatory Strikes Against Langley Virginia CIA Headquarters over Underpants Bomber."
Well, at least this false flag operation didn't get out of hand the way Cheney's hijacking charade did.
Exactly!
Exactly, Jerry!
In the meantime the US and its allies have no problem spotting and harassing journalists who might possibly write something embarassing. On December 22 Amy Goodman was held for intensive questioning at the Canadian border on suspicion that she might be planning to write an article critical of the Vancouver Olympics. Eventually the Canadians let her in, only to demand she leave within 48 hours.
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-columbia/story/2009/11/26/bc-amy-goodman-border-incident.html
But Abdulwatallab had a US visa, a one-way ticket, and was waved right through with a smile.
It goes both ways. A Canadian Science Fiction Writer was beaten at the border when he tried to enter the USA. He was deemed to be a suspect after someone read some of his speculative fiction that had "terrorists".
In another case a Canadian was denied entry into the US simply because HE was opposed to the Olympics and was heading to a seminar in the USA where he was to give a speech as to what a waste of money they were.
Canada meanwhile denies entry to "peace activists" while GW Bush War criminal sees our Government close down highways and gives his motorcade a police escort so he can give speeches in style.
Strange times.
Retaliatory strikes?! Yikes! Whatever happened to legal arrests, trial by jury and legal means of bringing wrongdoers to justice?
CommonVoice
Bingo! Very well said.
What are those, I forget?
Gary
My thoughts exactly. Apparently we truly have totally destroyed our Constitution and the rest of our legal system. Oh, yeah, right. I forgot we did away with habeas corpus several years ago. Why not the rest of the laws, too?!
When the CIA raided Cuba against the wishes of JFK, they proved that they work for Corporate America, not Obomba.
Keep in mind that it was George H W Bush that was the director
of the CIA years ago. Time to break up this gang...
Jeezus! What happened to the United States? We're out there attacking everyone!
The US is following the Israeli policy of tit for tat, and will wind up in the same boat if it keeps this up. Bombing and killing bring--you guessed it--more bombing and killing. They say it shows weakness not to retaliate, but the opposite is true; it takes more strength to show restraint.
We attacked Yemen many times before they sent a response via COD piece. So now what?
Are we going to follow the words of the Republicans' President and "Bring `em on" or what?
Couple problems with this.
1) We didn't know who and where the people were who hatched this nefarious flaming underwear attack, but NOW we will know who and where to attack. How many people are we talking about? A village? Tribe? Political party? A region? A family? Will we pick a location and bomb a lot people for being in the vicinity? Or, if it is just a couple of people, why not have the Yemen government arrest them?
2) The interviewee sounds like Maxwell Smart, saying we don't know who/where the alleged plotters are, so we'll retaliate on someone else.
3) If an American sets their underwear on fire on a Russian plane, will we be subject to similar collective punishment? Collective punishment. Anyone ever hear of it? I think it's a war crime.
4) This is described openly as retaliation... as if it's okay for us to do it. So what if the alleged attempted plot was in retaliation for the women and children we killed in our air strike? If we have the right to retaliate, don't they?
"...2) The interviewee sounds like Maxwell Smart, saying we don't know who/where the alleged plotters are, so we'll retaliate on someone else...."
we already did that... ever hear of a little country called iraq...?
Is there anyone sane and responsible in the American power structure? Retaliatory strikes against Yeman are madness! If a Brit tries to smuggle a bomb onto an airliner are there to be retaliatory strikes against Britain?
Of course we would, with the queens permision.
By the way, how did this kid get on the plane if he was on an FBI watch list...
FALSE FLAG !!!!!!
And the big wheels keep on truning, and Americans keep on believing what they are told.
Folks tell me all the time how terrified they are of terrorists being capable of cutting peoples heads off with a sharp knife,
imagine the fear of entire familys hearing bombs dropping on their homes and villages and seeing familys completely blown to bits , men, women , children, innocent casualties of war.Just because the main stream media does not show these events does not mean it is not happening, most intelligent people who read the news off the internet know the truth.
Day in, day out , over 8 years, of constant fear of the US military in thier country.Occupation on one side, terrorists on the other side.
The American public are being purposely kept in the dark, for if the good people of this country could see the real war, they would not stand for one more day of occupation.
And the war hawks know it.
Death tolls in Iraq since the war started are over 600000.
In Afghanistan , who knows, but if one relative of each wrongfully slain innocent decides to become a terrorist the simple question of " what the hell are we doing" must come to mind.
We have created an amry of enemys. Brilliant! Bush/Chenney did not keep us safe, they have deigned a golden bird cage of fear and hate.Turned Americans into cowards without a constution and emboldened our enemys with fuel for thier fires.
But hey, they got thier oil, made thier war hawk buddies rich, financially allowed banks and wall street to become to big to fail,put all that debt onto American tax payers and have locked America into believing we must be at war for the next 1000 years, till all the terrorists are dead. Give the neocon devils thier due, and send them hang mans gallows ,please.
How does the securitys and exchange commision no know what the Bernie Madoffs in the US are doing?
When will they stop, and admit, this was all about the controll of oil in the middle east, and if we want to find , jail, or kill terroists, a global police force is needed. Like US marshalls of the old west.These terrorists are criminals, we should not be at war with countrys that did not attack us.
And we all know that Afghanistan was friendly with us untill they canned the Unocal pipeline deal.
War is not the answer, it is causing a bigger global problem.
And 9/11 was a false flag event to start this mess in motion.
Thank you supreme court , for getting Bush elected, we know whos side your on.
It aint about protecting the constitution, is it.
When will they stop, and admit, this was all about the controll of oil in the middle east, and if we want to find , jail, or kill terroists, a global police force is needed.And we all know that Afghanistan was friendly with us untill they canned the Unocal pipeline deal.
_________________________________________
bornfreemen --- your post is all good stuff except the above.
All about oil is NONSENSE.
This "War on Islam" has been orchestrated mainly by Jewish Americans known as neocons who successfully sold the invasion of Iraq to dumb people like you as being for oil.
Richard Perle headed this group in the late 1990's when his paper on "Protecting the Realm" had been prepared on behalf of "Israel" was widely circulated at the Pentagon and US Power circles.
This was a "Prospect for a New American Century" with proposed wars in the Middle East to "spread US Diplomacy" but really to create a "War on Islam" for Israel's continued brutal Ethnic Cleansing in Palestine and Israeli Hegemony as the Super power in the Middle East.
Iran was the main objective but included also were Iraq ,Syria and more.
Your Oil objective is a red herring you seem to have swallowed or you are preaching more Hasbara propaganda or dare not question "cuo Bono" ????
http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2009/12/08/the-deadly-embrace/
Please educate yourself by reading Professor James Petras who will explain it to you.
Quote---
The US invasion and occupation policy in Iraq, including the fabricated evidence justifying the invasion, was deeply influenced by top officials with long-standing loyalties and ties to Israel. Wolfowitz and Feith, numbers 2 and 3 in the Pentagon, are life-long Zionists, who lost security clearance early in their careers for handing over documents to Israel. Vice President Cheney’s chief foreign policy adviser in the planning of the Iraq invasion is Irving Lewis Liebowitz (‘Scooter Libby’). He is a protégé and long-time collaborator of Wolfowitz and a convicted felon.----
http://petras.lahaine.org/articulo.php?p=1704
We now have US mayhem in Iraq , Afghanistan , Pakistan , Yemen and 23 % of the World's Population that is Islam is totally aware of it.
"Big Oil" did not start the Iraq war, nor has "Big Oil" benefited
This whole debacle is NOT in America's best interest ---Israel is the benefactor.
Try this on. It's about Oil, Zionism, and feeding the Insatiable US War Machine. The Dick Perle and the Dick Cheney and the Dick Armey and the Kristols and Feith and the Liebermans and the Wolfowitzs and Libby and Rice are all benefiting handsomely from unending war in that is playing out noisily in Iraq and Afghanistan and not so noisily in Pakistan and Yemen and Gaza and soon to play out in Iran.
When will they stop, and admit, this was all about the controll of oil in the middle east, and if we want to find , jail, or kill terroists, a global police force is needed.And we all know that Afghanistan was friendly with us untill they canned the Unocal pipeline deal.
_________________________________________
bornfreemen --- your post is all good stuff except the above.
All about oil is NONSENSE.
This "War on Islam" has been orchestrated mainly by Jewish Americans known as neocons who successfully sold the invasion of Iraq to dumb people like you as being for oil.
Richard Perle headed this group in the late 1990's when his paper on "Protecting the Realm" had been prepared on behalf of "Israel" was widely circulated at the Pentagon and US Power circles.
This was a "Prospect for a New American Century" with proposed wars in the Middle East to "spread US Diplomacy" but really to create a "War on Islam" for Israel's continued brutal Ethnic Cleansing in Palestine and Israeli Hegemony as the Super power in the Middle East.
Iran was the main objective but included also were Iraq ,Syria and more.
Your Oil objective is a red herring you seem to have swallowed or you are preaching more Hasbara propaganda or dare not question "cuo Bono" ????
http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2009/12/08/the-deadly-embrace/
Please educate yourself by reading Professor James Petras who will explain it to you.
Quote---
The US invasion and occupation policy in Iraq, including the fabricated evidence justifying the invasion, was deeply influenced by top officials with long-standing loyalties and ties to Israel. Wolfowitz and Feith, numbers 2 and 3 in the Pentagon, are life-long Zionists, who lost security clearance early in their careers for handing over documents to Israel. Vice President Cheney’s chief foreign policy adviser in the planning of the Iraq invasion is Irving Lewis Liebowitz (‘Scooter Libby’). He is a protégé and long-time collaborator of Wolfowitz and a convicted felon.----
http://petras.lahaine.org/articulo.php?p=1704
We now have US mayhem in Iraq , Afghanistan , Pakistan , Yemen and 23 % of the World's Population that is Islam is totally aware of it.
"Big Oil" did not start the Iraq war, nor has "Big Oil" benefited
This whole debacle is NOT in America's best interest ---Israel is the benefactor.
Convergence of interests.
None of those interests may be in America's interests.
That doesn't mean there aren't Americans who have interests involving the sabotage or even destruction of the USA.
How many Yemeni's need to die for one pair of fouled underwear?
He's really earning his Peace prize in Orwelland
"The people we want are the ones who put Abdulmutallab on the plane. Until we can get them there are other high-value targets that will make the point that attacking America does not go unpunished," said the official."
like osama bin laden...?
Besides already unobtrusively moving to sites that will not be bombed, "al-Qaida" or whomever can move a large family into the likely target sites.
General Doofus will deploy GBU-28, GBU-29, and lots of smoke and mirrors, blah blah blah sis boom bah, in another display of US military impotence, maybe have a video show of "special ops" Hard-Charging Wolf Team taking the fight to the Martian NME, yes sir, yes sir, hard-charging sir, three bags full, go go go, ooga booga ooga booga.
It will be horribly embarrassing if it turns out that the whole jetliner bombing plot was an entrapment scheme by the CIA, intended to give the US cover for opening a new front in Yemen. This whole episode stinks of deliberation, and is far too timely not to raise serious questions.
O Happy Day!
The CIA is finally being fingered as royal screw ups by POTUS. Now if he can only follow through with credible and severe reprimand of ALL the parties from the CIA and NCC who were involved in the debacle, without them getting to him first (I don't even what to think about that grassy knoll stuff), we the people might feel some sanctification that there is still the will and ability by federal powers to punish rather than reward stupidity and greed in the good ole US.
0's not shaking down his intelligence units. He's covering for his own open aggression in Yemen.
The circumstantial evidence gets nasty.
We're supposed to believe this:
- 1. 0 struck Yemen because of an attempted hijacking, but that
- 2. he does not trust his intelligence and security. However,
- 3. it is this same intelligence and security that provides the evidence that the hijacker and various cohorts are or were in or around Yemen. And,
- 4. Despite the supposed incompetence of intelligence and 0bama's supposed carefulness, this is all so certain that bombing women and children becomes worthwhile.
I assume we agree that the official story is not just contradictory but ridiculous.
Further, . . .
If 0 did not want to strike Yemen, he could simply have not done so. The connection between airport security and an airstrike on Yemen is absurd:
- If a group plotting airstrikes is in Yemen, why are there not more attempts?
- If a group plotting airstrikes is in Yemen, why can't they move?
- If a group plotting airstrikes is in Yemen, how does that give the US the right to attack Yemenis in general?
And the big one:
- If a group plotting airstrikes is in Yemen, how does an American airstrike reduce the possibility of future hijackings and hijacking attempts?
Of course it does not. It increases them. If you were a member of a small organization dedicated to high-profile acts of violence against the United States, and one of your number had just been captured, would you not relocate?
What scrap of possibility is there that this has not occurred to trained military experts working full time in counterinsurgency, when you or I can read it in a few dozen texts?
A large part of the antiwar population believes that Bush erred by believing bad intelligence (as opposed to hiring the invention of said "intelligence"). A large part of the antiwar population believes that straightforward incompetency on the part of the CIA (rather than some mixture of leche-cul sycophancy and manipulation of the US population).
This administration is trying to arrange false-flag-event publicity without having to stage the event. Here we have an attack supported by a hijacking that does not happen.
0bama covers his bases by pretending that he does not trust the CIA. If the story blows, he can blame some operative the way W blamed Tenet for incompetence rather than collusion.
What's rotten in this Denmark may sicken the rats.
"But they warn that finding those responsible is unlikely to be swift and say that identifying other "high-value" al-Qaida targets for retaliatory attack would also be a priority."
Come on, boys, it's not that hard---just wait til school lets out.