UN Food Summit 'Fails Before It Begins'
A UN food summit aimed at helping the one billion people worldwide suffering from hunger has been declared a failure a week before it has even begun.
The leaked World Food Summit draft declaration falls short of a UN goal of eradicating hunger by 2025. Instead, leaders are expected to to sign a watered down declaration in Rome next week that calls for vague increases in aid for farmers in poor countries but sets no targets or deadlines for action.
Leaders are expected to reaffirm their commitment to the UN's Millennium Development Goal of halving the number of hungry people by 2015 - a target that is unlikely to be reached.
The UN's Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), which is organising the three day conference, had hoped to win a clear promise from rich countries to increase the amount they give each year in agricultural aid from $7.9 billion (£4.8 billion) to $44 billion.
But a final draft declaration instead made only a commitment to "substantially increase the share of official development assistance devoted to agriculture and food security based on country-led requests".
"The declaration is just a rehash of old platitudes," said Francisco Sarmento, food rights coordinator for ActionAid.
Campaigners condemned the fact that the summit will be attended by only one G8 leader - Italy's prime minister, Silvio Berlusconi, who is hosting the gathering.
Britain will be represented by two junior ministers, Mike Foster, from the Department for International Development and Jim Fitzpatrick, of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
The US, the world's biggest food aid donor, will send the acting head of the US Agency for International Development.
More than 60 world leaders are expected, including Pope Benedict XVI, Col Gaddafi of Libya, Zimbabwe's President Robert Mugabe and Hugo Chavez of Venezuela.
"It's a tragedy that the world leaders are not going to attend the summit," said Daniel Berman of Medecins Sans Frontières .
Aid groups said the summit was a missed opportunity to tackle malnutrition, which kills a child every six seconds, despite the fact that the world produces a surplus of food. Cereal crops this year are expected to be the second largest ever, after a record harvest in 2008.
According to FAO, the number of hungry people rose this year to 1.02 billion people, as a result of the global economic crisis, high food and fuel prices, drought and conflict.
"This scourge is not just a moral outrage and economic absurdity, but also represents a threat for our peace and security," said FAO's director, Jacques Diouf, who will embark on a 24 hour fast on Saturday to show solidarity with the world's hungry.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
6 Comments so far
Show AllThere are way too many folks who rationalize that there are too many people on the planet and that deaths of the poor would be a good thing for everybody.
The Barbara Bush Syndrome.
Not to mention that it is far cheaper to kill folks from hunger than to kill them with weaponry and soldiers.
WAR BUDGET vs FOOD BUDGET.
To the $44 billion dollars a year required to halve world hunger by 2015, compare the American war budget. $130 billion projected next year for Afghanistan and Iraq: 65 for Afghanistan and 61 for Iraq.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/07/AR2009050704239.html
These figures are of course vastly understated. They don't include medical bills, future veterans payments, the cost of likely Afghan "surges," nor the cost of worldwide and homeland "security" occasioned by the rage of a billion and a half Muslims.
And then there's the Pentagon's "base budget" of $534 billion (also vastly understated), which includes over 700 foreign bases, including those absolutely essential new ones in Columbia.
Do I have to go on? With just a small fraction of our war budget, we could easily insure that the 5 million CHILDREN who die from hunger each year would have a chance at life.
When we talk about withdrawing from Afghanistan, or even just garrisoning the major cities and flooding them with economic assistance, the peace movement needs to inform the American public about the lives which are at stake worldwide. Misinformation is galactic. The average American now believes that our "foreign aid" is 24% of the Federal Budget. In reality, since most of our "foreign aid" is also military, the true figure for economic aid is 0.2% of the yearly budget.
Can we get out the truth? Are there any billionaires who would like to fund a television campaign? Our saturation of lies and ignorance means the agonized deaths of millions and millions.
How many people would the cost of the World Food Summit feed?
Aid is insufficient and the people have for the most part been removed from traditional lands to accomodate transnational industry/industrial agriculture, which was promised to end starvation and never has. But it has increased hunger, dispossession, ethnocide, genocide, war and ills too numerous to list.
No one seems to care that the model displacing these peoples is the one designed by the model itself - to be the only model left.
This has been assisted by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation embrace of Monsanto to craft their approach to their hunger related philanthropy.
matthew loughran
hmm this just shows the serious commitment the g8 has to an extremely serious problem world hunger.
of course our asshole country, the USA, seems to be even less concerned as usual. they will all show up when there are financial talks or to celebrate the fall of the berlin wall 20 years ago. Wooopeee!!!!!!