EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- Time for Big Green to Go Fossil Free
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
Popular content
Today's Top News
Thousands in Berlin to Protest Nuclear Energy
Anti-nuclear rally in Berlin becomes campaign issue
Thousands of people from across Germany, including farmers on tractors, are in Berlin this Saturday to protest against the nuclear energy industry and in support of a plan to shut down the country's nuclear reactors.
Activists with pig masks and barrels symbolizing atomic waste are seen near the Reichstag, which houses the German parliament Bundestag, during a demonstration against nuclear power in Berlin, on Saturday, Sept. 5, 2009. (AP Photo/Gero Breloer) The future of Germany's 17 nuclear power plants, due to be shut down by the early 2020s, is one of the major issues that separates Chancellor Angela Merkel's center-right Christian Democrats from the center-left Social Democrats.
The CDU, along with the liberal Free Democrats (FDP), would like to extend that deadline, a move that is opposed by the SPD and environmentalist Greens.
The issue has been largely ignored in pre-election campaigning for the September 27 general election. But, that may now change with Saturday's rally in Berlin, led by farmers from Wendland, a region in north-central Germany, where plans calls for permanent waste disposal sites.
SPD chancellor candidate, Frank-Walter Steinmeier, on Friday went so far as to accuse the CDU and FDP "of leading the country into an energy policy dead-end and endangering domestic security."
A divisive issue and maybe a rallying cry Tractors heading to BerlinBildunterschrift: Großansicht des Bildes mit der Bildunterschrift: Tractors heading to Berlin for Saturday's rally
Political analysts say that even though the dispute between the CDU and SPD has had little effect on the campaign, the nuclear issue could mobilize voters in both camps.
"So far, it has played almost no role at all, which is a bit surprising, considering it's one of the few issues where the CDU and SPD are completely at odds," explains Dietmar Herz, a political scientist at Erfurt University.
The SPD and Greens argue that polls show that a majority of Germans - around 59 percent - oppose nuclear energy and want the plants shut down, while the CDU and FDP emphasize that until Germany has built up a significant infrastructure of alternative energies, nuclear power plants should remain on line.
In 2001, the SPD-Green government under former Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder pushed through legislation to phase out the use of nuclear energy within two decades, despite protests from industry and power utilities.
Germany at odds with most other developed countries
A 'Castor' nuclear waste containerBildunterschrift: Großansicht des Bildes mit der Bildunterschrift: Nuclear waste is transported under heavy guard in special containers
The SPD and the Greens had hoped that Germany would lead the way into a "post-nuclear age", but instead most of the developed world has embraced the use of nuclear power as part of a climate-friendly energy mix. France, for example, gets 80 percent of its power from nuclear energy and even exports a significant amount of it to Germany. Those deliveries are indispensible for meeting Germany's energy needs.
Germany covers about 23 percent of its energy consumption with nuclear power, compared to 42 percent with coal-fired power stations, 14 percent with natural gas and 15 percent with renewable energy sources, such as wind, solar and thermal.
Nils Diedrich, a political scientist at Berlin's Free University, expects the nuclear issue to become a hot topic, if Merkel is able to form a coalition with the Free Democrats after the September election.
"If the CDU and FDP do actually win power and push through an extension of nuclear power we'll see a real battle. Then there will be massive demonstrations," he says.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

4 Comments so far
Show AllGermany is in a difficult position, as two of their energy sources are problematic. The first is the aforementioned nuclear, which is a truly bad concept with mind bogglingly bad side effects such as radiation. The second is oil and natural gas from Russia. In the long run, the nukes are worse though.
Germans are getting their act together while others like US keep speeding toward the wall. Maybe that's what Germany's free health-care and education will do.
The French, using nukes at the cost of increasing cancer forever from the beaches of Somalia to the rest of the biosphere, could be substituting green energy for their nukes as these are decomissioned. Maybe their free healthcare and education will lead them down a green, radioactivity free path. Or will they die (and kill) like their Mme Curie?
Germany was sold down the river by a group led by a previous Chancellor named Gerhard Schroeder. He worked very hard along with a lot of established energy interests in Germany to convince voters that it was somehow a good idea to shut down emission free, well constructed, well operated nuclear power plants that they had already bought and paid for. In exchange, the country would build a lot of visible wind turbines and solar panels that do not produce power at least 70% of the time. However, engineering firms like Siemens and Vestas are happy to take the ratepayer money to build large collectors and turbines.
The people behind the scenes understood what that equation meant - Germany would have to build more coal and natural gas fired power stations to take up the slack. Power plant construction companies and engineering firms thought that this replacement effort would be good for business - they could get paid to tear down the nukes and to build the replacement generation sources. Since 70-90% of the revenue associated with selling electricity produced by burning coal and natural gas goes to the fuel pusher, the coal and gas interests thought that was a great idea.
Less than one month after leaving office, Gerhard Schroeder accepted a job with the Russian gas monopoly, Gazprom, to build the pipeline that would bypass eastern European countries to move Russian gas directly to Germany. (http://bit.ly/2TVUNR) He continues to work and make lots of money to build a pipeline that would not be necessary if Germany simply did what most advanced countries have done with their 2nd generation nukes - extend their operating lives to 60 years.
Uh, Hey, there,
RodAdams
Yeah, you. I'll make a deal with ya'. Go mine uranium for just 5 yrs and come back and tell me if you are still pronuke...And do it under the conditions that those in the Congo, kidnapped and held in slave labor are doing.
Please respond.