Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Air Force Training More Pilots for Drones Than for Manned Planes
Lorentz's remark illustrates the major transformation occurring within that service. In a Pentagon session last month, Air Force Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Will Fraser told reporters that the unmanned systems are "delivering game-changing capabilities today, and ones that I'm confident will continue to be invaluable in the future."
Technicians and mechanics from General Atomics move the Predator B, an unmanned surveillance aircraft, from an air hangar at Fort Drum, N.Y., on June 18. (By Heather Ainsworth -- Associated Press) At that July 23 briefing, Air Force officers spelled out the growth of what they call the "ISR [intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance] transformation" of their service.
Today, the Air Force is flying both Predators and the more capable Reapers over Iraq and Afghanistan in 35 simultaneous orbits, each of which is a combat mission that keeps an aircraft aloft 24 hours a day. The target is to have 50 orbits by 2011.
A Predator was used over Pakistan last week in an attack that apparently killed Pakistani Taliban leader Baitullah Mehsud.
Right now there is basically one sensor in each Predator whose surveillance system provides 10 full motion video images simultaneously to forces on the ground, according to Lt. Gen. David Deptula, Air Force deputy chief of staff for ISR. Deptula also attended the July briefing. The newest version of the Reaper flies faster than the Predator, up to 250 miles per hour, carries more arms and will beam back to ground forces up to 30 video images. Troops on the ground, using new equipment called Rover (remote operations video enhanced receivers), literally see what the aircraft's sensor and the ground-based Reaper pilot -- thousands of miles away -- see. Rover also allows ground troops to send queries up to the aircraft.
Where Reaper with its four sensors can cover over six square miles, a more advanced version with six sensors, scheduled to be available in 2013, will be able to cover over 20 square miles. It also will beam back 65 separate video images to the ground.
What these aircraft bring "to the table is the ability to stay in position or maneuver over large areas for a long period of time, and that's where a person in an aircraft becomes a limitation," Deptula said. Without individuals in the aircraft "you can maintain your position for a long period of time with the opportunity to either watch or strike." Today one ground-based pilot flies one Predator, assisted by two analysts. By 2013 the Air Force expects technology to permit one pilot to fly three Reapers, and to fly four in a crisis.
Another advantage over manned aircraft is that there is always a fresh crew on the ground, "which enables any sort of persistence," said Col. Eric Mathewson, director of the Air Force UAS Task Force, at the July briefing. There are 1,000 Air Force personnel flying these unmanned operations today and none is in harm's way, according to charts at the briefing.
He added that an unmanned aircraft could be designed to stay airborne for five years, "and I can man it that entire five years with little fatigue." In fact, the Defense Advanced Projects Agency has a project called Vulture that is trying to do just that.
While there are five launch and recovery units in the Iraq-Afghanistan-Pakistan theater, the global operations center is at Creech Air Force Base, Nev., with five other centers in North Dakota, upstate New York, Arizona, Texas and California.
The hasty push of unmanned systems into the Iraq-Afghanistan battle area has shown some vulnerabilities, however, including the need for a better sorting, processing and distribution of the massive amounts of intelligence collected. That problem will only get worse with the new sensors.
In addition, the House Armed Services Committee complained in its report on the fiscal 2010 defense authorization bill that money meant to fund the Predator portion of the planned fleet was redirected to the Reaper program, which doesn't have enough aircraft in the pipeline to meet the 50-orbit goal.
A long-term issue for the unmanned systems such as the Predator and Reaper aircraft is how to protect them when they operate in an area where the enemy has sophisticated air defenses and the United States does not control the airspace. Deptula conceded survivability is a concern. He said the service is looking at countermeasures and "low observability," which means stealth aircraft that fly fast -- even at hypersonic speeds -- and cannot be picked up on radar.
Will the unmanned aircraft ever completely replace either bombers or fighters? In delivering weapons on target, Deptula said, "Yes, you bet." But when it comes to controlling airspace, flying against enemy fighters, the general said, the technology cannot yet achieve 360-degree awareness. A human brain is still superior in the assimilation of information and responding to it.
"Someday we might be able to, but until then, we'll still have manned aircraft," the general said.
- Posted in

25 Comments so far
Show Allof course they'll train more pilots for this most sadistic of all warfare. what better method is there "in delivering weapons on target" (well, sort of) and to keep the amercan sheople scared, limiting their already limited desire to take it to the streets?
State run terrorism,operated by joy stick gaming junkies in air conditioned comfort.This is a cowardly obscenity and I refuse to pay for it. peace
Sooner or later the rest of the world, including Europe, Japan and the British settled nations of the British Commonwealth will go against us too. We have enough problems here to take care of without minding everybody else's business.
We're not minding everybody else's business. We're minding our business, which happens to be to control their business. Or did you forget we're an empire?
One hopes that they would. Not in a Military fashion , but in one which isolates the United States of America.
I just do not see it happening. The "Power Elites" in these nations are too closely joined at the hip.
What MUST happen first is the people in each of these countries must elect Governments that are willing to set policy independent of the USA and its IMF, World Bank and UN.
THAT struggle will be hard as demonstrated in the Honduras, Cuba, Venezuala and the like.
It won't be long before even second rate countries like Pakistan and Iran are able to build their own Predators.
We can expect to reap what we have sown.
Who will the Pakistanis and Iranians target first in our country?
Neither Iran nor Pakistan have ever attacked us.
Give 'em time, friend. Heaven knows, this country is giving them all sorts of excuses to fight it with fury and passion.
To: Cygnus-X1-isaHole
Who died and left you king to rate countries. Iranian civilization is more than 1000 years old. Pakistan's civilzation is 5,000 years old. During the time of Mughal Empror Jehangir the British sneaked into India to steal the riches. Try and read anything other than american media and wake up to the fact that there is whole lot of smarter world outside US. Small exmaple US is the only country that uses imperial systems of gallons, feet and yards, the rest have moved to a metric system aalmost 35 years ago.
Actually, it is called the US customary syatem. The imperial system was a different British system (An imperial gallon and ton are different than the US ones). But yes, especially as an engineer, I do find the continued US clinging to an obsolete measurement syatem to be rather embarrassing.
-- The only two countries outside the United States that officially continue to use a non-metric system largely or exclusively are Burma (Mynamar) and Liberia. --
An old boss of mine from Belgium harassed me more than once about this.
Anyone who believes that the removal of human factors (reluctance, etc.) from the killing equation is aimed strictly at improving the capacity for combatting foreign "terrorists" is in for a rude awakening.
On the other hand, Americans are in for a rude awakening in any case. Most still haven't figured out that they no longer enjoy any special consideration as U.S. citizens when it comes down to possible threats to any so-called "U.S. interests" at home or abroad.
Except from a domestic PR perspective, you're all just inconsequential "sand niggers" now, with no greater voice in, control over or protection from imperial decisions and actions than any "lesser peoples" elsewhere. The only difference is that you've already been defeated and persuaded that resistance is futile. And if you doubt that, just try it and see.
This deserves emphasis.
Unmanned equipment deploys easily against domestic populations.
>>>A long-term issue for the unmanned systems such as the Predator and Reaper aircraft is how to protect them when they operate in an area where the enemy has sophisticated air defenses and the United States does not control the airspace.
The US has had complete control over the airspaces of Iraq and Afghanistan for a long time now. Iraq's air defenses were taken out systematically following the first Gulf War using all kinds of pretenses - so when "shock and awe" started in 2003, there was no air defese left. Afghanistan never had any to start with, and the Taliban are fighting apparently without the kind of shoulder-fired missiles (such as Stinger) which the US generously supplied to the Mujahideen when they were fighting the Soviets - possibly a 'game changer' back then. And yet there's been so much casualty in Iraq and Afghanistan. Imagine a real war where the enemy has an air force and air defense - I guess that's why using nukes is not off the table, and that's probably why the big powers are so adamantly against anyone acquiring nukes - because it removes their edge. Wouldn't it be cheaper to just make peace? Is there anyone who really believes that "they hate us for our freedom"?
"I guess that's why using nukes is not off the table, ..."
Absolutely correct. Nor is first use nor use against non-nuclear nations off the table for the same reason. It's the ultimate "trump card" for an imperial power that is rapidly losing every other basis for its "hyperpower" status, especially in the realm of finance and economics.
U.S. dominance based solely on its conventional military forces hasn't proven very successful or effective in recent times and clearly is not a sufficient guarantor for USA Incorporated's geopolitical aims. The possibility of others gaining any significant nuclear deterence could potentially thwart those aims completely.
Americans will tolerate (more or less reluctantly) almost any aggression against other "lesser peoples", but never the possible "inconvenience" of getting nuked themselves. That's why the otherwise insane "Mutually Assured Destruction" policy actually worked for so many years.
Unmanned drones only saves the pilots ass. It won't make a difference with us. We will still be the targets of terrorist.
As the US corporate-political-military elite loose control over its own citizens, it will be a matter of time before these unmanned drones will be used against US protesters and suspicious wedding parties. Department of Homeland Security has tested these weapons over the NYC-Canadian border in a joint security experiment with the NY police earlier this year.
With Hillary Clinton proposing spending tons of money for US defense training and weaponry in Africa, expect more of these machines flying over that continent later this year.
The US is the enemy.
They'll find lots of recruits in video arcades. They'll have to lie about their age though. Could kids fuck up the world any worse than their parents have?
They'll f--- on the shoulders of giants.
Wasn't there some grade B Hollywood movie, where someone figures out how to hack into a Predator drone control system? But, I'm sure the smart folks at the Pentagon wouldn't let that happen.
When will these USAF 'pilots' transition to commercial passenger aircraft?
So predators and reapers, guided by stay at home computer nerds will be our new way to bomb people.
so great. we have demonstrated that we are, besides being the world's biggest superpower, also the most cowardly. keep those flags flying.
Great. One good hit from the enemy and their goes US air power.
The deployment of drones seems to be a fact of life in central asian countries, however disgraceful it might be.
In the western hemisphere, however, the OAS could declare the countries of Central and South America, as well as the Caribbean, as being "Drone and unmanned-fighting machine" free zones.
I urge them to take this step at their next meeting.
Cost of a drone >$100 000.
Cost of a fighter plane or ground attack jet < $2 Million+ dollars.
Cost to train a jet fighter pilot < $75 000+ /year.
Cost of a drone pilot = free from high school.
Do the math.
Walk in peace.