Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Friends of the Earth Goes it Alone: Urges 'No' on Climate Bill
The House climate bill took another hit this week as Rep. Henry Waxman made further concessions, this time to farm-state Democrats, to ensure the bill's safe passage on Friday. Even weakened, though, the bill continued to draw support from most of the big environmental organizations.
Except for Friends of the Earth. The organization is going it alone
with an ad campaign and request to its members to demand better
legislation from Congress. FOE President Brent Blackwelder is publicly
urging Congress to either substantially strengthen the bill or vote no.
"Corporate polluters including Shell and Duke Energy helped write this bill, and the result is that we're left with legislation that fails to come anywhere close to solving the climate crisis," Blackwelder wrote.
"Worse, the bill eliminates preexisting EPA authority to address global warming-that means it's actually a step backward.
"This exercise in politics as usual is a wholly unacceptable response to one of the greatest challenges of our time, and it endangers the welfare of current and future generations. ... If the ‘political reality' at present cannot accommodate stronger legislation, their first task must be to expand what is politically possible-not to pass a counterproductive bill."
That position hasn't been easy hasn't been easy to take. Some of the largest environmental groups, including NRDC and EDF, were involved with Shell and Duke in the U.S. Climate Action Partnership, a consortium that wrote the industry-environment compromise that the American Clean Energy and Security (ACES) bill is based on. Groups that have questioned the legislation have been pressured to back off.
Blackwelder has also been pressured to support the bill, as well as to delay releasing an FOE report that looked into Wall Street's expectations for the bill's cap-and-trade program and the high potential for gaming and corruption in a carbon-trading system.
"We're getting a lot of criticism, but we've spoken honestly about the defects we see in this bill and that this is going to be a setback," Blackwelder told SolveClimate. "If you have a proposal that can't stand the light of day, then it's time someone said ‘Hey, the emperor has no clothes!'"
When Reps. Waxman and Ed Markey accepted U.S. CAP's compromise as the foundation for their climate bill, they set the bar too low, Blackwelder said.
"If you're going to deal from a low point, it's only going to go lower. Now, we've got a deal that will basically eviscerate biofuels standards," he said, referring to the latest concessions for farm-state Democrats. "It's just one thing after another."
"We're going to stand up for what the science calls for and point out the flaws."
It's unlikely at this point that House Democrats will attempt to strengthen a bill that they've already watered down to win what could be a close vote on the House floor Friday.
Under House Minority Leader John Boehner's orders, Republicans have almost uniformly lined up in opposition. Some coal-state and Midwestern Democrats, despite the concessions Rep. Collin Peterson wrung from the bill's sponsors this week, could still oppose the bill, as could some on the left who oppose cap-and-trade or say the ACES bill in its current form simply doesn't do enough.
The Rules Committee set a 9:30 a.m. Thursday deadline for submitting amendments to the ACES bill. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.) and a few other House members are quietly considering amendments, however the Rules Committee would not say how many had been submitted as of today.
Greenpeace isn't counting on amendments strengthening the bill now, though the group is remaining "agnostic" on the vote, spokesman Daniel Kessler said.
"We will keep calling upon President Obama to stick to his campaign pledge to stand with the science. He can act administratively or insert himself into the House debate, and its only through his leadership that we stand a chance against all of the politics and special interests," he said.
"As for amendments, I think we are beyond that. The biggest flaw is the targets, and no amendment will strengthen those. Offsets are now with the ag department showing that this debate is out of control and declining fast."
Obama has stayed behind the scenes through most of the ACES battle, but at a news conference yesterday, he urge Congress to pass the bill. The president said the bill would lead to the development of renewable energy, encourage energy efficiency and make clean energy profitable, leading to millions of new U.S. jobs.
"We all know why this is so important. The nation that leads in the creation of a clean energy economy will be the nation that leads the 21st century global economy," Obama said. "That is what this legislation seeks to achieve - it is a bill that will open the door to a better future for this nation. And that is why I urge members of the House to come together and pass it."
The president also went out of his way during that news conference to publicly thank two House Democrats who played the greatest roles in weakening the bill: Rep. Rick Boucher (D-Va.), who bragged in detail about the concessions he extracted during committee hearings so "the coal industry and the thousands of jobs in our region that coal provides will be secure," and Rep. Peterson (D-Minn.), who forced the latest round of changes.
Peterson's demands, which are expected to be met in an amendment from Waxman, include delaying for five years the EPA's authority to consider land-use changes when measuring the lifecycle emissions of biofuel, putting the Department of Agriculture in charge of agriculture offsets rather the EPA, and giving a percentage of valuable emissions credits free to rural electric cooperatives.
The majority of the big environmental groups have called for the bill to be strengthened, but at the same time have urged its passage, saying ACES at least gets a foot in the door.
Twenty leading leading climate scientists made that argument in a letter to Congress and the president earlier this week. A letter from 29 environmental groups led by the Sierra Club, Wilderness Society, Audubon Society, Union of Concerned Scientists and NRDC also echoed that theme, noting that the bill wouldn't be final until the president signs:
"On behalf of millions of members and volunteers that our organizations represent, we write to urge you to support final passage of the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (ACES)," they wrote.
"We also urge you to do everything possible to strengthen the bill between now and final passage, and along its journey to the president's desk."
The groups note that the window of opportunity is short - it's a non-election year and Democrats control both houses of Congress and the White House - and that ACES is only the first step. They also urge members of Congress to support any amendments that would strengthen the renewable energy and energy efficiency provisions of the bill and create more clean energy jobs.
The League of Conservation Voters, another signer of that letter, went a step farther. It issued an ultimatum, vowing in what it calls "an unprecedented decision" to not endorse any House member in 2010 who votes against the ACES bill.
A group of 20 businesses and energy companies, including Duke, Exelon, PG&E, PSEG and NRG, also wrote to the president and Congress in favor of the bill, saying that:
"Putting a price on carbon will drive investment into cost-saving, energy-saving technologies, and will create the next wave of jobs in the new energy economy."
Republicans, meanwhile, continued their opposition, arguing that more drilling was the answer and that climate action would increase our children's debt - never mind the studies showing how a continuation of business as usual will leave them with a far more expensive bill to pay.
Newt Gingrich's American Solutions group launched a fear mongering ad with footage of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge collapse. Boehner, who has succeeded so far in keeping House Republicans toeing his line, sent the Republicans a memo saying that anyone who voted for the ACES bill, including Democrats, did so at their own peril:
"The American people will remember this debate and will remember who stands up for them."



24 Comments so far
Show AllI'm with FOE. If we get this energy bill passed, it cancels the supreme court decision that the EPA must regulate C02. In other words we've already won something and we can lose it now.
In return, the stupid bill has poison pills calling nuclear energy renewable, calling unsorted trash burning (think incineration of mercury items and lead items) renewable, handing out monster pork to the biggest coal companies i.e. the biggest climate and other polluters, and setting up an economic system guaranteed to revolve around political graft. If you liked the American health care system you might like the energy graft system too.
It's not just Friends of the Earth. Public Citizen also said to call the legilature and tell them to vote against the bill. This article is wrong.
PDA is doing the same:http://blog.pdamerica.org/2009/06/action-alert-overhaul-or-scrap-acesa/
Pretty bold to claim they are the only ones -- not sure how that helps them. But good for them for opposing.
Greenpeace has come out against it too.
All the bankers that Obama has in his administration just love the cap and trade deal. Lots of chance to take on a whole new bubble infrastructure. Just put a tax on carbon. That gets around the gaming. However that goes against the mind set of wall street and the bankers. If you can't take big risks, the only thing left is gambler's anonymous.
I stand with friends of the earth and hope this Bill as it is today is not passed. I guess this is just another example of smoke and mirrors to fool the American people thinking we are going to actually start doing something, only to find that what we are doing is only going to help the bad guys like Coal and Nuclear. I keep on hoping that the good guys start fighting the bad guys, but maybe there are no good guys left?
The *Hippocratic Oath* says: "Above all--do no harm".
This bill, which is a "pot-luck" of legislation (the only way things can get done in Washington) has, IMO the potential of doing far more harm than good.
It picks "winners" in terms of so-called "clean" technologies and directs subsidies toward them, albeit not expressed as such in "plain language".
It emphasizes "local" rather than "global" solutions to Climate Change (e.g., coal, which USAns still have a lot of, or nuclear, a technology which few other nations have).
Pollutants, especially carbon dioxide, mercury or radioactive air emissions, have no boundaries, especially in the long run.
It completely ignores the greatest storehouse, by far, of renewable energy found on the planet, which is *residual solar*, stored as CAPE in the troposphere, warm sea water, as well as "industrial waste heat" and even "urban heat".
Vested Energy Interests do not want the public to become aware of these, so they pick out *patsies* from the Democratic Party to whom a "bill of goods" can be sold, and eventually to the public, by skillfully "framing the argument" in such a way as to appear to be a choice among *pre-selected* alternatives.
Since Democrats, and certain environmental groups are *notoriously ignorant* about the nature of energy and how its use affects the environment, they would be the last to understand that they are being "taken for a ride" as far as this bill is concerned.
With respect to this particular bill, I urge a NO vote, to help save them (and other USAns, too) from themselves. The Democrats need to experience an "Energy Boot Camp" NOT run by King CONG (Coal, Oil, Gas, Nuclear) so they get a clearer understanding of the Nature of the Beast, before writing another similar bill.
For an explanation on the harvesting of *stored solar* see
http://vortexengine.ca
Passing this bill, being written as it has been, stinks of the corruption and croynism of Bush/Cheney.
This as it stands is nothing more than an energy tax bill and it will hit our most vulnerable right in the teeth.
This is what I've been waiting for? honesty, openess, transparency, our citizens put before our politicians and our corporations....The machinations of this administration and this Congress are nothing less than disgusting for the most part.
I am acquiring a bitter taste watching this. How any liberal, let alone progressive can support this is beyond me.
(edit) I forgot to say that "Friends of the Earth" are apparently the only ones with guts and integrity left. Good for you guys.....my donation will be in the mail before the sun sets.
Oregoncharles
Years ago I worked for Friends of the Earth in San Francisco. Right across the hall from me was the office of this feisty environmental organization's president, David Brower. Before founding FOE, Brower had been president of the Sierra Club. He left over the Club's endorsement of nuclear energy and their tendency to capitulate - which has only gotten worse IMO. Brower was a "soft energy" proponent, educated and informed on the costs and dangers of nuclear power.
David Brower loved nature and fairness and he expressed it in FOE's value system. He lobbied hard in Congress for the rights of all nature. He shared with anyone who was interested the great beauty and intrinsic worth of our environment, with all of its dynamic variations and it's role as providers of everything we need. The only thing the environment needs from us is protection and the knowledge that what we do to our environment, we do to ourselves and future generations.
His words ring truer than ever: "Whenever we compromised, we lost."
Just before he died in 2000, the "Arch Druid"* went to the polls for the last time and voted for his candidate of choice, Ralph Nader.
(see John McPhee's book, "Tales of the Arch Druid")
Nicely stated Charles. I remember Ansel Adams returning from a meeting with Reagan and Watts about the Natural World, cracked to the press that, "I came away thinking the they [Reagan and Watts] know the cost of everything, and the value of nothing."
I guess we can conclude from Obama and the Democratic leaders like Waxman latest sell out, that the same standard exists in their jaundiced world view which pays homage to corporate interests above any other consideration.
Another day, another sell out.
genaman
Well here we go again. Always waiting for some official to make our environmental problems better.
Folks it ain't going to happen.
WE have got to do it ouurselves.
Stop living way on the grid. cut deep into corporate profits by reuseing everything.
If a few million of us do that in the USA we will be heard over al the corporate lobbiest.
Do we have the sand to try?
I would bet Friends Of The Earth Does.
What About You
genaman
Used to be a sign in my mother's kitchen : "Use it up Wear it out Make it do Or do without!
Congress is set to vote on the Waxman-Markey "American Clean Energy and Security Act". This bill needs to be strengthened!
Go to:http://www.pollutionfee.org
enter your zip code, and get your representatives numbers. Call them and tell them that you support simple Pollution Fees not Cap and Trade legislation biased towards our biggest polluters. A few simple phone calls and your voice will be heard, go on, pick up the phone and speak your mind, it'll make you feel good! And please! Forward this to your friends, family, and colleagues.
george sebouhian
I agree that as consumers we have the power of the dollar that could strike fear in and even arouse consumer-sympathetic actions by the corporations--to make changes that show respect for the consumer's needs and expectations. On the other hand, I'd also like to see us, the consumers, take to the streets the way the French do, and demand loudly, forcibly, for an approach that honors the people. Example: Of course MDs charge too much; of course pharmaceuticals charge too much; so what to do? Assail them publicly with blocked streets and boycotts. Simplistic? of course. Illegal? maybe. Successful? probably. What else can we do? Wait supinely for the Corporation-controlled Congress to act for us?
FORTUNATELY, THEY ARE NOT ALONE. The Climate Crisis Coalition
AND Public Citizen
BOTH ARE CALLING FOR A "NO" VOTE ON THIS LEGISLATION.
TIME FOR YOU TOO, TO GET ON BOARD AND LET YOUR REPRESENTATIVE KNOW ORGANIZATIONS ARE LINING UP AGAINST IT.
Greenpeace continues to oppose the bill too, according to their blog. See http://members.greenpeace.org/blog/greenpeaceusa_blog/2009/06/25/greenpeace_opposes_waxman_markey
I say let the dissenters and skeptics speak. There isn't, and has never been, proof of man-made global warming. Al Gore is making a fortune from this fairy tale.
We should be good stewards of God's planet, reducing pollution and cleaning up our industries. We should find ways to reduce our dependency on non-renewable energy sources. However, destroying our economy to accomplish these goals is nuts!
The left desperately needs a victory - something to placate the base, so they will water this down until it passes, all the while winking at the far, far left.
Nor can Global Warming be proven. Its an extrapolation of scientific understanding, proving it would require another earth somewhere to use as a laboratory. Another construct that can't be proven is that the bridge you are driving on won't collapse. Its design is ALSO an extrapolation of scientific understanding, and bridge collapse is not exactly unheard of. But the fact that it can't be proven doesn't stop you from driving on it, or does it?
God can't be proven either. Yet look at how many Americans believe in God (including me!)
"The president also went out of his way during that news conference to publicly thank two House Democrats who played the greatest roles in weakening the bill: Rep. Rick Boucher (D-Va.), who bragged in detail about the concessions he extracted during committee hearings so "the coal industry and the thousands of jobs in our region that coal provides will be secure," and Rep. Peterson (D-Minn.), who forced the latest round of changes."
This says volumes and explains why progress is the opposite of Congress.
Our system of legislating is based on turf battles, each mis-representative in Congress fighting to bring home the bacon for her/his constituents so that they can in turn elect said mis-representative back into office. It's a quid-pro-quo machine. What's left out of the equation is the rest of the world, and Nature.
So, when we excoriate any politician, hopefully we will understand that unless the system is completely re-engineered, we can expect the very same. Even our white knights in Washington (Kucinich, Sanders, et al) have to scratch backs.
At least there is still one 'environmental organization' still worthy of the title. I applaud Friends of the Earth for not selling their 'soul' to the Obama Administration and Democrat Party.
Governance in these United States continues to be a criminal enterprise, these days ever more so. It's interesting to watch the thunder generated around the distraction that power puts before us. We as a people simply refuse to accept maturity and reason. Not good for business. Well so be it. It seems like such a shame that this country essentially has no substance, proving ever willing to give into the next provided distraction.
Trouble is your selling out my World as well.
Thanks. . . have a good day you hear.
Stop eating meat and global warming could fix itself in 2 years. Here's an article on animal agriculture- the giant cow in the living room. some statistics and solutions
http://www.treeoflife.nu/article.php?p_id=33
Greenpeace
Friends of the Earth
PDA
Public Citizen
all against --
ONE OF OUR GREATEST CRIMES HAS BEEN TO LET PRIVATE INTERESTS
CONTROL OUR NATURAL RESOURCES --
CORPORATE POWER IS CORRUPT - CAPITALISM IS CRIMINAL --
AND SHELL AND DUKE ENERGY WROTE THE LEGISLATION --
AND WE THINK THAT THEY HAVEN'T BEEN HOLDING BACK ELECTRIC CARS AND
OTHER ALTERNATE FORMS OF ENERGY?
Obviously all of capitalism/corporatism needs to go if we
have any hopes of saving the planet
************************************************************
AND Sen. Henry Waxman is now a compromiser with corporations on Global Warming?
Sad comedown from the days when he stood against the tobacco industry!
"According to all myth, the female - not the male -- gives life"