Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Web of Dependency: The Thin New Line
In just a few short years, it has become increasingly apparent that humankind is fast approaching a technological tipping point. Particularly in the West – the First World , the Developed Nations, or whatever self-consciously superlative designation you prefer – a thorough going dependence on “high technology” for life-sustaining essentials is evident in all spheres of modern society. The hardware of our lives, from food and energy to transportation and shelter, is entirely bound up with the workings of a highly mechanized and digitized global economy. And no less so, the software of our existence – communications, community, entertainment, education, media, politics, and the like – is equally entwined within that same technocratic system.
This is not a lamentation, just an observation. To describe this state of affairs as a fait accompli or to conspiratorially suggest an orchestrated inevitability misses the larger point that it merely constitutes what is at this point in history. The utter dependency of our collective lives on the intricate workings of a hypertechnical web makes the perpetuation and evolution of that network a survival strategy for a significant portion of the species. Simply put, we need it. And in that, we come to realize the double-edged meaning of “the web” as something that simultaneously interconnects and ensnares. Our habituation to this web traps us even as it brings us together.

Consider the implications from the perspective of a typical modern life. First and foremost, our entire financial being – and with it the capacity to procure everything else – exists almost exclusively due to a computer’s ability to recognize and recall our bona fides to transact. More and more of our work activities and laborenergies are expended on digitally-based tasks that likewise rely upon computerized repositories and retrieval mechanisms of which we are scarcely knowledgeable. A substantial portion of our political, educational, and healthcare opportunities are similarly enmeshed in remote databases and personal delivery devices. And increasingly, our social interactions are coming to be dependent upon equivalent circuits of electronic exchange.
What would transpire if this web suddenly was to disappear? I’m not inclined to view humankind through a Hobbesian lens of aggression and ruthlessness. We might find surprising ways to reconnect to people and place that stave off the worst forms of behavioral descent, and even open up new pathways for sustainable and just living arrangements both among ourselves and with the balance of nature. There may be enough farmers, builders, teachers, and artists among us with old-school skills sufficient to sustain communities, if not cultures, on some level. Perhaps there yet remains an atavistic thread of time-tested humanity still within us that devolves upon the basic ways that the species survived for the overwhelming majority of our existence.
Indeed, such an admittedly romantic vision could come to pass for some of us. But in a more incisive “realist” rendering, it might also be surmised that many will perish or otherwise suffer in the process of any such rapid digital demise. Similarly, it might be tempting to suppose that people in the Third World – the Global South, the Developing Nations, or whatever other pejorativepearl comes to mind – could somehow escape the worst outcomes should the “grid go down” precipitously. Yet their lives, too, are rapidly becoming conditioned upon the existence of the same system that binds us – even as they oftentimes will experience it from the “business end” of the machine, whereas we tend to see only ourselves in its polished surfaces.
Here, then, is the tipping point just up ahead. There is a threshold of dependency that, once crossed, may be irreversible in terms of ourbasic humanity. Essential survival skills are bred out and replaced with capacities suitable for application to the global web. Consciousness and desire likewise adapt to the pervasive technologies in our midst, as even emotions and sensations are approximately replicable. Our very identities become reflexively intertwined with this grid, just as our bodies are contingent upon its workings. At a certain point in time, if not already realized by now, there comes into existence a new line of humankind: homo technologicus.
We are potentially on the cusp of one of the most significant alterations in the fabric of the species. Instantiated concretely, we can easily envision a near future where everyone possesses (or has implanted, if you want to go there) a personal communications device that carries with it real-time GPS and RFID data-streaming capabilities in a fully-wired world. Wherever we move in this landscape, our location is logged electronically and our economic credentials are verified biometrically. We can simply pick up items from store shelves and stroll out with them, with each purchase being automatically tabulated. Status updates of our movements and interactions will be uploaded instantaneously to our personal profiles for remote friends to share. And in fact, whether in physical orvirtual space, the likes and preferences of our circles of association will be with us, helping to guide our choices of real goods and focal points of information alike.
This is just around the next corner, technologically speaking. Even more compelling, however, will be the speed at which this brave new world moves. Microprocessors that mirror the capacity (even if not quite the efficacy) of the human brain will become part and parcel of the enterprise. Mere thought alone could activate the various nodes of consumption and communication that define the nexus of our lives. The texture of reality gradually begins to shift, as perception equally includes the tangible and intangible aspects of existence. Over time, with new evolutions of the paradigm introduced incrementally so as to allow seamless adaptation, the virtual comes to eclipse the physical as the dominant sphere of human interchange. We are not merely dependent upon the technological web that undergirds our lives – we have become symbiotic with it and, in a remarkable progression of interdependent fortunes, just as integral to its survival as it is to ours.
You use your own science-fiction allusions to speculate onwhere humanity is bound on its current path. Some will be tempted to opt imaginarily for a Matrix-like scenario in which our total enslavement is ensured by those who promulgate and profit from the baseline technological inputs that frame our lives. Others may see an almost spiritual deliverance in the experience of reality from a formless, transcendent viewpoint in which our minds live freed from the shackles of mundane existence. A few may indeed be seeking to craft aca lculated and integrated vision of economy, theology, and bureaucracy for less than altruistic purposes. A handful are striving to opt out in anticipation of an upheaval that seems perpetually in the offing. On some level, all of us are being and will be impacted by the rapid changes at hand. That thin line between utopia and dystopia, between autonomy and captivity, awaits us like a back-porch web in the breeze.
I sat for a while the other day and watched a flock of birds delicately pick seeds from the tenuous fruit of a majestic tree. Gazing down a vast green canopy that slowly yields to bustling prairies below, I watched in receptive stillness as wraithlike clouds skirted atop obsidian peaks, stoically rising behind rich vermillion cliffs on the unending horizon. In my mind’s eye, I could never imagine a system as elegant and enduring as that before me. Nor am I all that inclined even to try.


65 Comments so far
Show AllAs I watch a flock of starlings start from the trees and then weave this way and that in the ecstasy of their being, I have decided I will remain behind, unattached to this new matrix which commands the attention of so many billions of people. For all its brevity and the suffering of disease and aging, life is still a marvel. The starlings and I know it.
Beautifully said, drosera!!!
You're posting here right? Seems to me you're already attached to this new matrix. If you use a bank of any kind you're attached to it, if you have a phone, if you have a TV, if you have a drivers license or passport, etc. This is the world we live in. You can try to minimize the influence or the impact the grid has on your life or your involvement in it, but until you choose to live in the wilderness, away from all this, you're in the mix with the rest of us...
The very fact that they posted precludes them being "disconnected".
But you don't have to totally disconnect to become more appreciative of the natural world.
In the end the internet is a tool. It depends on us using it to exist.
I acknowledge that I am attached to this new matrix in many ways. Certainly my job demands in. I basically owe my present employment to this. I found my job on AOL within days of being connected to the internet. And as things have progressed I now need to be connected to even do my job -- the finished product is sent via e-mail and I often download my work from an FTP site.
Online banking and the debit card has been a good thing for me and my often scattered brain. I never was good at keeping a checkbook and I never, ever write checks now. I am grateful for this.
I have a basic cell phone, which still has a lot of bells and whistles that I simply don't need and don't use. In the absence of pay phones anywhere if I break down it is a safety thing.
I could, of course, list all the ways I am connected into the matrix -- which even at a bare minimum is quite a bit. It is what it is. So I guess I'm in the minimization mode.
It's strange, though, that the more I am online the more I appreciate real human contact, even if fleeting, in the "real world." The world would be a much better place if we connected in this manner more often. Connection with real life is powerful.
How can you be unattached? You're on the computer today, aren't you? Where are our computers made? what resources do they demand? Do the components have toxic ingredients? Could we function without them? Seems impossible, doesn't it?
Can we stay off jet airplanes? Give up the telephone? Refuse the gas fueled auto? Eschew electricity, mass processed food (organic or otherwise), modern medicine?
Perhaps you have minimized the connections but how can any social person cut themselves off entirely? If we all lived as you do, minimally connected, the natural balance that has been constructed over millions of years could perhaps survive.
Beautiful. I am not particularly interested in this new matrix, either. I had to hang on to the last paragraph of this article, as I was beginning to feel dizzy and anxious over this new matrix. I would like to stay on the outside of it.
The paragraph about GPS and RFID has actually come to pass, with the new iphones ands Facebook. At least it has for those who use them. But the rest of the article is, as he says, just science fiction.
As far as participasting, my cell phone makes and receives calls - when it is turned on. The clerk at a Radio Shack thinks I am a Neanderthal, probably correctly.
When some friends showed me a Kindle and a Nook recently, I took a hardbound book off the shelf and dropped in to the (concrete) floor, asking them if their device would work if they dropped it.
Like drosera, I will remain behind. The comnputer I am using to send this message is a tool, no different than a screwdriver. Nice to have around, but if necessary I can get along without it.
You forgot the jews... thats where statements like this usually end up. Why well yets see (Goldman-Sachs, and Greenspan, and thousnds of other suspisusly jewish sounding CEOs in charge of the powers that be, banks, infrastructure.
Makes me wonder.
Has dissing bankers become a matter of antisemitism?
Thats what I'm asking
The answer, in this case, is no...so why are you drawing a line where none existed?
I have seen video on youtube of representatives of AIPAC saying that it is.
Of course, they also say that any criticism of the State if Israel is inherently antisemitic.
One must understand, of course, that this is a methodology employed by Zionists to confuse the issue as they actually aim to foster antisemitism, as it is their claim that they are being "persecuted for being Jews" that allows them to be excused from, amongst other things, basically everything the State of Israel does.
It goes back to the founder of the movement, Theodr Herzel “Anti-Semites will become our surest friends, anti-Semitic countries our allies.” (his Diaries, page 19)
as cited here:
http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/antisemitism/zionismpromotes.cfm
Of course, this is something that was known to his contemporaries, as is evidenced by their comments:
"Zionism is a suicide attempt on the part of Judaism."
-- Dr. Moritz Güdemann, chief rabbi of Vienna, 1897. (Cited by Jacob A. Rubin, Partners in State Building: American Jewry and Israel; New York, 1969; p.35).
It's kind of like the leaders in the US. If you create enemies, your power will increase in the name of "defense."
But this is as off-topic as the original accusation of antisemitism so I will stop here.
Thanks so much for running this article.
There are so many implications for the meaning of our humanity in the "web" we are weaving. Most people i try to talk to about it will not have a realistic conversation, yet we all keep weaving the web, continuing on the path toward embedding our individual selves into a larger organism.
Just a couple things: On a mundane level, i work in retail, and no one i work with is thinking about the RFID / biometric implications Amster alludes to, "purchasing" goods simply by taking them off the shelf and leaving. All the cashiers will be out of work. In terms of social evolution this is, as Amster notes, right around the next corner.
More deeply, as i have noted here before, everyone i have ever asked about it has insisted "No, i will never get an implant." But of course everyone will get an implant, for exactly the same reasons we have gotten radios, TVs, phones, mobile phones, computers, wireless internet, etc. Because in the first place it is both convenient and empowering, and in the second place it soon becomes required for basic functioning in society.
Look now, as the new power begins to spread through society, that you can deposit a check in your account by scanning it with your telephone camera. Who will not adopt this, or a thousand other examples of the power, and convenience, and eventual necessity of these technological steps toward our enmeshment?
Finally, for all the entirely valid privacy and liberty concerns, as well as the gut reactions that many people have with regard to this web and the implants that will connect you to it: Eventually, when enough people are part of the system, people who do not accept an implant will be distrusted, and peer-pressured to join. Also there is extreme economic pressure: think how many jobs today literally require automobile and telephone and internet. It will be the same with the implants: it won't literally be legally required, but almost everyone will have to have them.
As Amster notes, this is not an alarmist freak-out, this is simply the way it is.
Personally i hate it, and in some ways i work against it, but here i am blogging Common Dreams via my wireless internet connection. And i have spent my life without using automobiles because of the obvious plain-as-day horrific consequences in human and ecological devastation, but i'm still enmeshed in the transportation web, and i don't seem to have turned society in a different direction via my rational arguments or emotional pleas.
i really really really wish humans would move much more slowly and deliberately in adopting hugely impactful technologies (impactful via blunt ecological trauma to the living Earth, and also impactful via drastically changing what it is to be human). But i don't see it stopping until the ecological system crashes, or humanity is subsumed in the new organism we are weaving.
"everyone i have ever asked about it has insisted "No, i will never get an implant." But of course everyone will get an implant, for exactly the same reasons we have gotten radios, TVs, phones, mobile phones, computers, wireless internet, etc. Because in the first place it is both convenient and empowering, and in the second place it soon becomes required for basic functioning in society."
Think about this statement and then consider Ionesco's play Rhinoceros.
While far less convenient than an 'implant,' simply carrying an information card (or cell phone) could accomplish many convenience goals while still allowing one to leave the card at home. Technology something like this will almost certainly happen.
I have a credit/debit card linked to my bank account since most stores will no longer take checks. I have never had a cell phone, and I will never be implanted with a chip. Starving won't be fun, I know.
I came across an article a couple years ago about a Spanish nightclub that is offering reduced admission rates and being able to bypass the line to get in if you had a chip implanted. People were lining up for it.
(quick search turned this up)
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2004/040704bajabeachclub.htm
(and this about a woman that had second thoughts about it afterward)
http://rfid.skyriver.org/rfid-mark/removal
Wow. Now we are getting somewhere.
Even though there are a few statements within this article which are stirring some desire in me to challenge, such as "Simply put, we need it", overall, this questioning gaze into our motivations and dependencies is very refreshing.
Common dreams and common dependencies without a seeming political-psuedo-scheme and with birds too!
This is an outstanding article and brings to mind Martin Luther King Jr's attack on people putting so much emphasis on technology and things over people. It is all interrelated and Dr King said so so many years ago. "We are all inescapably caught up in a network of mutuality tied together in a garment of destiny." As Marchall McLuhan made the point so well what happens with technology often has a tremendous impact on all society and yes culture.
AD
Maybe; but he was a preacher and spoke often to the sky-gods. I don't like where that kind of life goes either. (Eventually you have to put aside people to love Jesus) I'll take a cell-phone over that non-sense anyday.
>^^<
"I’m not inclined to view humankind through a Hobbesian lens of aggression and ruthlessness. Perhaps there yet remains an atavistic thread of time-tested humanity still within us that devolves upon the basic ways that the species survived for the overwhelming majority of our existence."
I'm afraid Hobbes was right. Nonetheless, that doesn't change drosera's observation that "life is still a marvel". It most certainly is. It is unfathomable that we must experience this marvel, this wonder, in such a cruel and stupid world.
I like the spirit of this article, but don't believe the speculations are realistic. Though everything he mentions is technically possible, very little of it will happen. We will soon experience peak technology along with the other peaks in oil, soil and finance -- namely because technology is really not a cause, it's an effect (in the sense that energy and investment precede the spread of a technology, though of course the technology then has feedback effects).
There are all kinds of reasons why technological progress cannot continue for long if energy ceases to be abundant and cheap, and financial deleveraging will interrupt investment for years to come. We are experiencing a brief, exciting ride that will slow down (or stop completely) within most of our lifetimes. Not sure if the consequences will be better or worse than if we continued on the upward slope, but we should probably devote more thought and resources to figuring out life on the downside.
Why not? once we're all reduced to welfare, I feel sure the government will want to use RFID to manage it's herds of dependants. Just as the International corporations are starting to do now.
Once fudalism becomes a daily reality, we'll need to be marked somehow.
>^^<
Spot on, bones.
Several years ago, as a reluctant participant in a state agency's transition from field offices providing face-to-face service to the degraded "call center" electronic sweatshop method, it flashed upon me that ours is a "technobarbaric" culture.
This article nicely resonates with this notion.
Maybe because of my brother-in-law's recent distasteful iPhone addiction, I have a real aversion to "smartphone" technology.
Given my abiding antipathy to manipulative teevee ads, it's predictable that "smartphone" ads drive me up the wall at Mach speeds.
Most are classic status symbol pitches, with a strong infusion of appeals to duty-- i.e., those dreadful ads directed to "helicopter parents", inculcating the meme that any RESPONSIBLE parent needs to put the family in a smartphone network in order to track their vulnerable pre-teens alone in the mall, or order pizza on the way home from soccer practice.
But a recent ad-- for something called "Droid", IIRC-- shows some cutting-edge young professional texting the hell out of his new Droid, to a point where his hands and arms morph from dweeby human into cyborg/android appendages. There's the usual bloviating about "unmatched speed and efficiency".
I don't begrudge people hi-tech toys; I have some of my own, and used to be more of a sucker for them. But I can't wrap my fleshy head around the possibility that anyone watching that Droid ad would relate positively to the image of TURNING INTO A MACHINE as a selling point.
This is your brain on technobarbarism. There's no doubt that it's pervasive, insidious, and metastasizing. It remains to be seen whether there's a silicon lining to this trip to Techno-Hell in a souped-up, miniaturized, battery-powered handbasket.
And now I have to go sandwich peanut butter between two rounds of Honeycomb cereal to lure that damn squirrel away from the bird feeder.
Brilliant.
I loved the end.
Yes, brilliant. Thank you.
I'm sure there's an app for the birdfeeder squirrel!
"the virtual comes to eclipse the physical as the dominant sphere of human interchange. ....... Others may see an almost spiritual deliverance in the experience of reality from a formless, transcendent viewpoint in which our minds live freed from the shackles of mundane existence."
Try eating only "virtual food" for awhile and see how "free" your mind becomes from the "shackles of mundane existence". Stick to this diet long enough and you will achieve the "ultimate" freedom.
"What would transpire if this web suddenly was to disappear?"
I suspect we will find out, as soon as cyber "terrorists" get a little more sophisticated - they're working on it.
i have often thought it insane, and not a little ironic, that folks in a country that prides itself on "rugged individualism" and "independence" would so easily not only put themselves in a position of accepting, but actually tout, the wide adoption of, and dependence on, a technology that is so fragile and easily disrupted - just a few little bits and bytes here and there and the whole house of cards comes tumbling down .....
Bring America Back !!!!
***Let us not worry so much that microwaves and
electro waves will control us like Andrids and
Terminators.
***Let us really worry that those dickheads in
the pickup trucks behind us all have cellphones
stuck in their ears, and they can't drive
vehicles competently to begin with.
We have built the ultimate house of cards with our technology. It is not a matter of if, but when a major solar storm brings the whole thing crashing down.
The link below discusses the huge solar storm of 1859 and what a similar storm would mean to our world now.
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/090902-1859-solar-storm.html
Here are a few noteworthy tidbits from the article.
"The solar storm of 1859 was three times more powerful than one that cut power to an entire Canadian province in 1989. Experts say if it happened today – and it could – the result might be unthinkable.
If a storm that severe occurred today, it could cause up to $2 trillion in initial damages by crippling communications on Earth and fueling chaos among residents and even governments in a scenario that would require four to 10 years for recovery, according to a report earlier this year by the National Academy of Sciences. For comparison, hurricane Katrina inflicted somewhere between $80 billion and $125 billion in damage."
I was sort of hoping The System would collapse under its own massive unsustainable weight. It would be I think, a more useful object lesson than some "act of god," though probably no less final in terms of our way of life.
It would certainly reshuffle the deck.
technology is only a tool for humans to use in achieving their goal, their vision, in terms of what kind of society we want to have, how we want to relate to each other and to the nature.
technology itself doesn't set or change the vision.
i find myself stating the obvious, again.
The medium is the message.
--Marshall McLuhan
i'm with McLuhan. Our tools do indeed change us. It is not at all "obvious" that they do not.
For a challenging read on how our technologies transform what it means to be human, read "Orality and Literacy" by Walter Ong.
My two Canadian children had contempt for the dial face of an ordinary watch with moving hands. They wanted to know what time it was by looking at four numbers, not a spatial wrist treatise upon what time it wasn't, had been or would be, maybe. Either way, I reminded them that a broken watch was correct twice a day. They grinned.
When the school told me my son was lacking (relatively) in verbal skills - I thought about it, then convinced his teacher to allow my son to compose dirty limericks in class. Suddenly words were fascinating to him. His constant laughter made other kids demand to be allowed to compose dirty limericks. Soon the English department had to adjust its lousy curriculum.
For 30 years, a philosophical position of mine has been this: "All technology is prosthesis."
All humans have limits to what they can and cannot do. The academic study of this is Human Factors or Ergonomics - (in which field I've published). My POV holds great ethical appeal and meaning for Persons With Disabilities, because they are subject of charitable put-down by using what is called =adaptive technology=. This acceptance of MY limitations made my psychological work with them lack social distance. I designed some =Rube Golderberg= user interfaces for PWDs that made us laugh, but they worked.
Trylon
My only problem with your formulation is that it makes us seem like helpless Pauline, supine and bound to the railroad tracks as the behemoth of technology and power bears down on her. We are changed to some extent, yes, but only if we use the technology, and the nature of the change depends on how we choose to use it.
And there is nothing automatic about it. IT could drastically alter our political environment for the better, but we ignore its benign implications and fail to adopt it for our own good. Meanwhile, the bad guys take it up and use it against us.
There is no magic here. The computer cannot rescue democracy for us, but we could employ it to do so if we only recognized the possibility and the need to take some actions in pursuit of that goal. I keep pointing this out but nobody pays much attention.
I exemplify the situation in a vision of the early Western pioneer, struggling manfully to clear enough forest to grow the food he must have using an axe and his weary muscles. Somebody comes along and offers him a new invention, the chain saw, and he turns it down, saying "But I have always done it this way."
Passivity like ours can be fatal. Technology is not a force to be afraid of, it's a set of tools; you have to pick them up and use them.
Sadly, and I mean sadly, there is an ideal but not a truth in any of those five paragraphs. For a quick illustration why, visit the website of the Electronic Frontier Foundation and read the following short article:
http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/08/government-monitors-much-more-social-networks
The medium is the message. What was the =computer message=?
In the mid 1960s major American libraries were converting from the old use of card catalogs to the modern technological use of IBM 360 computers. No sooner had the process begun than the FBI began sending agents to libraries all across the United States, seeking their permission to track the borrowing of particular material and, as needed, the borrowings of specific individuals. The American Library Association manned the ramparts and stood on guard against this privacy invasion, until two airliners flew into the World Trade Center.
Marshall McLuhan was as prescient or even more than George Orwell. Prior to computers we had the phenomenon of =guilt by association=. Today government supercomputers data mine the entire social intercourse of this nation and we now have =guilt by step-wise linear regression with varimax rotation= which coughs out you and your cronies as a CLUSTER of possible interest.
As you read this, your bank is ready and willing to rat out your purchases on their plastic, and they apply a code number of your =degree of interest= to alphabet agencies wearing night vision goggles. A big =Fuck You= from me to the banking industry.
Anyone who believes we live in a democracy, or a damaged but regainable and salvageable democracy - if only we organize to do X, Y, and Z -is living in La La Land. Somewhere, American democracy is strapped to a board with head lower than feet, and cackling capitalist psychopaths are playing the water hose over its nose. Do you know what a national ELECTION is? It is a cough and headshake to expel water but a new set of reformist psychopaths soon put the hose back.
But - we no longer have to worry. Elizabeth Warren is going to fix all this. And if she fails we will simply chase her with e-torches and e-pitchforks.
The computer is not magic. It is not the computer's fault that it has been misused, we have only ourselves to blame for our inaction. I warned, publicly, on the Pacifica stations (3 at the time) that if the good guys don't take control, the bad guys will, and sure enough they did.
It's tragically, ironically grotesque that the Congress now counts its votes by computer! It should be counting our votes, not theirs, as the Congress would no longer exist if we put the right technology to the right uses in the right way.
You grandly miss the point. So have we all.
"What would transpire if this web suddenly was to disappear?"
I have a different answer. The web cannot and will not disappear all of a sudden. Nothing can disappear suddenly. Like television, this may peak out and eventually we will return to some of our old ways of socializing and getting things done. No technology or way of connecting people can ever be dominant forever. My guess is that with the Internet undergoing privatization and then some to prevent possible uprising, we the people might find ways to turn the worst of things around. Like television, it will have to be a matter of moderation and easing the addiction. Those of us few trying to snap others out of their addiction will get ignored, laughed, and barraged with endless mud but if successful, we might get enough people to wake up and see for themselves why following us for a change is better. Provided that we can convince them that we are not meant to dictate their lives but guide them to real freedom, we could be successful. It may take longer than expected but like all addictions, this one is no different and can be defeated.
Fact is many of us especially in this economy have taken hits to our credit giving us problems when it comes to auto loans. Regardless is you have no credit or bad credit you can easily obtain the auto loan you need to purchase the vehicle you want, but you need to be careful.
http://www.yourbadcreditautofinancing.org/
Your Bad Credit Auto Financing
j.a.h.W.T.F.;)
peace
Professor Amster,I first became alarmed about this "web of dependency" after the emergence of the UPC symbol scanner.What some called the "Mark of the Beast"was useless in a power outage.Clerks for a thousand years did business with a pencil and now were helpless.All commerce halted by the slightest glitch,I find it all ridiculous.Honestly I picture a post epocalyptic urban landscape with talking drums in the projects and smoke signals from the rooftops.And pencils and paper,scales,newspapers to wrap the food,net bags,and bushel baskets for the hanging gardens of the South Bronx!Thanks for the post.
peace
Same as how we "can't" count paper votes, we need technology to count a few thousand votes in a precinct. ;)
Know the best way to count votes? Use pennies as tokens. Drop them in the container of your choice, and count them using the coin sorter at the bank. Pennies are widely freely available, not good for much else, and you pay the workers with them when you're done.
Cheap, fast, verifiable, reusable, eco-safe and non-carcinogenic.
The trick is just to use the technology that's appropriate.
No charge for this suggestion; I enjoy methodology as both a hobby and a profession.
I have a car. I'm not a car. Get it?
The perfect response to this article.
No, you are not a car, but you are inescapably linked to cars and computers and the Internet and a million other technologies. And unless you are different from the rest of us (please don't make us laugh), you are as hooked into them as we are. While there are many beneficial aspects of our technologies, the worst of the dark aspects is the way they separate us from Nature and from each other.
Many psychological illnesses we now face and deal with are due directly to this separation.
Get it?
The late Edward Abbey, author and essayist, opined:"Science is the whore of industry and the handmaiden of war." And Abbey is describing only the tip of the iceberg.