Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Death Bonds: Wall Street Teams Up With Insurance Companies to Kill People, Reap Profits
Any remaining doubt that a for-profit, private monopoly of our nation's health care system is a dangerous idea should be removed by the recent news that Wall Street plans to reap profits from people not living to collect their life insurance policies.
False accusations of plans for government "death panels" was ironic enough, given that private insurance companies have long entrenched real death panels deep within their profit-driven bureaucracy. One woman from Tennessee told a frightening story of how a hospital wouldn't give her husband a CAT scan because the hospital had cut a deal to not use the machine too often, which would cost the insurance company too much money. The financial interest of the insurance company was to provide less care to make more profit.
Now come "death bonds" to take things one step further. Having already ruined the mortgage market and plunged more families into foreclosure than ever before, Wall Street needs a new way to make money. And profiting off the sick and elderly has worked so well for insurance companies, why not expand the sector?
People with frail health who have life insurance have the option of selling their policies before they die for a lesser amount than the full value. Say you have $500,000 in life insurance. Depending on your life expectancy at the time you sell your policy, you might be able to sell it for, say, $250,000 in cash. Whoever bought it is taking a gamble. According to the New York Times:
The earlier the policyholder dies, the bigger the return -- though if people live longer than expected, investors could get poor returns or even lose money.
Now Wall Street's latest scam is to bundle life insurance policies purchased from the sick and the elderly into securitized death bonds and funds. The earlier the group of policyholders die, the bigger the return.
Insurance companies already had a financial incentive to deny care and increase profits. Now Wall Street banks are adding another incentive -- the sooner people die, the sooner death bond prices rise. And since it's really the same super-rich investors benefiting from both enterprises, the grand conclusion is simple -- poor health is good for profits. If the opponents of health care reform have their way, the quality of our health care will only get worse.
The stupidity of designing a health care system that gives a monopoly to private companies that puts profits ahead of patients is so self-evident that the only way to preserve this twisted system as-is is to attack and undermine any reasonable alternative. And so opponents of reform have tried to convince us that a publicly funded insurance program that puts the public and patients first is a bad idea while a big-money private monopoly that puts profits first is somehow virtuous and in the best interest of our nation. (Yet another example of the contortions required to make these warped arguments is columnist Charles Krauthammer arguing that preventative care is not cost effective and therefore not in the public's best interest!)
From health care to education to war, private companies have spent billions of dollars in advertising and messaging to try and convince us that private industry is better at providing public services than, um, the public is. In fact, the health care industry is spending $1.4 million per day trying to kill a public health insurance option. They have to fight so hard because the truth is so obvious -- public institutions are inherently better at looking out for public needs. Private health care will drop you if they can't make a profit off you, kill you if your care is costing to much. Public health insurance wants you to live because public health insurance cares about the American public -- all of us.
It's fitting that Congress returns to work on health care reform legislation just after Labor Day, which commemorates hard working Americans rising up to protest the profit-driven abuses of factories at the turn of the century. Everything from the 40 hour work week to restrictions on lead paint to seat belts came from the recognition that, left to its own devices, big, for-profit corporations would never put the health and safety needs of the American public before their own private profit. We continue to spend more on health care than any industrialized nation and yet have worse health outcomes on almost every measure. If the private insurance companies are so confident they can care for us better than publicly-funded insurance, what are they worried about? The public option makes them nervous because they know it will care for us better while cutting into their obscene profits.
When securitized bundles of subprime mortgages went sour, people lost their homes. When death bonds and the private insurance monopoly reach fruition, even more people will lose their lives. That, in addition to the piles of money we're already pouring down the insurance monopoly drain, is a tremendous price to pay to preserve a false ideology of private market supremacy in matters of the public interest.


38 Comments so far
Show AllNot only is the financial industry no more regulated today than it was when it perpetrated the crimes that landed us in this depression, now the finacial industry has trillions of US taxpayers' dollars at its disposal to create more "products" such as those described in this article.
The Obama Regime and the Federal Reserve will continue to assure that Wall Street's profits remain privatized, while losses remain socialized.
Sioux Rose
RAY: This latest reads like fiction produced by a team of writers who well could be the legendary Lucifer working with Ebineezer Scrooge, who after his transformation, morphed back into one imprisoned by his love of money/profit. Angel-heart and Denero's Louis Cipher have nothing on these Wall St geniuses.
The big casino that is Wall Street never loses. The house that is.
Sara Palin distracted us with a false death panel theme, and ignored the real death panel.
If I cash in my life insurance policy and use the money to buy some of those death bonds, then I'm betting on myself to die early? I'm beginning to feel nauseous already.
"If I cash in my life insurance policy and use the money to buy some of those death bonds, then I'm betting on myself to die early?"
No, because you've removed your policy from the pool of those to be securitized. Now, if you bought the bonds without having cashed in your policy, then you would be trying to profit from your early demise.
Yes, it is VERY nauseating--Eugenics for profit.
Freewheelin Franklin was correct. He has to cash in his life insurance policy for it to be securitized. Before its cashed it is in the pool the insurance company holds as a liability.
It's easy to be confused by these financial products as well we know. The mortgage debacle brought the global economy to it's knees and only a few mathematicians, who specialized in advanced algebra, really understood them.
I find this idea of "death bonds", (however will they market them?) to be as bizarre as the most speculative science fiction. First we take your home, then when you are destitute and cash in your insurance we take your life. I wonder how they will identify the serfs due for extermination? Must ensure good returns on the bonds so that more can be sold.
Hi Prof--Please read my summarized explanation to Rose above. The insured sells his/her policy to a life settlement company--not to their original insurer--and the settlement company keeps the policy in force by continuing to pay the premium with it now being the beneficiary.
Oh great! Now all those investors have to do is go hire hitmen to improve their return. A new industry. Good for the economy. I can't wait to hear the next good idea.
When the people fear their government there is tyranny,
when the government fears the people there is liberty.
~ Thomas Jefferson
"... hire hitmen to improve their return. A new industry."
That "industry" already exists. Blackwater, or whatever it goes by now, is just one of many. The "hitmen" started with the Pinkertons back in the 1870s. Their real title ought to be Death Squads.
We really must destroy the Plutocracy before it kills any more of us as this article shows it clearly intends.
The only reason it has gotten this far is because it was allowed to get this far.
This should lay to rest any notion that Corporations can regulate themselves. These guys are absolutely...BONKERS.
Think about the fundamental premise here: The "market" is betting that life expectency will fall. Why would it think that when life expectancy is still rising slightly in the US? For the whole idea to have any logic, there must be a strong sense based on some factual information that this will reverse, and drastically enough to create the short-term profits that drives the Wall Street money machine. I for one would sure like to know what that information is.
This whole idea is somewhat akin to placing your bet on a crap table's Don't Pass Line--you're betting against yourself. And for this to be really profitable, a great increase in the deaths of affluent people (those most likely to own life insurance) in their 30s-40s would be needed. Furthermore, owning life insurance only makes sense for young folks with young children. So to repeat my question above, what does Wall Street think is going to happen to greatly increase the deaths of under-50-year-olds that will allow it to make money from this scheme?
brother karlof1...my guess is that the information you are seeking would have to do with the current and future nature of nature...
just as I cannot fathom predictions of economic recovery in light of planetary changes, I also cannot fathom how we can treat the planet the way we are and not suffer soon-to-be greatly increasing numbers of ailments and deaths...
the health of the planet will not hold, due to our industrial and chemical devastation of virtually every living system, and all else depends upon this, though no one likes to say so...
as long as we are held prisoners to the financial world due to the privatization of property, we have no way to engage the living world in a meaningful and sustainable way...we are riding in a locked boxcar on a train driven by lunatics...we will have to break out, get to the engine and remove them from the controls...
I cannot speak to scenarios involving deliberate reductions in the population, not because they are not possible, or even contemplated, but because I don't want to sound any more nutty than I already do, sometimes...certainly, the technologies exist to carry out such things...
the planet is in deep trouble, either way, though, and that's enough trouble for anything living here...
Hi dubet--I contemplated the short-term ecological situation and also the issues of Peak Oil and fossil fuel/energy production decline and their likely impact over the next ten years, which falls within Wall Street's short-term timespan. I've deeply researched those subjects for the past ten years and cannot find an answer there; although in the longterm, these problems will certainly have a negative impact on life expectency.
So I repeat: The insiders wouldn't have hatched, let alone publicized such a scheme, unless they knew something the rest of us don't.
I understand...we are certainly, en masse, vulnerable on many fronts...how terrible to find, too late, one's trust to be misplaced...one's purpose to be fraudulent...
there is one other aspect...if the economy continues to tank, which I think it will, due, again, to nature's accelerating collapse, and humanity's response to such, where will monies for any healthcare come from?
without employers paying, due to dwindling numbers of viable businesses, or employees or governments paying (in the form of income taxes), due to the same, where is the soon-to-be average citizen to find the money to pay the doctor? could the collapse of an economically-viable healthcare system, in general, be part of their thinking?
eternal vigilance is the price of liberty - wendell phillips?
Here's most of the quote:
"Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty—power is ever stealing from the many to the few…. The hand entrusted with power becomes … the necessary enemy of the people. Only by continual oversight can the democrat in office be prevented from hardening into a despot: only by unintermitted Agitation can a people be kept sufficiently awake to principle not to let liberty be smothered in material prosperity."--speech in Boston, Massachusetts, January 28, 1852
"there is one other aspect...if the economy continues to tank, which I think it will, due, again, to nature's accelerating collapse, and humanity's response to such, where will monies for any healthcare come from?"
There is a precedent for this in the USSR's wholesale collapse of most of its socio-economic institutions, although I think comparing the USSR in 1991 to the USA in 2009 is little better than comparing apples to oranges. And if the economy does go even further downward, those with life insurance would be more likely to cancel their policies in order to utilize whatever cash they can get--Would you keep paying for your policy while unable to pay your mortgage or buy food?
Sioux Rose
KARLOF & DUBET: Interesting discussion. Someone has been posting about a bad swine flu vaccine and mandatory innoculation campaign. Is that a puzzle piece that fits here?
I don't understand the mathematics behind these trade schemes; but are the traders perhaps betting that persons will trade in their policies for lesser amounts due to their fear that the policy may NEVER pay off due to industries going insolvent, then miraculously forming anew under a new title and charter, liberated from the pesky dues they owed those who paid in diligently, over the years? I mean are they prepared to bail while the $ is still good, if at a lesser pay-out?
Admittedly, economics is not my strong suit... so I'm just adding a possible factor to your mix.
Hi Rose--The best way to understand this is to read the original NY Times item. But I'll try to summarize. You hold a life insurance policy and pay a monthly premium. You feel that you no longer need this insurance for whatever reason and want to get some of your cash back (they won't let you have 100% of your premiums). But you want that 100%, or even the total death benefit amount. Enter the life settlement company--note the name change. This company offers to buy your policy from you for some amount less than the total death benefit and will continue to pay the premium keeping the policy in force, with the life settlement company now the beneficiary of the policy when you die. If you die two days (whatever) after selling your policy, then the settlement company recieves the death benefit, and its net profit is the difference between what it paid you and the amount it received from your previous life insurer. If you live much longer, then the settlement company's profit margin declines because it continues to pay your premiums. But what the settlement companies want to do is to bundle the policies and sell them for a short-term profit rather than waiting for you and others to die. They do this by creating a bond backed by the policies, just as bonds are created by packaging mortgages, with similar derivatives and an index that prices the bonds. That's the basics; the article's last page provides additional details about how such bonds would be priced and what might effect that price.
There's $26 Trillion in USA policies alone, and probably an equal amount globally; lets just call it $60 Trillion. You can now see why Wall Street wants to get its hands on this stack as its greed has no limits whatsoever.
Sioux Rose
KARLOF: Thank you for taking the time to explain. Before I turned off my TV 3 years ago, my favorite show was "Law and Order." I recall an episode based on chasing down a German insurance company that knowingly sold life insurance policies to Jews who were about to be sent to the gas chambers. This latest "money maker" sponsored by Wall St newly remodeled as Vegas-style casino seems like a kindler, gentler version of the alluded to Law & Order plot line!
"Why would the market bet that life expectancy will fail?" Think about it. What's the most common reason why a sick or elderly person would cash in their life insurance policy in the United States? To pay for health care of course. It should be readily apparent to you why odds against survival are stacked against someone in that position.
As to your second statement ["And for this to be really profitable, a great increase in the deaths of affluent people (those most likely to own life insurance)..."], you are presuming from a false assumption: most life insurance policies are brought by employers on the life of their employees. Wal-Mart, for example, is famous for taking life insurance policies out on their employees - even those who only work for the company for a few months. When that person eventually dies, Wal-Mart gets paid, the person's family does not, and it's tax-free. Ghoulish, huh? They've been doing it for years.
Here's a link that reports on what you're describing, http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/insurance/p64954.asp
"...most life insurance policies are brought by employers on the life of their employees." It would be good if you could provide a link to some facts proving this.
If the above is true, then I must wonder why it took so long for Wall Street to come up with this new scheme.
Don't forget that the health insurance industry is looking forward to a toothless reform, so that they can deny even more care. Also, Dick Armey's group and its co-horts have let slip their actual goal- the complete dismantling of Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. If you didn't adequately prepare for your ill health, or your old age- then die and decrease the surplus population. That has been the right's goal since the 1960's, and they are dangerously close to convincing the lemmings on the right to follow them off the cliff and take us with them.
There doesn't have to be a fall in life expectancy for this idea to be profitable for the Wall Street entity that is purchasing the policy. The determining factor is the price they pay to acquire the policy. If purchasing the 50 year old person's $500,000 policy for $250,000, as in the article, would not be profitable, they will offer a lower price that is actuarially profitable, maybe $200,000, based on whatever is the current life expectancy (say, 78). The company, buying a lot of policies, will make a profit on average, if it doesn't pay too much for them, and the individual will get his money when he is still alive, rather than his survivors getting it when he's dead. If his children are already grown and don't need the money, the insured and his/her spouse might like spending the money on themselves.
I heard some talking head predicting on some msm outlet today that there will be a bio-terror wmd attack within 5 yrs. probably getting pretty good odds right now. let me cash my unemployment check and get some cash down on it.
Jeevee
The only solution is to get down on our knees and pray to the Lord of the Universe!!!
LET's STOP THE ARROGANCE AND GREED DRIVING US TO EXTINCTION.
Dafoe
When will the free enterprisers and the self interest believers ever learn that it is those precise beliefs that have been fostered as the"American Way" that allow the corporate socialists to prosper at their expense. For 90 years anything smacking of public ownership is communist or socialist and evil, what a bunch of dopes.
The idea of the commonweal or commonwealth smacks of furrin ideas simply because every one has been told that it is up to the individual to do it "My Way" which is a load of gopher dust we were all helped by others without being transactional.
Nothing is going to change, the greedy are worshipped and the snake oil salemen are in full force and people are buying it.
There are no redeeming features in the neo conservative and fundamentalist beliefs who pull the strings, none. Public health will be in the hands of yer private sector and costs will no doubt go up.
I suggest the Pres. contact Cuba and trade the republicans for doctors!! It would be a step in the right direction and the repugnants would learn about manual labor and sharing and the nation would be well served by doctors who serve their patients.
You have said very well and succinctly what I have been feeling for a long time. I offer this quote circa 1910 by Teddy Roosevelt to remind us that very little has changed since the run-up to the first Great Depression: "Ruin in its worst form is inevitable if our national life brings us nothing better than the swollen fortunes for the few and the triumph in both politics and business of a sordid and selfish materialism."
As for the trade with Cuba, they don't want 'them', either.
It's become clear that this healthcare scam was just another corporate giveaway, no different than the auto and financial industries. When will we wake up and get angry about this? I guess when there's no more money to give away.
http://www.mindwafers.com/3/post/2009/09/hmohhhshit-part-ii-the-return-of-the-coop.html
But this is already money that has not been printed yet.
But this is already money that has not been printed yet.
CORP IS BORG.
Revoke corp "personhood".
Re-compose charters to demand accountability to humanity and ecology.
Yesterday, I read the NY Times article. Someone on CD alerted me, and was advising everyone to read it.
These men -- banksters -- continue to reach new heights of inhumanity on almost a daily basis.
Of course, they would be against any kind of health care reform -- they are betting on our deaths -- our life insurance policies! They don't want us to be well and healthy, that wouldn't pay off for them.
Next, after all of us are forced to purchase health care insurance, they will have the perfect cataloguing system in place, with all of personal data, and the "snakes in suits" will be scheming to buy life insurance policies in our names, and then, they will deny us medical care and wait for our deaths.
I know, I'm our of control, but so are they!
Can they do this? And, we're expected to trust these people? This is insane!
Sioux Rose
KAY: Based on the horror stories shared by Donna Smith, I am 99% certain I will not purchase--by government mandate--health insurance. I would rather pay the $750 extortion fee, and hope to become part of a class action suit, perhaps filed by ACLU to later reclaim it. How DARE a government (as a parallel to how it treats the banker caste and the "luminaries" of the private mercenary nouveau riche armed services) force persons to buy insurance without reciprocally legally MANDATING that said companies must cover ALL life-threatening conditions. Plastic surgery and elective treatments are one thing, but denying coverage to things that the individual has paid for under the assumption this fee would save his own life? PROFIT gets to be the final arbiter on what said life costs, or is evaluated to be worth? I refuse to be herded into this system, as it is anything but FREE enterprise! It is naked extortion, and when added to the fact that my savings just lost a percentage of value thanks to equally unregulated corruption taken to a high art on Wall ST these days, added to fees everywhere squeezing the middle class...
Property tax
Property Insurance
Sales Tax
vehicle registration fees
Car insurance
Income Tax
Interest on credit cards & late fees & membership fees
And now health insurance? FUCK all this B.S. This society sets individuals up to become sick or impoverished, pays its right wing pundits (having gained control of the media) to forge a message of consensus based on smoke and mirrors, and then holds each individual accountable to some uber: Ayn Rand concept of individualism? While these vultures rely on the public's largesse?
Disaster Capitalism is the nation's new unspoken mantra. The insidious ways that basic earnings are being eroded by those who use them as betting chips, is so immoral that I can hardly believe it's happening. And after each new "exploit" the congressional centrists, following orders from their paid sponsors, set the next "new deal" into motion, each one designed to steal from the needy to give to the insatiable. Some call them psychopaths; in my view the nation has given birth to its own 21st century disease: Excessive Greed DISORDER!" For a segment of the population time is rolling backwards; they seem to want a replay of The Dark Ages crossed with The Crusades. I hope they roll all the way back into the blackhole from which they came, these takers of the Light.
Sioux Rose:
I agree with your post. I won't buy into the "mandatory insurance" scheme, either. It is exactly what you called it -- "naked extortion!" And, the new health insurance bill won't even kick in until 2013 -- just after the next presidential election. Hhhhmmmmm! More obfuscation -- keeping it out of the public view for their own self-interest. These people have NO shame!
On Saturday, September 12, here in NYC, I am joining the march for "single-payer!" We're meeting at 9:30 AM at 44th Street and 5th Avenue. Even though I know there's little chance of changing the outcome, I have to do something -- something that is real and humane!
Anyone reading this: If you live in the NYC area, join us! Please!
The only way they can kill us is if we allow them to. WE can prevent that by killing them first. That's what the whole situation now boils done to. There is no way to have our grievences redressed by the national government because it's totally controled by the Plutocracy, which having now shown its Profit through Eugenics program must be eliminated before they eliminate us. The Class War is now a Shooting War.
hi
Profitability is guaranteed by just contracting to have certain people killed.
There is just one fundamental problem with the economy.
It is the imbalance in the US wage-to-salary formula.
In 1973 the minimum wage was $1.65/hour, and the highest salary was a whopping, heavily taxed $300,000./year.
There were a few millionaires, but these assets were in holdings, not in salary.
Now, the top dogs have added 4 zeros to their yearly salary, with only slight taxation.
The workers have not realized even a single additional zero/hour.
This is all necessary for the creation of world slavery, but this horrid scheme can lead to no good end, and the people of the USA were not consulted, because this scheme sits in blatant opposition to the American philosophy and her dream of world peace and prosperity.
Certainly, the lying and killing, and stealing by the 'leaders' of the pack have added contortions, confusions and insult to the system, but the wage to salary imbalance is the problem underlying the sub-prime mortgage collapse, the health care crisis, and all other sufferings in, and outside of the USA.
If the Federales had actually wanted to solve the problem, they would have set the minimum wage at $55/hr., and used the unprinted billion$ to subsidise the wages until the economy had established a sustainable momentum. They would not have had to subsidise the core criminals who hold the passwords to the banks computers and the printings presses of the private 'Federal(/International) Reserve Banking Corp.'.
The growth of the very uppermost salaries should certainly be halted, and heavy taxes levied.
Poor Obama, he is killing the USA, by following in the footsteps of 35 years of trudging bully's, and misery-mongering psychopaths who have been enabled by legions darling, highly-degreed idiots.
The useless war, and the tarnished image of the USA is the creation of the elegant thugsters who can't stand to see fairness and general prosperity. They are afraid. They are very afraid, because they know what they have done.
What we need is a treasury that follows the formula implemented by the Colonists as they issued 'Colonial Script', not the 'bust and boom', unpatriotic Fed. Reserve Banking Corporation.