Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
A Weaver's Welcome in Swat Valley
ISLAMABAD -- Shortly after arriving in Pakistan, one week ago, we met a weaver and his extended family, numbering 76 in all, who had been forcibly displaced from their homes in Fathepur, a small village in the Swat Valley.
Fighting between the Pakistani military and the Taliban had intensified. Terrified by aerial bombing and anxious to leave before a curfew would make flight impossible, the family packed all the belongings they could carry and fled on foot. It was a harrowing four day journey over snow-covered hills. Leaving their village, they faced a Taliban check point where a villager trying to leave had been assassinated that same morning. Fortunately, a Taliban guard let them pass. Walking many miles each day, with 45 children and 22 women, they supported one another as best they could. Men took turns carrying a frail grandmother on their shoulders. One woman gave birth to her baby, Hamza, on the road. When they arrived, exhausted, at a rest stop in the outskirts of Islamabad, they had no idea where to go next.
While there, the weaver struck up a conversation with a man whom he'd never met before. He told the man about the family's plight. Hearing that they were homeless, the man invited them to live with him and his family in a large building which he is renovating. He offered to put the reconstruction on hold so that the family could move into the upper stories of his building.
The weaver was also fortunate to have known, for many years, a family that had sold his art work through a small shop in Islamabad. Women in this family have been working, as volunteers, to assist refugees who've come to Islamabad. They and their companions have delivered one thousand "food kits," plus cots, mats and cooking supplies, to desperately needy people. Two of the women, Fauzia and Ghazala, invited our small delegation to visit the weaver and his family, in Islamabad's Bara Koh neighborhood.
When we arrived, older men and boys were outside, ready to unload a truck delivering mats and flour. The generous building owner invited members of our group into his home, on the ground floor, where plans were already being made to turn the top floor into a school for the children.
Several tots led me upstairs to meet their grandparents. The elderly couple sat, cross-legged, on cots. When we entered, the grandmother stood, embraced me, and then softly wept for several minutes. Soon, about twenty men, women and children clustered around the cots. All listened attentively while one of the weaver's brothers, Abdullah Shah, spoke with pride about the school in Fathepur where he had been a headmaster. The village had three schools, and his school was so successful that even Taliban families sent their children to study there. Now, the Taliban has destroyed all of the schools in Fathepur.
He and his brothers wonder what their future will be. How and when can they return to their village? And how will they start over? The crops are ruined, livestock have died, and land mines have been laid. Most of the shops and businesses have been destroyed. Many homes are demolished.
The trauma endured by the refugees is overwhelming. Yet, numerous individuals and groups have swiftly extended hospitality and emergency aid. We visited a Sikh community, in Hassan Abdal, which has taken in hundreds of Sikhs, housing them inside a large and very famous shrine. Nearby, we stayed for several days in Tarbela, where families in very simple dwellings have welcomed their relatives. The townspeople quietly took up a collection to support the refugee families. Some of the townspeople accompanied us to Ghazi, just up the road from Tarbela, where 155 people are staying in an abandoned hospital, relying entirely on the generosity of their new neighbors. Doctors from Lahore invited two of us to go with them to villages near Mardan, where people from the Swat Valley are still arriving. The doctors were part of a project organized jointly through Rotary Lahore, Pakistan Medical Aid, and Jahandan, which has worked with area councils to convert schools into refugee centers. The doctors take turns, several times a week, delivering relief shipments and helping supervise distribution.
Generosity in the face of such massive displacement and suffering is evident everywhere we go. But Pakistan needs help on a much larger scale. The U.S. has pledged 100 million dollars toward relief efforts. Two other disclosures about money budgeted for Pakistan should be considered in light of the unbearable burdens borne by close to two million new refugees. First is the decision to spend 800 million dollars to renovate and expand the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad and to upgrade security at U.S. consular offices elsewhere in the country. Secondly, the U.S. will spend 400 million dollars, in 2009, to teach counter-insurgency tactics to Pakistan's military. The 2010 Defense Spending budget requests an additional 700 million for counter-insurgency training in Pakistan.
What would happen if U.S. officials put plans to expand the U.S. Embassy on hold? Suppose the U.S. were to declare that helping alleviate the misery of people forcibly displaced by Taliban violence and the recent military offensive is a top priority, one that trumps spending money on renovating and expanding the U.S. Embassy.
Suppose that the U.S. were to redirect funds designated to train counterinsurgents and instead make these funds available to help alleviate impoverishment in Pakistan. No one seems to know how the Taliban are funded, but they clearly use large sums of money to build their ranks, giving each new recruit 25,000 rupees, a sum that exceeds what a teacher earns in one year. In villages where people don't have enough resources to feed their children, the Taliban would initially move in with plans to build schools and offer two meals a day, plus clean clothes, to the children. Later, they would exercise increasingly fierce control over villages. But their initial forays into villages were marked by offers to reduce the gaps between "haves and have-nots."
Enormous resources will be spent to "crush" the Taliban, and as always happens in warfare, the bloodshed will fuel acts of revenge and retaliation.
The relationship that began when a stranger took the risk of offering shelter to a weaver holds a lesson worth heeding.
The weaver and his family will never forget the extraordinary, immediate kindness extended to them when a man put his renovation project on hold so that he could help them find shelter in his building.
The U.S. could help assure that every Pakistani family displaced by the fighting has enough to eat and the security of at least a temporary home. It would be an unusual but sensible homeland security initiative within Pakistan. And it would be a signpost pointing to greater security for the United States. The maxim that guides this idea is simple: to counter terror, build justice. Build justice predicated on the belief that each person has basic human rights, and that we have a collective responsibility to share resources so that those rights are met. This means eliminating the unjust and unfair gap between the "haves" and the "have-nots." It means weaving new relationships that don't rely on guns and bombs for security.


14 Comments so far
Show AllThank You Kathy Kelly for your ferocious bravery to speak truth to power.
I often wonder if much of the attacks on Muslims are instigated by their being a more socialistic (albeit paternalistic) society.
It just struck me and I am not being facetious as to how similiar and parallel the Republicans and Taliban are.
Control of womens reproduction rights.
Fundamentalist Education.
Facist state control.
Support for violent resolutions.
I would say that the Taliban are less materialistic and imperialistic.
And both groups contain the reasonable to the fanatic.
I think that the benifits of the presented behaviour is so obvious in Iraq, Afganistan, and Pakistan that to do otherwise is clearly intentional.
The powers that be obviously do not want the peaceful solution offered by increased aid and clearly want something else. To say that our government wants to help these people is a cruel hoax and a devious lie. Reporters and writers should stop presenting these things as a missed opportunity and start presenting them as ideas that our government does not wish to follow out of cruel intent.
So right. The US government is not about improving anyone's life. It is about spreading the tentacles of power and domination.
One might apply the same logic to life here in the US. What if the US gov't spent a fraction, say 5%, of its "Defense" budget on the needs of everyday Americans?
That would be a stimulus package I could "Believe in."
Until the entire west leaves Pakistan alone, Pakistan and India will never have a chance to reconcile on their own. The west is asking for more trouble and karma the more they keep interfering with the lives of the Afghans and Pakistanis.
Sioux Rose
I hope Kathy Kelly gets nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize. She's been on the front lines and seen the costs of war as extracted through its human price in some of the most hard hit areas. And she retains her dignity, peace, balance, and a refined sense of justice. What a woman! Bravo!
Even if she doesn't, she will get lots of blessings from millions of devout citizens in Swat Valley. This article needs to be passed to the citizens of India and Pakistan immediately. If not the sectarian violence destroying villages, it is always the corporate demons, mostly western no offense doing it. This must stop.
Kathy Kelly has woven a wonderful portrait of humanKind. Her writing brings the Swatis to life.
As the Pakistan National Army takes aim at Waziristan, I hope to read more by KKelly.
Pakistan has disparate ethnicities and sects, but as attacks upon it's people by it's own Army increase, at Obama's insistence-this last offensive began the day after Zardari visited BO-the more they will have one thing in common. Increased hatred for the US and support for those forces opposing the US, ie the Taliban, AQ too. After 9-11 bin-Laden was lionized in Pak.
The article stated dead on the money the enemy in Pakistan was Poverty.
If you really want to know Pakistan very well, you need to study the way the Europeans settlers armed the native tribes and encouraged them to hate and fight one another. How else would the settlers have won? Similarly, by dividing India and Pakistan up after India obtained her independence, the west has been doing everything they can to keep us two fighting each other even when ordinary people from both sides have done as much as possible to stop the divide. There have been some successes and some failures but until the West gets its bloody hands out of our way, Pakistan will never be given the chance to heal. Lord Krishna is punishing the west with poverty and insecurity as a result.
Ranjit, hello,
Do you think well or nay of AsiaTimes, Juan Cole may I inquire?
I depend on them both and would value your opinion, thank you.
I don't know Juan Cole but I'm mixed on AsiaTimes. I cannot trust either the far right or the far left given my Hindu background. There's 50% I like about the left, 50% I hate about it. Likewise, there's 40% I like about the right, 60% I hate about it.
Ranjit Kumar, Juan Cole is a scholar of the Middle East & much of Asia, he has a daily column online, Informed Comment. Hope you may find it interesting.
Kathy Kelly is right on, and reminds me of Tamim Ansary's expert suggestions. From that...
I would like to suggest An *Exitable* Afghanistan/Pakistan ("Tribalistan") Strategy:
It's based on a) statements by Tamim Ansary (Afghanistan expert), and on the fact that we already are in country there with momentum. I use the term "Tribalistan," since the people, especially of that key border region respond much more as one community of tribes (the "Tribalistani") than as two nations - especially to outsiders.
Ansary most appreciates NGO's building community amongst the tribes, those few that have hung in there while not taking credit for the U.S. while doing it. He gave the example of Julia Bolz building schools. He lists more at his site (links below). He said essentially that the word "Taliban" should be replaced with "Talibanism" because that was more akin to the actual reality in there. That if you want to rid the land of destructive ideas, killing "the bad people" was far from the best solution available.
Tamim said that he hoped Obama would use the military (so long as it was already there and not disposed to leave) for protecting those support projects that the communities themselves expressed need for. These projects would be the actual objectives to be accomplished by the US presence, and "killing the bad guys" may happen only as necessary to accomplish the objective (and probably would, given the apparent tenacity of resistance to any outside military presence).
I don't remember if Tamim said the military should also try to initiate such community support projects, but I'm assuming he would prefer they be initiated by those who were the best available for the work at hand. Which in some cases the US military might be (?), at least until their NGO betters can get to each situation in question.
* * * But from this point, I can see a US strategy * * *
...that would be drawn fairly directly from the above: select as many towns and villages, and networks there-of, as can be supported in their best interests, provide that support on an ongoing basis until the communities are sufficiently self-supportive and/or intra-supportive as a community network, and protect that community/network as necessary until they can be self-protected or protected by Afghan nationals; bring more communities into the those developed networks as resources allow, keep the network of networks growing and expanding as appropriate for long-term stability as can be managed by Afghan national government authorities. Assist in the stabilization of the later to the degree that it supports a true Afghan autonomy. Set goals for all the aforementioned such that the US military involvement has a stopping point as regards it's interaction and deployment. Provide motivation and assistance as needed for NGO's taking over community/network support roles where this will serve the higher good of Afghanistan.
Extending this to the areas that are officially parts of Pakistan should be far less complicated (in the long run certainly) than any military strategy that we've heard about so far. I'm not calling it simple, nor as non-violent and peace-oriented as I'd prefer. But given where we already are (Spring 2009), not to mention where we most apparently are already going, this can be a strategy that, for starters, may be sufficiently clear-cut, do-able, *and exitable* for the US in Tribalistan.
I might add that what we really don't need in Afghanistan right now is a bunch of walking (PTSD-loaded) time-bombs putting our worst US faces in the Tribalistani faces. Or in economically depleted main-street American communities, but that's another essay.) One thing that really puts believers of Islam into a mood, is Christians acting like they are God in their own communities - and that's how some of our behavior hits them. That's a "holy war" message to them, whereas they do respond to what they believe are true acts of God. (I'm suggesting that) A big part of our approach, besides helping them meet their greatest support needs, needs to be around *patience* - letting their own extremists screw up - as all extremists do, revealing their hypocrisy as all extremists do - in spades. Because as long as we keep doing things that their extremists can call out as sacrilege, we might as well be marked, and the Tribalistani's will give way to their extremists.
---
Tamim Ansary is a native Afghani, whose American mother taught English at the first girl's school in Afghanistan. His dad taught science and literature at Kabul University. He came to America in 1964 with a scholarship for high school. He graduated with honors from Reed College and took to the 60's counterculture wholeheartedly. Besides a having solid writer/editor career, his commentary has been heard on the Bill Moyers show, the News Hour with Jim Lehrer, the Opra Winfrey Show, Hardball, and numerous NPR radio stations. This very short bio hardly does him honor, but only serves to put these notes here. His website, complete with list of his books as well as a number of other interesting features, is at http://www.mirtamimansary.com/
---
Thank you sincerely for your consideration. These thoughts are elaborated with resource links at http://www.chalicebridge.com/ObamaMomentum.html#Tribalistan