Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
States Should Lead Green Recovery Investment
Today, our nation is facing two crises: One is our failing economy, and the other is global warming.
The good news is that President-elect Obama appears ready to explore how to use this challenge and opportunity to help rebuild the U.S. economy and energy infrastructure through a green recovery package, with 21st-century green technologies.
The real challenge is where and how the money from the various stimulus packages should be invested. Any new funding must be put to use quickly and effectively in order to have an immediate impact on the economy. Governors from both parties met last month in Philadelphia, and the members of the National Governors Association advised President-elect Obama to invest the stimulus money in state infrastructure improvement programs immediately -- a "bottom-up" approach.
We have a very simple suggestion to make this happen. The federal government should deploy a portion of the green stimulus money directly through the many state clean-energy programs that already exist -- without any new federal bureaucracy.
Many states already have launched innovative finance, policy and market initiatives that are supporting new clean-energy infrastructure. These state programs are established, staffed and capable of administering new funding immediately to drive new clean-tech industries, markets and jobs. It will be cheaper, smarter and faster to invest in existing state programs than to create new federal programs. A federally funded, but state-administered, initiative can get money out the door, revitalizing the economy now.
Historically, states have built and financed new infrastructure and innovative technologies, from the Erie Canal to stem cell research and development. The states can create green jobs by constructing the 21st-century clean-energy infrastructure: wind farms; retrofitting buildings with energy-efficient technologies; modernizing the electrical grid; expanding and greening the public transportation system; building energy-efficient automobiles; and manufacturing solar panels and photovoltaic cells. These projects will create real, meaningful jobs for engineers, metalworkers, electricians, welders, factory workers, software engineers, steel workers, machinists, scientists, agricultural laborers, contractors and carpenters. We can turn our fading blue-collar jobs into export-proof green-collar jobs.
As we begin to seriously invest in clean energy programs, it's important to remember that in the past the federal government has used a largely top-down, one-size-fits-all, research-focused approach to advance clean-energy technology. It hasn't worked. Impressively, in the last 10 years the states have spent billons of their own dollars to become the real laboratories for clean- and renewable-energy economic development. This bottom-up approach has proven to be the smartest way to build local, green economies.
Individual states have already seized the initiative to develop their own groundbreaking clean-energy programs -- to use clean energy as economic stimulus. As New Jersey Gov. Corzine recently said, "One of the cornerstones of my economic stimulus plan is an investment in changing our energy future." The business community should see the economic crisis, he said, as "an opportunity to drive a clean-energy future fueled by innovation, economic opportunity, local job growth and environmental fortification." To that end, New Jersey is building the first offshore wind farm in the United States, and they're not waiting for the federal government to take the lead.
Vermont is a national leader in biomass renewable energy innovation. Alaska is spending $100 million to help small rural communities foster their own renewable energy projects. In California, Gov. Schwarzenegger has created a partnership with homebuilders to sell 1 million homes with solar panels built into their roofs. Connecticut has launched a leasing program to help low-income families afford renewable-energy systems with no capital costs down.
Consequently, each state can take advantage of its unique strengths and resources. Vermont can use cow manure to create bio-energy; Arizona can invest in solar technology; and Kansas can harness wind power.
Let's encourage and expand this bottom-up, state innovation. Congress should direct this clean-energy infrastructure funding directly through state clean-energy programs. It will impact the economy quickly and create the types of jobs that will strengthen and green our economy at the same time.
- Posted in

7 Comments so far
Show AllHELL ! Virginia is building a new hybrid clean coal fired power plant. Appalachia is powering the world, yet can't even power it's own schools. Thanks
to THE COAL INDUSTRY http://www.wisecountyissues.com Appalachia is a toxic waste
dump third world America.
When Obama and the Democrats can team up to remove the ban on INDUSTRIAL HEMP, get rid of big government HOA on forbidding people from installing solar panels, wind mills, and clothes lines on their own, and getting rid of corporate farm factories and big corn, then let me know.
By the way, states such North Dakota, Kentucky, West Virginia, Montana, and Vermont are already leading the way by legalizing industrial hemp but BIG GOVERNMENT DEA in Washington, courtesy of both parties supporting it, is obstructing progress !
Hey there, hows it going on the energy front, the climate change front and the long haul? i find it more difficult to write about these issues today, yet easier than commenting on the true pain in the asses that seem to be spreading like wild fires. the other issues on the site today make me sick and i feel like the wild fires will be upset that i have equated the other destructive forces to their natural, abate dangerous, way. when it comes to clean energy i wonder what would happen if we, the people, did go off the grid with alternatives? would the one tenth of a single percent be able to grow their food, or man their businesses, or demand obedience, or neglect the sick, or drive hundred thousand dollar cars, or pay the tax man? i also wonder what the tax man would do to those captains of industry, that have lead us down this rocky road, when they don't pay him the taxes they owe for decades of excesses? just what could happen when the man walks into their lives and asks why they have cheated the americans by so many trillions of dollars, or more importantly damaged their overall health and wellness? these are questions that i have no answer too. addressing the very interesting and usable idea of bottom up money for clean energy, just watch for localities that steal everything from their respective townships and communities because a few bad apples can ruin this possible revolution for everyone.
kinda a rant, but better that commenting on issues far outside of my influence. good luck and may the force be with us all:)
The simplest and quickest way to save oil and greenhouse gases is to simply
run and adequately support the mass transit systems already existing in
many urban areas. Ironically when gas prices hit $4 gallon, many mass transit agencies around the country actually CUT their mass transit train and bus
services at the very time when people were clamoring to use them.
Last May New Jersey Transit cut my train line service by 20%. The MTA for
New York City is talking about cutting service. Many buses were also cut
as they could not afford the increased fuel costs.
These cuts all need to be restored and should be the priority of any aid to States.
But beyond that many existing rail lines with perfectly good tracks and enough equipment are way under utilized. Many New Jersey Transit rail lines do not run on weekends and off-peak hours. MARC in Maryland does not run on weekends. Most Transit agencies just like New Jersey Transit have a myopic view of
transit - it is for commuters to major downtown areas like Manhattan to work 9 to 5 Monday through Friday. They do not see it as potentially serving as THE way
to actually get from place to place locally at all times.
Even for serving commuters New Jersey Transit is lacking parking, shuttles or
ways to reach their rail stations. Most parking lots are totally full and many have waiting lists of years.
Jumpstarting this by providing for parking, shuttles frequent off-peak and weekend service using equipment which is already available for peak service
would not cost hundreds of billions but be the low hanging fruit which could pay off in oil and greenhouse gas savings immediately.
This should be Priority 1 of any aid to States and the first part of any
"Infrastructure Stimulus".
When Obama has 4 lunches with Big Auto for 1 lunch with public transportation folks, you know something smells rotten and it ain't in Denmark. Neither he nor Congress have any real intention of improving public transportation. Like Clinton and Bush, keep cutting it to DEATH. It's no coincidence that they're giving high priority to bailing out Big Auto.
Now you understand why the oil, auto, and bus companies conspired to buy up and dismantle the urban light rail systems around the country in the Forties...
Canada's First Nations to demonstrate in Washington, DC
Protests over oil exploitation spur visit to the "Great White Father."
http://www.straightgoods.ca/2009/ViewFeature.cfm?Ref=6
Canada’s opposition to the human rights of Indigenous People at UN Conference on Climate Change is shameful says AFN National Chief
http://afn.ca/article.asp?id=3