EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Transcript: Today's Live Q&A With NSA Leaker, Edward Snowden
- 'Tip of the Iceberg': Senators Warn Far More Data May Not Be Safe
- Playing the Obama Bumper Sticker Game
- Intentional and Evil: Court Marshall Sexually Assaults Woman, Then Arrests Her When She Protests
- David Brooks, Tom Friedman, Bill Keller Wish Snowden Had Just Followed Orders
- Transcript: Today's Live Q&A With NSA Leaker, Edward Snowden
- Remembering Satyajit Ray’s Hirok Rajar Deshe: On Edward Snowden, Resistance and Inverted Totalitarianism
- Pentagon Bracing for Public Dissent Over Climate and Energy Shocks
- Bank of America Lied to Homeowners and Rewarded Foreclosures, Former Employees Say
- The Terror Con
Popular content
Today's Top News
Growing Gas Cloud Forces Evacuation of Oil Rig in North Sea
French-owned platform is abandoned with no answers yet on how to avert further calamity
An oil and gas platform owned by French oil giant Total has been evacuated and an 'exclusion zone' has been set up around it, as a cloud of natural gas hovers over the site and a six-mile long 'sheen' has formed in the ocean around the rig.
Oil platforms in the North Sea - Total said the cause of the gas leak at the Elgin rig remains unclear. (Photograph: Getty) Ships have been ordered by Maritime and Coastguard Agency in the UK to stay at least two miles from the Elgin PUQ platform, which sits about 150 miles off Aberdeen on Scotland's east coast, and aircraft must stay at least three miles away.
Technical teams from the oil company were investigating the cause of the gas leak but declined to give further details, according to a Total spokesman today. The company contends that although the situation is 'stable' though they admit they do not yet know the source of the leak.
Environmentalists have warned about the inherent risks of drilling in the North Sea, and Bellona, a Norwegian environmental NGO, has been monitoring this well closely.“This is a gas blowout that is out of control and is going to be so for a long time," Bellona President Frederic Hauge said. “The information we have right now indicates that it will be very challenging to prevent a blowout. This is a critical situation that is out of control.”
* * *
BBC reports:
Total's Elgin platform in 2009. An exclusion zone has been placed around the platform in the North Sea following a gas leak which forced it to be evacuated, coastguards said on Tuesday. (AFP)
Jake Molloy, of the RMT union which represents offshore workers, was asked if the incident was the most serious in the North Sea since the 1988 Piper Alpha oil platform tragedy which saw 167 men die.
He told BBC Scotland: "Fortunately we have dealt with the human side of it, but the potential exists for catastrophic devastation.
"If it somehow finds an ignition source we could be looking at complete destruction." [...]
Dr Simon Boxall, an oceanographer at Southampton University, told BBC Scotland that this was not a deepwater drilling rig and platform but it was unusual in that they were drilling down 5km (3.1 miles) into the sea bed.
He said: "It is a very deep well. The gas they are bringing up is what we call sour gas.
"That gas has a high proportion of hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide and that makes it very flammable and quite poisonous.
"So the big problem they have got is dealing with a very combustible gas - unlike Deepwater Horizon where we were dealing with crude oil which ironically is very difficult to light sometimes."
* * *
Bellona, an international environmental NGO based in Norway reports:
Total Gas Leak in North Sea Out of Control for Foreseeable Future
As the news started to pour into the Bellona offices on Monday night, the information became more and more alarming.
“The information we have right now indicates that it will be very challenging to prevent a blowout. This is a critical situation that is out of control,” Hauge said.
Jake Molloy, the head of the section of the UK union that represents offshore oil and gas workers, agreed telling Reuters that A separate relief well may need to be drilled to ease pressure and allow emergency teams to regain entry to the rig and try to fix the problem.
"The well in question had caused Total some problems for some considerable time ... a decision was taken weeks ago to try to kill the well, but then an incident began to develop over the weekend," said Malloy.
"Engineers have told me that it is almost certain that gas is leaking directly from the reservoir through the pipe casing," he said – something Hauge had pointed out might be the case early Monday morning.
So far, three oil platforms – the Elgin, Shell’s Shearwater and nearby Rowan Viking drilling rig have evacuated a total of 323 workers – 238 from Elgin alone.
Extreme reservoirsThe Elgin/Franklin reservoirs are located off the coast of Aberdeen, Scotland in an area of high petroleum activity. The fields are linked. The area contains a large field with wells up to 6000 meters deep and that hold extreme pressure and temperature.
During the drilling of Elgin/Franklin in 2003, world records for pressure and temperature were broken as engineers found reservoir pressures between 600 and 1100 bar and temperatures reaching 200 degree Celsius. By comparison, the Deepwater Horizon blowout occurred at 896 bar. The field on which the platform is located was discovered in 1991.
Bellona has learned that there have been incidents at the well that have veered dangerously close to accidents, including a serious incident in 2005. Other grave safety shortcomings have also been revealed in this field.
Total was, in fact, considering killing the well when the problems began over the weekend.
“The well in question had caused Total some problems for some considerable time [...] a decision was taken weeks ago to try to kill the well, but then an incident began to develop,” Malloy was quoted by the BBC as saying.
Elgin identified as a problem wellAccording to Hauge, the Elgin/Franklin is “the well from hell.”
The incident leading up to the bubbling disaster started early on Sunday morning at Elgin platform when workers discovered a well control problem.
They noted a blue sheen on the water’s surface and bubbles from boiling water beneath the platform. The leak was already so large Sunday by 12:15 that 219 non-critical personnel were evacuated to Aberdeen, leaving a skeleton crew of 19 aboard the platform.
Crews from Elgin, other platforms evacuatedThose left behind tried to gain control of the leak. Over 114 hours, they attempted to jam the well with drilling mud with no success. At 6:14 am, they abandoned their attempts and were evacuated, which raises the chances of a major blowout significantly.
After the evacuation, a no-fly zone of three nautical miles around the well was established. Coastguards said shipping was also being ordered to keep at least two nautical miles away.
During the evening on Monday the gas cloud is became so large that workers aboard Shell’s Shearwater platform 6 kilometers away reported they could smell it.
Shell also evacuated 52 of the 90 workers aboard Shearwater platform, leaving 38 onboard. Thirty three of these have now been evacuated to the nearby Noble Hans Deul platform
Petroleum company Total E & P United Kingdom (TEP United Kingdom) operates the Elgin/Franklin platform and Rowan Viking rig, which was connected to Elgin. Total E & P told Bellona that both the platform and the rig are intact and confirmed that all crew have been evacuated to the mainland.
Impossible to stopIn Bellona's analysis, the discharge at the Elgin field is going to be very difficult to stop. When the gas escapes it becomes impossible to get back on board the platform to deal with it. Gas in the water affects the buoyancy of possible rescue rigs, and the water is flammable. [...]
When gas and condensate coming from such great depths as great as 5000 meters at high pressures rise, they will expand exponentially on their way to the surface. Sand and debris will dig holes in metal near the bore hole. If the gas is moving outside of the well, it will dig further and further into the bore’s rise.
Problematic relief wellsBellona believes that when a platform is evacuated, the only remaining measure to bring the situation under control is drilling a relief well – as was done at Deepwater Horizon.
But Bellona fears this may difficult if not impossible. Such a well must be drilled very deep depending on how deep the leak in the Elgin well is. To dig the relief well, workers must somehow drill in under the leak and put in a new plug. Doing this depends on using highly advanced platforms in a nearly surgical procedure that can take months.
High gas concentrations in the area along with the fact that gas is in the air as far as 6 kilometers away is telling as it shows how far from any platform a relief well must be drilled to avoid aerial gas pollution.
But with buoyancy and flammability issues to consider, any rig drilling a relief well would have to do it from a great distance. To get a rig any closer than 10 kilometers, said Hauge, rescue workers would have to set the gas in the sea on fire.
But if there are platforms available to drill from such distance and this deep, the question that remains is will they do it? This, thinks Bellona, will be very difficult to arrange. Platforms of this nature would first have to be released from their current contracts, which will take time as such highly specialized rigs are used for drilling other complex wells. Drilling for the relief well alone could then take as long as three months if not far longer.
So task number one at the moment, says Bellona, is to immediately secure a drilling platform that is capable of drilling the relief well. If such equipment is available, it must immediately be requisitioned.
If drilling a relief well is not possible, the only solution is the worst-case scenario of letting the reservoir blow out until all of its pressure is tamped down. As the quantity of gas in the reservoir is unknown, fears that large amounts remain are founded. This gas would then be released into the water and air for a long time to come.
Environmental impact
The environmental consequences of this accident could be substantial. Having large amounts of hydrocarbons in water and on the surface is not desirable. It will not look like an oil spill, but the hydrocarbons released will have many of the same dramatic effects. Bacteria, for instance, ingest hydrocarbons and hence consume enormous amounts of oxygen in the water. Condensate blue sheen on the surface of the water will destroy the plumage of sea foul.
Should the situation develop to the point where all the gas from the reservoir is released, it will lead to major emissions of greenhouse gasses: When unburned natural gas enters the atmosphere, its detrimental effect on the atmosphere is 20 times worse than CO2.
Difficult choices ahead
The coming days will lead to difficult choices as Total struggles to bring the lead under control. If the worst case scenario does indeed occur, it must be considered whether setting fire to the spill is not the best course of action. This too will have environmental consequences, putting Total and the government between the devil and the deep blue sea.
The Elgin/Franklin accident bears similarities to the Deepwater Horizon blowout, the only real difference being that Elgin is pumping gas condensate and not crude oil into the sea. The Rowan Viking rig is a brand new platform launched in 2010 and considered – like the Deepwater Horizon rig – to be state of the art for the drilling industry.
Rough conditions in the North SeaThe drilling was taking place under difficult conditions, with extreme pressure, high temperatures and great depths of the reservoir. Drilling in such circumstances involves enormous gambles: In situations like this, there are no ready-made solutions for dealing with the worst-case scenario, as Deepwater Horizon showed.
# # #
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



109 Comments so far
Show All--And that's the real story about all natural gas production. It inevitably has massive air leaks of methane, and then it kills planets dead.
"The drilling was taking place under difficult conditions, with extreme pressure, high temperatures and great depths of the reservoir. Drilling in such circumstances involves enormous gambles: "
They'll have to create the fix on the fly in the middle of an ongoing Emergency.
It's Pure Insanity - but hey it's worth Any Price for another nickle of profit and another vacation home - or mistress.
Let's see, "further catastrophe" . . . ?
We have a flammable toxic gas dispersed over what has been identified as a six mile spread, growing at a rate as yet not described. The plume probably is shaped about like a plume of smoke from a campfire on a windy day, plus about 5.99 & change miles or so. Since it has to disperse gradually, we do not know at what concentration it is considered to have dispersed: the extent of the area contaminated has to be far larger.
Aircraft cannot get close to it. That must go for other mechanized transport. The company that created it has little to gain from futzing with it. I suspect that one wants to row up to six miles of poison gas or be worried about setting of a spark dragging an oar across an iron fitting.
So this will likely continue to leak more or less until pressure equalizes.
CD staff likely reports this as completely and as harshly as whatever information they have access to might indicate. However, there have to be some limits to this information at this point because the leak is at sea and the persons involved with it mostly industry and government people. Companies, company agents, and people with careers or stock or other stakes around the hydrocarbon industries will adhere to the most benign story that can be defended in the aftermath as not having been intentionally or criminally misleading. Those (like me) without considerable knowledge of the technical, chemical, geographic, and other particulars are left in the position of either speculating, with considerable chance of error, or accepting an industry-gov't fairy story.
So, what can a non-expert know at this point? By observing the social circumstances, we can reasonably assume that the leak is worse than described, that its spread is greater, that its chance of resolution less than what is presented.
Sadly, all this remains way too vague for action.
Does anybody know
--- at what levels of concentration this stuff is flammable?
--- ditto for toxic?
--- what are symptoms of exposure?
--- what parts of this gas will float in air?
--- will said parts float indefinitely?
--- to what atmospheric levels will these tend to reside?
--- will some, all, or any come down with precipitation at different points in its dispersal?
--- how much gas is in the reservoir that is leaking?
--- which way does the wind generally blow, and how consistently?
--- what and most particularly who is downwind?
By answering these questions (and surely something that I have missed), people outside of the company and government have some chance of forming some conception of the distribution of more immediate and direct damage. This is necessary to know whether people have to evacuate immediately or to avoid using contaminated products over some space of time.
We need to regulate the utility companies to buy all the power that home owners create with their solar panels and send onto the grid. As it is now, the excess electricity the home owner creates is given free to the utility to sell to other customers. In Germany and Japan, who as nations have the goal to be the first nation to go totally solar, there are regulations that demand the utilities pay the homeowner for the power generated by their solar panels. With this incentive everyone is putting up solar panels.
The United States must join in the race to be the first nation that has shut down all their nuclear power plants, reduced the burning of fossil fuels and done their best to stop and reverse global warming. Go solar and we breath better air, we don't worry about radiation making us sick (or dead) and we make some money. The price of solar panels is going down and we can get a check each month to pay our mortgages, and go shopping!
I could suggest you contact your elected Representative with this idea but as we know they are working for the big corporations. How much do you think big coal and gas and oil give the scum in Congress? Maybe you should take this idea to the General Assembly of your nearby Occupy group.
Wikipedia gives the average depth of the North Sea as 95 meters, so there is another substantial difference between this well and the Deepwater Horizon - the depth of water below the rig. If memory serves, the Deepwater well was in approximately 5000 meters of water.
I think a key point here is that while any one operation in a complex world may be relatively safe, when you have thousands of complex operations ongoing, the chances for a mistake, somewhere, at some time, approach certainty.
The mad rush for hydrocarbons to replace the declining 'big elephants', such as shale-oil fracking, Arctic Ocean drilling and Alberta Tar Sands development - are inevitably going to produce massive failures for us to deal with.
It would be much better to cut back usage first and then to develop non-nuclear non-fossil fuel alternatives. Japan is getting by having shut down 53 of it 54 nuclear plants, and Germany appears to be following the saner path right now.
Why aren't we in North America doing the same?
Manysummits
========Let me offer one small editorial change on that line. Change 'unable' to 'unwilling'. That would be far closer to the truth. Our rampant pseudo-culture has grown accustomed to an unprecedented level of common luxury, and as a consequence, many are simply incapable of conceiving of any other way of living their lives. The propaganda has been that effective.
the Jack London tale of the men 'wintered in' a remote cabin starving to death while surrounded by edibles...
none of it fit into their concept of edible, so they didn't eat it, and died...one at a time...none of them ever crossed that mental boundary...
this work still plays to the point, however, of man's unwillingness to change leading to his downfall...
it is an excellent short story, as are all of his (Jack London is a master of this form)...
Call Of The Wild, and White Fang, of course, are his deservedly notable novels, but if you really want a deep plunge into the ocean of the human psyche, read The Sea Wolf...
Cargo-cult techno-fetishism aside, you cant operate a modern technologically dependent society on an 'alternative' energy source that only meets a limited fraction of the total energy demand.
Glenn, I'm disappointed you still think you can run a technologically complex (and therefore failure prone) system on good intentions and promises that are still 30-50 years away, even after 30-50 years worth of development.
Technology has reach a functional plateau, and will so encounter a sharp downturn due to resource depletion coupled with increasing consumer demand driven by human overpopulation.
Yes, SOME countries are implementing what amounts to a late stage LIMITED response to a problem that was already dire thirty years ago. If the entire world swallowed you magical pill, the resources needed to implement it would be wiped out in less than a year, leaving the world with nothing.
There is nothing intermittent except your grasp on reality- you have reached a functional plateau. No one is disappointed in you, no one has any hope that you are going to help out. Take your malthusian based defeatism somewhere it will do some good, like your parents house.
Exactly. Every DAY. No sunlight, no power. Unless you have resource-intensive battery banks. QED.
"... what planet are you living on?"
One with a rapidly dwindling resource base and an out of control overpopulation problem for the human species.
I'm not a 'malthusian'. I just happen to have done the research that many others have done and reached the same conclusion they have. Technology has not substantively changed since the 1950's. Yes, products are smaller, lighter, faster... but they are still the same fundamental machine, often of a higher degree of complexity, which in turn means a higher probability of catastrophic failure.
'Technology' has become the buzz-word of a fantasist cargo-cult that refuses to take responsibility for their own actions and addiction to petroleum byproducts and the machine obsessed pseudo-culture dependent on them.
Who was the individual who recognized and popularized the way to analyze and quantify that displacement? What was the quality of being in observation that permitted the emergence of that knowledge?
The extent of resource that is invested in these two different paradigms/ways of being remains "externalized" for all intents and purposes. We have long been in the time frame of 'diminishing returns', the equation that serves 'bottom line' analysis of profitability. It is and has been always defrauded of reality, by its very own terms. The profit construct has always veiled the extent to which it depends on hiding/denying the true costs. Historically when people have awakened to the fact that it has exhausted its chosen framing of obfuscation, it has rolled up its sleeves and taken to force. Now it is exhausting the paradigm itself.
All over the world people are working to pull the heavy foot of this abominable fraud off the acceleration pedal. We are not permitted the creative process of picking and choosing the aspects of technology that work and ceasing from engaging the strangling aspects that don't work. Why? Because of the systemic dependency on the vast externalized aggressions and failings behind the imposed veil.
The mass die-offs that result from this will trigger further whales, porpoises, flora and fauna. No scientific model adequately envisions the scope and thread of interconnection to the closing of a billion car doors and the revving of an engine to go to work, with accelerator pedal well depressed. Because the 'life support system' has been externalized.
you have such grasp of reality a masterful way with words. perhaps could help me in my effort to come up with a pithy definition of civilization?
Petroleum is the feedstock for more than ten thousand items, from aspirin to asphalt.
Aspirin, and almost every other pharmaceutical is now synthesized from... you guessed it, PETROLEUM!
hard to argue...
wish it weren't...
still game to try?
we could all jump out of modern life, together, on September 22, 2012...
don't know what else to suggest...
the idea would be to withdraw from the propertied world, negating all contract and obligation...to quit the industrial revolution...
consensus is critical, as individual attempts would certainly fail...
this would not be a 'strike', with a plan to return to business as usual once certain issues are renegotiated...
this would be the end of the devastation, and a beginning of the cleanup...
the date I suggest is September 22, 2012, which I chose several years ago, as it seemed not too distant...it seems ever closer, of course, now...
I cannot offer much in the way of specific suggestion, as each person will find they will need to work with those around them to decide how things are going to go...
my primary point is environmental, at heart, but that word has lost effectiveness...
as I watch my planet die from human industry, the simple question becomes: do I have no other choice but to watch my planet die, even, as a worker, by my own complicit hand? Is my only alternative suicide?
I believe we do have choices, but that those choices are being eliminated by the actual destruction of the living world, and the rise of technologies that can put the whole planet into lockdown...
I am aware that any hopes for present action, or future world, are frail, at best...
as a performing musician, I am also intimately familiar with aural feedback...
one of the interesting characteristics of such is it can start out so quiet as to be almost not really there, yet rise, rapidly, to be so earpiercing as to drive one from the room...
methane is increasing in our atmosphere...quietly, now, perhaps, but...
I cannot give up, yet, though...
we might, still, deny those who would hold us hostage to their economy and their industry...
the drones are not yet airborne, nor are all our waters yet ruined...
these things, however, will come to pass...if nothing is done to prevent...
are people willing to sacrifice, even fight, to prevent global oppression and death?
I am, still, hopeful...
my own sanity requires I maintain some plan for betterment, no matter how poorly received by the general populace, nor how remote the resulting chance, just because betterment, or the possibility, sort of seems to be the whole point, to me...
sad to hope that devastation might occur to just the point of desperate motivation, and not agonizing geocide, leaving a door open to wiser ways...
even sadder to know that, no matter what one debates, the enemy is actively building and networking drones...among all of the other horrors...
thanks for understanding...I argue for the living world, as no other makes sense...
HOLY SHIT!
Think of the resulting fireball. Whoever or whatever they use to ignite this would be wiped out in the ensuing conflagration. And then you have to deal with the resulting burn-off residue drifting downwind...
The Corporation responsible for this disaster doesn't need to be fined. It needs to be wiped off the stock market, it's assets stripped and shared equally to everyone affected by this event, and it's Corporate officers, directors, and investors thrown into prison until such time as they can be humanely executed.
Sociopaths run the world. We're screwed basically.
They create these monsters of production with No Idea of how to fix an emergency -
And why should they when the government will pick up the tab - while the rich predators keep the $.
The guillotine needs to be reintroduced as a punishment tool for these predators.
Too bad they get to pick and choose our leaders - with No Hope that a decent one can be elected.
The history of the world is great civilizations rise up, destroy their nearby environment and then disappear under the sands of time - we now live in a world wide civilization so when we follow history to it's logical destruction of society it will be - in all likelyhood An Extinctin Event.
But hey the Taliban and al queda are lurking under your bed!