Thousands of US Weapons Astray in Afghanistan: Auditors
WASHINGTON - Thousands of US weapons, including assault rifles and grenade launchers, may be in Taliban or Al-Qaeda hands in Afghanistan because of lax controls, congressional auditors warned on Thursday.
The Pentagon has failed to track an estimated 87,000 weapons given to Afghan security forces, one-third of the 242,000 shipped by the US government between December 2004 and June 2008, the Government Accountability Office said.
A 46-page report by the GAO, the non-partisan investigative arm of Congress, said there had been no monitoring of a further 135,000 weapons donated by NATO allies to the poorly paid and corruption-rife Afghan army and police.
Defense Department spokesman Bryan Whitman said the Pentagon had already taken action on the report's recommendations for tracking of serial numbers and physical inventories of weapons given by both the United States and allies.
"We take our responsibility with regard to accountability of weapons seriously," he told reporters. "I think the record will show that our performance on this has improved over time for any number of reasons."
Under-staffed US military officials neglected to record serial numbers or conduct on-site inventories once the weapons were delivered, the report said.
"Given the unstable security conditions in Afghanistan, the risk of loss and theft of these weapons is significant," said the evaluation, which was submitted to a House of Representatives hearing Thursday.
Asked if US weapons could already be under Taliban or Al-Qaeda control, GAO international affairs director Charles Johnson cited military reports about "the theft of weapons and weapons potentially being sold to enemies."
The chairman of the House subcommittee on national security and foreign affairs, John Tierney, said he would not want to explain to a grieving parent "why their son and daughter died at the hands of an Afghan insurgent using weaponry we provided."
"That's what we risk if we were to have tens of thousands of weapons we provided washing around Afghanistan, off the books," the Democrat said at the hearing.
The report mirrored GAO findings in August 2007 that the Pentagon had lost track of nearly 200,000 weapons given to security forces in Iraq.
Having toured Afghanistan last August, GAO inspectors wrote: "Lapses in accountability occurred throughout the supply chain.
"This was primarily due to a lack of clear direction from Defense and staffing shortages."
Lack of manpower has long worried US commanders in Afghanistan. President Barack Obama is expected shortly to decide on a request from General David McKiernan for up to 30,000 extra troops to combat the resurgent Taliban.
Aside from M-16 rifles, machine guns, grenade launchers and mortars, the GAO report found inadequate oversight of 2,410 night-vision goggles issued to the Afghan National Army.
The Pentagon waited 15 months, until October 2008, before it started monitoring the end use of the high-tech devices, which give a crucial edge on the nocturnal battlefield, and 10 remained unaccounted for.
The GAO said that at the Afghan end, corruption and illiteracy were major impediments to keeping track of the weapons.
Security was often risible, with just a wooden door and a miniature padlock guarding an arms room in one northern Afghan police station visited by the GAO inspectors.
At the Afghan army's central weapons depot in Kabul, the team found "guards sleeping on duty and missing from their posts." A subsequent audit by the US military found 47 pistols had been stolen from the depot.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
30 Comments so far
Show AllJames A. Swanson, Los Altos, CA
“The Bush League of Nations”
www.bushleagueofnations.com [for FREE download of entire $25.95 book]
Thousands of U.S. weapons astray in Afghanistan? Is anyone in the entire world surprised?
My views on Bush regime incompetence and fraud in Afghanistan and Iraq, and much more, can be found in "The Bush League of Nations: The Coalition of the Unwilling, the Bullied and the Bribed – the GOP’s War on Iraq and America," by James A. Swanson (2008, published by CreateSpace Publishing, 448 pages).
You can now download the entire book for free at www.bushleagueofnations.com.
I ask for nothing in return, except that you consider using it as a resource to help restore and build America.
Jim Swanson, Los Altos, CA
“The Bush League of Nations”
www.bushleagueofnations.com [for FREE download of entire $25.95 book]
The Rothschilds have been war profiteers for centuries. They understand that to keep the war prolonged, you need to make sure both sides can fight to some extent. Looks like the Pentagon has learned this lesson from them.
Aloha, salud, lechiem,
- Tobias
http://www.youtube.com/user/tobiasaurusrex
Money changes ethics. Until we change the way money works, we change nothing.
Tom Edgar
Now I can't remember the exact tonnage but it was considerable. This particular item was railroad tracks. The country Vietnam. Remember that place? Yes those lines went amissing. Seems they were flogged off to the Viet Cong before they had barely settled on to the wharf.
Well I guess it was fair seeing how the Americans had bombed out the original tracks.
So nothing new in this lot either. Money matters most of all.
During WW2. Antwerp wasn't bombed. Well much of the city's real estate, especially around the docks was owned by the English aristocracy. So don't damage your own.
You would think those assholes in Congress would do something about this, but it's not their people getting killed. Wake up and vote these scum bags out.
if you have had such an option, you wouldn't have to deal with them in the first place :)
edweg
Time to start bringing charges of treason!
in the endgame
every human has a gun
but there is no food
every human has a website
but there is no water
all are armored
none safe
we can watch each other starve in high definition
and a million rhoombas will suck up our bones
Apt poetry, Maplefudge. I just saw a bit of the movie "Brazil" on TV. It is better than ever, or should I say that history has caught up with it since 1985.
Joe
Well said, maple fudge, albeit pessimistic.
the right to share arms!
The American government has always maintained the right of its citizens to ship arms to belligerents. President Washington, through his Secretary of State, Thomas Jefferson, and his Secretary of the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton, took this position when France protested against the sale of arms to England in 1793, the answer being that "the exporting from the United States of warlike instruments and military stores is not to be interfered with." - Theodore Roosevelt's "Fear God..."p.160
Gun runners from the getgo!
Ugh.
glenn ford is right. It's seldom been about defense at all... It's been about FINANCE.
Hey, if the U.S. arms their enemy, then war can go on and on and those arms manufacturers, well, they'll be in seventh heaven!
We humans, led by the U.S., are headed towards a fiery end. Only NEO-HUMANS can save us. WTF are neo-humans you ask?
They are humans like you and me but they have minds that actually think in a rational way. They are humans who want peace, who want equality, who are sick of greed and materialism and the law of the jungle.
If you want to know more check out:
www.dangerouscreation.com
One thing I noticed in other postings is that people do not understand that the Taliban have no need for Al Qaeda. Two different organisations. The USA invasion has pushed them more together as an alliance of convience. The same with the Pushtun population in general the USA invasion only increases the support for a group that can effectively resist the occupiers.
If we support the known moderate Taliban we can diplomatically squeeze Al Qaeda out; they really do not mix well with Pushtuns.We have no qualms about dealing with the Saudi's who treat women just as bad if not worse than Taliban. If the USA cared about women it would not make so many widows and orphans around the world.
If we really wanted to block terrorism we would stop destabilizing countries, Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Palestine, Pakistan, and Iran.
Our predator attacks are destablizing a nuclear armed democracy.
taliban is not making us zombie, but afgan people
Deepa
This reminds me of "the US weapons lost in Iraq". According to the Guardian (August 7, 2007): "The US has lost track of about 190,000 weapons issued to Iraqi security forces since the 2003 invasion, some of which will have ended up in the hands of insurgents, according to an official report published in Washington. Among the missing items are AK-47 rifles, pistols, body armour and helmets."
· 110,000 AK-47s
· 80,000 pistols
· 135,000 bits of armour
Does it highlight a pattern or euphemism for the US supplying weapons to its terrorist organisations in Pakistan and Afghanistan to conduct terrorist operations inside Iran?
Actually I was thinking it highlights a pattern of arming your enemy so you have someone to shoot at. Otherwise it's just another fish in a barrel war crime, like Gaza.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.", Albert Einstein.
Ed note: white phosphorous, dense metal super weapons, nuclear stick-up, missile defense, bailouts and propaganda!!
>>This reminds me of "the US weapons lost in Iraq". According to the Guardian (August 7, 2007): "The US has lost track of about 190,000 weapons issued to Iraqi security forces since the 2003 invasion, some of which will have ended up in the hands of insurgents, according to an official report published in Washington. Among the missing items are AK-47 rifles, pistols, body armour and helmets
To add to this, all the while US weapons were getting into the hands of the insurgents the US administration and its Military were claiming that Iran was arming the same....Classic tactics.
The US Government and Its Military can never be trsuted to tell the TRUTH. It does not matter who in charge. They will lie to their electorate and they will lie to their Allies.
Those "allies" Canada included , should recognize the same and if they do not and persist in cooperating with the Government of the United States, they too become part of the lie.
There are some here that question why I am so againt the Government of the United States of America.
It for that reason. They LIE to allies in order to get those allies to participate in their crimes.
This is unforgivable.
I've read this sort of report before. It was back in the late eighties and I was writing a history report of the Soviet Occupation of Afghanistan. Exact same shit happened then. La plus que ca change, le plus que c'est le meme chose.
Yep!
Read your Kipling. One of the greatest problems was the "wily Pathan" who would creep into any camp and steal rifles. They probably did the same thing, stealing swords, spears and shields out of Alexander's camps.
They've always been very good at it.
The biggest impediment to keeping track or just keeping the arms is Afghan Patriotism. Pushtunstan for Pushtuns!!!!!!!!
Who here remembers the multiple TONS of plastic explosive that wandered off from a US munitions bunker locked with a common padlock in Iraq?
Any bets how much of that wound up providing the punch for the wave of IED's that ravaged US forces?
Now you have the latest US assault guns and grenade launchers loose in the hands of local militias who want nothing better than to drive the US/NATO occupiers out.
Kipling said it best:
'When you're wounded and left on Afghanistan's plains,
And the women come out to cut up what remains,
Just roll to yer rifle, and blow out yer brains,
And go to your God like a soldier.'
Walk in peace.
Galenwainwright
Yep!
What I remember is an Iraqi warehouse with the highest tech available plastiques not locked or guard being emptied before the USA thought to guard it.
It is all about selling arms. The arms manufacturers do not care who they kill even if it is an unemployed USA citizen.
"The GAO report said that at the Afghan end, corruption and illiteracy were major impediments to keeping track of the weapons."
And at the American end in my opinion, corruption and stupidity are the major impediments, rather than "lack of clear direction from Defense and staffing shortages" as the GAO euphemistically concludes.
Bill from Saginaw
Yep!
why do they have to be in the hands of the taliban or al queda??? why can't they be with the local shopkeeper or someone????? fear, fear, fear................
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of
patriots and tyrants. ....Thomas Jefferson
So, what else is new?