Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Students Are Revolting: The Spirit of '68 Is Reawakening
Campus sit-ins began as a response to the Gaza attacks, but unrest is already spilling over to other issues.
They are the iPod generation of students: politically apathetic, absorbed by selfish consumerism, dedicated to a few years of hedonism before they land a lucrative job in the City. Not any more. A seismic change is taking place in British universities.
Oxford students demand the university condemns Israel's attack on Gaza Around the UK, thousands of students have occupied lecture theaters, offices and other buildings at more than 20 universities in sit-down protests. It seems that the spirit of 1968 has returned to the campus.
While it was the situation in Gaza that triggered this mass protest, the beginnings of political enthusiasm have already spread to other issues.
John Rose, one of the original London School of Economics (LSE) students to mount the barricades alongside Tariq Ali in 1968, spent last week giving lectures on the situation in Gaza at 12 of the occupations.
"This is something different to anything we've seen for a long time," he said. "There is genuine fury at what Israel did.
"I think it's highly likely that this year will see more student action. What's interesting is the nervousness of vice chancellors and their willingness to concede demands; it indicates this is something that could well turn into [another] '68."
Beginning with a 24-hour occupation at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) on 13 January, the sit-ins spread across the country. Now occupations have been held at the LSE, Essex, King's College London, Birmingham, Sussex, Warwick, Manchester Metropolitan, Oxford, Leeds, Cambridge, Sheffield Hallam, Bradford, Nottingham, Queen Mary, Manchester, Strathclyde, Newcastle, Kingston, Goldsmiths and Glasgow.
Among the demands of students are disinvestment in the arms trade; the promise to provide scholarships for Palestinian students; a pledge to send books and unused computers to Palestine; and to condemn Israeli attacks on Gaza.
Technology has set these actions apart from those of previous generations, allowing a national momentum to grow with incredible speed. Through the linking up of internet blogs, news of successes spread quickly and protests grew nationwide.
Just three weeks after the first sit-in at SOAS, students gathered yesterday at Birkbeck College to draw up a national strategy. The meeting featured speeches from leaders in the Stop the War movement, such as Tony Benn, George Galloway MP and Jeremy Corbyn MP. There has also been an Early Day Motion tabled in Parliament in support of campus activism.
At the end of the month students from across the country will gather for a national demonstration calling for the abolition of tuition fees, an event that organizers say has rocketed in size following the success of the occupations over Gaza.
Vice chancellors and principals have been brought to the negotiating table and - in the majority of universities - bowed to at least one of the demands. The students' success means that now there is a new round of protests. On Wednesday two new occupations began at Strathclyde and Manchester universities, and on Friday night students at the University of Glasgow also launched a sit-in.
Emily Dreyfus, a 21-year-old political activist in her third year of reading classics at Oxford, was one of around 80 students to occupy the historic Bodleian library building in the city and demand that the university issue a statement condemning the Gaza attacks and disinvest from the arms trade. She said: "I found Oxford politically very dead when I arrived, but it's completely different now. There seem to be more and more people talking about politics, which is so exciting. It's really been aided by the communication tools we've got, things like Facebook."
Wes Streeting, the president of the National Union of Students, said: "What we've seen over the Gaza issue is a resurgence of a particular type of protest: the occupation. It's a long time since we've seen student occupations on such a scale. It's about time we got the student movement going again and had an impact."
Establishments that have not previously been known for their activism have also become involved. Fran Legg was one of several students to set up the first Stop the War Coalition at Queen Mary, a research-focused university in London, a month ago. Now they are inundated with interest.
"Action on this scale among students hasn't been seen since the Sixties and Seventies," she said.
"This is going to go down in history as a new round of student mobilization and it will set a precedent. Gaza is the main issue at the moment, but we're looking beyond the occupation; we're viewing it as a springboard for other protests and to set up a committee to make sure the university only invests ethically."
As the first generation of students to pay substantial direct fees to universities, their negotiating power has also been strengthened. Their concern over their college's investments have been given new legitimacy because it is partly their money.
Ms Legg said: "For the first time, you've got students getting principals to the negotiation table, saying they don't want their tuition fees funding war. Everybody wants to know where their money is going."
The activist: 'Students will see they can take action'
Katan Alder, 22, student leader speaking from the occupation at Manchester University
"We've been occupying the university since Wednesday. More than 500 people came to an emergency Students' Union meeting and we took the vice chancellor's administration block that afternoon. Israel's assault on Gaza made people angry, and we heard about the occupations at other universities through blogs. This is the biggest student campaign we've had and it's also the most wide-reaching. We'll stay until the university lets us meet with the vice chancellor. I think students will see they can take action on more issues, such as the war in Iraq and Afghanistan and the education system; the Government's refusal to stop the marketization of education has provoked a lot of anger."
The '68 veteran: 'It changed our lives'
John Rose, 63, former student organiser at the London School of Economics in 1968; now a lecturer and author on the Middle East
"I arrived at the LSE in '66 as an extremely naive liberal student and I left in '69 as a revolutionary socialist. It changed our lives. I was one of the student organizers with Tariq Ali and attended all the demonstrations and occupations. We did think a revolution was coming; we thought mass action of students might overthrow capitalism and bring genuine equality. It took us some time to realize that wasn't going to happen.
"It wasn't just about rioting and having fun, it was political argument that probed all the assumptions about the world. It was a highly intense period and the memory stays powerfully with anyone involved; it's the memory of those times that has kept me going.
"It was a feeling of fantastic elation: we began to realize that mass action could change things. Once it started, we developed a taste for it and began to consider mass activity as a way of doing politics, which is what's happening now. People are fed up with bankers, politicians and elite institutions. Hundreds of us thought the revolution was coming in '69, but maybe the revolution is coming now."
- Posted in



107 Comments so far
Show AllAllow me to be the first to say "Hell yeah!"
Tune in, Turn on, Drop out.
This is about the U.K. not the U.S.A. American students don't give a shit.
You said it.
I live near that (not so) hot bed of left-coast "liberalism" Berkeley.
About the only thing that would get those students riled up enough to stage a sit-in would be if AT&T decided to charge them extra (above what they already do charge) for the their iPhone data plan.
"Gaza?...Oh yeah, that restaurant has excellent sushi."
Bravo to the U.K. Please do what you can to try and wake up those wallowing in ignorance and denial over here.
I disagree, hoytdouglas. 20-somethings I've talked to are nothing like their collegiate predecessors from the Me Generation, but their revolution, so far, is more quiet than the Brits. They tell me '60s-style coffee houses with protest music are making a comeback on college campuses; students are speaking up, challenging their conservative professors; college conservative clubs are declining in membership and ridiculed; there are always large demonstrations against neocon twits such as David Horowitz and Ann Coulter whenever they appear to make speeches; and many of these college kids think other things are just as important as possessions and money; and they came out in force to get Obama and other progressive candidates elected. And let's not forget the 2.5 million who showed up in Washington, a majority of them under 30, for the inauguration of the new president. Perhaps public sit-ins and the like are next, but I definitely think the '60s are coming back -- with a vengeance. However, they're returning with a new twist; I saw a young guy wearing a t-shirt with a peace sign and the legend, "I'm a pacifist, you wanna make something out of that?"
I'm 47 and haven't become moderate/conservative.
I don't believe it has that much to do with taxes, unless as you become older you simply turn more selfish/greedy.
Among other reasons, I think it's more or less a natural outcome of having more at risk of losing than when younger, and less time to make up for it. I think people become more cautious as time goes by, since they've seen more of what life can do to them and others, and have learned that there might not be as much they can do to effect a real change as they once thought. The world can wear you down and make you back off.
Don't worry about massive change from within the economy. Worry about massive change from the environment upon which our economy has gluttonously feasted for so long. That which our economy--and our "good lives"--have externalized from the economy is about to give us a solid lesson in economics.
Well see, that's where I'm different. If a greater change would improve things substantially, and not just for myself but for others, I'm all for it even if it might uproot some things I've grown comfortable with. It's not good to get too complacent, IMO.
FastEddie75 -
Thanks for the book title. I'll see if I can find it. :^ )
Sorry to butt in...But the fact that you happen to have a decent life is no reason to fail to understand that change is very necessary, precisely because far too many in this nation are less fortunate than are you. I wonder if you understand fully how close many of us are to disaster, yourself included. Most are a couple of missing paychecks or a health care disaster from ruin. Even those fairly comfortable, as am I, understand that absorbing a couple of hundred thousand in cancer treatments because my health care is a sham and a fraud may later in a serious fashion my own comfortable life.
But the real reason to work for change is because you are supposed to have a conscience.
"Most people would sooner die than think, in fact they do so." Bertrand Russell
nwfisher February 12th, 2009 4:32 pm: "I'm invested in the system. I have a good life and make a good living under the current system. Tweaking, incremental change, ok, I'm game. Massive change, fight it to the death."
You're invested in an economic system that is rapidly falling into a bottomless black hole. The time for 'tweaking' and 'incremental change' has passed. Right now you may have a good life and earn a good living, but I wouldn't count on that in the future unless some major changes take place. The notion of 'corporate capitalism' as practiced in this country since the end of the 19th century has shown that it doesn't work -- neither for the country nor even for the investors it is supposed to serve. Go ahead and fight massive change and in a few years you'll be lucky if you can sleep in your car. I know, you're smug and don't think this can happen to you but, believe me, things are much worse than the mainstream media are making them out to be. We are in a deep depression right now heading to the worst world economic collapse in recorded history and no one will be spared from the effects.
You might be interested in a book called DISCIPLINED MINDS: A CRITICAL LOOK AT SALARIED PROFESSIONALS AND THE SOUL-BATTERING SYSTEM THAT SHAPES THEIR LIVES, by Jeff Schmidt. Howard Zinn endorsed it thusly: "I have been waiting a long time for someone to write this book..."
P.S. I should also point out, though, that the unfortunate article title reminded me of that old joke where the king's closest advisor goes up to him and says in exasperation, "Sir, the peasants are revolting!"
And the king replies, "They certainly are. Isn't there something we can do about the smell?"
Wow! Goose pimples it takes me back to Berkeley 68'. Thank you younger folks for taking the lead towards peace in Gaza and the world.
The US students need to get real world news before that takes place in the US. The infotainment "news" is a disservice to all Americans.
However, John Stewart, for all his self-deprecating humor, is one of the heroes of our times for getting some of the truth out to the younger generation.
This article gives me a tinge of hope. Perhaps it's the beginning of a French-type Revolution again?
Perhaps the Universities are beginning to function again, beginning to churn out people who can think, who question the status quo?
I don't want to get too excited but...
Build the Barricades quick before the Robber Barons engineer another Boom!
www.dangerouscreation.com
The coming insurrection against the machine?
About time.
Now waiting for the sequel:
About time 2 !
The problem with this "movement" is that we are always preaching to the choir. Maybe it would be a good idea to go enmass to say....Rush's web site or O'reilly, or alex jones, or ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox, on a pre agreed-upon day and put OUR comments from THIS site on THEIRS. We are inbreeding here, and from my journeys to other sites "alone" I am like a voice crying in the wilderness.
I listen to Alex Jones almost every day. I think you would most likely be quite welcome as a call-in or by all means post on his Infowars site.
Did you catch his show yesterday where he interviewed Oklahoma State Rep. Charles Key and the movement for sovereignty from the federal government? Cool show! If you happened to miss that one, YouTube has them up.
Part I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_psnifeRds
Part II
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zp8KEc_gkjo
I find Alex jones to be a little melodramatic at times, but he brings up important issues not found in the mainstream media.
I think Alex Jones dillutes and confuses the real issues. You know he firmly believes global warming is the result of sun spots, right? Right... I only refer to Alex Jones for a barometer of what the conservatives are trying to frame as 'conspiracy'. Not to be taken at face value.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.", Albert Einstein.
Ed note: white phosphorous, dense metal super weapons, nuclear stick-up, missile defense, bailouts and propaganda!!
That guy is a crazy conspiracy theorist. Almost everything he says is without basis in reality or fact. I would be careful about him.
Of course there is value in sharing good ideas where they're not known. Thanks.
Real organizing against the real media decision makers would be even better.
Of course, the really big decisions aren't made by the media. How they decide, these others, whether the media knows or the public, or not, is what really matters.
Who is the person with the real power to decide? That is the big question. Then focus on their choice. See Roger Fisher, Beyond Machiavelli, chapters 2 & 3, and Shel Trapp on organizing. Again, change their choice, and it doesn't matter about media, public, or that third huge diversion, police (and of course, the police aren't the ones making any important decisions on substance).
American students get some of the worst-quality educations in the industrial world - a bachelors degree in the UK is equal to a masters in the US in most courses of study.
Americans pay more for that lousy education than anywhere else in the world they get at least 70,000 in debt by the time they graduate - guaranteeing a life of wage slavery and no leisure time - including time to follow world events. In many European countries university education is free and most students take off a year after graduation and see the world.
But is there any sign of revolt on the campuses - of course not! Everything here is the best! Why in the world would they revolt?
---USAn---
Back in the days that I went to college (in the U.S.), the same was true: "most students take off a year after graduation and see the world."
But that was in the days when material possessions and tech toys (outside of having a great stereo system) didn't matter much.
These days, not only are students not allowed to think for themselves, they CHOOSE not to think for themselves. How can they think with a cell phone permanently attached to their brains?
Revolts on U.S. college campuses nowadays will only happen when students are deprived of their high-tech toys.
Today, anything like this in the US would result within minutes with tear gas, tazers, and truncheons.
Aloha, salud, lechiem,
- Tobias
http://www.youtube.com/user/tobiasaurusrex
Anyway, whenever that happens, you get way off track, as if the enforcers made the substantive decisions. So do folks have a plan to focus on the real decision makers, without getting lost in diversions? Roger Fisher's "Getting Ready to Negotiate: The Getting to Yes Workbook" has worksheets to work it through. There are worksheets in his "Beyond Machiavelli" and "Coping with International Conflict" which apply to ANY action. See especially Currently Perceived Choice and Target Future Choice.
So true, those were the days.
A high-wattage stereo system and an LP collection in the dorm room was the status symbol. Practically all mainstream popular music blasting from those speakers from Pink Floyd to Styx to the (well, not so mainstream) Clash largely preached the questioning of conventional wisdom. Long discussions on philosophy, science and politics (albeit sophomoric ones) would go on late onto the night over beer and joints.
Tuition and fees could be covered from a summer or co-op job. Many took a year off to travel or hike the AT from Georgia to Maine after graduation. Some states like the California and texas state U's were free for state residents.
These were the times that Obama has derided as "times of excess".
But, the quality of education at reputable state U still was lousy as I later learned from working along a lot of Brit expats, and later an Australian mathematician girlfriend. It isn't all their fault, U-bound US high school grads are about 2 years behind British kids.
---USAn---
Most students back then weren't much different. I know, I was there. But some were.
But the movement has a long way to go to become highly effective, and that was true then.
But we can.
"It's really been aided by the communication tools we've got, things like Facebook."
Beware of Facebook, and the like. When these protests really grow in momentum, Facebook is going to be the achilles heal that brings it all down. It is the intelligencia surveillance tool extraordinaire, compilling all the information they need to subvert the movement or even to mass arrest all of the protesting friend networks, ensemble.
Facebook is a CIA creation.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology/news/article.cfm?c_id=5&objectid=10456534
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.", Albert Einstein.
Ed note: white phosphorous, dense metal super weapons, nuclear stick-up, missile defense, bailouts and propaganda!!
That is an interesting interpretation. FaceBook is a tool of the intelligence agencies, indeed, is invented and sponsored by them. It makes sense, even if not provable.
The CIA ran BCCI-the Bank of Crook and Criminals International. If you read of its story, you may be shocked at the control the NSA/CIA has within this country.
So it is plausible that the CIA made and still controls Face Book.
CIA monitoring or not, the biggest probelem with facebook is that it isoliates activism into little invitation-only chatrooms instead of an open public forum.
Me, I refuse to have anything to do with Facebook.
Since a lot of activism planning moved to facebook in my city, our Indymedia site is effectively dead, and our indymedia radio program has very little original programming as well.
---USAn---
PJD said, "CIA monitoring or not, the biggest probelem with facebook is that it isoliates activism into little invitation-only chatrooms instead of an open public forum."
Yup. So would you lean towards "by coincidence", or "by design". I know which label I would choose.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.", Albert Einstein.
Ed note: white phosphorous, dense metal super weapons, nuclear stick-up, missile defense, bailouts and propaganda!!
Wow, that's sad to hear. :(
I am happy to say that I have a more optimistic view of the future than many here apparently. Perhaps these British kids are simply at the front of the curve. If you see no hope for our future why come here?
"Most people would sooner die than think, in fact they do so." Bertrand Russell
What you said. Frankly I despair at the poverty of some folks outlook sometimes. They continually fail to understand I'm seldom wrong as you do.
And I'd pay a lot more attention to the strikes in the UK than to a few students sitting in. Thats the curve....."British jobs for British workers"
My take is you are far more likely to see a movement of "American jobs for American workers"
You do not want to read this ,Thomas...
I believe that the economic disaster is going to really be disasterous, and its affects may outlast those of us in our "golden years"....I can actually envision food riots and homeless marches on Washington and State capitals too...I even have a faint glimmer of hope that this may bring us to a more efficacious governance, socialism even.
"Most people would sooner die than think, in fact they do so." Bertrand Russell
Red Rick
Why wouldn't I read it? All you are saying is it looks a lot worse than people think (I think you are right) and we will come out of it better as we always have.
"I believe that the economic disaster is going to really be disasterous, and its affects may outlast those of us in our "golden years"
Well ole Red, I'm afraid you may be close....even right. What the government is doing right now is a farce. I may owe you a couple of net dollars.
I don't see the riots you do, I believe we will have enough food, I'm still of the opinion its going to be about jobs. Men can put up with as lot and will, but take their jobs and you've got a pretty pissed off bunch of folks.
And the ones that are getting pissed off are exactly the ones you don't want to be.
I can envision real riots and strikes about work. "a more efficacious governance", very possibly, "socialism even." not going to happen. But a move towards Social Democracy (with a little less Social) than the Europeans practice...could be.
The greatest worry if I'm right is that business (and Congress apparently from the provisions they stripped out of this bill) are providing ready made scapegoats for their dishonesty.
If (you) are right....its a good thing we live in a rural area!
Bring America Back !!!! You Go, BRITS and the Youth organizers in the UK colleges and universities.
This article needs to watch when it equates the words "mass action" with revolution, because a revolution is a whole other thing !!! For example, a revolution would've been if the military refused the illegal order of the President to make war on a defenseless Iraq, because it was immoral, illegal,
and treasonous under the US Constitution. International Law forbids pre-directional and pretentionous offensive wars. So does the United nations !
Our college crowd here in the States are much too tired from our recent Presidential election demonstrations to be out there protesting, plus
Man, spring break's almost here, where's the beer ?? Duh, whats a Gaza ???
Revolution, as defined here as, for example, military refusal, has its place.
But I see no actual case for revolution being made here in comments, no case for our situation today. If anyone wants to argue that, I'd like to hear the case, learn something.
Am I hearing that something different must be done, that what's being done isn't working? And then, am I hearing that folks don't know of anything that would work?
Oh, except the leap to "revolution" and Greek (riots) "revolt," of course.
Well, then, that would be understandable, I guess, for discussions to explore it in that way, given the lack of credible alternatives to talk about. There are, however, excellent, credible alternatives, and they require no such leaps out over the abyss of revolution (as defined here), and revolt as defined near here.
This is not to say that it's easy.
Anyway, I recommend a group approach, (Shel Trapp, "Dynamics of Organizing" "Basics of Organizing,") with some MLK mythic reconciliation ("Letter from Birmingham Jail") and with tons of help from the Harvard Negotiation Project (planning worksheets, books). See here for a start: http://www dot pon.harvard.edu/hnp/theory/tools/tools.shtml
It is indeed about time. It's too bad they didn't start earlier and follow up on the massive antiwar demonstrations in the UK and Europe in the buildup to the Iraq war. What had looked like a true mass movement petered out into nothing, as US troops and bombs wreaked havoc and slaughter in ancient Mesopotamia. But better late than never. Let's just hope it continues and spreads like wildfire.
Massive demonstrations have their place and can make the difference. Beyond that, they always look like they're what made the decision.
But it's fairly easy to establish that they don't rate very high on the effectiveness scale compared to other methods. We must effectively focus on decision makers at the regional level (for federal and global issues). We must learn the "who" "what" "how" and "why" part, collectively.
Yeah, weak little "sit down" protests. It'll change nothing. Israel will still kill and destroy whenever it suits them, with the Stars & Stripes behind it.
These spoiled, wimpy Oxford/Cambridge brats want to protest something, why don't they riot against the economic system that is the root of all of the oppression, instead of merely squawking about their tuition fees? No, because they're the ones who directly benefit from the plutocracy, and from where their parents and friends derive their fortunes.
"Protest" my ass. This will just give the brats something to brag about at the next frat meeting, as if they actually "did" something, while placing a cell call to Mum & Dad about how they unfortunately dented up the Beemer the other day.
Give me a freaking break. The 60s were sparked in large park by student protests. Those led to massive social change. Instead of pointlessly criticizing, how about you recognize the fact that this is a very, very good thing.
My criticism has many salient points, thank you. I think by now we should be well beyond these lame, soft-peddle approaches attempted by bored rich kids looking for a bit of excitement from misplaced whining over tuition fees and Israel.
Fair comment.
Not necessarily. JMHO.
Youre kidding right? Far too dismissive of kids actually doing stuff...I fail to understand that poster's insulting tone.
"Most people would sooner die than think, in fact they do so." Bertrand Russell
laguy83 February 12th, 2009 11:02 am, I read in a book years ago (title and author lost in the fog) that the Nixon White House had two preoccupations prior to Watergate: 1) That most of our troops in Vietnam would become addicted to hard drugs and unable to fight or mutiny against their commanders; 2) that the general public, Nixon's 'Silent Majority,' would begin listening to the social demands of the student protestors beyond ending the war in Southeast Asia. The Nixonites and J. Edgar Hoover viewed John Lennon as a particular threat because of his fame and ability to get media attention for the causes of peace and social justice. What gave them nightmares was the possibility that Lennon, incredibly charismatic and popular, could unite white youth and minorities behind him into a solid voting bloc, the same fear they harbored of MLK when he began speaking out on social issues besides civil rights in 1967 and broadened his audience.
Then Hoover died, Nixon quit, the war ended, and Lennon retired from public life for a few years to raise his kids. Interesting that when the former-Beatle reemerged and started recording again, just after Reagan's election, he was suddenly murdered.