On the morning of an apparent cease-fire between Israel and Hezbollah militants, 11-year-old Hadi Hattab played in the street for the first time since the monthlong war began in July 2006.
Seconds later, an explosion of ball bearings shot into his skull from one of more than 4 million cluster bombs fired into southern Lebanon by the Israeli military. The boy died a few hours later.
Since the end of the conflict, Hadi and 29 other Lebanese civilians have been killed and more than 200 injured by triggering some of the unexploded cluster bombs in southern Lebanon. The United Nations estimates that about 1 million of these bombs - mostly produced in the United States - failed to explode on impact, leaving roads, schools, homes and fields littered with lethal explosives. Most of the bombs were fired by the Israeli military in the last three days of the conflict after a cease-fire had been declared.
Military experts say hundreds of cluster bombs - also known as submunitions - can be contained within a single shell, exploding in midair before showering an area the size of several football fields with fragments. These same experts say the bombs are especially effective against airfields, tanks and enemy convoys.
But because cluster bombs also have a high failure rate, human rights groups have long cautioned that unsuspecting civilians - especially children - are most vulnerable, because the slightest touch can inadvertently detonate unexploded bombs.
These small bombs caused more civilian casualties in the 2003 invasion of Iraq than any other weapon, according to the Cluster Munition Coalition, an international network of 200 nongovernmental organizations campaigning to ban its use.
82 nations on board
Last month, 122 nations met at a Cluster Munition Coalition meeting in Wellington, New Zealand, to work out final discussions for an eventual treaty banning cluster bombs. The draft, which has been endorsed by 82 nations, would bar signatory nations from producing, using or stockpiling cluster bombs.
Supporters say the final treaty, which is expected to be signed in Oslo, Norway, later this year, would be the most significant advance in disarmament since the 1997 ban on anti-personnel mines.
But for U.N. minesweepers in southern Lebanon, 13 of whom have died during the painstaking task of destroying unexploded cluster bombs, the ban can't come soon enough.
"This was unprecedented and one of the worst, if not the worst, use of submunitions in history," said Dalya Farran, spokeswoman for the U.N. Mine Action Coordination Center for South Lebanon.
In a report released last month, Human Rights Watch said Israel dropped 4.6 million cluster bombs on southern Lebanon, more than in recent wars in Kosovo, Afghanistan and Iraq combined.
To be sure, cluster bombs have been used in warfare since World War II and are standard air-dropped bombs for many nations. At least 14 countries and a small number of nonstate militias - Hezbollah, for example - have used cluster bombs in at least 30 nations and territories, while at least 76 nations have stockpiles, according to Human Rights Watch.
Cluster bomb manufacturers say the failure rate is typically between 10 and 15 percent. But the United Nations says it is between 20 and 30 percent and was even higher in southern Lebanon due to Israel's use of Vietnam War-era and Chinese bombs, whose date of effectiveness had long since expired.
"By their nature, cluster bombs are very likely to fail," said Farran, the U.N. spokeswoman. "They are not accurate and not reliable."
Farran said the mine removal campaign in Lebanon is far more daunting than that in Kosovo, an area comparable in size. "In a 2 1/2-year program, (the U.N. Mine Action Service) cleared 25,000 submunitions, and that was 90 percent of the problem," she said. "In Lebanon, in a year and a half we have cleared 137,000 submunitions."
U.N. mine technicians say they are finding an average of 10 new sites monthly to add to nearly 1,000 existing locations. As a result, initial estimates that most unexploded cluster bombs would be cleared by the end of last year have been revised to the end of this year.
Part of the problem is Israel's refusal to cooperate with U.N. requests to supply information that would help mine removers find unexploded bombs. Last month, the Israel Defense Force finally gave the United Nations an estimate of the number of cluster bombs it believes are in southern Lebanon but withheld precise location coordinates, which are logged in computers.
Israeli air force officials say that their military dropped cluster bombs to destroy launch sites used by Hezbollah to fire more than 4,000 rockets - including cluster munitions - into northern Israel, and that their use was in accordance with international law.
"Israel's use of cluster munitions ... was in direct response to acts of aggression perpetrated against its citizens, sovereignty and territorial integrity by the Hezbollah terror organization," said Aryeh Mekel, spokesman for the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
But Israel's state-ordered investigation into the war - the Winograd Commission - acknowledged in January that cluster bombs were dropped in populated areas and caused post-conflict civilian casualties. The commission expressed concern about the military's "lack of clear orders, discipline and effective controls."
Israel faulted
The Geneva Convention outlaws the use of weapons in civilian areas, and an initial report by the State Department in January found that Israel had broken a military sales agreement by using U.S.-made cluster bombs in civilian areas.
In 1982, the Reagan administration imposed a six-year ban on the sale of cluster bombs to Israel after a congressional investigation found Israel had used the weapons in civilian areas during its invasion of Lebanon that year.
The recent Human Rights Watch report said Israel violated international humanitarian law by its "indiscriminate and disproportionate cluster munitions attacks." But it also acknowledged that Hezbollah had fired cluster munitions into populated areas of Israel in violation of international law.
U.S., Russia, China resist ban
Meanwhile, major arms-producing countries such as the United States, Russia, Israel and China oppose any ban on cluster bombs, arguing that they are a viable option for self-defense. None was present at the Wellington conference, and none is expected to attend or sign the upcoming Oslo treaty.
The United States, the world's largest producer of cluster bombs, has been lobbying allies that support the treaty to create loopholes, according to several participants at the Wellington conference.
In an off-the-record briefing with journalists last month in Geneva, a senior U.S. official said that as long as states involved in conflicts use cluster bombs responsibly, their use shouldn't be banned, according to the Reuters news agency.
Despite opposition, Cluster Munition Coalition officials say the treaty has built unstoppable momentum and will be signed by more than 82 countries in Oslo.
"It is now a question of negotiating the strongest treaty possible in order to create the stigmatization of this weapon, as we did with anti-personnel mines," said Simon Conway, director of Landmine Action, in London. "That way, even if the U.S. and others do not sign the ban, they will find it very hard to justify using these weapons in the future."
© 2008 The San Francisco Chronicle
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
30 Comments so far
Show AllGood point, sophia.
Banning cluster bombs completely isn't the same as banning the use of bombs in general in civilized areas. The reason why is because cluster bombs can lay around unexploded for decades, whether in civilized areas or not, making it impossible to use the land they're on. Basically, using cluster bombs ANYWHERE is theft of the land they're used on.
And using them is imposing a demoralizing form of psychological torture on the people who live in the area where they're used. I mean, what's more demoralizing for a people to know that their children might get blown up while they're out for a stroll.
... majority of the Supreme Court today seemed to clearly indicate that the Second Amendment provides an individual right to possess a firearm...
Or machine gun, hand granade, D.U. or cluster bomb?
cactuspie,
You wrote,"The Geneva Convention outlaws the use of weapons in civilian areas" and senate Amendment No. 4882 would have banned the use of cluster bombs in civilian areas. So why did we need an amendment to ban something which is already against international law?
The use of weapons in general is outlawed by the Geneva Convention, but specific weapons are not. That is why this vote is so important. The next time we examine the details of the Geneva Convention, hopefully, cluster bombs will not even be discussed.
But it all boils down to money. No other explanation is plausible.
BushCo thinks that if we don't sell cluster bombs somebody else will so we may as well get the profits. That seems to be the rationale used by war profiteers of which BushCo's party is an extension.
Corporation's only mandate being to make as much money for their shareholders as possible, scare tactics about terrorism keep war profits rolling in, much from our own pockets. Why resolve the issue of Israel/Palestine when war is their cash cow?
Mike Corbeil:
Whoa! The USA does a lot of good, but we cancel it all out with bad. US AID: Good; CIA: Bad. The people of the USA are mostly good, but our elite ruling class (military indutrial complex) is incredibly good at being bad in secrecy.
Deep down, my analysis of them is that they hyper-rationalize doing evil by twisting America's Judeo-Christain mythos and then throw in a mix of "geopoliticking" to maintain our standard of living.
Lately, much more bad than good.
I was in the Peace Corps in Africa teaching village children for three years. Nevertheless, US Peace Corps budget is about 3000X less than the military budget.
We put all the chips on the table for war and begrudgingly spare a nickel for peace.
Truth Fairy is right on! Pride in our subgroups whether it be religious/tribal/national is at the root of the problem. We separate us from them. Should we start a new campaign: Be Proud of Humanity with "I (heart) Humans" t-shirts?
It is impossible to simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." Einstein
When the only thing you have is a hammer, everything begins to look like a nail.
For humanity's sake, we need to reform the UN Security Council. Let's start a grassroots worldwide push to reform it so that the world's biggest weapons traders do not have a permanent veto AND a permanent seat. How is that democratic or just?
Also. Condi Rice is all hot under the collar about Iran selling Iraqi insurgents IED technology because they are used to kill Americans. Congressmen are even calling it an act of war!
They might wish to reason this more thoroughly, however. What if the whole world could consider it an act of war any time someone gets killed by a heinous (cluster bomb) weapon sold to them by the USA?
Hugh Macleod writes, "Cluster bomb manufacturers say the failure rate is typically between 10 and 15 percent. But the United Nations says it is between 20 and 30 percent and was even higher in southern Lebanon due to Israel's use of Vietnam War-era and Chinese bombs, whose date of effectiveness had long since expired."
"In a report released last month, Human Rights Watch said Israel dropped 4.6 million cluster bombs on southern Lebanon, more than in recent wars in Kosovo, Afghanistan and Iraq combined."
Clearing out the old stock to keep the weapons industry (both R&D and sales) in business. The equation is simple.
Maybe a compromise would be attaching a radio frequency device to each bomb. They are used widely in inventory control. If the RFD survives it means the bomb didn't go off and it should be detectable from a safe distance.
Please vote for the democratic candidate this fall to ensure we send the neocon war criminals home.
Its only the manufacturers and/or users that oppose the ban. Its been an era of "pushbutton warfare" for 70 years. We push the buttons and the other guys die. The term "collatoral damage" has become common.
The US military rolled over the Iraqis twice with relatively small forces. It worked because the Iraqi soldiers were mostly dead or routed before the American toops got to their positions.
Cluster bombs must be one of the most useful WMD for such warfare. It will be a long hard sell to the US military. I guess Israel justifies them as an "equalizer".
Its only the manufacturers and/or users that oppose the ban. Its been an era of "pushbutton warfare" for 70 years. We push the buttons and the other guys die. The term "collatoral damage" has become common.
The US military rolled over the Iraqis twice with relatively small forces. It worked because the Iraqi soldiers were mostly dead or routed before the American toops got to their positions.
Cluster bombs must be one of the most useful WMD for such warfare. It will be a long hard sell to the US military. I guess Israel justifies them as an "equalizer".
Mike Corbeil March 17th, 2008 10:29 pm
Mike, you are accurate in your perception. I admit that the sanctioning, manufacture and using of cluster bombs is not the sole identifier of a terrorist nation. What I meant to say was that it is just another brick in the building of a terrorist nation. Taken in and of itself, it stands alone. It does not require further proof. As with your other examples, the U.S.A has demonstrated throughout its history that it does not practice compassion and a recogniton of the rest of humanity and the environment as part of its planetary family. Somehow, "we" think because we can overpower other peoples and use "science" to maintain our relative superiority to others we consider our subordinates, we are entitled to the spoils of that use of force. Gandhi demonstrated the futility of this form of power, and there is a Gandhi somewhere preparing to face the power-addicted. It is up to us to recognize that this is possible in our lifetimes, and to make a commtiment to be the change we wish to see in the world, as Gandhi stated. Live your own lives in integrity and courage, and make a choice each day to stand for Peace, Love and Equality.
I am committed to Oneness through Justice and Transformation
peace,
st john
" ezeflyer March 17th, 2008 12:50 pm
If the US as the most aggressive, militaristic nation takes the first step and joins the ban, would Russia and China also join?"
I DO NOT THINK IT MATTERS whether they would, or not. The USA is the only country selling these damn munitions to hellish Israel, or else most of the cluster bombs Israel has been using are US-manufactured. But regardless of whether that's right, or off-base, at all, it does not really matter what Ru. and China would do, or not, for the USA to do what is RIGHT.
It is always right to make the right decision, and to avoid committing wrongful ones, IMO. It is always right to cease being wrongful.
And neither Ru. nor China commit war on other countries, while the USA has been long doing it WORLDWIDE.
" sphne March 17th, 2008 3:32 pm
Anyone considering voting for Hillary should really ask themselves why she voted against banning the cluster bombs."
SEE THE HENRY KISSINGER QUOTATION in my above post and you'll find my answer or reply therein. Hint: What do you expect from 'dumb animals'?
" David Grayling. March 17th, 2008 5:20 pm
There's a simple solution: make both the nations that manufacture cluster bombs and the nations that use them liable for any damage or deaths they cause after the war is finished."
KEEP ON DREAMING, although more recommendable is to stop doing that. WE CANNOT EVEN make states committing wars of aggression, so against peace, the supreme of all crimes, answereable, and you dream that the above might work? You are dreaming.
AS FOR THE $$$$ made from manufacturing and selling cluster bombs, a point repeated by several readers who posted, above, I WONDER about this. I believe to recall that the article states that Israel used mostly OLD cluster munitions, perhaps, if not surely, then, sold to Israel long enough ago; or sold more recently and to make space for storing new manufactured weapons the U.S. MIC hopes to sell sometime in the relatively near future.
Anyway, being old, I'd expect that they don't cost much compared to newer U.S.-manufacturered weapons. If that's not true because of their age, then I'd still expect cluster munitions to cost less than plenty of other weapons manufactured by the U.S. MIC. ... Iow, the U.S. MIC can profit MUCH or hugely from selling other weapons of war, I believe.
I'm nowhere near being expert on the latter subject though, so '?' on the immediately above $$$ matter.
However, whatever the U.S. MIC has manufactured, but not yet sold, I expect the MIC profiteers, as psychopathic as they are, would far prefer to sell old muntions, instead of junking them, which'd bring NO $$$. Even if the U.S. govt offered to buy up the munitions, then MIC and U.S. govt might, behind closed doors, swindle taxpayers again; by telling the world that the govt bought up these munitions and saw to their destruction, while the MIC profiteers would really be selling these off to various parties around the world.
After all, they ARE GANGSTERS; the worst of all.
" st john March 17th, 2008 12:18 pm
... If this does not identify the U.S.A. as a terrorist nation, I don't know what does."
YOU MUST NOT READ MUCH, for if you think that this is a top example of U.S. terrorism, then consider that over 1 MILLION Iraqis are now dead because of the present war on Iraq, 4 million or more have been forced into becoming internal and external refugees, life is still very bad, harsh, unjust, ... for even the external Iraqi refugees, Iraq (and neighboring countries, in addition to some parts of Europe) have been contaminated with radiological poisoning from the massive use of DU, ..., and like Iraqi refugees have been reported saying, I believe recently by Dahr Jamail, Iraq IS FINISHED, a country that is NO PLACE to ever return to ever again, for those who can manage to get and stay out, that is.
And that's just one of the present examples, while I'd say very important is also the following example.
"AUDIO: The Forgotten Tapes, My Lai: Legacy of a massacre
by Celina Dunlop
Global Research, March 16, 2008
BBC "
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8361
That date is slightly off, and the following is the original BBC article of March 15th. GR provides the link for the BBC page for listening to the audio recording of BBC's airing on these tapes, which were finally obtained by Ms Dunlop; after her struggles with the U.S. National Archives, which had the tapes since 1987 and was telling her did not exist. She didn't relent and got the tapes, which this article indicates to be very important.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7298533.stm
Add the war on Afghanistan, Kosovo, so Yugoslavia and Serbia, on African countries, Diego Garcia's population, the U.S.-Colombia "connection" and its extremely criminal consequences, the perpetual refusal to recognise the sovereign rights of the long indigenous populations of all of the Americas, etc., etc., ETCETERA.
The U.S. uses the Colombian govt and its hellishly extreme criminality, etc., just like the U.S. uses Israel for in the Middle East.
Want examples of U.S. terrorism? There is a nearly endless number of examples; while there basically is NO example of any good by the U.S. govt and, therefore, its ruling elites.
Remember when Henry Kissinger was quoted saying that soldiers are only 'dumb animals'? That is another example of U.S. govt and ruling elites' terrorism, too.
"'Military Men Are Just Dumb, Stupid Animals To Be Used As Pawns In Foreign Policy'
- Hennry Kissinger"
That's quoted from the following article.
"Depleted Uranium:
The Trojan Horse of Nuclear War",
by Leuren Moret, July 2004
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/MOR407A.html
Just in case you ever again wonder what else could constitute an example of proof that the U.S. govt, and its therefore ruling elites, is all about TERRORISM.
I find it hilarious when people say words like, "If this does not identify the U.S.A. as a terrorist nation, I don't know what does"; not understanding how anyone could imagine that the U.S. govt is at all representative of good. Sure, a [few] politicians, members of the U.S. body-politic, represent good, but they clearly don't reflect the nature of the U.S. govt.
I'm glad that only 29 Lebanese civilians have been killed, so far, because of these damn cluster bombs, for I would've thought the number was considerably higher; of course not because 29 or even 1 is a good number, at all, though.
That 13 UN mine clearers have been killed is something that should catch everyone's attention. These people have been trained, so I guess are experts, at handling these DAMN FUCKING bombs, yet 13 killed since the US-Israel war of aggression on Lebanon in July 2006! Sure sounds like many to me, anyway.
The criminally forced "independence" of Kosovo and the USA and KLA turning Kosovo into a major and super-power imposed, protected, ... organised crime and drug-trafficking "country" is worthy of note. Oh, and similarly in Afghanistan, now, too; well, except it already was and is a real country, while Kosovo wasn't and legally, ... cannot be.
USA => STATE TERRORISM AND GANGSTERISM!
Oh, and course we have the proof from the Winter Soldiers truth-telling event this past weekend.
Heat is energy. Cold is not. Cold is simply the relative absence of heat. One cannot manufacture a machine that produces cold. To make something cold, remove the heat.
Light is energy. Darkness is not. Darkness is simply the relative absence of light. One cannot manufacture a machine that produces darkness. To make something dark, remove the light.
Compassion (love) is energy. Evil is not. Evil is the relative absence of compassion. To make something evil, remove compassion.
The degree to which one lacks compassion is the degree to which one serves evil. This is true regardless of religious beliefs, political alignment or anything else.
Imagine yourself in a giant auditorium with all of the lights turned off. Total darkness. In your hand is a flashlight. A flick of the thumb sends a beam through the darkness. While the flashlights beam is not infinitely powerful, all of the darkness in the universe, if you could bring it into the auditorium, would have no effect on it whatsoever. There is no battle between darkness and light. Darkness is powerless. The battle takes place in the thumb.
The same thing can be said for the trigger finger. The battle between good and evil does not take place "out there" where the bullet is. It takes place in the finger.
The battle is between that which is separate from all else (ego) and that which is connected to all else (spirit).
To borrow from Joseph Campbell-
"…every failure to cope with a life situation must be laid, in the end, to a restriction of consciousness, Wars and temper tantrums are the makeshifts of ignorance; regrets are illuminations come too late."
"Totem, tribal, racial, and aggressively missionizing cults represent only partial solutions of the psychological problem of subduing hate by love; they only partially initiate. Ego is not annihilated in them; rather, it is enlarged; instead of thinking only of himself, the individual becomes dedicated to the whole of his society. The rest of the world meanwhile (that is to say, by far the greater portion of mankind) is left outside the sphere of his sympathy and protection because outside the sphere of the protection of his god. And there takes place, then, that dramatic divorce of the two principles of love and hate which the pages of history so bountifully illustrate. Instead of clearing his own heart the zealot tries to clear the world. The laws of the City of God are applied only to his in-group (tribe, church, nation, class, or what not) while the fire of a perpetual holy war is hurled (with good conscience, and indeed a sense of pious service) against whatever uncircumcised, barbarian, heathen, "native," or alien people happens to occupy the position of neighbor."
Truth Faerie
The_truth_faerie@yahoo.com
Exactly right, Siouxrose. To whom much is given, much is expected. Those entrusted with public power have the ability to declare peace, as well as war. However, in this world of ours, declaring peace is a much more courageous act. It has been made evidently clear that the White House does not presently have an occupant having the character or the will for that.
I am praying somehow that someone, an American Ghandi perhaps, will simply step forward, rally the people behind him/her, and say "enough." It would be such a relief.
Confession: On really bad days like when the CD news (and its progressive cousins) overwhelms all senses of compassion, reason and justice, I think of the after-life... how persons like Hillary and Bush and Cheney and Rice and their like-minded amoral counterparts will ANSWER before the LORDS of karma for the decisions they made while in power, and for the senseless brutality they advocated when they might have used their positions for far more principled stands in pursuit of a morality that HONORED humanity.
Who makes the most $ from this war? The military-industrial establishment. Since deploying its "toys" requires so much oil, the two are economic Siamese twins... so long as this nation's elite makes profit from war, those pre-selected to run for high office will be beholden to these "industries" regardless of the deft cover of words/PR they make use of.
DAVID GRAYLING: pragmatic and JUST solution! I just wish it could be put into practice!
"The Geneva Convention outlaws the use of weapons in civilian areas" and senate Amendment No. 4882 would have banned the use of cluster bombs in civilian areas. So why did we need an amendment to ban something which is already against international law? And does that make Clinton and all the other senators who voted against the amendment criminals? The law means nothing to these monsters as long as profits come before people.
God Damn (portentious pause and obligatory comma), America.
Did Reverend Wright take a breath?
I think he did.
I declare him innocent.
btw, thank you Hillary. All the little children you've been so dedicated to helping thank you too. Didn't you have something to do with getting them all wheel chairs?
That Hillary, why I just can't see a bit of difference between her and Obama... such a PERSONABLE lady.
I often had a problem with war and an even greater problem with rules of war. The British didn't like the fact that the (now) Americans didn't line up and fire at each other across the field in a classic dignified manner. In fact those barbarian Americans used hit and run techniques taught to them by the Indians (now, Native americans).
It seems to be more logical to be completely brutal and in blatant disregard for the lives of others during war. The point where we become considerate or compassionate for the life of our enemy and their civilian population is a contradiction and borderline insanity. I guess that's where we separate ourselves from the barbaric practices of warring countries from humanity's not so distant past. We are more civilized because we are more selective in killing.
Gone are the days where soldiers in uniforms (clearly marked targets) going about the duties of war, following the rules of a civilized society. We as a, so called, civilization have not come to the point where war is not an option. Unfortunately if the life of a family member is threatened most will use deadly force to prevent it, an act of war on a minute scale. Banning tools and techniques of war is an act of protest and and act of acceptance. We don't need more rules we just need to stop believing that violence and war are inevitable and acceptable responses to aggression.
Those that can make them or buy them will use them. We can't expect suicide bombers to stop because terrorism hurts civilians. Those that have no other means will use what they can for defense and offense. Funny how the terrorists have made a nuclear bomb an ineffective threat. The big three will not ban cluster bombs. They didn't stop making nuclear weapons as they promised, they just made them smaller (do a search on "Nuclear Bunker Buster").
We have a long way to go. I think that we should stop making concessions and take a bigger step to make any and all acts of aggression illegal. Crazy idea...
I will be the first to admit--
My comments are usually not overly detailed or sophisticated in their depth - like this one:
The Corporations that profit by the manufacture and use of these evil weapons are the reasons that the USA is not signing the treaty. Bottom line is money talks, and if there is much money involved, then the voice speaks loudly and with authority.
Period.
Follow the money.
I hate this country sometimes, sorry.
There's a simple solution: make both the nations that manufacture cluster bombs and the nations that use them liable for any damage or deaths they cause after the war is finished.
Make the liability twenty million dollars for each life lost, ten million for every injury plus making good all destruction of property.
That would get rid of cluster bombs in double-quick time!
www.dangerouscreation.com
Just think of the money lost by US fascist corporations if cluster bombs banned. At least it does make public another industry Clinton is beholden to.
Anyone considering voting for Hillary should really ask themselves why she voted against banning the cluster bombs.
Cluster Bombs droppeth as the gentle rain from heaven on both the quick and the dead. Is it not time to fall on the children of the makers of these WMDs under the law of reseprocity?
If the US as the most aggressive, militaristic nation takes the first step and joins the ban, would Russia and China also join?
A senior US official says " as long as cluster bombs are used responsibly, they should not be banned". That is like saying waterboarding is a fun experience, as long as it is done correctly and the person survives.
If we only had more "senior officials" our country would be in great shape. I guess that theory makes our Iraq conquest a great deal, as it was no doubt done "responsibly".
Hillary Clinton voted AGAINST BANNING cluster bombs.
Barack Obama voted IN FAVOR of BANNING cluster bombs.
Why are they even "allowed" to be used and manufactured, today? I don't understand how we could be so ignorant and criminal. What is their purpose? To kill and maim human beings, only. There is no strategic purpose other than fear and terror. If this does not identify the U.S.A. as a terrorist nation, I don't know what does.
I am committed to Oneness through Justice and Transformation
peace,
st john
"The United States, the world's largest producer of cluster bombs, has been lobbying allies that support the treaty to create loopholes, according to several participants at the Wellington conference."
We are leading by example in the worst way.
If you are not part of the solution here, then you're part of the problem!