EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Chickening Out in Iraq: How Your Tax Dollars Financed “Reconstruction” Madness in the Middle East
Very few people outside the agricultural world know that if the rooster in a flock dies the hens will continue to produce fertile eggs for up to four weeks because “sperm nests,” located in the ovary ducts of hens, collect and store sperm as a survival mechanism to ensure fertile eggs even after the male is gone. I had to know this as part of my role in the reconstruction of Iraq.
Like learning that Baghdad produced 8,000 tons of trash every day, who could have imagined when we invaded Iraq that such information would be important to the Global War on Terror? If I were to meet George W., I would tell him this by way of suggesting that he did not know what he was getting the country into.
I would also invite the former president along to visit a chicken-processing plant built with your tax dollars and overseen by my ePRT (embedded Provincial Reconstruction Team). We really bought into the chicken idea and spent like drunken sailors on shore leave to prove it. In this case, the price was $2.58 million for the facility.
The first indication this was all chicken shit was the smell as we arrived at the plant with a group of Embassy friends on a field trip. The odor that greeted us when we walked into what should have been the chicken-killing fields of Iraq was fresh paint. There was no evidence of chicken killing as we walked past a line of refrigerated coolers.
When we opened one fridge door, expecting to see chickens chilling, we found instead old buckets of paint. Our guide quickly noted that the plant had purchased 25 chickens that morning specifically to kill for us and to feature in a video on the glories of the new plant. This was good news, a 100% jump in productivity from previous days, when the plant killed no chickens at all.
Investing in a Tramway of Chicken Death
The first step in Iraqi chicken killing was remarkably old. The plant had a small window, actually the single window in the whole place, that faced toward a parking lot and, way beyond that, Mecca. A sad, skinny man pulled a chicken out of a wire cage, showed it the parking lot, and then cut off its head.
The man continued to grab, point, and cut 25 times. Soon 25 heads accumulated at his feet. The sharply bright red blood began to pool on the floor, floating the heads. It was enough to turn you vegan on the spot, swearing never to eat anything substantive enough to cast a shadow. The slasher did not appear to like or dislike his work. He looked bored. I kept expecting him to pull a carny sideshow grin or wave a chicken head at us, but he killed the chickens and then walked out. This appeared to be the extent of his job.
Once the executioner was done, the few other workers present started up the chicken-processing machinery, a long traveling belt with hooks to transport the chickens to and through the various processing stations, like the ultimate adventure ride. But instead of passing Cinderella’s castle and Tomorrowland, the tramway stopped at the boiler, the defeatherer, and the leg saw.
First, it paused in front of an employee who took a dead chicken and hung it by its feet on a hook, launching it on its journey to the next station, where it was sprayed with pressurized steam. This loosened the feathers before the belt transported the carcasses to spinning brushes, like a car wash, that knocked the feathers off. Fluff and chicken water flew everywhere.
One employee stood nearby picking up the birds knocked by the brushes to the floor. The man was showered with water and had feathers stuck to his beard. The tramway then guided the chickens up and over to the foot-cutting station, which generated a lot of bone dust, making breathing in the area unpleasant.
The feet continued on the tramway sans torso, ultimately to be plucked off and thrown away by another man who got out of bed knowing that was what he would do with his day. The carcass itself fell into a large stainless steel tub, where someone with a long knife gutted it, slid the entrails down a drain hole, and pushed the body over to the final station, where a worker wrapped it in plastic. The process overall sounded like something from Satan’s kitchen, grinding, squeaking, and squealing in a helluva racket.
According to our press release, the key to the project was “market research which indicated Iraqis would be willing to pay a premium for fresh, halal-certified chicken, a market distinct from the cheaper imported frozen chicken found on Iraqi store shelves.” The only problem was that no one actually did any market research.
In 2010, most Iraqis ate frozen chicken imported from Brazil. Those crafty Brazilians at least labeled the chicken as halal, and you could buy a kilo of the stuff for about 2,200 dinars ($1.88). Because Iraq did not grow whatever chickens ate, feed had to be imported, raising the price of local chicken. A live bird in the market went for about 3,000 dinars, while chicken from our plant, where we had to pay for the feed plus the workers and who knew what else, cost over 4,000 dinars, more than the already expensive live variety and almost double the price of cheap frozen imports.
With the fresh-chicken niche market satisfied by the live birds you killed yourself at home and our processed chicken too expensive, our poultry plant stayed idle; it could not afford to process any chicken. There was no unfulfilled market for the fresh halal birds we processed. Nobody seemed to have checked into this before we laid out our $2.58 million.
The US Department of Agriculture representative from Baghdad visiting the plant with us said the solution was to spend more money: $20,000 to pay a contractor to get license plates for the four Hyundai trucks outside in the parking lot facing Mecca. Our initial grant did not include licensing the vehicles we bought. The trucks, he hoped, would someday transport chicken to somewhere there might be an actual market.
Another Embassy colleague repeated the line that the plant was designed to create jobs in an area of chronic unemployment, which was good news for the chicken slasher but otherwise not much help. If employment was indeed the goal, why have an automated plant with the tramway of chicken death? Instead, 50 guys doing all the work by hand seemed like a better idea. A chubby third Embassy person who came to the plant for the day, huffing and puffing in body armor, said the goal was to put more protein into the food chain, which might have been an argument for a tofu factory or a White Castle.
A Poultry Field of Dreams in Iraq
How many PRT staff members does it take to screw in a lightbulb? One to hire a contractor who fails to complete the job and two to write the press release in the dark.
We measured the impact of our projects by their effect on us, not by their effect on the Iraqis. Output was the word missing from the vocabulary of developing Iraq. Everything was measured only by what we put in -- dollars spent, hours committed, people engaged, press releases written.
The poultry plant had a “business plan,” but it did not mention where or how the chickens would be marketed, assuming blindly that if the plant produced chickens people would buy them -- a poultry Field of Dreams. Without a focus on a measurable goal beyond a ribbon cutting, details such as how to sell cold-storage goods in an area without refrigeration fell through the cracks. We had failed to “form the base of a pyramid that creates the possibility of a top,” the point of successful development work.
The plant’s business plan also talked about “an aggressive advertising campaign” using TV and radio, with the modern mechanized chicken processing, not the products per se, as the focus. This was a terrific idea in a country where most people shopped at open-air roadside markets, bargaining for the day’s foodstuffs.
With a per capita income of only $2,000, Iraq was hardly a place where TV ads would be the way to sell luxury chicken priced at double the competition. In a college business class, this plan would get a C−. (It was nicely typed.) Once someone told the professor that $2.58 million had already been spent on it, the grade might drop to a D.
I located a report on the poultry industry, dated from June 2008, by the Inma Agribusiness Program, part of the United States Agency for International Development (and so named for the Arabic word for “growth”). The report’s conclusion, available before we built our plant, was that several factors made investment in the Iraqi fresh-poultry industry a high-risk operation, including among other factors “Lack of a functional cold chain in order to sell fresh chicken meat rather than live chickens; prohibitive electricity costs; lack of data on consumer demand and preference for fresh chicken; lack of competitiveness vis-à-vis frozen imports from Brazil and USA.”
Despite the report’s worrying conclusion that “there are no data on the size of the market for fresh chicken,” the Army and the State Department went ahead and built the poultry-processing plant on the advice of Major Janice. The Major acknowledged that we could not compete on price but insisted that “we will win by offering a fresh, locally grown product... which our research shows has a select, ready market.”
A now defunct blog set up to publicize the project dubbed it “Operation Chicken Run” and included one farmer’s sincere statement, “I fought al-Qaeda with bullets before you Americans were here. Now I fight them with chickens.” An online commentator named Jenn of the Jungle added to the blog, proudly declaring: “This right here is what separates America from the swill that is everyone else. We are the only ones who don’t just go, fight a war, then say hasta la vista. We give fuzzy cute little baby chicks. I love my country.”
So, to sum up: USAID/Inma recommended against the plant in 2008, no marketing survey was done, Major Janice claimed marketing identified a niche, a business plan was crafted around the wish (not the data), $2.58 million was spent, no chickens were being processed, and, for the record, al Qaeda was still in business. With this in mind, and the plant devoid of dead chickens, we probably want to wish Major Janice the best with her new ventures.
Telemarketing? Refi sales? Nope. Major Janice left the Army and the U.S. Department of Agriculture in Baghdad hired her. Her new passion was cattle insemination, and we learned from her blog, “You don’t just want semen from bulls whose parents had good dairy production. You may want good feet, good back conformation or a broad chest.” Just what you’d expect from a pile of bull.
War Tourism
Soon after my first chicken plant visit we played host to three Embassy war tourists. Unlike the minority who traveled out on real business, most people at the Embassy rarely, if ever, left the well-protected Green Zone in Baghdad during their one-year assignments to Iraq. They were quite content with that, happy to collect their war zone pay, and hardship pay, and hazardous duty pay while relaxing at the bar.
Some did, however, get curious and wanted to have a peek at this “Iraq” place they’d worked on for months, and so they ginned up an excuse to visit an ePRT. A successful visit meant allowing them to take the pictures that showed they were out in the field but making them miserable enough that they wouldn’t come back and annoy us again without a real reason.
One gang of fun lovers from the Embassy who wrote about water issues in Iraq decided to come out to “Indian Country.” At the ePRT we needed to check on some of the wells we were paying for -- i.e., to see if there was a hole in the ground where we’d paid for one. (We faced a constant struggle to determine if what we paid for even existed.) So the opportunity seemed heaven sent. The bunch arrived fresh from the Green Zone, two women and a man.
The women still wore earrings -- we knew the metal got hot and caught on the headsets -- and had their hair pulled back with scrunchies. (Anyone who had to live in the field cut it short.) The guy was dressed for a safari, with more belts and zippers than Michael Jackson and enough pockets and pouches to carry supplies for a weekend. Everyone’s shoes were clean. Some of the soldiers quietly called our guests “gear queers.”
Everywhere we stopped, we attracted a crowd of unemployed men and kids who thought we’d give them candy, so the war tourists got multiple photos of themselves in their chic getups standing next to Iraqis. They were happy. But because it was 110 degrees and the wells were located in distant dusty fields an hour away, after the first photo op or two the war tourists were quickly exhausted and filthy, meaning they were happy not to do it all again.
We took two more tourists back to the chicken plant: the Embassy’s Deputy Chief of Mission (who proclaimed the visit the best day he’d ever had in Iraq, suggesting he needed to get out more often) and a journalist friend of General Raymond Odierno, who was thus entitled to VIP treatment.
VIPs didn’t drive, they flew, and so tended to see even less than regular war tourists. Their visits were also more highly managed so that they would stay on message in their blogs and tweets. It turns out most journalists are not as inquisitive as TV shows and movies would have you believe. Most are interested only in a story, not the story.
Therefore, it was easy not to tell the journalist about the chicken plant problems. Instead, we had some chickens killed so the place looked busy. We had lunch at the slaughter plant -- fresh roasted chicken bought at the market. The Iraqis slow roast their chickens like the Salvadoreans do and it was juicy, with crisp skin. Served lightly salted, it simply fell apart in your mouth. We dined well and, as a bonus, consumed the evidence of our fraud.
* * *
Excerpted from We Meant Well: How I Helped Lose the Battle for the Hearts and Minds of the Iraqi People by Peter Van Buren, published by Metropolitan Books, an imprint of Henry Holt and Company, LLC. Copyright © 2011 by Peter Van Buren. All rights reserved.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


18 Comments so far
Show Allmy neighbor has been four years in afganistan, as a ag specialist. Not having ever been a farmer , he fits in quite well with his season extender programs deigned to supplant poppy production in the dessert. He tells me after his last visit home that he has such broad experience in what he does he can call the shots over how and where he will work.
He sends the money he makes home and they are remodeling their big old drafty colonial into a modern bed and breakfast for income when he re tires.
What exactly is it he has experience in? What is his area of expertise? What are we paying him for? What's he supplanting poppy production with?
My guess is organic fruits and vegetables to improve local nutrition.
So ... a failed animal killing operation embedded in a much larger failed human killing operation. Not to worry, in both cases the contractors are quite happy to write press releases and pocket the money.
And about ten years of so ago some of knew this is just the way it was going to (not) work and here we are up to our arm pits in debt with some seriously considering cutting benefits to the elderly and less well off while this chicken crap goes on and on....imoral doesn't even begin to describe this travesty.
The US invades a sovereign country, kills, mutilates and displaces millions of innocent men, women and children, destroys hospitals, schools and museums, parks the fat butts of occupiers in a safety zone with booze and big macs, pays off and protects a ruling puppet, steals the national oil fields, throws billions at parasite corporations like the one who built this ridiculous chicken processing plant and calls it all Operation Iraqi Freedom. The Iraqi chickens-for-show are few because - metaphorically speaking - the rest are already coming home to roost over here.
Karma. You might not believe in it, but it doesn't care. It happens anyway.
"The Iraqi chickens-for-show are few because - metaphorically speaking - the rest are already coming home to roost over here. "
Funny but true, rama.
Right on, Rama... and well said.
This chicken operation is small potatoes compared to the far larger frauds and losses that have taken place in Iraq, added to the massive loss of life and ruined infrastructure that you've spoken about. This was a war based on false pretenses, and as an elected war of aggression, it is a CRIME against humanity. All of the war profiteers will pay a huge price.
I also know someone from my area with a background in computers who went voluntarily to Afghanistan. His wife is as fat as a house, and a friend of mine told me she had to rent a truck to get all the booty she bought at Wallmarts back to her home.
Hubby sends $ home and the shopaholic wife indulges... that the blood of occupation and/or Iraqis is all over this tribute to Mammon is of no concern to them. But then, as you stated, the knowledge of karma is not required for its mandate to be fulfilled.
The opening salvo in the title of Peter Van Bergen's book - "We Meant Well" - needs some clarification. Who is this royal "we"?
The context suggests he was talking about the subjective mindset of individuals in the post-invasion civilian reconstruction teams like himself, and military commanders of the occupation forces like Major Janice who bought into Petraeus' "winning hearts and minds" counterinsurgency warfare script. So?
Did George W. Bush and the bipartisan Congressional coalition of elected politicians who endorsed the shock-and-awe overthrow of Saddam Hussein similarly "mean well"? Did Dick Cheney and the CIA black ops/enhanced interrogation boys "mean well" when they took the gloves off to go riding with the bad boys on the dark side? What does the mentality of the traditional Pentagon military chain of command matter, when a parallel clandestine Special Ops world coexists based upon night raids and death squad hit lists?
The chicken processing factory farm boondoggle described in this article is relatively small potatoes compared to the shrink wrapped millions or billions of US dollars that simply vanished into the void during the Iraq and Afghanistan "reconstruction" efforts. Those daylight thieves never meant well at all. Dwelling upon anecdotes from well-intentioned, but now thoroughly disillusioned alumni of the Iraq occupation like Mr. Van Bergen actually diverts and distracts public attention away from confronting the enormity of the crimes which were officially sanctioned and very publicly committed in the name of the war on terror.
Small wonder the big players in this colossal rip off of the US treasury keep laughing all the way to the bank. If nobody will be held legally accountable for torture or murder, why work up a sweat over some nostalgic war stories about financial fraud?
Americans are not individually or collectively guilty of anything you see, because we all meant well.
Bill from Saginaw
Bill: I am very grateful to see others, especially a legally trained mind such as yours, argue against the universal use of this falsely ubiquitous meme of WE, when it's a "small circle of friends" designing the misery being so universally spread around.
Also, I hadn't read down the threads when I posted, and found that we both chose to use the same metaphor: small potatoes! So MASHED it is...
fondly, Sioux
So we went to war in Iraq so a multinational corporation could build a new plant with government subsidies for consumers that can't afford to buy their products and undermine local producers? I am just wondering which companies profitted. I'd like names.
Only slightly less obnoxious than the 5 billion dollar water park we wasted US taxpayer funds on in Iraq.
http://www.newser.com/story/108837/derelict-iraqi-water-park-a-symbol-of-us-fund-abuses.html
"June 7, 2003: Paul Bremer Lifts Iraqi Trade Restrictions Paul Bremer, US administrator for Iraq, signs Order 12, suspending all trade restrictions such as tariffs and customs duties until December 31, 2003. [Coalition Provisional Authority, 6/7/2003 ] The policy is expected to have a negative impact on Iraq’s economy. In 2002, the gross domestic product (GDP) of Iraq was $25 billion. In 2003, it is expected to be $15 billion. Iraqi manufacturers complain that after 12 years of strangulation by UN sanctions they are nowhere near ready to compete with cheap foreign imports. A month after Bremer’s order, the San Francisco Chronicle will report that textile plants and clothing factories are being devastated by clothing from China. And chicken legs dumped on the Iraqi market by the American company Tyson will force Al-Helli Chicken Co., a former major chicken butcher, to lay off all but 20 of the firm’s 140 workers. [San Francisco Chronicle, 7/10/2003] The move also reportedly leads disgruntled Iraqi businessmen and manufacturers to begin funding the insurgency. [Harper's, 9/24/2004]"
http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=tyson_foods,_inc._1
I knew I smelled "Tyson Chicken" in the hen house. If we were really interested in reconstructing and rebuilding Iraq, why were we so instrumental in tearing down their GDP?
Why wouldn't we have protected the Al-Helli production of chicken for Iraqis?
What's our goal to bring Walmart and Tyson chicken to the world? Excuse me if I don't think that's very noble. But then Obama's vision of "peace" isn't very "Nobel" either, but he received the prize and a million dollars. Go figure?
This is the stuff of Opposite Day, or the Bizarro World.
Unfortunately, standard Amerikan history textbooks will not record that the Amerikan Imperium's heinously illegal and immoral invasion and occupation of Iraq was simply a ploy to plant Weapons of Mass Production.
For more on the author, and his relationship with the State Department:
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/09/27-6
Shouldn't it be "Pigging Out in Iraq"?
That made me chuckle. With our expertise, we should have made a porcine slaughterhouse there, to put fresh pork chops on the tables.
I've heard of "dog and pony" shows. But "chickens?"