Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Is Poverty a Death Sentence?
The crisis of poverty in America is one of the great moral and economic issues facing our country. It is very rarely talked about in the mainstream media. It gets even less attention in Congress. Why should people care? Many poor people don't vote. They certainly don't make large campaign contributions, and they don't have powerful lobbyists representing their interests.
US Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT)
Here's why we all should care. There are 46 million Americans -- about one in six -- living below the poverty line. That's the largest number on record, according to a new report released Tuesday by the Census Bureau. About 49.9 million Americans lacked health insurance, the report also said. That number has soared by 13.3 million since 2000.
Moreover, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the United States has both the highest overall poverty rate and the highest childhood poverty rate of any major industrialized country on earth. This comes at a time when the U.S. also has the most unequal distribution of wealth and income of any major country on earth with the top 1 percent earning more than the bottom 50 percent.
According to the latest figures from the OECD, 21.6 percent of American children live in poverty. This compares to 3.7 percent in Denmark, 5 percent in Finland, 5.5 percent in Norway 6.9 percent in Slovenia, 7 percent in Sweden, 7.2 percent Hungary, 8.3 percent in Germany, 8.8 percent in the Czech Republic, 9.3 percent in France, 9.4 percent in Switzerland. I suppose we can take some comfort in that our numbers are not quite as bad as Turkey (23.5 percent), Chile (24 percent) and Mexico (25.8 percent).
When we talk about poverty in America, we think about people who may be living in substandard and overcrowded homes or may be homeless. We think about people who live with food insecurity, who may not know how they are going to feed themselves or their kids tomorrow. We think about people who, in cold states like Vermont, may not have enough money to purchase the fuel they need to keep warm in the winter. We think about people who cannot afford health insurance or access to medical care. We think about people who cannot afford an automobile or transportation, and can't get to their job or the grocery store. We think about senior citizens who may have to make a choice between buying the prescription drugs he or she needs, or purchasing an adequate supply of food.
I want to focus on an enormously important point. And that is that poverty in America today leads not only to anxiety, unhappiness, discomfort and a lack of material goods. It leads to death. Poverty in America today is a death sentence for tens and tens of thousands of our people which is why the high childhood poverty rate in our country is such an outrage.
Some facts:
• At a time when we are seeing major medical breakthroughs in cancer and other terrible diseases for the people who can afford those treatments, the reality is that life expectancy for low-income women has declined over the past 20 years in 313 counties in our country. In other words, in some areas of America, women are now dying at a younger age than they used to.
• In America today, people in the highest income group level, the top 20 percent, live, on average, at least 6.5 years longer than those in the lowest income group. Let me repeat that. If you are poor in America you will live 6.5 years less than if you are wealthy or upper-middle class.
• In America today, adult men and women who have graduated from college can expect to live at least 5 years longer than people who have not finished high school.
• In America today tens of thousands of our fellow citizens die unnecessarily because they cannot get the medical care they need. According to Reuters (September 17, 2009), nearly 45,000 people die in the United States each year -- one every 12 minutes -- in large part because they lack health insurance and cannot get good care. Harvard Medical School researchers found in an analysis released on Thursday."
• In 2009, the infant mortality rate for African American infants was twice that of white infants.
I recite these facts because I believe that as bad as the current situation is with regard to poverty, it will likely get worse in the immediate future. As a result of the greed, recklessness and illegal behavior of Wall Street we are now in the midst of the worst economic downturn since the 1930s. Millions of workers have lost their jobs and have slipped out of the middle class and into poverty. Poverty is increasing.
Further, despite the reality that our deficit problem has been caused by the recession and declining revenue, two unpaid for wars and tax breaks for the wealthy, there are some in Congress who wish to decimate the existing safety net which provides a modicum of security for the elderly, the sick, the children and lower income people. Despite an increase in poverty, some of these people would like to cut or end Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps, home heating assistance, nutrition programs and help for the disabled and the homeless.
To the degree that they are successful, there is no question in my mind that many more thousands of men, women and children will die.
From a moral perspective, it is not acceptable that we allow so much unnecessary suffering and preventable death to continue. From an economic perspective and as we try to fight our way out of this terrible recession, it makes no sense that we push to the fringe so many people who could be of such great help to us.
- Posted in


65 Comments so far
Show AllHas Obama ever mentioned poverty in any of his speeches ?
Poverty? No. Barry prefers to discuss "shared sacrifice" for the poor and tax cuts for the rich.
I have A suspicious feeling that Religion and Religious Institutions were invented to keep the poor from killing the rich...With all of the wealth and power of all of the churches, just how much real change have they tried to bring about? People don't want "Charity", not from the Church and certainly not from the Wealthy..They just need the opportunity to rise up and live like human beings should...EVERYONE SHOULD GET THEIR FAIR SHARE OUT OF THIS LIFE-PERIOD!!!
I hear the ghost of Jimmy Cliff humming.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGE4dnrPPZQ
Those who have more than their fair share know it, no matter what they say. They resent the poor because they know they don't deserve having it better than they do, no matter what they say. Since civilization's beginnings, the elites have feared that the masses will rise and throw them down the nearest volcano, and they have created institutions -- religion, royalty -- to keep the poor in their place. No matter what they say.
Of course not. John Edwards was the only remotely mainstream candidate to mention poverty, and people said how it harkened back to RFK and the 60's it was so "out there".
Good question. So who was the last president to explicitly mention poverty? Thanks for anyone willing to offer a brief history lesson here..
from my understanding Clinton was all about the storied "middle class" too, and that's where his rhetoric drew the line... Carter? Do we have to go all the way back to Kennedy or Johnson?
LBJ, I believe, though Jimmy Carter has done so out of office.
Jimmy Carter has helped *build houses* for the poor.
It is a death sentence. And life before the untimely death is hard and painful.
Yet liberals as well as conservatives will always claim with a straight face that America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth and that American Exceptionalism must always rule. If the United States is supposed to be the richest nation in the world then there simply is no excuse for the poverty rate in this country to keep rising.
As Ray has accurately noted, when is the last time that the alleged successor to Martin Luther King has ever tried to deal with the issue of poverty in America?
If Americans had an ounce of brains in their collective heads, then surely they would vote for the socialist candidate who is running for election in their particular state in 2012. But the last thing that the corporate media would wish to happen is to give any socialist candidate any prime time exposure that might dare to criticize corporatism and capitalism.
I think you've skated closest to the thin ice of MLK, Jr. Point? He's the last one with a national audience that took up the banner against poverty. Apparently the object lesson stuck with his assassination; everyone else has been loathe to take it up.
President Lyndon Johnson declared war on poverty, but found he couldn't win so he switched his warmaking to Vietnam where he thought he had a better chance. He was wrong, but rulers and leaders usually are.
I consider myself a liberal, and I don't consider the US as the greatest nation on earth. The US is about the 45th greatest nation, we rank below every European nation including the former Warsaw pact nations..I'd even say we rank below Turkey after all they aren't "first" world country's. They however are members of the G-20.
Shoot we are now on our way down below most nations in transparency, just ask Bradley Manning or Julian Assange, or those who are thought to be hackers. We at least on this point are well on the way down near the bottom just around where Kim Il Song of North Korea. If the Tea Party/GOP get their way we'll be below Vietnam in Democracy. And if things go further south with regards of Bradley Manning we'll be below Eritrea. We already rank #1 in Prison Population per 100,000 (Double the number of all but 14 other nations of the world). Since we can tell from the bail out of Wall Street started under Bush and continued under Obama, as well as the bail out of banks. The corruption index we must consider that newest one will place us at the the bottom, when we have ALEC and the Koch brothers preparing the legislation that the GOP puts forth at the state and federal level we will be below Burma and Somalia. As we have seen recently at a GOP Presidential Debate where they had Tea Party members present we probably will be below Cambodia. Our Life Expectancy Rate has fallen and we are now below Bosnia-Herzegovina and we will continue falling. The Democracy Ranking we are below Spain and just above Cyprus and falling, since the GOP is trying to pass things that can only be considered Poll Taxes..i.e. Texas has made it so that the cheapest form of ID that you can use is $26, no they aren't like Wisconsin where they will offer an ID for free to vote. Wisconsin under Scott Walker has made it so bad that they have closed offices in the Democratic areas of the state and won't tell potential voters that a voter's ID is free. Effectiveness of Education has fallen so, that we have members of State Legislatures that don't know that a miscarriage of a fetus is usually "God's" way of saying that the fetus was not going to be a viable form of life or would have had gross deformities. They are such idiots that they believe that baby's of drug addicts died because of the drug use, 99.99% (the other .01% are idiots) of the nurses in the neo-natal areas of the hospitals would tell you that almost all baby's born from a drug addicted mother were born with drug addiction but the drug addiction caused did not cause any deaths. Our effectiveness of Education ranks below Russia. (Taiwan is #1). Cell Phones per capita the US ranks below Algeria. Renewable Energy use were below Australia. Scientific Literacy were just above Turkey. We rank below Costa Rica with regards Healthcare. Considering the Religious Right want's the poor not to have Abortions and carry a baby to term, but they aren't going to give them help with things such as Planned Parenthood's help with things as vitamins, folic acid things that are needed to help bringing a healthy baby to term. The Religious Right along with the Tea Party/GOP is mistaken when they think that any funding that they give them via State aid helps with abortions are wrong, they don't. Abortions must be paid for by the person seeking them. I personally am appalled by the jerks that want those that want children as soon as they can get pregnant that are victims of incest be made to get "parental notification" before they can get an abortion. Or victims of rape be made to carry to term a fetus. I want 100% of Pharmacist be FORCED to fill the Morning After Pill. If they are against filling the Rx then hand it off to a person in the same Pharmacy that can fill it up, If they won't. Then I want them to put a "Voodoo" sign out front of their stor.
The 1 in 6 figure depends on a poverty income level of $22,000 for a family of 4. Realistically, if you earn even $40,000 a year with a family of 4, you are poor. So matters are bleaker than the statistics.
absolutely
and if you scrimped and saved and were able to get a home mortgage, they are going to make you poorer by taking away the home mortgage interest deduction
Poverty has always been a death sentence,
its comes quicker the poorer you are
For some, death is preferable to poverty. Vermont 211 number for Hurricane victims now gives the suicide hotline number. In Bennington we need Bernie's help in getting CVPS trucks to be located in town - not way out in the boondocks of Sunderland. They can't get here from there in case of emergency. The trucks used to be in Bennington, but the politicians granted permission for CVPS to move them out of town - way out of town. Winter is coming. Those who do not have the approx $3000 for a generator hard wired into furnace and water pumps have been at risk since that political decision was made. Frozen bursting pipes can cause as much damage as a hurricane. WE NEED GENERATORS BEFORE THE TEMPS DROP BELOW FREEZING - or else we need enlightened leaders who will recognize the risk that has been ignored for the past few years in an area that has power outages on a regular basis - even when there is no hurricane!
The elite in this country don't give a damn about the poor. Never have and never will. As Dickins wrote in his 'Christmas Carol' novel 'If they must die, then let them do so and decrease the surpluss population.' We have become a nation of Scrooges. I see nothing changing and nothing that can effect change.
But the poors have it so good in America Bernie! Weren't you paying attention to the report on Faux Nause last month?
.
The poors in this country live in luxury with their refrigerators and microwaves and telephones! They live lives of leisure and pure opulence! Remember the Joad's? They didn't do jack **** except spend their time wandering around aimlessly, and they even owned a truck for christ's sake!
.
I'm so sick of the media and people like Bernie relentlessly coddling the poors. Maybe if they got up off their lazy asses, pulled themselves up by their boot straps with just a little old bit of american ingenuity and gumption, and jumped off the entitlement train this country could begin to return to the glory yesteryear. Bernie they need a kick in the ass ... you're doing them a disservice.
.
A little hard living will toughen them up, help them build character. In the long run they will be better people for it! I envy their good fortune! Now I say we take away their refrigerators and telephones and social security and healthcare (oh wait ... nvrmind that one, *wink wink*!) ... and turn these people into the toughest ... hungriest mutha's anywhere on the planet. Only then can we be #1 again. Who's with me on this?!?
.
Bernie, the best way to show our love for the poor is to make them poorer!
.
Francis Ek2--
Should we assume that your rant is irony?
My grandparents knew poverty, but were thankful to God for what little they had.
They lived in a one room house on a homestead with no running water, no electricity, no gas, no car, no bathroom, etc. But they had a piano and a phonograph. If they wanted milk, they milked the cow. If they wanted veggies, they planted some seeds. If they wanted water, they pumped it. If they wanted meat, they chopped off a chicken head.
Nowadays, the poor always seem to have enough money to buy drugs or booze.
In today's world your grandparents would be evicted for redevelopment and if they had a chicken, a clothes line and in some places a garden that did not meet homeowner board approval they would be fined or arrested.
"..Nowadays, the poor always seem to have enough money to buy drugs or booze."
Nowadays, the rich always seem to have enough for their hundreds of dollars of wine and cocktails, their medical marijuana and their pure grade cocaine. They also always seem to be able to afford a lawyer so as to avoid prison for their imbibing.
"Nowadays, the poor...."
.
I have to assume you're being facetious here ... otherwise I'm going to have to drink myself into a stupor and forget that this conversation ever occurred.
Well. now we know how tough your grandparents had it. My grandparents lived under similar conditions. But what does that have to do with you?
Do you have to milk a cow to get your milk, or grow your own veggies, pump your own water, or for that matter have the land to even try to live as they did?
Times change as do the way people live. Could you live as your grandparents did if you had to? If you are poor and live in the city do you have the opportunity to do as they did a century ago? I could and have done so on the same land they used to work. Big difference still as my grandfather got his first tractor in 1963 but until then from 1927 forward, he used two mules (Toby and Nancy) and a handplow to work his fields, and a double bit axe to clear the scrub cedar from his land. (Too bad Bu$h wasn't handy seeing as how he likes to clear brush so much;) All water came from a Chicago Aeromotor windmill. No breeze no water. Oh yeah, I almost forgot to mention...he lived in Central Texas where the summers are quite hot. We ran out of water frequently because of no wind and they didn't have air conditioning. I was fortunate enough to spend time with my grandfather and learn what he had to do to put food on the table at night. It was no cakewalk...I watched him sit on the back stoop and cry as the river washed away his crops. When he couldn't make ends meet he drove a school bus or worked for the highway dept.
I feel fortunate for the opportunity to have done so, but realistically, for most the option just isn't there. So I ask of you, what exactly do *YOU* plan to do if you find yourself in the financial dire straits? (HINT:When milking your cow, first make sure it's a cow, not a steer, and second, always milk from one side and never between the hind legs...hooves pack one hell of a punch!)
I work my ass off 6 days a week and i'm still living under the poverty level so how about you get your facts straight and don't lump all poor people in the same category. I don't need some rich fucker coddling me I make do with what I got.
Bernie, put up or shut up. Help get a progressive candidacy started to give Americans a presidential choice in 2012. You could start by declaring yourself available if drafted by enough supporters for the job, and inviting others willing to make the same commitment to join you in town halls around the country, the aim being to find someone with the qualities necessary to make a decent showing in 2012. Use Americans Elect 2012.
I agree. If he does not feel up to running personally, I think he needs to put together a progressive slate chosen from people from around the country, to run outside of the Democratic Party. It would be a party that deals with the topics about which he speaks so eloquently. He has the platform and respect to be instrumental in that effort. They may need bodyguards, and I will gladly volunteer.
The Green Party is fulfilling that role. Examine their platform and vote green in the next election. Install Green Party candidates in Congress, state and local offices and help build the party up to balance the corporate parties.
'If he does not feel up to running personally, I think he needs to put together a progressive slate ...'
Come to think of it, after the debt-ceiling fiasco, I heard Sanders say that it was time for Obama to be primaried and that he and some other congresspeople had just been discussing appropriate candidates; when asked who those candidates were, he said 'everyone knows.'
That was some weeks ago. Haven 't heard a thing about it since. Think the Grinning Man's political thugs disabused him of the notion?
With all due respect to Senator Sanders, whom I admire a great deal; those engaged in a "war on the poor" KNOW FULL WELL it is a death sentence -- and applaud it....
The solution is not to appeal to the better natures of those who wear the Bible like an accessory, but fail to read it -- it won't happen. We must fight for the rights of the poor to be part of American society.
Okay, borrowing from the film, "A Clockwork Orange," I propose that all of congress & the senate be locked up inside their respective chambers, with Paul Horn's music recorded at the Taj Mahal piped in (preferably in association with marijuana, via the heating/cooling system), and that NONE be allowed out, until some anti-poverty legislation is passed.
Behavior modification of the 60's sort, is long overdue!
And the caveat is, this tactic just might prove a torture to those most in need of it. Imagine then, how apt!
"Wild in the Streets" had a better way
Whatever plan you endorse, if it doesn't include retribution for them, it won't work. Sociopaths respond only to that.
Off with their heads!
For all the good they do, they might as well be high on "25"...Man, you are going way back in time..
Of course poverty is a death sentence: why else would the rich take so much trouble to maintain it?
In the rhetoric of its supporters, poverty "forces people to work." The threat of suffering and death for oneself and for loved ones provides the force.
Apparently this appears a reasonable, even inevitable system to many, perhaps in part because they manage without examining the term "work." They equivocate, taking "work" in one sense as though it were "work" in another: they confuse "gainful employment" with "productive labor" and "honest toil."
A particular instance can combine the three. More usually, it does not or does little: jobs tend to pay more as they become less genuinely productive because most people have to be bribed to serve power, and most people are happy to find that some small part of their worklife goes to something that they regard as productive.
My congratulations to all the exceptions and most of the partial exceptions, but "productive labor" and "honest toil" are less synonymous for "gainful employment" than is "selling out."
Bernie for President.
Here is an exercise for every one here that considers themselves a compassionate person that cares about their fellow citizens. Read this piece from a far right, libertarian, teabagger point of view.
From the article:
"Why should people care? Many poor people don't vote. They certainly don't make large campaign contributions, and they don't have powerful lobbyists representing their interests."
"Here's why we all should care. There are 46 million Americans -- about one in six -- living below the poverty line. That's the largest number on record, according to a new report released Tuesday by the Census Bureau. About 49.9 million Americans lacked health insurance, the report also said. That number has soared by 13.3 million since 2000."
And he continues on sighting stats, and appealing to morality. Well, guess what. What happens if you don't care about morality, or anyone else unless you can exploit something out of them?
Well, then, that first paragraph explains why a right winger, and blue dogs, don't care about these people and won't care about them under any circumstances. And in his second paragraph that explains why we "should" care about them. If you read that through the "I got mine, screw you if you if you don't have yours" lens, a person using that frame would see absolutely NO reason why they should care about these people. What's in it for THEM to care? Are these poor people going to have any effect on THEM and THEIRS?
Until we can figure out how to make the selfish care about others you're going to have a tough time getting through to an awful lot of people. These things need to be framed to get the attention of the selfish. For example; The reason you SHOULD care about the uninsured poor is because if they don't get vaccines, and treated for communicable diseases YOUR family may get very sick, and it will cost YOU big bucks, or some member of YOUR family could die.
Remember for a lot of people out there it's ALL, ME ME ME, I, I, I, MINE, MINE, MINE.
The poor people preparing your food need medical care.
Sharing doorknobs is not for snobs!
There's only one way to make them care, Tom - IMPOVERISH THEM!
When they find themselves considered excess weight on a sinking ship, they'll change their attitudes.
But how to do it? These people don't live on jobs, they live on investments. So how do we crash the stock market? How do we make their portfolio worthless?
Your infectious disease idea won't do it. They don't go near the poor, if they've ever seen one, it's from the back of a moving limo.
*Repeat-**Deleted by one pissed off American Citizen...
I wonder if Poe wrote this breach of sanctuary of the rich, to plague inside their walls story under the same conditions and setting you describe here NC-Tom...
"THE "Red Death" had long devastated the country. No pestilence had ever been so fatal, or so hideous. Blood was its Avatar and its seal -- the redness and the horror of blood."
"A strong and lofty wall girdled it in. This wall had gates of iron. The courtiers, having entered, brought furnaces and massy hammers and welded the bolts. They resolved to leave means neither of ingress or egress to the sudden impulses of despair or of frenzy from within. The abbey was amply provisioned. With such precautions the courtiers might bid defiance to contagion. The external world could take care of itself. In the meantime it was folly to grieve, or to think."
"It was toward the close of the fifth or sixth month of his seclusion, and while the pestilence raged most furiously abroad, that the Prince Prospero entertained his thousand friends at a masked ball of the most unusual magnificence."
"And now was acknowledged the presence of the Red Death. He had come like a thief in the night. And one by one dropped the revellers in the blood-bedewed halls of their revel, and died each in the despairing posture of his fall. And the life of the ebony clock went out with that of the last of the gay. And the flames of the tripods expired. And Darkness and Decay and the Red Death held illimitable dominion over all."
Exerpts from-"The Masque of the Red Death"-Edgar Allen Poe-
http://www.online-literature.com/poe/36/
How to end poverty, war and other depredations of oligarchy parasites:
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/17215280
Actually I believe the attitude is bleaker than "I'm all right, Jack". It's not that the elite don't care, they actively want a large proportion of the "useless breathers" to die.
The elites, whatever they may claim on Fox news, know very well that both climate change and peak oil are real and will be horrendous and deadly. They plan to be the survivors and they don't want any more starving peasants storming their castles than absolutely necessary. The more of us who die early the happier the rich will be.
I agree. The often unspoken Elephant in the room is that many who subscribe to the 'every man for himself, free market' ideology do so because they believe the less-deserving poor will be selected out by that system, to die hopefully before having children. I unhappily know people in my own family who, after years of rightwing propaganda, are almost uncontrollable with rage when forced to face a homeless person, so certain are they of that deservedness, and so uncomfortable are they with the knowledge of what it means about them if they are wrong.
When our corporate controlled government lets the top few take most of the money then the lower 99% must starve - that's the Neo-Con's way. At least we have permission to overthrow tyrany - it's in our founding document. To Arms!
To Arms? That is a foolish call. The right wingers are armed to the teeth, and would certainly win in any direct confrontation.
I would look to the advise given by one of the leaders in in Tahrir Square in Cairo, who said that that what was the most necessary thing to do was to "organize and mobilize" the people.
If it could be done in Tunisia and Eygpt, maybe its possible in America as well.
The people who claim to love the US most are the ones who seem to be the most anti-american citizen. Like when the old man was carted out of the Paul Ryan "Town Hall" meeting and thrown down and arrested, just for shouting out that Social Security was not the cause of our economic woes. They don't realize they are looking at themselves. The low-income, redneck working class right-wingers who have bought into this bullshit are voting against their own best interests, and doing so because they are willfully ignorant. Bernie Saunders for president!...Of course, it'll never happen...
Very true. How can conservatives vote otherwise when oligarchy propaganda is ubiquitous and has long been produced by the best propagandists money can buy? Flags, patriotic parades, sports events and mind numbing alcohol are some of their favorite tools.
Don't forget high fructose corn syrup, once everyone is obese and diabetic they will all line up in row. We already eat factory produced and genetically modified plants and animals.
Tom the Plumber is his name and should, with a twist, become the poster boy that Joe the Plumber was for Bush.
Tom paid into it for more than 50 years. He certainly does feel he is owed something now that he is so old he cannot climb under sinks, houses, and into sewers. Pay up you rich and you rich corporations. The Have Mores have too much. If they don't freely give it up for Tom the Plumber and his ilk, we have to take it away from them.
The Have-Mores do not have the right to zoom off to North Island, Seychelles or Le Sirenuse, Positano, Italy or Sandy Lane, St. James, Barbados while Joe the Plumber cannot afford to go to a movie when the temperature is above 100.
Why doesn't one of these supposed Christian fundamentalists preach Matthew's Sermon on the Mount during his/her campaign?