Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- In Arkansas, Exxon Is Threatening to Arrest Reporters But Otherwise Telling Nobody Nothing
- It’s Official: A Democratic President Proposes to Cut Social Security
- Exxon's Unfriendly Skies: Why Does Exxon Control the No-Fly Zone Over Arkansas Tar Sands Spill?
- The Growing Campaign to Revoke Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize
- The Corporate Betrayal of America
- The Corporate Betrayal of America
- Exxon's Unfriendly Skies: Why Does Exxon Control the No-Fly Zone Over Arkansas Tar Sands Spill?
- The Elephant in the Room: Militarism
- The Growing Campaign to Revoke Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize
- Chemical Disasters, Agent Orange, and GMOs: Monsanto's Legacy Traced in Exposé
Popular content
Today's Top News
Treasury Makes A Mistake – Claiming They Are Not Blocking Elizabeth Warren
It's one thing to block Elizabeth Warren from heading the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
It's quite another thing to deny in public, for the record, that any such blocking is going on (e.g., see this report; Michael Barr apparently said something quite similar today).
There is a strong groundswell of opinion on this issue from the left - see the BoldProgressives petition. But the center also feels strongly that, given everything Treasury has said and done over the past few months, it would be a complete travesty not to put the strongest possible regulator in change of protecting consumers. (See Ted Kaufman on the NYT's DealBook, giving appropriate credit to the SEC, and apply the same points to broader customer issues going forward.)
This can now go only one of two ways.
- Elizabeth Warren gets the job. Bridges are mended and the White House regains some political capital. Secretary Geithner is weakened slightly but he'll recover.
- Someone else gets the job, despite Treasury's claims that Elizabeth Warren was not blocked. The deception in this scenario would be nauseating - and completely blatant. "Everyone was considered on their merits" and "the best candidate won" will convince who exactly?
Despite the growing public reaction, outcome #2 is the most likely and the White House needs to understand this, plain and clear - there will be complete and utter revulsion at its handling of financial regulatory reform both on this specific issue and much more broadly. The administration's position in this area is already weak, its achievements remain minimal, its speaking points are lame, and the patience of even well-inclined people is wearing thin.
Failing to appoint Elizabeth Warren would be the straw that breaks the camel's back. It will go down in the history books as a turning point - downwards - for this administration.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

37 Comments so far
Show AllMr. Johnson, let me suggest a small, but not insignificant correction to your title; "Treasury makes another mistake".
"To put it very simply, he [Barack Obama] is our first African American president, or he will be. And we wish him well. But his choice, basically, is whether he is going to be Uncle Sam for the people of this country or Uncle Tom for the giant corporations."
"This is what I meant a year ago when I said the next year will determine whether Barack Obama will be an Uncle Tom groveling before the demands of the corporations that are running our country or he'll be an Uncle Sam standing up for the American people."
You forgot to properly attribute the person who said this...
Johnson sez: "Failing to appoint Elizabeth Warren would be the straw that breaks the camel's back. It will go down in the history books as a turning point - downwards - for this administration."
***
Ahem.
The "turning point - downwards" for this administration came between its election and its inauguration, while its current lineup was being assembled.
Ahem.
The "turning point - downwards" for this administration came between its election and its inauguration, while its current lineup was being assembled.
That's totally accurate. I didn't give up on Obama until March '09. What a sucker I was! Ladies and gentlemen, in the realm of politics it does not pay to have a romantic nature.
How's business going in Chicago after Big O took office? I get a lot of new people from all over IL especially Chicago moving in. I heard that many who can't afford to live in Chicago are moving to Tennessee too.
FISA was the last straw.
Anyone, like this author, who supported Obama after that
was either a sap, or playing others for a sap.
Please!!
If anyone saw who paid for Obama campaign and his voting record and his advisors and still hoped for real change, you were already a "sap".
Revolution is the only solution!!
Meet you in the streets!
The Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 signed by President Roosevelt remains at least in a tie as the most important economic legislation of the last 75 years. The Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act of 1999 signed by President Clinton which repealed the Glass-Steagall Act and enabled the current depression/recession is second most important if not tied with the 1933 bill. The recently passed Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which neither seriously reforms Wall Street nor protects consumers, isn't even in third place. The 1944 Servicemen's Readjustment Act (GI Bill of Rights) which provided funds that opened up higher education to masses of veterans was a more serious and genuine reform than the Obama's Dodd bill ever pretended to be.
Some grave robber who gave Obama a lot of money will get the job, not Elizabeth Warren. Obama will wonder what all the fuss is about. He will give one of his usual phony speeches.
Right on, Mordechai Shiblikov!
This:
" Some grave robber who gave Obama a lot of money will get the job, not Elizabeth Warren. Obama will wonder what all the fuss is about. He will give one of his usual phony speeches."
is the most likely case scenario.
Petition for Elizabeth Warren
http://act.credoaction.com/campaign/pick_warren/?r_by=10087-2937758-KhhElvx&rc=confemai
Thanks! I quit petitions quite some time ago - seemed a waste of time. But I did this one...and then I "posted it to my Wall". Have to chuckle about that - after all this time I did give in a few days ago and now I have a Face book page...or whatever it's called. :-)
the author's 1st mistake is thinking that obama will do ANYTHING for WE THE PEOPLE....
the 2nd is thinking that warren has ANY chance at all.....
screw obama - screw geitner - screw summers!
The "tipping point" and downward spiral for this administration began long before this.
A deliberate cross-posting by Trylon:
I wouldn't wish the job of heading the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau upon my worst enemy. I predict it will soon become a psychological nightmare for the incumbent.
Elizabeth, by a chance of my procuring, you will be visited by three ghosts - the Ghost of Consumer Protection Past, the Ghost of Consumer Protection Present, and the Ghost of Future Consumer Protection. Expect the first when the bell tolls ONE.
(Back of hand to pained forehead) LOOK TO SEE ME - - NO MORE!!!
"The straw that broke the camel's back," and what's anybody going to do about it? Unless we have violent revolution and the rich get what's coming to them, we'll just have to toady along.
When, if ever, are we going to cease and desist from giving His Imperial Highness Barack Obama a free pass and call him on what he is and what he is doing to this country?
Hellllloooo Chris Matthews, Keith Olberman, Ed Schultz, Rachel Maddow, Brian Williams, Katie Curic, Dianne Sawyer and the unnamed cadre of sychophants that keep trying to convince us that Obama is actually the Second Coming.
Please!
Excellent by Simon Johnson! I hope Obama will take his advice and exercise option 1
Obama will give Warren the job ONLY if he can assure his Masters that the agency she oversees can be guaranteed to accomplish absolutely nothing. Otherwise, he and Geithner sit around in their weekly circle jerk and joke about what a "homely broad" Warren is.
Better to be outside than a part of this corrupt administration. If you have scruples you are not wanted by --look whose a part of it. Capture does not begin to describe the members of this administration, nor deep capture, nor even corrupt, for that would assume the person had some greater sense of duty or obligation to start with. Just assume that whoever gets this job is ready, willing and able to serve banker's interests first and foremost.
> This can now go only one of two ways.
Option 3
Elizabeth Warren makes a deal from behind closed doors and gets the job. One month later, she's becomes a part of them or goes her own way and gets fired.
The problem with our present capitalist government-by-maladministration, even a supposedly Lesser Maladministration, is that seeding the ranks with a token worthy administrator here and there isn't going to make much of a difference.
Ms. Warren may be the second coming of Brooksley Born, a seemingly honest reformer run out of town by the über-banksters*.
But if Warren IS installed as administrator of this cockamamie regulatory agency-- which is ultimately another governmental front or cover for Wall Street-- it won't be because Team Obama is genuinely interested in rigorous regulation and reform.
If it happens, it will happen because of some insane, wretched Team Obama "realpolitik" logic-- perhaps Warren will be lowered like a handful of sweetened feed into the Veal Pen to take the bitter Dawn Johnsen taste out of the mewling calves' collective mouth.
And once in place, as the Born travesty reveals, Warren will either be subject to the death of a thousand cuts or maneuvered into a bureaucratic corner treadmill and invited to knock herself out.
_____________________
* See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brooksley_Born
In any other country our Treasurey Secretary would currently be incarcerated and unable to block anything. But, unfortunatly, money still talks and bull shit still walks.
Or maybe Barak O'Bush will surprise us and pick William K. Black, Yeh right.
By the way, does anyone know if that Congressional Committee investigating the finanical collapse is actually doing anything? Maybe they will bring the "change" that the savior promised. I am not going to recommend holding your breath.
Elizabeth Warren has absolutely NO chance. She is first "NON" crimminal to graduate from HARVARD in several years.
Barak O'Bush will up the anty from the boys over at Wall Street. This presidency will become the richest bunch of thieves in the history of our country. They are going to give George W. and President Chaney a run for their money.
"She is first "NON" criminal to graduate from HARVARD in several years."–(theleosman)
-Mordantly funny. All the funnier, as it happens to be true.
Harvard itself is a criminal institution.
When the modernized version of Dante's masterwork is updated, Harvard University will be stolidly and appropriately lodged in a discrete wrung of the infernal nether regions. Perhaps adjacent to Guantanamo Bay, the 'Green Zone,' or any number of 'killing fields' testifying to American barbarity.
When its gates are shuttered and its august, stentorian halls are converted to homeless shelters, only then will one be able to say that America has changed.
Elizabeth Warren and her tiny band of 'consumer protectors' versus Big Bankster.
It's just like David and Goliath - except David is an ant and Big Bankster is that planet eating thing from Star Trek episode 35, 'The Doomsday Machine.'
I feel super extra protected already...
Wake up Simon, this administration turned downward from the beginning. Unfortunately docile people will increasingly be hammered. The system is rigged to reward the rich and to punish working people. It's been doing so in flashing lights since the beginning. Those who cannot see it choose not to see it. Yes, you too should be worried as the rich eat from the bottom and work their way upward ultimately even consuming themselves. It's an orgy of greed.
Preaident Obama. I am a progressive. Whatever you do, DO NOT nominate Elizaeth Warren for CFP agency head.
Maybe that'll work.
Two things that no longer matter much, if anything at all–
"...and the White House needs to understand this, plain and clear - there will be complete and utter revulsion at its handling of financial regulatory reform."
"Failing to appoint Elizabeth Warren would be the straw that breaks the camel's back."
These pathetic hopes are indicative of how Progressives–confronting a desert of options– continue to grasp at straws and hope for saviors, when there are none.
A Warren appointment would only be a craven act of opportunism and cynicism of political PR. It would be similar to appointing a well intentioned, but disempowered 'liberal' to plug the dam after the flood gates have long ago opened leaving a lunar surface of utter destruction in their wake.
The White House does not care about "complete and utter revulsion," when it has almost set the gold standard for atrocity? From whom, pray tell, will this disgust come? The New York Times?
And there never was a "camel" with a "back to break" to begin with.
There is only America.
At first I thought the phrase "tin ear" applied to the
administration. But that is too weak. Maybe going over to
the "Dark Side" is appropriate.
I couldn't care less about Barakus Obombus, but Elizabeth Warren deserves this appointment. If she doesn't get it, that should shatter the illusions of those so easily deluded.
AD
HOPE in Obama is worth as much as the CHANGE in your pocket.
HOPE in Obama is worth as much as the CHANGE in your pocket.