Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Why We Left Our Farms to Come to Copenhagen
Speech of Henry Saragih, general coordinator of Via Campesina at the opening session of Klimaforum
Copenhagen, 7th December 2009
Tonight is a very special night for us to get together here for the opening of the assembly of the social movements and civil society at the Klimaforum. We, the international peasant movement La Via Campesina, are coming to Copenhagen from all five corners of the world, leaving our farmland, our animals, our forest, and also our families in the hamlets and villages to join you all.
Why is it so important for us to come this far? There are a number of reasons for that. Firstly, we would like to tell you that climate change is already seriously impacting us. It brings floods, droughts and the outbreak of pests that are all causing harvest failures. I must point out that these harvest failures are something that the farmers did not create. Instead, it is the polluters who caused the emissions who destroy the natural cycles. So, we small scale farmers came here to say that we will not pay for their mistakes. And we are asking the emitters to face up to their responsibilities.
Secondly, I would like to share with you some facts about who the emitters of green house gases in agriculture really are: new data that has come out clearly shows that industrial agriculture and the globalized food system are responsible of between 44 and 57% of total global greenhouse gas emissions. This figure can be broken down as follows (i) Agricultural activities are responsible for 11 to 15%, (ii) Land clearing and deforestation cause an additional 15 to 18%, (iii) Food processing, packing and transportation cause 15 to 20%, and (iv) Decomposition of organic waste causes another 3 to 4%. It means that our current food system is a major polluter.
The question we have to answer now is: how do we solve the climate chaos, hunger and assure a better livelihood for farmers, when the agricultural sector itself is contributing more than half of the total emissions? We believe that it is the industrial and agribusiness model of agriculture that is at the root of the problem, because those percentages that I mentioned earlier come from the deforestation and the conversion of natural forests into monoculture plantations, all of which is being carried out by Agribusiness Corporations. Not by familly farmers. Such large emissions of methane by agriculture are also due to the use of urea as a petrochemical fertilizer through the green revolution, very much supported by the World Bank. At the same time, agricultural trade liberalization promoted by free trade agreements (FTA) and by the World Trade Organization (WTO) is contributing to the greenhouse gases emissions due to food processing and food transportation around the world.
If we genuinely want to tackle the climate change crisis, the only way we have to go forward is to stop industrial agriculture. Agribusiness has not only highly contributed to the climate crisis, it has also massacred the small farmers of the world. Millions of farmers , men and women from around the world, have been kicked off their land. Millions of others suffer violence every year because of land conflicts in Africa, Asia and Latin America. Small farmers and landless farmers make up the majority of the more than 1 billion hungry people in the world. And because of free trade, many small farmers commit suicide in South Asia. So putting an end to industrial agriculture is the only way we can go.
Will the current climate negotiations, that are relying on carbon trade mechanisms, bring solutions to climate change? To this we say that carbon trade mechanisms will only serve polluting countries and companies, and bring disaster to small farmers and indigenous peoples in developing countries. The REDD initiative (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation) has already kicked off their land many indigenous peoples and small farmers in developing countries. And more and more agricultural land is being converted into tree plantations in order to attract carbon credits.
At COP 13 in Bali 2007, La Via Campesina proposed the landless farmers' and small farmers' solution to climate change, which is: "small scale sustainable farmers are cooling down the earth". And here, at COP 15, again we bring that proposal, backing it with the figures that prove that it could reduce more than half of the global greenhouse gas emissions. This figure comes from: (I) Recuperating organic matter in the soil would reduce emissions by 20 to 35%. (ii) Reversing the concentration of meat production in factory farms and reintegrating joint animal and crop production would reduce them by 5 to 9% (iii) Putting local markets and fresh food back at the center of the food system would reduce a further 10 to 12%. (iv) Halting land clearing and deforestation would stop 15 to 18% of emissions. In short, by taking agriculture away from the big agribusiness corporations and putting it back into the hands of small farmers, we can reduce half of the global emissions of greenhouse gases. This is what we propose, and we call it Food Sovereignty.
And to achieve that we need social movements to work together and struggle together to put an end to the current false solutions that are today on the table at the climate negotiations. This is a must, otherwise we will face an even bigger tragedy worldwide. We, as social movements, have to bring our own agenda onto the table, because we are the first climate victims and climate refugees and therefore climate justice is in our hands.
At the FAO Food Summit in 1996, governments committed themselves to reduce hunger by half by 2015. The reality is that the number of hungry people has recently increased dramatically. We do not want the same thing to happen with the climate talks and see the emissions increase even further regardless of what the governments negotiate within the UNFCCC.
We invite all the movements present in Copenhagen to join together to bring climate justice to the table. Climate justice will only be achieved through solidarity and social justice.



9 Comments so far
Show AllYes, if we do not stop humans engaging in the producion of economic activity to help them survive, the climate will change and there will be droughts and the waters will rise and glaciers will melt and species will become extinct and plagues will swim upstream and the animals will howl and continents will drown all while the polar bears dance in the moonlight with revenge.
At least that's the picture emerging from every MAINSTREAM newspaper (owned by Rupert Murdoch) and the British Royal Commonwealth led by Queen Elizabeth, who has melting glacier wet dreams about reasserting her personal touch to ensuring the continuince of the globalist banker agenda of control over the worlds resources and the establishment of an international board to supercede the soveriegnty of individual nations. Oh, the polar bears must be so happy!
The corporations know that more starving people equals more people willing to work for low wages.
Its all part of the plan.
Love your imagination, ivymaureen.
This is a heartbreaking statement in light of the cynical sham that the Copenhagen Conference has turned out to be. If our planet does manage to be saved from the ravages of global warming, it will be due to the effort of people such as Henry Saragih, and not to the politicians and their corporate masters. It is well past time for us to take the means of production of food and other essentials back into our own hands and our own communities.
How can we keep them down on the farm, once they have seen Copenhagen?
Funny but truer to say, how can we keep them in Copenhagen once they've sen the farm.
Growing your own'll help with solidarity with Via Campesina and actually contribute materially to local sustainability. Network with others who are doing this locally. Become a campesina and grow enough of something to share with others. That's the basis of a new economy.
They won't do it for us.
La Via Campesina puts forward a powerful argument here.
Growing and consuming local, carefully hand produced food must be effective. The Chinese have done it for 2500yrs, do it still and their yield is higher than any agribusiness'. It is asserted by those better to do so that in terms of effective nutrition and land usage they are far more efficient than America.
But some regions produce better than others, in food and everything else. Trade must not stop. As many Chinese I know say 'There is nothing wrong with wealth.'or 'Wealth is happiness.'
Trade distributes this wealth.
What is wrong is greed. Although not alone by any means, America has shown us this to a shameful degree. We are all scarred dreadfully.
Trade and local production go hand in hand. Wealth is distributed very efficiently this way. There is enough wealth for all on earth. We have to get rid of the bandits who do not pay their costs, gang together and steal from others. America is a bandit nation. So is the EU. So are all nations, to various extents.
Such gangsterism is the cause of climate change. It is here, not there that the great poisonous toad squats.
Via Campesina is la via buena. It's difficult to get people to listen to this sort of thing because in a capitalist theocracy like ours, we are always taught that big agra is best and also "efficient" not true.
saving small farmers is how to save the planet. big agra depends on monoculture, spraying poisons and artificial fertilizers. all these destroy the natural soil. Indian farmers kept their land fertile and productive for 10,000 years before big agra came. they still can do that, and all the other small farmers in the Majority World. U.S. farmers use 88 times as much energy to grow a kilo of rice as filipino farmers, who do it all by hand. and so on.
anyway i learned all about this from Vandana Shiva. you can too.
read her books
or go to her website:
http://www.navdanya.org/