EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
A Columbus Day Meditation - As Nobel Laureate Obama Decides Whether to 'Conquer' Afghanistan...
"Gold is most excellent; gold constitutes treasure; and he who has it does all he wants in the world, and can even lift souls up to Paradise." -- Christopher Columbus, 1503 letter to the king and queen of Spain.
"Christopher Columbus not only opened the door to a New World, but also set an example for us all by showing what monumental feats can be accomplished through perseverance and faith." -- George H.W. Bush, 1989 speech
If you fly over the country of Haiti on the island of Hispaniola, the island on which Columbus landed, it looks like somebody took a blowtorch and burned away anything green. Even the ocean around the port capital of Port au Prince is choked for miles with the brown of human sewage and eroded topsoil. From the air, it looks like a lava flow spilling out into the sea.
The history of this small island is, in many ways, a microcosm for what's happening in the whole world.
When Columbus first landed on Hispaniola in 1492, virtually the entire island was covered by lush forest. The Taino "Indians" who lived there had an apparently idyllic life prior to Columbus, from the reports left to us by literate members of Columbus's crew such as Miguel Cuneo.
When Columbus and his crew arrived on their second visit to Hispaniola, however, they took captive about two thousand local villagers who had come out to greet them. Cuneo wrote: "When our caravels... where to leave for Spain, we gathered...one thousand six hundred male and female persons of those Indians, and these we embarked in our caravels on February 17, 1495...For those who remained, we let it be known (to the Spaniards who manned the island's fort) in the vicinity that anyone who wanted to take some of them could do so, to the amount desired, which was done."
Cuneo further notes that he himself took a beautiful teenage Carib girl as his personal slave, a gift from Columbus himself, but that when he attempted to have sex with her, she "resisted with all her strength." So, in his own words, he "thrashed her mercilessly and raped her."
While Columbus once referred to the Taino Indians as cannibals, a story made up by Columbus -- which is to this day still taught in some US schools -- to help justify his slaughter and enslavement of these people. He wrote to the Spanish monarchs in 1493: "It is possible, with the name of the Holy Trinity, to sell all the slaves which it is possible to sell...Here there are so many of these slaves, and also brazilwood, that although they are living things they are as good as gold..."
Columbus and his men also used the Taino as sex slaves: it was a common reward for Columbus' men for him to present them with local women to rape. As he began exporting Taino as slaves to other parts of the world, the sex-slave trade became an important part of the business, as Columbus wrote to a friend in 1500: "A hundred castellanoes (a Spanish coin) are as easily obtained for a woman as for a farm, and it is very general and there are plenty of dealers who go about looking for girls; those from nine to ten (years old) are now in demand."
However, the Taino turned out not to be particularly good workers in the plantations that the Spaniards and later the French established on Hispaniola: they resented their lands and children being taken, and attempted to fight back against the invaders. Since the Taino where obviously standing in the way of Spain's progress, Columbus sought to impose discipline on them. For even a minor offense, an Indian's nose or ear was cut off, se he could go back to his village to impress the people with the brutality the Spanish were capable of. Columbus attacked them with dogs, skewered them with pikes, and shot them.
Eventually, life for the Taino became so unbearable that, as Pedro de Cordoba wrote to King Ferdinand in a 1517 letter, "As a result of the sufferings and hard labor they endured, the Indians choose and have chosen suicide. Occasionally a hundred have committed mass suicide. The women, exhausted by labor, have shunned conception and childbirth... Many, when pregnant, have taken something to abort and have aborted. Others after delivery have killed their children with their own hands, so as not to leave them in such oppressive slavery."
Eventually, Columbus and later his brother Bartholomew Columbus who he left in charge of the island, simply resorted to wiping out the Taino altogether. Prior to Columbus' arrival, some scholars place the population of Haiti/Hispaniola (now at 16 million) at around 1.5 to 3 million people. By 1496, it was down to 1.1 million, according to a census done by Bartholomew Columbus. By 1516, the indigenous population was 12,000, and according to Las Casas (who were there) by 1542 fewer than 200 natives were alive. By 1555, every single one was dead.
This wasn't just the story of Hispaniola; the same has been done to indigenous peoples worldwide. Slavery, apartheid, and the entire concept of conservative Darwinian Economics, have been used to justify continued suffering by masses of human beings.
Dr. Jack Forbes, Professor of Native American Studies at the University of California at Davis and author of the brilliant book "Columbus and Other Cannibals," uses the Native American word wétiko (pronounced WET-ee-ko) to describe the collection of beliefs that would produce behavior like that of Columbus. Wétiko literally means "cannibal," and Forbes uses it quite intentionally to describe these standards of culture: we "eat" (consume) other humans by destroying them, destroying their lands, taking their natural resources, and consuming their life-force by enslaving them either physically or economically. The story of Columbus and the Taino is just one example.
We live in a culture that includes the principle that if somebody else has something we need, and they won't give it to us, and we have the means to kill them to get it, it's not unreasonable to go get it, using whatever force we need to.
In the United States, the first "Indian war" in New England was the "Pequot War of 1636," in which colonists surrounded the largest of the Pequot villages, set it afire as the sun began to rise, and then performed their duty: they shot everybody -- men, women, children, and the elderly -- who tried to escape. As Puritan colonist William Bradford described the scene: "It was a fearful sight to see them thus frying in the fire and the streams of blood quenching the same, and horrible was the stink and scent thereof; but the victory seemed a sweet sacrifice, and they [the colonists] gave praise therof to God, who had wrought so wonderfully..."
The Narragansetts, up to that point "friends" of the colonists, were so shocked by this example of European-style warfare that they refused further alliances with the whites. Captain John Underhill ridiculed the Narragansetts for their unwillingness to engage in genocide, saying Narragansett wars with other tribes were "more for pastime, than to conquer and subdue enemies."
In that, Underhill was correct: the Narragansett form of war, like that of most indigenous Older Culture peoples, and almost all Native American tribes, does not have extermination of the opponent as a goal. After all, neighbors are necessary to trade with, to maintain a strong gene pool through intermarriage, and to insure cultural diversity. Most tribes wouldn't even want the lands of others, because they would have concerns about violating or entering the sacred or spirit-filled areas of the other tribes. Even the killing of "enemies" is not most often the goal of tribal "wars": It's most often to fight to some pre-determined measure of "victory" such as seizing a staff, crossing a particular line, or the first wounding or surrender of the opponent.
This wétiko type of theft and warfare is practiced daily by farmers and ranchers worldwide against wolves, coyotes, insects, animals and trees of the rainforest; and against indigenous tribes living in the jungles and rainforests. It is our way of life. It comes out of our foundational cultural notions.
So it should not surprise us that with the doubling of the world's population over the past 37 years has come an explosion of violence and brutality, and as the United States runs low on oil, we are now fighting wars in oil-rich parts of the world and pipeline-necessary Afghanistan. It shouldn't surprise us that generals want more troops (remember psychologist Abraham Maslow's famous dictum: "When the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail"); the rich want more tax cuts; and multi-millionaire health "insurance" cartel leaders give millions to politicians to ensure single-payer never passes, leaving the average person in the iron grip of the very rich.
These are all dimensions, after all, of our history of patriarchy, hierarchy, and slavery, which we celebrate on Columbus Day. But if we wake up, and we help the world wake up, they need not be our future.
Let's hope that President Obama brings the wisdom and intellect he has so often displayed to all of these issues, particularly (on this day) the ones that can bring about or further disrupt peace in this world.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


84 Comments so far
Show AllG.B.Shaw said that what we learn from history is that we do not learn from history.
I suspect that President Obama will just be another in a long line to confirm the truth of that assertion.
Great quote, but from what I've seen, the wealthy and powerful employ people to destroy or distort beyond recognition the historical record.
Happy Columbus Day everyone. I think I'll celebrate it by going out and slaughter some Indians and take all their gold and land. America honors thugs like Columbus is just sickening. How about a holiday for Al Capone?
I suspect Mr. Obama's actions are designed to protect him from being a victim of 'wetiko' at the expense of others.
He's a man too cowardly and weak to stand up to the entrenched forces that rule the country --- even if he wanted to.
Pretty much says it all: Obama is a Master of Lip-Service. Nothing more.
I stopped viewing that Show years ago. George Steppinopolus (and friends) Katrina, Flanders, Hartmann, and Hayden: the spiritial elite advocating for a narrative called, Still Waiting For Godot!
A few bits of wisdom taken from the original narrative entitled Waiting for Godot:
The tears of the world are a constant quantity. For each one who begins to weep somewhere else another stops. The same is true of the laugh. Let us not then speak ill of our generation, it is not any unhappier than its predecessors. Let us not speak well of it either. Let us not speak of it at all. It is true the population has increased."
- Samuel Beckett, Waiting for Godot
"Astride of a grave and a difficult birth. Down in the hole, lingeringly, the gravedigger puts on the forceps."
- Samuel Beckett, Waiting for Godot
"I don't seem to be able... (long hesitation) to depart."
- Samuel Beckett, Waiting for Godot
"Such is life."
- Samuel Beckett, Waiting for Godot
"Our Saviour. Two thieves. One is supposed to have been saved and the other (he searches for the contrary of saved) damned."
- Samuel Beckett, Waiting for Godot
We are all born mad. Some remain so."
- Samuel Beckett, Waiting for Godot
"Let us not waste our time in idle discourse! (Pause. Vehemently.) Let us do something, while we have the chance! It is not every day that we are needed. But at this place, at this moment of time, all mankind is us, whether we like it or not. Let us make the most of it, before it is too late!"
- Samuel Beckett, Waiting for Godot
"But that is not the question. Why are we here, that is the question. And we are blessed in this, that we happen to know the answer. Yes, in this immense confusion one thing alone is clear. We are waiting for Godot to come."
- Samuel Beckett, Waiting for Godot
"To-morrow, when I wake, or think I do, what shall I say of to-day?"
- Samuel Beckett, Waiting for Godot
"Astride of a grave and a difficult birth. Down in the hole, lingeringly, the grave-digger puts on the forceps. We have time to grow old. The air is full of our cries. (He listens.) But habit is a great deadener."
- Samuel Beckett, Waiting for Godot
"We wait. We are bored. (He throws up his hand.) No, don't protest, we are bored to death, there's no denying it. Good. A diversion comes along and what do we do? We let it go to waste... In an instant all will vanish and we'll be alone once more, in the midst of nothingness!"
- Samuel Beckett, Waiting for Godot
A metaphor for those (like Hartmann) still waiting for Obama to do somthing progressive.
?...were will's lips moving?
Probably, but the words were prerecorded--Disney animatronics is really amazing isn't it?
Poet
WTF wisdom from the duped BS Soldier-in-Chief?
Obama's allegiance is to the Military Industrial Complex. So he already knows what to do regarding these problems. What " hope" would you have that he would do the right thing in Afghanistan? He chose Gen. McChrystal as his commander there when he knew that McChrystal had lied about the circumstances of Pat Tillman's death.
Similiarly, as far as economic policy, could Obama have chosen any more vile appointees than Geithner and Summers? Hope is nice...but why waste it on Obama?
Other than the wasted hope thingy, great article. Thank you for the information and perspective.
...greenspan and lafer!?!?!
Obama's allegiance is to the Military Industrial Complex. So he already knows what to do regarding these problems. What " hope" would you have that he would do the right thing in Afghanistan? He chose Gen. McChrystal as his commander there when he knew that McChrystal had lied about the circumstances of Pat Tillman's death.
Similiarly, as far as economic policy, could Obama have chosen any more vile appointees than Geithner and Summers? Hope is nice...but why waste it on Obama?
Other than the wasted hope thingy, great article. Thank you for the information and perspective.
summers brought us the definition of "economic comparative advantage" that AFRICA has a comparative advantage as a toxic waste dump site for the future because they have very weak governments that can't stand up to the multi-nationals dumping waste there. If that's not the very definition of being a sociopath I don't know what is. And summers is Obama's main economic adviser. God help the indigenous peoples around the world - they'll need it.
Hartmann is good when it comes to articulating a vision of the decline of culture, but when it comes to Obama and his corporate/Military driven Administration, along with the Presidency that never was/or never will be, he still has on blinders: what Jung called the Shadow. Too bad; it does not appear that Hartmann will ever reconcile the contradictions of his belief system rooted in a form of spiritual hubris of BiG Brother knows what is best for the rest of us.
Thom speaks to Obama's errors daily.
Buy a radio!
Oh, another Hartmann 24/7 Disciple. Ever try thinking for yourself for once? Hartmann is not my guru, I think that is your domain.
And if you can't afford a radio, you can find links to listen to Thom live or via podcast at his home station, KPOJ: www.620kpoj.com
Perhaps if you listen to him you can learn to respond logically, like Thom, instead of with gratuitous insults, like Hannity & Limbaugh.
Your presuppositions represent galactic stupidity. I know Hartmann personally.
Thank you for proving my point.
That is the charm you offer here ctl, you often have no point.
Thanks again. Really though, no need to prove it further.
Oh dear, now it is abundantly clear; you just have issues with men, and need to get the last word in. Ok. Take the last word and make it memorable!
...can you blow yourself?
Issues with men? You're claiming to be an adult? An adult male? That is memorable.
OK, we get it. You have a beef with Hartmann. But he's a great orator and debater, a well-informed and thoughtful progressive. He's one of us. He's not an Obama groupie-- he criticizes Obama regularly, and supports when appropriate.
You only look foolish using multiple sign on names (alter egos) or is it just multiple personality disorder?
You, on the other hand, look brilliant with your name-calling.
Well written and informative. Thank you Thom. It bears mentioning that sexual slavery continued right through the Emancipation Proclamation. When the South fought to maintain their way of life, they were fighting for property rights which included the right to do whatever they wanted to the bodies of their property. Quite a history.
It says a lot about America that a thug like CC is honered with a national holiday while the indigenous people's of America have never been honored with a national holiday. Lets replace CC day with Native American day.
South Dakota has already done so!
Poet
Cancel this most DESPICABLE of "holidays" now!!!
Hey Kucinich2012--
I was just about to agree with you when it ocurred to me that actually "Columbus Day" is a most perfect and quintessential American holiday. Along with Independance and Memorial Days this unholy trinity most accurately mirrors our culture that celebrates and honors greedy acquisition, unending warfare and death.
Poet
You are right on the money about that!!
And our national symbol, the eagle? A ruthless predator that attacks from the air.
Thom left out one huge fact, that underpins so much of world events like CC. The role of organized religion. When your belief system institutionalizes US as the chosen, and THEM as savages, of COURSE episodes like CC's will result.
And it doesn't do to "apologize" by saying, religion wasn't at fault, it was just those who used religion as a scapegoat.
From Thom's article:
"...and they [the colonists] gave praise therof to God, who had wrought so wonderfully..."
CC and his buddies were some sick bastards.
Sioux Rose
KANE: Good point. Also, within the religious context, this idea that GOD GAVE MAN DOMINION over the earth. By seeing the Indigenous as a form of nature, and extension of the earth and its creatures, the belief that domination was ordained by 'god' was easier to practice... with alleged impunity.
Dr. Alberto Villoldo, who was a California brain surgeon that left the operating room to study with Indigenous tribes (particularly their medicine men) of South America noted that the Western Bible's Creation allegory is the ONLY one (of all myths of creation) that throws the lovers, man and woman, OUT of the garden. What results is a repudiation of nature along with the natural instincts (like healthy sexuality) that flesh is heir to. I find Villoldo compelling.
Playing into the Dominion over the earth part, is this belief in a messiah that will come down and save believers from all sins.
This all but excuses those believers from SIN. As long as they believe in this Messiah THEY will be saved.
The Dominionists are a very scary bunch. Their belief system in a nutshell is that trying to preserve the enviroment is the work of Satan. God gave man Dominion over the earth so that man can CONSUME it while waiting on the savior to take us all to a better place. Those left behind with Earths carcass are the "unbelievers".
Sioux Rose
Hey, GW, the church made plenty of money centuries ago selling Indulgences, too; so why not take that monkey out, dust it off, give it a facelift... along with a modern rationale, and presto! You're in business again!
The philosophical, or should I say spiritually bankrupt intersection between US militarism, which seems to be resurrecting a new model of M.A.D (Mutually assured destruction) and Christian fundamentalism which BELIEVES in a holy war to end all wars, is inordinately lethal, in combination.
Whether it's the Muslim boys who become suicide bombers or the naive Christian fundamentalists who join the air force, in both instances, they take "God's will" for acts of destruction, sometimes including the self-destructive sort.
I can think of no greater spiritual blasphemy than that of a human presuming to speak for God's will while calling for the destruction of ANY (other) human being. Nor does it present a show of particularly astute spiritual homage to destroy the earth and desecrate her brilliantly woven ecosystems. The GOD worshipped by too many, as I frequently point out in this forum, IS Mars. In fact, it's a Mars-Mammon hybrid, and both of these entities represent what compels THE FALL in human beings, and the natural world they are now prepared to take along with them.
The astrologer truly was the first heretic because one learned in this art is positioned to counter, indeed challenge, the church's claim to absolute, immutable authority when it speaks for, and has alleged to speak for, the deity over endlessly-bloody centuries. Our understanding bears witness to a more inclusive system of relationships than that which suits the church's need for insiders/the saved, versus outsiders/those consigned to hell, death, sin & damnation.
Beliefs are what fuel action. Given the direction of mankind, beliefs are in need of altering to a higher level of realization. Frankly, I think the mystics (along with the poets and artists) can offer a vision that could prove an improvement over M.A.D-driven End Times. Expansion of minds or the fate of massive decimation, seems like a no-brainer to me!
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
"The only means of strengthening one's intellect is to make up one's mind about nothing, to let the mind be a thoroughfare for all thoughts." - John Keats
Thom Hartmann once again nails it. His knowledge of history is remarkable. This is a real lesson that should be shared. The fact that we Celebrate Columbus day is ludicrous, since he NEVER DISCOVERED America!
Please watch this short, uplifting video from Paul Hawken and share it far & wide!
The species knows, at a molecular level, change must happen!
http://blessedunrest.com/video.html.
Finally someone with a forum has remembered the pipeline. We've been so overrun with articles and comments about the dearth of Al Qaeda fighters in Afghanistan, and how that is why America is free to militarily disengage from Afghanistan, that we've all forgotten that the invasion was not about destroying Al Qaeda -- that could have been done much better with investigative and commando operations -- but to unseat a government that wasn't giving us the contract for "our" pipeline.
With the country politically completely unstable and corrupt, and territory changing hands (usually to opponents of the United States) with great frequency, that pipeline still can't be built and defended, so we ain't going nowhere just yet -- and maybe not ever, because political and territorial stability probably cannot be achieved there. Bush got us caught in a Gordian knot, and Obama is trying to untie it by tightening it. The only way to change that is if peace activists declare the real anti-war front in Afghanistan to be the pipeline, not the terrorists, and force Obama to respond.
Mention the pipeline on Huffington Post and the editors rarely allow the comment.
Its useful to recall that after farming out most of her industry and living on credit for 30 years, America's trade imbalance and foreign-owned debt are 'forgiveable' only through deploymen of our one remaining asset, our military. That Iraqi oil and Afghan oil pipeline are being secured for interests that aren't even primarily American (we really do have much of our own oil, after all). It seems almost too shameful to admit that the soldiers we are asking to die on foreign soil are dying to make someone else rich, someone who probably isn't American.
I have heard this pipeline argument before and would like to know more about it. Where is the oil this pipeline would access? Why does it have to go through Afghanistan? Where would it end? Why is this the way that the US has chosen to get access to this oil? Thanks for any info you can share about this.
It's not oil. It's gas. Look it up in Wiki.
And would anyone actually put a gas pipeline in such a volatile part of the world ? Not good business practice.
Yes, but of course the pipes must be laid where the material-to-be-piped is located.
Given a finite amount of global resources, business will be forced to choose from increasingly remote and inconvenient locations. Some are indeed in bad neighborhoods.
Then it's just a matter of using the economic alchemy of cost-benefit analysis to transmute base locations into gold.
That is, the highly corporatized and militarized capitalist hegemony-- fka the U S of A-- calculates the most efficient use of resources, including the probable volume of blood to be shed by military meat puppets and "collateral damage", to achieve the biggest bang for the buck.
ยท Yr Obd't Servant
Natural gas and oil pipelines to get Central Asian/Caspian hydrocarbons to the west.
Only official citations from me, no conspiracy theories. Google the links instead of C&P'ing them in your browser, as most of the originals are down, 11+ years old now, but they're archived all over the place. These deals were being developed in the late 1990's, scuttled after the Clinton cruise missile attack on Bin Laden in 1998 after the Cole incident. Taliban later sought to award contracts to Bridas, the Argentine oil & gas company. Unocal Board of Directors, made up largely of alumni of Bush 1's administration, became very unhappy & hired themselves a new Bush who would have the head of Halliburton (which would do much of the construction end) become his VP and launcher of wars), with the assistance of much of the original Reagan/Bush squad. That's what you lived under for the last 8 years. You may wish to google Unocal's settlement for the atrocities it paid for in building its Burmese pipeline. In 2005, just after the settlement, Unocal was absorbed by Chevron.
This first link from the US Geological Survey, 1997, still seems to be working! http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/country/1997/9301097.pdf You'll want to read the whole thing. The war in Afghanistan neither Bush nor Obama told you about is contained therein. Excerpt:
"Unocal Corp. of the United States and Bridas of Argentina were competing for the right to build a $2.5 billion, natural gas pipeline from Turkmenistan to Pakistan; it would cross southern Afghanistan (Far Eastern Economic Review, 1997). The Unocal proposal was favored by Turkmenistan and Pakistan, and Bridas's was backed by the Taliban of Afghanistan. Unocal was unlikely to secure the financing required for the project until the ethnic fighting ends. Unocal and its Saudi partner, Delta Oil, planned to start construction by the end of1997, even though the Taliban refused to give Unocal permission to build the pipeline across their territory. Turkmenistan was to sell natural gas to the consortium at the border. Bridas was prepared to go ahead with the project without external funding from major banks. Bridas set up the TAP Pipeline, a 50-50 partnership with Ningharco of Saudi Arabia, and might offer up to 45% of its shares to other oil companies to raise the necessary funds. The Taliban demands for building infrastructure and the continuing war delayed the negotiations."
continued from above:
From the Department of Energy (have to google this link) http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/afghan2.html
"Regional Pipeline Plans
In January 1998, the Taliban signed an agreement that would allow a proposed 890-mile, $2-billion, 1.9-billion-cubic-feet-per-day natural gas pipeline project led by Unocal to proceed. The proposed pipeline would have transported natural gas from Turkmenistan's 45-Tcf Dauletabad natural gas field to Pakistan, and most likely would have run from Dauletabad south to the Afghan border and through Herat and Qandahar in Afghanistan, to Quetta, Pakistan. The line would then have linked with Pakistan's natural gas grid at Sui. Natural gas shipments had been projected to start at 700 Mmcf/d in 1999 and to rise to 1.4 Bcf/d or higher by 2002. In March 1998, however, Unocal announced a delay in finalizing project details due to Afghanistan's continuing civil war. In June 1998, Gazprom announced that it was relinquishing its 10% stake in the gas pipeline project consortium (known as the Central Asian Gas Pipeline Ltd., or Centgas), which was formed in August 1996. As of June 1998, Unocal and Saudi Arabia's Delta Oil held a combined 85% stake in Centgas, while Turkmenrusgas owned 5%. Other participants in the proposed project besides Delta Oil include the Crescent Group of Pakistan, Gazprom of Russia, Hyundai Engineering & Construction Company of South Korea, Inpex and Itochu of Japan On December 8, 1998, Unocal announced that it was withdrawing from the Centgas consortium, citing low oil prices and turmoil in Afghanistan as making the pipeline project uneconomical and too risky. Unocal's announcement followed an earlier statement -- in August 1998 -- that the company was suspending its role in the Afghanistan gas pipeline project in light of the recent U.S. government military action in Afghanistan, and also due to intensified fighting between the Taliban and opposition groups. Unocal had previously stressed that the Centgas pipeline project would not proceed until an internationally recognized government was in place in Afghanistan. To date, however, only three countries -- Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates -- have recognized the Taliban government. Besides the gas pipeline, Unocal also had considered building a 1,000-mile, 1-million barrel-per-day (bbl/d) capacity oil pipeline that would link Chardzou, Turkmenistan to Pakistan's Arabian Sea Coast via Afghanistan. Since the Chardzou refinery is already linked to Russia's Western Siberian oil fields, this line could provide a possible alternative export route for regional oil production from the Caspian Sea. The $2.5-billion pipeline is known as the Central Asian Oil Pipeline Project. For a variety of reasons, including high political risk and security concerns, however, financing for this project remains highly uncertain. In April 1999, Pakistan, Turkmenistan and the Taliban authorities in Afghanistan agreed to reactivate the Turkmenistan-Pakistan gas pipeline project, and to ask the Centgas consortium, now led by Saudi Arabia's Delta Oil (following Unocal's withdrawal from the project), to proceed. Periodic meetings to discuss the project have continued. It remains unlikely, however, that this pipeline will be built."
House of Representatives testimony (have to google the link): www.house.gov/international_relations/105th/ap/wsap212982.htm
"Today we would like to focus on issues concerning this region, its resources and U.S. policy: The need for multiple pipeline routes for Central Asian oil and gas. ... The Caspian region contains tremendous untapped hydrocarbon reserves, much of them located in the Caspian Sea basin itself. Proven natural gas reserves within Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan equal more than 236 trillion cubic feet. The region's total oil reserves may reach more than 60 billion barrels of oil - enough to service Europe's oil needs for 11 years. Some estimates are as high as 200 billion barrels. ...
"[An] option is to build a pipeline south from Central Asia to the Indian Ocean. ... The only other possible route option is across Afghanistan, which has its own unique challenges. The country has been involved in bitter warfare for almost two decades. The territory across which the pipeline would extend is controlled by the Taliban, an Islamic movement that is not recognized as a government by most other nations.
"From the outset, we have made it clear that construction of our proposed pipeline cannot begin until a recognized government is in place that has the confidence of governments, lenders and our company. In spite of this, a route through Afghanistan appears to be the best option with the fewest technical obstacles. It is the shortest route to the sea and has relatively favorable terrain for a pipeline. The route through Afghanistan is the one that would bring Central Asian oil closest to Asian markets and thus would be the cheapest in terms of transporting the oil.
"Unocal envisions the creation of a Central Asian Oil Pipeline Consortium. The pipeline would become an integral part of a regional oil pipeline system that will utilize and gather oil from existing pipeline infrastructure in Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and Russia. The 1,040-mile-long oil pipeline would begin near the town of Chardzhou, in northern Turkmenistan, and extend southeasterly through Afghanistan to an export terminal that would be constructed on the Pakistan coast on the Arabian Sea. Only about 440 miles of the pipeline would be in Afghanistan. This 42-inch-diameter pipeline will have a shipping capacity of one million barrels of oil per day. Estimated cost of the project -- which is similar in scope to the Trans Alaska Pipeline -- is about $2.5 billion."