Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Published on Saturday, October 3, 2009 by New America Media
ACORN Is the New Dirty Word
Over the last 18 months, conservatives have launched a nationwide assault on the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), which is now peaking with widespread media coverage and Congressional action. This isn’t the first time that the 37-year-old organization has been under attack. With chapters in more than half the 50 states, it is arguably the largest national network that consistently organizes truly poor people, the vast majority being immigrants and people of color. In that time, ACORN has helped communities organize for desperately needed changes, from living wage ordinances to policies that protect every child’s right to a high quality education. In this time, ACORN has angered many a local politician and multinational corporation, and these folks would be perfectly happy not only to see ACORN go down, but also to deal a blow to poor people organizing for power.
There are three major accusations against the group. First, that there is widespread financial corruption; second that they engage in massive voter fraud; and finally that they have too many different entities hiding their relationship to each other to get around legal limitations. As a natural outgrowth of its organizing, ACORN has provided critical services, including mortgage counseling, voter registration and tax preparation. These services were sometimes funded through federal government contracts, and it is those contracts that Congress is now threatening to end.
The only hard fact is that there was embezzlement. Though problematic, it was addressed both within and outside of the organization. The rest is a mash-up of misinformation with a lot of red-baiting and race-baiting, as Peter Dreier, the Dr. E.P. Clapp Distinguished Professor of Politics, and director of the Urban & Environmental Policy Program at Occidental College in Los Angeles, and others have reported.
These fabrications are designed to arouse distrust of collective action. The campaign against ACORN serves as an attack on organizing as a whole, which no community of color can afford not to do. We can see it from the denunciation of President Obama’s background in community organizing to Glenn Beck’s attacks on environmental leader Van Jones, cultural leader Yosi Sergeant and FCC Diversity Chief Mark Lloyd. This attack, like those, is a warning to anyone who adopts organizing as a social change strategy.
Does ACORN need tighter internal controls? Certainly, and so do most community organizations, which are perpetually cash-strapped, in part because funders are never interested in funding “overhead” and “administration.” If the search for “corruption” among community-based organizations gathers steam, I guarantee that any number of groups will be tied up in investigative hell for years. It’s dangerous to imagine that once they’re done with ACORN, the right won’t come looking for that one mistake you made years ago that can be attached to a bunch of lies to discredit and take down your organization. Obviously, we should pay attention to our inner workings, whether someone is paying for that or not, but even the most rigorous internal scrutiny won’t save us from a well-funded opposition that is willing to lie.
The attack on ACORN isn’t about fighting corruption. If it was, then dozens of corporations with federal contracts far larger than ACORN’s would be under investigation now, or would already have been cut off. The anti-ACORN Senate bill implicates any government contractor that has fraudulent paperwork, or is accused of violating lobbying or campaign finance laws. That list includes Blackwater, the private security contractor that has been implicated in civilian deaths during the Iraq war. Florida Congressman Alan Grayson is collecting a list of such contractors.
Of course, Congress could make ACORN obsolete by passing and enforcing laws that protect poor people from being pushed to the margins of society. Instead of paying ACORN to register voters, the federal government could actually punish voter suppression, which is largely directed at people of color and immigrants. It could adopt automatic voter registration systems that would be triggered by an 18th birthday or driver’s license being issued. It could pass predatory lending laws that protect us from insane interest rates, and then ACORN wouldn’t have to counsel its members about avoiding foreclosure.
The assault on ACORN is an assault on community organizing. Organizing is essential to building the power of poor people, immigrants and people of color to protect their interests. This is the time to stand up for ACORN, not just to keep this vital part of our national infrastructure, but also to prevent the hate from tying up all of us. That’s why we must demand that our election officials and media outlets stop this unwarranted campaign against the poor and people of color.
There are three major accusations against the group. First, that there is widespread financial corruption; second that they engage in massive voter fraud; and finally that they have too many different entities hiding their relationship to each other to get around legal limitations. As a natural outgrowth of its organizing, ACORN has provided critical services, including mortgage counseling, voter registration and tax preparation. These services were sometimes funded through federal government contracts, and it is those contracts that Congress is now threatening to end.
The only hard fact is that there was embezzlement. Though problematic, it was addressed both within and outside of the organization. The rest is a mash-up of misinformation with a lot of red-baiting and race-baiting, as Peter Dreier, the Dr. E.P. Clapp Distinguished Professor of Politics, and director of the Urban & Environmental Policy Program at Occidental College in Los Angeles, and others have reported.
These fabrications are designed to arouse distrust of collective action. The campaign against ACORN serves as an attack on organizing as a whole, which no community of color can afford not to do. We can see it from the denunciation of President Obama’s background in community organizing to Glenn Beck’s attacks on environmental leader Van Jones, cultural leader Yosi Sergeant and FCC Diversity Chief Mark Lloyd. This attack, like those, is a warning to anyone who adopts organizing as a social change strategy.
Does ACORN need tighter internal controls? Certainly, and so do most community organizations, which are perpetually cash-strapped, in part because funders are never interested in funding “overhead” and “administration.” If the search for “corruption” among community-based organizations gathers steam, I guarantee that any number of groups will be tied up in investigative hell for years. It’s dangerous to imagine that once they’re done with ACORN, the right won’t come looking for that one mistake you made years ago that can be attached to a bunch of lies to discredit and take down your organization. Obviously, we should pay attention to our inner workings, whether someone is paying for that or not, but even the most rigorous internal scrutiny won’t save us from a well-funded opposition that is willing to lie.
The attack on ACORN isn’t about fighting corruption. If it was, then dozens of corporations with federal contracts far larger than ACORN’s would be under investigation now, or would already have been cut off. The anti-ACORN Senate bill implicates any government contractor that has fraudulent paperwork, or is accused of violating lobbying or campaign finance laws. That list includes Blackwater, the private security contractor that has been implicated in civilian deaths during the Iraq war. Florida Congressman Alan Grayson is collecting a list of such contractors.
Of course, Congress could make ACORN obsolete by passing and enforcing laws that protect poor people from being pushed to the margins of society. Instead of paying ACORN to register voters, the federal government could actually punish voter suppression, which is largely directed at people of color and immigrants. It could adopt automatic voter registration systems that would be triggered by an 18th birthday or driver’s license being issued. It could pass predatory lending laws that protect us from insane interest rates, and then ACORN wouldn’t have to counsel its members about avoiding foreclosure.
The assault on ACORN is an assault on community organizing. Organizing is essential to building the power of poor people, immigrants and people of color to protect their interests. This is the time to stand up for ACORN, not just to keep this vital part of our national infrastructure, but also to prevent the hate from tying up all of us. That’s why we must demand that our election officials and media outlets stop this unwarranted campaign against the poor and people of color.
Copyright © Pacific News Service
Comments are closed

13 Comments so far
Show AllEmbezzle from an organization that is established to help the poor. Suhweeet. Nice work if one has the stomach for it I 'spose.
Haven't you ever heard of "Vulture Capitalists"? This is small potatoes! Greg Palast and Robert Kennedy Jr exposed the filthy practice, but they won't be stopped by simple exposure since they have no morals or ethics to start with. They can actually say "It's only business" with a straight face. Never heard of them...check it out; http://kennedy121.wordpress.com/2009/08/04/vuluture-capital/
A simple audit and a complete investigation by the AG's office will soon clear things up. But embezzlement, the willingness to subvert the law by employees, the voter fraud exposed so far I would hardly consider an attack by the right. You can't find something if its not there.
I look forward to your soonest posting of links to "the voter fraud exposed so far."
Don't tell me to do my own research. I can't find what isn't there.
Just as the Robber Barons of the Gilded Age had their minions go after organized labor, or anything that would improve the lot of those less fortunate, so to is ACORN the target of our current crop of corporate bandits and their media shills. The reason for this is simple, ACORN is quite good at what they do: register poor people to vote, advocate for them against predatory businesses such as check cashing stores, and the adoption of living wage ordinances for those companies doing government contracts. ACORN has cost these corporate crooks money, and in their eyes, that is an unforgivable sin.
Sioux Rose
NATE: Everything you relate is true, but I would add another element to the discussion. Every fascist system has required the use of a scapegoat population so that the hatred and angst festering in the population of overworked, underpaid laborers has a redi-made target. THAT is also part of the stategy here. I meet these types of people. One guy I know who is so wonderful in many ways, has a great connection with the natural world, absolutely rails when he sees a homeless vet panhandling on the exit ramp from a Florida state highway. One day I purchased a lunch for this guy and seeing the vet, handed him part of the lunch instead of giving him money. Later when I handed my friend a GRATIS (since it was my gift) lunch, he was almost furious that I gave part of it to the vet! People that perceive themselves having little, have a tendency to eye the person next to them. There is a fear of looking up to properly recognize who's pulling the strings and how this mechanism might be altered (if enough persons were to act in unison as history boldly portrays). So this particular diversionary tactic is aimed at the lower income population. Let's face it, the think tanks have their Ph.D psychologists on board, many fully understand the power of framing issues and how to go about dividing so as to conquer.
Europeans must look at this Acorn purposeful smear campaign, added to the images of Black citizens on New Orleans rooftops awaiting help, added to our mercenary approach to universal health care, added to today's release of new drones prepared to kill with anonymity. America's morality is in a TOILET. It is sickening for those of us who do NOT go along with these programs, and wish to dynamically alter this life-negating paradigm before it negates all of us.
Sioux Rose: Your added comment bringing in the scapegoat element is on the mark. Creating scapegoats is part and parcel of the "divide and conquer" strategy, a crucial part of any fascist's playbook. It feeds into a behavior that one often sees in packs (the most basic form of mammalian social structure beyond the family), the most vicious and constant fights are between the lower members of the pack, as being the absolute lowest is usually a slow death sentence. Superimpose this on humans and the behavior you saw between two lower members of the man pack was not surprising in the least.
As for Europeans, based upon the non-scientific sample based of my friends and relatives across the pond -- it is a mix of laughter, pity, and disbelief.
Sioux Rose
Hello, Nate: Thank you for your comment in response. Being across "the pond" seems more compelling by the day. Perhaps those of us with eyes NOT wide shut, dealing with the breakdown of America happening at full throttle are made of a strong enough fiber to not only endure this cycle, but are destined to take part (in whatever small, creative, intelligent ways we can) in the resurrection of our nation's symbolic Phoenix. My faith in this prospect waxes and wanes. There is also the fear that that which taints the American-dream-turned-nightmare could, through the vast network of elites and the totalitarian tools at their disposal, extend well past US borders. U.K is using quite a bit of surveillance, and nations that ought know better are lined up in Afghanistan with their hands out awaiting the oil/gas deposits found along that geographical "trade route."
Although history provides sociologists and psychologists with ample data on the proverbial pecking order, or hierarchical structure(s) that tends to result when human beings collectively form societies, I still believe an egalitarian system is possible. Amid the inevitable collapse ahead (ecology/banking/war-based economies) the opportunity exists for establishing different societal structures. The problem is that so many have been so long conditioned by "might makes right" creeds that for them to alter behavior in pursuit of more equitable roles may be almost impossible. Almost.
The right wants everything back--and more--and is slowly getting rid of what brought Obama and the Dems into power. I'm a little worried.
When they came for the organizers . . . .
We have to aggressively defend ACORN and counter the smear machine of the right. It must not only be stopped in its filthy tracks, we must turn it back by exposing it's own involvement in corporate crimes against the nation. Carl Rove accuses ACORN of electoral fraud!?! If we can't expose that hypocrisy we might as well commit mass suicide before they come to exterminate us.
Folks, we use to have the Red menace, but now we have the Acorn menace. All I can say is the rabid, right wing, nuts must have a lot to fear from the Acorn menace!
I hope you saw that the Democrats voted overwhelmingly to de-fund ACORN. Or did that rabid right wing MAKE them do it?
America has a double standard, one that is against groups that help the poor and one that is for those that make capital for profit. We all have seen what crimes the private contractors have gotten away with over the years especially during the war on terror. I saw what crimes private contractors did during the economic sanctions against Iraq and how much they got away with while my friend suffers the misery of a 22 year sentence for breaking IEEPA to help the starving victims of the sanctions, mostly children.
During the cold war Americans who helped the poor were called communists. Now, when you help the poor in America you are a socialist, if you help the poor in the middle east you are a terrorist sympathizer and a national security concern. ACORN is not perfect and when they see their wrong they try to correct it. If they had the money the private corporations have they could scrutinize and supervise their workers better.