EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Fascist America: Are We There Yet?
And every time this question got asked, people like Chip Berlet and Dave Neiwert and Fred Clarkson and yours truly would look up from our maps like a parent on a long drive, and smile a wan smile of reassurance. "Wellll...we're on a bad road, and if we don't change course, we could end up there soon enough. But there's also still plenty of time and opportunity to turn back. Watch, but don't worry. As bad as this looks: no -- we are not there yet."
In tracking the mileage on this trip to perdition, many of us relied on the work of historian Robert Paxton, who is probably the world's pre-eminent scholar on the subject of how countries turn fascist. In a 1998 paper published in The Journal of Modern History, Paxton argued that the best way to recognize emerging fascist movements isn't by their rhetoric, their politics, or their aesthetics. Rather, he said, mature democracies turn fascist by a recognizable process, a set of five stages that may be the most important family resemblance that links all the whole motley collection of 20th Century fascisms together. According to our reading of Paxton's stages, we weren't there yet. There were certain signs -- one in particular -- we were keeping an eye out for, and we just weren't seeing it.
And now we are. In fact, if you know what you're looking for, it's suddenly everywhere. It's odd that I haven't been asked for quite a while; but if you asked me today, I'd tell you that if we're not there right now, we've certainly taken that last turn into the parking lot and are now looking for a space. Either way, our fascist American future now looms very large in the front windshield -- and those of us who value American democracy need to understand how we got here, what's changing now, and what's at stake in the very near future if these people are allowed to win -- or even hold their ground.
What is fascism?
The word has been bandied about by so many people so wrongly for so long that, as Paxton points out, "Everybody is somebody else's fascist." Given that, I always like to start these conversations by revisiting Paxton's essential definition of the term:
"Fascism is a system of political authority and social order intended to reinforce the unity, energy, and purity of communities in which liberal democracy stands accused of producing division and decline."
Elsewhere, he refines this further as
"a form of political behavior marked by obsessive preoccupation with community decline, humiliation or victimhood and by compensatory cults of unity, energy and purity, in which a mass-based party of committed nationalist militants, working in uneasy but effective collaboration with traditional elites, abandons democratic liberties and pursues with redemptive violence and without ethical or legal restraints goals of internal cleansing and external expansion."
.
Jonah Goldberg aside, that's a basic definition most legitimate scholars in the field can agree on, and the one I'll be referring to here.
From proto-fascism to the tipping point
According to Paxton, fascism unfolds in five stages. The first two are pretty solidly behind us -- and the third should be of particular interest to progressives right now.
In the first stage, a rural movement emerges to effect some kind of nationalist renewal (what Roger Griffin calls "palingenesis" -- a phoenix-like rebirth from the ashes). They come together to restore a broken social order, always drawing on themes of unity, order, and purity. Reason is rejected in favor of passionate emotion. The way the organizing story is told varies from country to country; but it's always rooted in the promise of restoring lost national pride by resurrecting the culture's traditional myths and values, and purging society of the toxic influence of the outsiders and intellectuals who are blamed for their current misery.
Fascism only grows in the disturbed soil of a mature democracy in crisis. Paxton suggests that the Ku Klux Klan, which formed in reaction to post-Civil War Reconstruction, may in fact be the first authentically fascist movement in modern times. Almost every major country in Europe sprouted a proto-fascist movement in the wretched years following WWI (when the Klan enjoyed a major resurgence here as well) -- but most of them stalled either at this first stage, or the next one.
As Rick Perlstein documented in his two books on Barry Goldwater and Richard Nixon, modern American conservatism was built on these same themes. From "Morning in America" to the Rapture-ready religious right to the white nationalism promoted by the GOP through various gradients of racist groups, it's easy to trace how American proto-fascism offered redemption from the upheavals of the 1960s by promising to restore the innocence of a traditional, white, Christian, male-dominated America. This vision has been so thoroughly embraced that the entire Republican party now openly defines itself along these lines. At this late stage, it's blatantly racist, sexist, repressed, exclusionary, and permanently addicted to the politics of fear and rage. Worse: it doesn't have a moment's shame about any of it. No apologies, to anyone. These same narrative threads have woven their way through every fascist movement in history.
In the second stage, fascist movements take root, turn into real political parties, and seize their seat at the table of power. Interestingly, in every case Paxton cites, the political base came from the rural, less-educated parts of the country; and almost all of them came to power very specifically by offering themselves as informal goon squads organized to intimidate farmworkers on behalf of the large landowners. The KKK disenfranchised black sharecroppers and set itself up as the enforcement wing of Jim Crow. The Italian Squadristi and the German Brownshirts made their bones breaking up farmers' strikes. And these days, GOP-sanctioned anti-immigrant groups make life hell for Hispanic agricultural workers in the US. As violence against random Hispanics (citizens and otherwise) increases, the right-wing goon squads are getting basic training that, if the pattern holds, they may eventually use to intimidate the rest of us.
Paxton wrote that succeeding at the second stage "depends on certain relatively precise conditions: the weakness of a liberal state, whose inadequacies condemn the nation to disorder, decline, or humiliation; and political deadlock because the Right, the heir to power but unable to continue to wield it alone, refuses to accept a growing Left as a legitimate governing partner." He further noted that Hitler and Mussolini both took power under these same circumstances: "deadlock of constitutional government (produced in part by the polarization that the fascists abetted); conservative leaders who felt threatened by the loss of their capacity to keep the population under control at a moment of massive popular mobilization; an advancing Left; and conservative leaders who refused to work with that Left and who felt unable to continue to govern against the Left without further reinforcement."
And more ominously: "The most important variables...are the conservative elites' willingness to work with the fascists (along with a reciprocal flexibility on the part of the fascist leaders) and the depth of the crisis that induces them to cooperate."
That description sounds eerily like the dire straits our Congressional Republicans find themselves in right now. Though the GOP has been humiliated, rejected, and reduced to rump status by a series of epic national catastrophes mostly of its own making, its leadership can't even imagine governing cooperatively with the newly mobilized and ascendant Democrats. Lacking legitimate routes back to power, their last hope is to invest the hardcore remainder of their base with an undeserved legitimacy, recruit them as shock troops, and overthrow American democracy by force. If they can't win elections or policy fights, they're more than willing to take it to the streets, and seize power by bullying Americans into silence and complicity.
When that unholy alliance is made, the third stage -- the transition to full-fledged government fascism -- begins.
The third stage: being there
All through the Bush years, progressive right-wing watchers refused to call it "fascism" because, though we kept looking, we never saw clear signs of a deliberate, committed institutional partnership forming between America's conservative elites and its emerging homegrown brownshirt horde. We caught tantalizing signs of brief flirtations -- passing political alliances, money passing hands, far-right moonbat talking points flying out of the mouths of "mainstream" conservative leaders. But it was all circumstantial, and fairly transitory. The two sides kept a discreet distance from each other, at least in public. What went on behind closed doors, we could only guess. They certainly didn't act like a married couple.
Now, the guessing game is over. We know beyond doubt that the Teabag movement was created out of whole cloth by astroturf groups like Dick Armey's FreedomWorks and Tim Phillips' Americans for Prosperity, with massive media help from FOX News. We see the Birther fracas -- the kind of urban myth-making that should have never made it out of the pages of the National Enquirer -- being openly ratified by Congressional Republicans. We've seen Armey's own professionally-produced field manual that carefully instructs conservative goon squads in the fine art of disrupting the democratic governing process -- and the film of public officials being terrorized and threatened to the point where some of them required armed escorts to leave the building. We've seen Republican House Minority Leader John Boehner applauding and promoting a video of the disruptions and looking forward to "a long, hot August for Democrats in Congress."
This is the sign we were waiting for -- the one that tells us that yes, kids: we are there now. America's conservative elites have openly thrown in with the country's legions of discontented far right thugs. They have explicitly deputized them and empowered them to act as their enforcement arm on America's streets, sanctioning the physical harassment and intimidation of workers, liberals, and public officials who won't do their political or economic bidding.
This is the catalyzing moment at which honest-to-Hitler fascism begins. It's also our very last chance to stop it.
The fail-safe point
According to Paxton, the forging of this third-stage alliance is the make-or-break moment -- and the worst part of it is that by the time you've arrived at that point, it's probably too late to stop it. From here, it escalates, as minor thuggery turns into beatings, killings, and systematic tagging of certain groups for elimination, all directed by people at the very top of the power structure. After Labor Day, when Democratic senators and representatives go back to Washington, the mobs now being created to harass them will remain to run the same tactics -- escalated and perfected with each new use -- against anyone in town whose color, religion, or politics they don't like. In some places, they're already making notes and taking names.
Where's the danger line? Paxton offers three quick questions that point us straight at it:
1. Are [neo- or protofascisms] becoming rooted as parties that represent major interests and feelings and wield major influence on the political scene?
2. Is the economic or constitutional system in a state of blockage apparently insoluble by existing authorities?
3. Is a rapid political mobilization threatening to escape the control of traditional elites, to the point where they would be tempted to look for tough helpers in order to stay in charge?
By my reckoning, we're three for three. That's too close. Way too close.
The Road Ahead
History tells us that once this alliance catalyzes and makes a successful bid for power, there's no way off this ride. As Dave Neiwert wrote in his recent book, The Eliminationists, "if we can only identify fascism in its mature form—the goose-stepping brownshirts, the full-fledged use of violence and intimidation tactics, the mass rallies—then it will be far too late to stop it." Paxton (who presciently warned that "An authentic popular fascism in the United States would be pious and anti-Black") agrees that if a corporate/brownshirt alliance gets a toehold -- as ours is now scrambling to do -- it can very quickly rise to power and destroy the last vestiges of democratic government. Once they start racking up wins, the country will be doomed to take the whole ugly trip through the last two stages, with no turnoffs or pit stops between now and the end.
What awaits us? In stage four, as the duo assumes full control of the country, power struggles emerge between the brownshirt-bred party faithful and the institutions of the conservative elites -- church, military, professions, and business. The character of the regime is determined by who gets the upper hand. If the party members (who gained power through street thuggery) win, an authoritarian police state may well follow. If the conservatives can get them back under control, a more traditional theocracy, corporatocracy, or military regime can re-emerge over time. But in neither case will the results resemble the democracy that this alliance overthrew.
Paxton characterizes stage five as "radicalization or entropy." Radicalization is likely if the new regime scores a big military victory, which consolidates its power and whets its appetite for expansion and large-scale social engineering. (See: Germany) In the absence of a radicalizing event, entropy may set in, as the state gets lost in its own purposes and degenerates into incoherence. (See: Italy)
It's so easy right now to look at the melee on the right and discount it as pure political theater of the most absurdly ridiculous kind. It's a freaking puppet show. These people can't be serious. Sure, they're angry -- but they're also a minority, out of power and reduced to throwing tantrums. Grown-ups need to worry about them about as much as you'd worry about a furious five-year-old threatening to hold her breath until she turned blue.
Unfortunately, all the noise and bluster actually obscures the danger. These people are as serious as a lynch mob, and have already taken the first steps toward becoming one. And they're going to walk taller and louder and prouder now that their bumbling efforts at civil disobedience are being committed with the full sanction and support of the country's most powerful people, who are cynically using them in a last-ditch effort to save their own places of profit and prestige.
We've arrived. We are now parked on the exact spot where our best experts tell us full-blown fascism is born. Every day that the conservatives in Congress, the right-wing talking heads, and their noisy minions are allowed to hold up our ability to govern the country is another day we're slowly creeping across the final line beyond which, history tells us, no country has ever been able to return.
How do we pull back? That's my next post.
Tip o' the hat to Chip Berlet and Steven Martin for their research help and encouragement.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

127 Comments so far
Show AllI'll give you the short answer and wait until your next article.
Of course we are there. We have been there since the coup in 2000 and then the next coup in 2001. The Patriot Act, the MCA and the bailouts put the icing on the cake.
"How do we pull back?"....Not without MASS participation. And THE MASSES ARE STILL ASLEEP from the 2008 fiasco of lies and MSM hypnosis.
Mass participation must include some inroad into the MSM. Without that, we are peppered, salted and cooked.
@easydoesit - The elites have already planned for this. The Halliburton/KBR built camps, Blackwater mercs, Microwave Area Denial System weapons, 'free speech zones', total corporate control of the media and 'public' airwaves, the North American Army Command (NORTHCOM)... the list goes on.
And the Democrats were in on the ground floor. They did nothing to repeal or oppose an of the draconian measures that the Bush junta enacted.
Now with the rumors of an enforced 'flu vaccination' program floating around, along with evidence of squaline, a known human sterility adjuvant in the flu shot(which has been met with telling silence from the drug industry), would not doubt there is about to be something very...interesting... in the works for the population of the US.
Walk in peace.
Galenwainwright... August 9th, 2009 3:54 pm..............ABSOLUTELY! You can believe all this Tea Party nonsense is merely a diversionary tactic well orchestrated to keep out attention focused on the "the lovely girl in the cute outfit" and not what is going on up their sleeves or under the stage. JUST like on 9/11. KNOW that the MSM is complicit every step of the way. JUST like on 9/11.
Galenwainwright... August 9th, 2009 3:54 pm
Great post. Thank you.
What is all this fuss about some angry "right" wingers yelling at town hall meetings? Big deal. Obamacare is a fraud, with its retention of 30% insurer take, and doomed-to-failure "public option." We should all be as angry and visible.
I am not afraid of the truck driving red neck down the street who listens to Alex Jones and owns several guns. What I am afraid of is a government run for the benefit of corporations, domestic spying, war waged under false pretenses, media that is a seamless merger between corporate and government interests, an unaccountable Federal Reserve, a leverage-and-derivative-based economy, millions of jobs controlled by the government funded yet privately owned corporation CityCorp, and so forth and so on.
Those on the "left" need to see that they have more in common with someone like Ron Paul than they do with Larry Summers, Rahm Emmanuel, Tim Geitner, and Barack Obama. Paul and many other true conservatives are as averse to wars of aggression and crony capitalism as any Kucinich-like dove. Paul wants to STOP the trillion dollar per year waste that is our overseas empire with 800 bases in over 130 countries. So-called "paleoconservatives" want nothing to do with empire building. Webster Tarpley wants tariffs on goods coming in from China and other sweatshop havens in order to protect American jobs. He wants a Tobin tax on all speculative investments like currency trading; he wants to abolish derivatives. Tarpley is formerly of LaRouche PAC. I thought I had nothing in common with LaRouche, but listening to him now, he and Tarpley sound way more like FDR with their proposed social investments and the specificity and intelligence of their ideas than does Obama (who is vapid and mealy mouthed by comparison). Both Kucinich and Paul are against the police state, the GWOT, trade treaties that violate our civil rights and standards of living, invasions of privacy, and so forth.
There is common ground here. We better find it before another war or manmade bioattack (ie the flu vaccinations) distract us yet again.
I would be for a Nader/Paul, Nader/Kucinich, or Paul/Kucinich ticket. You could throw in Cynthia McKinney and Mike Gravel in there if you wish, too. We need some cross-over. The two party system has us in a stranglehold. I agree that we must not wait for 2012 however. We must agitate now.
I actively support 9/11 Truth, End The Fed, the Green Party, Campaign for Liberty, and We Are Change, among other things.
Peace
Indeed, we are there already. Its over. And I'm afraid there will be no a appearance of "masses of people".
We are leaderless.
Leaderless? That's YOUR job. Get cracking!
Right on! However - we were a Fascist state by 1992. The all out "war on the urban poor" was well under way as the white right used drug war (a brazilian construct) to insure white elite control over the military industrial complex that makes the bacon for the both the good old boys and the skull and bones types who literally called the shots - in Dallas and where ever else they so desired. Nip it in the budding stages (democracy) was the old school method that the GI bill rocked in the post WWII era, but the election of JFK called demanded a return to the status quo, and we have been fighting that war since 1968. We are in a great repression, and have been since MLK and RFK's deaths.
The masses are not necessary to contol an empire. I think the mongols were less than 13% of the Chinese empire they ran. No one has spent more time and money to understand how to burden, bleed, fleece, and slaughter humans in order to maintain the status quo than the bucks behind the white right - a bunch that could care less about america.
I'm reading a book called "Horizontalism" about the people's revolution in Argentina in 200 and 2001. Really great book, mostly interviews.
Things will get worse here...much worse...but eventually it will get so bad that people will wake up. Americans have had the luxury of a large middle class for some time. Now that it's going away more and more people will get uncomfortable and that will wake them up. I hope we have enough time!
This article makes some good points, but I would dispute their rather flimsy contention that history always repeats itself predictably.
1. "Lacking legitimate routes back to power, their last hope is to invest the hardcore remainder of their base with an undeserved legitimacy, recruit them as shock troops, and overthrow American democracy by force."
This can only happen if the police, the military chain of command, and its civilian oversight is in disarray, as it was in Germany in the 1920's. Does anyone think this is the case in the US today?
2. "This is the sign we were waiting for"
Huh? Sounds like the authors are gleefully anticipating the next stages, as if this is an intellectual game.
Yes, the teabaggers remind us of Brownshirts. But do they have that much power? Any act of violence they commit needs to be dealt with swiftly and decisively, just like any other crime. Otherwise they are free to voice their opinions.
Already, more levelheaded citizens are showing up at town hall meetings in bigger numbers and pushing back. When we show up at these meetings in numbers, the teabaggers and their ilk are shown to not be the force they would like the Congressmen and the media to think they are.
I take issue with you, hamster.
In answer to your point 1.: Yes, this is the case today with Napolitano's blending of all three into 'law enforcement cooperation centers' with reps from local police, FBI, military, CIA, and DEA coordinating.
answer to 2. The forerunners for the teabaggers were the 'Swiftboater'. The incitement of the disrupters of the town halls is vicious as well as misinformed. I heard an commentator questioning some about their reasons. Turns out that their complaints and fear points are resolved in the very act they are opposing with violence. And in case you had not noticed, the more backers that show up for the town halls, like unionists, does nothing except increase the number of protestors with an increasing level of violence - creating th every conditions described in the above article.
But I could be wrong !
Yes, you could be wrong. On point #2: At our local town hall meeting backers outnumbered teabaggers and noticeably countered their influence and aggressiveness.
On point #1, I agree that the concentration of law enforcement into constructs like the "Department of Homeland Security" are onerous, oppressive, and bloated and should be gotten rid of, along with pretty much everything else Bush came up with. But I'm not sure their overriding purpose is to overthrow American democracy or even to round up and imprison American dissenters.
But I could be wrong!
Hamster, I share your skepticism about the stages relative to where we are. The assassination that happened in Kansas was more single-issue than broadly political. And the subject is in custody.
For a good look at the crucial years in Germany, from WWI up to 1933, see Sabastian Haffner's book titled "Defying Hitler." Written by a white progressive born in 1907, he was a young lawyer in the early 1930s. He documents what it was like up close and very personal. We are not there yet. Not until all American lawyers have to join a military camp to pass their bar exams, and much much more.
Sure, we have mass murder of foreign people being legal. But that has been going on since the approval by Congress of the invasion of Florida in 1819. Obama kills innocent civilians nearly every day with drone attacks and the three US-controlled occupations in the Mideast.
But the idea that domestic political murder is now *sanctioned* by the authorities is false. Some of the signs exist. But your point that domestic violence would be treated "like any other crime" is an astute observation.
Great article. You have explained for me feelings that I haven't been able to put words to for 9 years except that "I'm afraid". About every 6-8 months since 2000, I have found myself seriously looking at foreign real estate, then backing away, not entirely trusting my gut feeling that the U.S. was becoming a bad place to live.
I think all hell is about to break loose here and when it does, the World Trade Towers incident will seem like diddly-squat compared to being a non-elite in a police state.
Pippilin August 9th, 2009 4:16 pm........Keep looking...it may not be too late. Try the Philipines. The dollar is very strong there, real estate is still reasonable, although you may have to marry a Filipino to own property. The people are the warmest, most humble and sincere people I have ever come across. They will roll out the red carpet even if they have to beg or borrow one. Check out "Island Properties" on the net. I was in Cebu, where you have malls like nothing in the US, wonderful beaches and lush mountains. The fruit is ambrosia.
Jim Shea
I am deeply afraid for my grandchildren. We are well on the way to a fascism that is controlled by big corporations and the military with help from religious fundamentalists. We are already a global bully of the worst sort and it's hard to see any limit to the damage we can cause to the world political system. On top of that we face a global climate catastrophe whose existance the fascists resolutely deny.
T.S. Eliot was right:
This is the way the world ends.
This is the way the world ends.
This is the way the world ends.
Not with a bang but a whimper.
Jim Shea August 9th, 2009 4:54 pm...Not to be picky, but believe me, we are there...not "well on the way".
The wimper was 2000. The sobbing started on 9/11. The weeping was the bailout. In 2008, we went full cycle back to the wimper and remain there...wimpering without a clue as to the next step....they are eons ahead of us.....
I've been waiting for the 'knock on the door' for some time.
The United States under Obama and the Democrats is very much like the Weimar Republic or France in the 1930's.
Me, too, with a loaded 12-gauge ...
Ecuuuse me but just where has the bogeyman of fundamentalism besides islam been gaining ground with respect to govt power?
FyI: We already have defacto economic fascism, obwama, bwarney fwank , timmy geitner etc.
C street and the GOP, maybe?
BS-ist:
Are you for real?
What in hell are you talking about? Making fun of names, denying how powerful Christian fundamentalists are (for example in the US military www.thefreelibrary.com/Author+warns+of+fundamentalist+surge+in+U.S.+military.-a0171540808 )...
Defacto...fascism I get, althought "economic fascism" is redundant and repetitive; but coming at it from a position of trying to ridicule the left tip of the right wing... you baffle me. Would you please sometime somewhere on some issue just say what you mean, please? Otherwise we will just have to consider you a robotic troll, designed to throw spam spanners into the train of thought to derail it.
DING,ding, ding, ding, ding ding ding!!! And we have a winner, J4zonian.
If you have read other articles posted on CD like Barbara Ehrenreicht's criminaliztion of poverty piece, you'll see that someone let blacksocialist into the bad sh*t and bs can't hold a thought thread. Don't bother engaging him, waste of time.
Fascism? I think not. How about calling this a fake "democracy" where we're told two pick between the same choices that look cosmetically different. This need not be limited to politics but to most of the daily products you buy and use in life. To top it off, we're spreading fake "democracy" to Iraq and Afghanistan with Pakistan and possibly Iran and making the Middle East HATE US ! It seems that according to most Republicans and Democrats, just judge a book by its book cover and not its contents. Even last year there were good pols out there both in the primaries and the general elections but it appears that falling for the corporate media trash and voting for pols based on who fundraises the most, party affiliation, phony corporate media written polls, faux "personality", etc ... are all the matter. Pay no attention to non-monied pols ready to address the issues like real adults instead of Manchurian brats like Dubya and Barry ! If Obama hadn't been doing a dirt poor job already, the author wouldn't be going through all this trouble writing such an article. I paid attention to the issues and gladly voted for Ralph Nader.
J.B.
What hides underneath this fake democracy where we are told to pick between the same choices? I don't know what to label them either.
Regardless of what to label them, the pols are not the source of our problems; they are just the mechanism for the problem. The problem is our way of life (or western industrial civilization) and how it requires exploitation, domination, ecocide, theft and murder to continue this way of living. Even if responsible politicians were to get into power they would face the same old problem that the old corrupt "masters of the universe" face. Which is... how to take resources from other people's landbase to continue our way of life.
Check out the book "Endgame" by Derrick Jensen... he explains it much better than I can. Somebody on CD mentioned it a few weeks back (THANK YOU!!!) and I haven't been able to put the book(s) down since they arrived.
"Not to be confused with a republic, a democracy is a system in which, theoretically, what the majority says goes. The reality, however, is more complex and much uglier. In a democracy, various political elites struggle for control of the state apparatus by appealing to the material interests of large voting blocks with promises of legalized graft". –H. H. Hoppe-
Are we there yet?
You can see it and you don't need binoculars. It's eroding quickly, like a sand castle at high tide.
What is fascism?
At the peak of its expression, fascism is the religious veneration of death and cruelty. That's always been part of the United States. The money madness gripping this country for the last 30 + years is part of that. It's almost as if the pirates stealing the money think that the more they have, the longer they'll live and the more they will be favored by God, the fount of all money. Throw in some inferior human being shredded into fleshy slaw by a cluster bomb dropped by a hymn singing pilot and you have fascism, American-style.
Fascism came to America with the Indian wars... Spread with human chattel slavery...
And set down roots with wage slavery, corporate personhood, and became cemented with $$$ as free speech and eminent domain for corporate development... Our leaders have been assassinated, our children have been brainwashed, and our treasury has been looted...
We are one more false flag attack away from declaring martial law and closing the borders for good...
I don't want to be here when that happens...
Fascism Anyone?
The 14 characteristics of Fascism
by Dr. Lawrence Britt
Free Inquiry magazine, Spring 2003
Dr. Britt, a political scientist, studied the fascist regimes of Hitler (Germany), Mussolini (Italy), Franco (Spain), Suharto (Indonesia), and Pinochet (Chile). He found the regimes all had 14 things in common, and he calls these the identifying characteristics of fascism. ]
1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism -- Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.
2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights -- Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of "need." The people tend to 'look the other way' or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc.
3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause -- The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial, ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.
4. Supremacy of the Military -- Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized.
5. Rampant Sexism -- The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Opposition to abortion is high, as is homophobia and antigay legislation and national policy.
6. Controlled Mass Media -- Sometimes the media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or through sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in wartime, is very common.
7. Obsession with National Security -- Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses.
8. Religion and Government are Intertwined -- Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government's policies or actions.
9. Corporate Power is Protected -- The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.
10. Labor Power is Suppressed -- Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely or are severely suppressed.
11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts -- Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts is openly attacked, and governments often refuse to fund the arts.
12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment -- Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses, and even forego civil liberties, in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations.
13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption -- Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions, and who use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders.
14. Fraudulent Elections -- Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against (or even the assassination of) opposition candidates, the use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and the manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections.
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Fascism/14_Characteristics_Fascism.html
I sent this to a right wing republican and he emailed me back that this is Obama.
Of course he did. The power of projection.
This article like Chris Hedges articles on an authoritarian government coming from the Right is very much needed in this country. I think that many Americans are very distrustful of those who are intimidating others at town meetings but being liberal or independent minded we are a more cautious group which the Right (those people that were terrified that terrorist would be locked up in maximum security prisons) misreads as cowardice.
The reason I'm writing this is to let you know of a (FREE) short, seven chapter book/pamphlet on the internet written by a professor who has studied RWAs (Right Wing Authoritarians) for 40 years. Once you read it you will gain a great deal of insight as to why and how these people come to decisions. The study of RWAs started in post WWII with the question; why did the so called "good Germans" follow Hitler. This book does not challenge but highly complements what the article's authors are saying. I think this book should be required reading in all high schools.
http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~altemey/
These RWAs are terrified that they are losing control and their minds are not wired to adjust to other conditions. That is why they are so scared and scary. There is no alternative (TINA) to a RWA world.
The word fascism is used too often, the "Liberal Fascism" author is a good example. However, there are some worrying signs. For one, the Nazis never actually got the majority of votes from Germans, at no time did the majority of people back the Nazis. The far right has support from a relatively small percentage of the public, but they are vocal, they are active and they like guns a lot. The Nazis actually lost votes after taking power and were brought back to life by big German industrialists. Who is funding the disruptino of these health talks? We aren't even debating single payer, so they're disrupting exactly WHAT? At least though in Germany there was an influencial and powerful left wing movement, who almost came to power in a revolution a few years before the Nazis were handed power by the social democrats. The author of "A People's History of the World" wrote a lot about this. He talks about it in that book and a book about the nearly successful German workers revolution.
Here though in the US there is no leftist movement. People are increasingly taking what are regarded as "leftist" positions on issues, but that is because they're so obviously better than the status quo positions. What ARE the right wing crazies fighting against? If their chants were honest, they'd get up and scream, "The most expensive and inefficient health care in the world NOW! We want medical caused bankruptcy!" What are they defending in the economic realm? The de-industrialization of their country, the stagnant wages (thanks to THEIR ideas being put into practice), the loss of state sovereignty?
The most ironic fact of all is that THEIR leaders have implemented the very policies they cite as leading to their downfall and the growing of state power, and they're attacking the people who warned against the effects of their policies. How many of these "tea baggers" attacked the left for opposing the growing power of the state after 9/11, calling us "un-American"? Just to point out how dumb these people were at the time, and are now: Where I worked at the time in San Diego a few years after 9/11, they changed the menu. It no longer said "FRENCH fries", they were called "Freedom fries", lettuce was now "freedom cabbage". No lie.
It wasn't the left who argued for NAFTA, and NAFTA has caused immigration (which makes the right cuckoo for cocoa puffs) to increase many times over. NAFT has thrown Mexican farmers off the land thanks to our high subsidized corporate imports. NAFTA and "free trade" deals have caused their wages to decline. The shredding of the constitutional rights happened thanks, in large part, by the people THEY support and put into office. The far right was the most vocal in giving Bush as much power as possible after 9/11 and treating him like a living god. Now all of their stupidity is causing them pain and instead of looking in the mirror and blaming themselves they attack the people who warned them.
"they're attacking the people who warned against the effects of their policies"
Not really. The rightwing rabble, despite suffering under an avalanche of propaganda delusion, clearly understand that the pseudo-left elites and their Demok servants are no more trustworthy than the rest of the elite establishment. The rightwing rabble know the most they can get under Demoks is a union card and factory wage slavery. They want a whole lot more than that.
I don't think the "Right wing rabble" trust the pseudo left political elite, as you say, but they apparently do trust our wonderful capitalist dog-eat-dog system. They've been brainwashed. If they want a whole lot more, what do they want? Do they all think they can be rich?
"If they want a whole lot more, what do they want? Do they all think they can be rich?"
Working class people on the right and left are different in many ways, but the biggest difference is in regards to morals. We on the left are horrified by imperialism, in whatever form it takes. The right doesn't have the same problem, they just need a platitude to mouth off, to justify in their heads (assuming they aren't sociopaths) immoral and violent policies. "Communism", "socialism" "terrorists", "Cuba", now "Chavez", "Venezuela", etc, and they don't have to even know what the hell these words or ideas MEAN. When they look at "free trade" deals, they don't care what the affects are on poorer people and countries, or the money and resources we steal from them. That is ok. They care about how the loot is divided up. We can steal from these countries, but how much am I gonna get from it? Remember, as the right wing posters always say, there is always "human nature" (the claim is absurd and never backed up, but its a saying they like and use whenever they can't defend their positions). They are just doing what all "rational people" do in their minds, they're backing policies that are in their best interest, right? Give me a good wage, a house and a big TV and I'm sold. The left can't do this, there are fundamental morals that they'd have to ignore to compromise with these people. That's why I hate the whole "post-ideology" talk, we're all in this together. No the hell we aren't, there are conflicting interests and we do not benefit equally from one policy vs. another, we also work less or more for more or less money (depending on what policies are choosen). Hell, the more the right wins, the less the rich have to actually work (they can just play around with currencies on a computer screen or something) and the more they'll get from that little amount of work they do. These conflicts are largely along class lines. Realizing and acknowledging this might be a thing of the past, but the truth is the same now that it was when it was ok to say it.
"Not really. The rightwing rabble, despite suffering under an avalanche of propaganda delusion, clearly understand that the pseudo-left elites and their Demok servants are no more trustworthy"
That's not who I'm talking about. The Democratic Party wasn't warning of the long term consequences of "free market" policies, a large and violent military, environmental destruction, etc. They cheered that on, there are few leaders in the party and they warned, if anything, about how many workers and social movement leaders were simply afraid of change.
No, the right fights their own straw men, like "socialism". The socialists, anarchists, etc (ie marginal groups in the US who don't have access to the majority of people in the country) were warning what would happen by adopting neo-liberal economic policies. They are now boogey men, that are being used as excuses by the far right and "conservatives" about everything that has gone wrong. The unions and social movements protested NAFTA (well the union rank and file at least), their warnings have turned out to be true. When the left points out the benefits of universal single payer, they are right (which even many on the right in the elite admit), but any movement in that direction (supported by a majority of people in this country) is fought against, with "socialism" being a useful punching bag.
You are right that they want more than what the Democrats are and were offerring, as I said though, I wasn't talking about Democrats. They're horrible and are just as much a problem as the right, for different reasons. Kinda like the social democrats and how gutless and self serving they were when Hitler was making his way up. Hell, some of them even cheered him on, how he would bring "stability" to Germany, the same group of cowards who killed Rosa Luxemburg. How many Democrats voted for and support these horrific "free trade" deals, mouth off platitudes about the wonders of "free enterprise"? How many supported Bush at his most authoritarian, his wars, his tax cuts? We agree, believe me.
i'm not going to quibble w/any particular point this author makes, except when she says "the fascists will be anti-black." well duh.
but did this author ever consider that, you know, black reagan superjesus might be "anti-black" too? that america's hitler could be black (not that obama=hitler, not saying that, but worse than bush, yes)?
i'm not so sure this town-hall anti-obama health care "reform" is a sign of full-blown fascism. obama's health care plan is a nightmare. so, whatever the incoherencies and stupidities of these town-hall protesters (and teabaggers), they are "fascist" for opposing obama's economic policies?
well then thank god saint obama was elected to save us from all this "fascism".
I was disappointed that the article barely mentions the fundamentally critical relationship of corporate and state power. All of other characteristics flow from this foundational reality. Maybe the author doesn't mention this because the US has long been a corporate state. But I am not so sure. Mainstream histories of fascism rarely mention the union of corporate and state power - for obvious reasons - the US has always had fascist characteristics. It must be emphasized therefore, that the solution to fascism, lies in breaking that union of corporate and state power. Without doing that, fascism will always be just beneath the surface.
The collusion between the corporate elites and the state is definitely a fact in the U.S. This collusion was greatly enhanced and entrenched during the Bush regime. It is the key to what this country is becoming. The corporate elites have been gradually eroding all the public institutions of the state and turning them into enablers of their private interests.
Tom, you've nailed it on this article leaving out corporatism and nationalism from the definition of fascism. Others have noted that the description of fascism in this article is maybe too complex, especially when people like Mussolini have defined it so simply and succinctly.
The thuggery is nothing new from the Republicans. Party operatives sent Republican aides to pound on the the Florida court's door when they were recounting the 2000 election returns. However, these sorts of Republican protests are always ad hoc organized efforts. There isn't a Republican constituency that protests independently. There's no movement.
So, I think this article overreaches.
We have fascism already in the United States because of corporate control. However, the role of the Dem and Repug leadership is to pretend that the republic still functions. The Dem and Repug parties agree to follow the rules of the corporations that fund their campaigns. People would know the gig is up if they started goose-stepping, so they don't do that.
In a way, this article wants to find the traditional strong-arming tactics of the fascist state in the form of violent mobs, but that's not how they operate. Control in the United States is done by controlling public opinion. If that doesn't work, they've got stuff like Northcom.
And by the way, this is a police state. Obama didn't repudiate Bush's whole-scale domestic surveillance; he embraced it.
This article would make its point a lot more effectively by adding that several Constitutional rights are effectively nullified since Bush, with no change under Obama.
-TIA
Everybody posting on CD is headed for prison.
You have no idea how common it is in poor communities to see big, shy, dirt poor fifteen to thirty year olds in short sleeved threadbare shirts just waiting, no, longing to be told what to do so they can have somewhere to belong.
Once given a 'home' i.e. a uniform and a head full of bullshit, they won't be shy anymore. And if you don't believe they will shove a rifle butt down your throat you have a hell of a surprise coming.
Let them come, because I DO have something for their punk asses. It's called fighting for my rights as a citizen..."against ALL enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC".
Did you get that, NSA/FBI/"Homeland Security"? I hope so because some of us are NOT a bit cowed.
I just can not wait to see the Xe (formerly Blackwater) goons patrolling my neighborhood. Can... not... wait... if you get my drift... I have had just about enough of the bullshit.
I'd like about 5 minutes with that gutless Eric Prince, and we'd see if he can handle someone his own size instead of just murdering defenseless Iraqis.
I'd sign up for the effort to send these people to Jesus a little sooner than they expected!
The difference between fascist movements of the past and present day USA is:
Big screen TVs, HD, Real3D, XBox, iWhatevers, and a population of fat, lazy buyers and spectators.
Seriously, why go totally fascist when we're already letting a small group of corporate/government 'elite' steal everything that's not nailed down without raising a peep? It'd be like trying to find an even more elaborate way of robbing a bank, in spite of the fact you've already got the keys and alarm code. "Hmmm... maybe we could tunnel from the spa next door..."
Plus, fascists of the past didn't have a population voluntarily sitting in front of an electronic box for 6-8 hours a day for 20-30 years receiving the same 2 messages: you are what you buy, and you are not being brainwashed into believing you are what you buy...
Basically, we just don't have a mass movement left in us anymore... small blips on the radar, sure, but for the most part, we're, like, fascism, whatever, pass the bong...
Great post. Funny and pretty much true.
There's only so much people will take, even when they're sedated. We'll see how far the fat cats will go preserving their pathetic, tainted pile of cash.
Yep. That's what Aldous Huxley said in his book Brave New World. The most efficient totalitarian government is one where the slaves love their slavery so much that they refuse to be liberated.
But here, when the big fascist push comes, I think we will split into three countries (New England and some peripheral states in the midwest and Colorado, the South from Virginia to Arizona with Utah, Idaho, Montana and Nevada thrown in and finally the West Coast states of California, Oregon and Washington as a country). I think it will be a lot messier than the USSR disassembly. I hope I'm wrong.
ok but it doesn't have to be so complicated.
Didn't Mussolini invent fascism?
anyway, whether he did or not he sure oughta know what it is.
so what is it?
listen carefully to Benito:
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism,
since it is the merger of state and corporate power"
are we there yet? is there really a question?
I think the authors are talking about this present time when the fascist are under threat and the way they are reacting to it. The question is will they prevail because the rest of us do nothing except complain. The fascists have to be confronted directly (not just in print or on TV) because otherwise just like any other bully (who could care less about what you say) they will roll over you.
Remember, fascist don't like and resist (town hall) democracy because they have to deal with "lesser" people than themselves. To them there is no alternative (TINA) to authoritarianism. That's why they're so scared and why they're so scary.