Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Some Choice Words for the 'Select Few'
If you want to know what really matters in Washington, don't go to Capitol Hill for one of those hearings, or pay attention to those staged White House "town meetings." They're just for show. What really happens -- the serious business of Washington -- happens in the shadows, out of sight, off the record. Only occasionally -- and usually only because someone high up stumbles -- do we get a glimpse of just how pervasive the corruption has become.
Case in point: Katharine Weymouth, the publisher of The Washington Post -- one of the most powerful people in DC -- invited top officials from the White House, the Cabinet and Congress to her home for an intimate, off-the-record dinner to discuss health care reform with some of her reporters and editors covering the story.
But CEO's and lobbyists from the health care industry were invited, too, provided they forked over $25,000 a head -- or up to a quarter of a million if they want to sponsor a whole series of these cozy get-togethers. And what is the inducement offered? Nothing less, the invitation read, than "an exclusive opportunity to participate in the health-care reform debate among the select few who will get it done."
The invitation reminds the CEO's and lobbyists that they will be buying access to "those powerful few in business and policy making who are forwarding, legislating and reporting on the issues...
"Spirited? Yes. Confrontational? No." The invitation promises this private, intimate and off-the-record dinner is an extension "of The Washington Post brand of journalistic inquiry into the issues, a unique opportunity for stakeholders to hear and be heard."
Let that sink in. In this case, the "stakeholders" in health care reform do not include the rabble -- the folks across the country who actually need quality health care but can't afford it. If any of them showed up at the kitchen door on the night of this little soiree, the bouncer would drop kick them beyond the Beltway.
No, before you can cross the threshold to reach "the select few who will actually get it done," you must first cross the palm of some outstretched hand. The Washington Post dinner was canceled after a copy of the invite was leaked to the web site Politico.com, by a health care lobbyist, of all people. The paper said it was a misunderstanding -- the document was a draft that had been mailed out prematurely by its marketing department. There's noblesse oblige for you -- blame it on the hired help.
In any case, it was enough to give us a glimpse into how things really work in Washington -- a clear insight into why there is such a great disconnect between democracy and government today, between Washington and the rest of the country.
According to one poll after another, a majority of Americans not only want a public option in health care, they also think that growing inequality is bad for the country, that corporations have too much power over policy, that money in politics is the root of all evil, that working families and poor communities need and deserve public support if the market system fails to generate shared prosperity.
But when the insiders in Washington have finished tearing worthy intentions apart and devouring flesh from bone, none of these reforms happen. "Oh," they say, "it's all about compromise. All in the nature of the give-and-take-negotiating of a representative democracy."
That, people, is bull -- the basic nutrient of Washington's high and mighty.
It's not about compromise. It's not about what the public wants. It's about money -- the golden ticket to "the select few who actually get it done."
When Congress passed the Helping Families Save Their Homes Act, "the select few" made sure it no longer contained the cramdown provision that would have allowed judges to readjust mortgages. The one provision that would have helped homeowners the most was removed in favor of an industry that pours hundreds of millions into political campaigns.
So, too, with a bill designed to protect us from terrorist attacks on chemical plants. With "the select few" dictating marching orders, hundreds of factories are being exempted from measures that would make them spend money to prevent the release of toxic clouds that could kill hundreds of thousands.
Everyone knows the credit ratings agencies were co-conspirators with Wall Street in the shameful wilding that brought on the financial meltdown. But when the Obama administration came up with new reforms to prevent another crisis, the credit ratings agencies were given a pass. They'd been excused by "the select few who actually get it done."
And by the time an energy bill emerged from the House of Representatives the other day, "the select few who actually get it done" had given away billions of dollars worth of emission permits and offsets. As The New York Times reported, while the legislation worked its way to the House floor, "It grew fat with compromises, carve-outs, concessions and out-and-out gifts," expanding from 648 pages to 1400 as it spread its largesse among big oil and gas, utility companies and agribusiness.
This week, the public interest groups Common Cause and the Center for Responsive Politics reported that, "According to lobby disclosure reports, 34 energy companies registered in the first quarter of 2009 to lobby Congress around the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009. This group of companies spent a total of $23.7 million -- or $260,000 a day -- lobbying members of Congress in January, February and March.
"Many of these same companies also made large contributions to the members of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, which has jurisdiction over the legislation and held a hearing this week on the proposed 'cap and trade' system energy companies are fighting. Data shows oil and gas companies, mining companies and electric utilities combined have given more than $2 million just to the 19 members of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee since 2007, the start of the last full election cycle."
It's happening to health care as well. Even the pro-business magazine The Economist says America has the worst system in the developed world, controlled by executives who are not held to account and investors whose primary goal is raising share price and increasing profit -- while wasting $450 billion dollars in redundant administrative costs and leaving nearly 50 million uninsured.
Enter "the select few who actually get it done." Three out of four of the big health care firms lobbying on Capitol Hill have former members of Congress or government staff members on the payroll -- more than 350 of them -- and they're all fighting hard to prevent a public option, at a rate in excess of $1.4 million a day.
Health care policy has become insider heaven. Even Nancy-Ann DeParle, the White House health reform director, served on the boards of several major health care corporations.
President Obama has pushed hard for a public option but many fear he's wavering, and just this week his chief of staff Rahm Emanuel -- the insider di tutti insiders -- indicated that a public plan just might be negotiable, ready for reengineering, no doubt, by "the select few who actually get it done."
That's how it works. And it works that way because we let it. The game goes on and the insiders keep dealing themselves winning hands. Nothing will change -- nothing -- until the money lenders are tossed out of the temple, the ATM's are wrested from the marble halls, and we tear down the sign they've placed on government -- the one that reads, "For Sale."





151 Comments so far
Show AllGo to DC and shout this out at the top of your voice so the unwashed masses hear you. Talking quietly, softly and with no real passion in your comfortable studio will not get the message out to those who need to hear it Mr. Moyers.
Use your bully pulpit to real effect even if it affects your cushy job as a quiet, very quiet speaker on your tv show.
Gee. A news troll.
Trying to turn this around on Bill Moyers, one of the most credible people in journalism, is so patently stupid and dishonest as to make me question your sanity. Even Karl Rove knew that his "big lies" had to have at least a grain of tuth in them.
q
barrycounty - you need to crawl out of your drole hole and educate yourself. Moyers has done more than most when calling for reform and accountability.
I suspect you are either simply 1)ignorant, or 2)disingenuous in attempting to discredit someone you politically disagree with.
If you are ignorant, then simply google in Moyers name and educate yourself. If your post was camouflaging your real intent - you really need to get better at it.
I think that barrycounty has a point. Moyers could stand to engage more real activism.
Will he be in DC for the citizen's day of health care action on July 30?
Why should Moyers "engage more real activism"? He's a journalist. Whether he is in DC on July 30 is irrelevant to this article and to his program.
Moyers is fighting the powers that be (for whom I suspect that you work) with the tools that he uses best: investigative journalism and reporting. Please show me anything more real than the details of what he reports.
q
I agree with you, quickstepper. What Bill Moyers is doing is far more valuable than standing in front of the White House being ignored by the media.
When the people fear their government there is tyranny,
when the government fears the people there is liberty.
~ Thomas Jefferson
Well, if we turned out three million in the streets, with commentators like Moyers using their bully pulpits to help the turnout, thereby shutting the city down, it would be hard for the media or the politicians to ignore it, wouldn't it? But comfortable liberals like yourselves would never join an any mass action (and I suspect most of you never have) if it got in the way of your weekends, wouldn't you?
And what is the odd trend of denigrating direct action, demonstrations, and CD actions among you liberals?
The events of July 30 will be a combination of demonstration plus flooding the congressional offices with citizen action. What do you propose instead other then watching Moyers on PBS, chardonnay in hand, while nodding in agreement?
I have admired Bill Moyers for as long as I can remember.
While others in the media talk about celebrities, Moyers talks about the issues that affect our daily lives.
I might add that before Reagan slashed progressive tax rates, the 'select few' was a pretty broad group of humanity that often DID represent the rest of the nation. But since the wealthiest 1% went from owning 20% of the country in 1970 to today owning 40%, the 'select few' just don't 'feel our pain' anymore.
Moyers might have mentioned the curious way our obese military is deployed overseas in areas rich in oil, or rich in oil-transport potential (while alternative energy research survives on handfuls of rice). 'the select few' again? Otherwise, this piece reads like a brilliant dissection of America's troubles, going right to its heart.
Moyers "might have mentioned" many things - such as the complicity of the corporate media - but he provided enough examples to make his point about the way that corruption works in Washington.
q
Moyers/Winship sez: "Weymouth ... invited top officials from the White House, the Cabinet and Congress to her home for an intimate, off-the-record dinner to discuss health care reform with some of her reporters and editors ..."
***
The authors use this revelation as a jumping-off point to hammer congresspersons and their patrons. But it's pretty clear who the silent partner is in this cozy cabal. This aborted soiree was not scheduled for a union hall or a Dunkin' Donuts.
I don't know what it's called when "reporters" and "editors" work big-ticket, off-the-record confabs with the very people they're "covering", but I'm pretty sure it's not journalism.
Are you suggesting that the authors of this article had been invited to attend the gathering described in the passage that you quoted?
q
quickstepper, I don't think Goebbels meant that at all. Would a snake invite a mongoose to dinner? Besides, the authors said a lobbyist leaked the story. I'm wondering why. Drunk, bragging, or least likely, a tinge of conscience?
When the people fear their government there is tyranny,
when the government fears the people there is liberty.
~ Thomas Jefferson
quickstepper-
No, I did not suggest that. I apologize if my scribbling was convoluted to the point of leading you to that conclusion.
My 'silent partners' are the Post and other "media" (sic) conglomerates who whore themselves to those they should be holding to account.
It's not journalism for sure.
The practice of printing "All the news that's fit to print", was an advertising slogan practiced by the New York Herald and the San Francisco Herald by the Hearst corporation in the 1940's.
The popularized version of journalism that was taught in the 1970's was a collage of ideas that was proposed by Truman Capote in assembling "all of the facts" whether or not, the journalist(IN COLD BLOOD) understands the story.
Now we have the post 9-11 version that has been looming since the 1980's in that journalism as a science and an obligation to the public has taken the "poison pill" and returned to the "Sensationalism" of the vanity style shopped and produced for the exclusive priviledge of the "few" in the same style of the 19th to the 20th century standards.
For example, the role of the New york Times in interviewing "Boss Tweed", in New York's Tamany Hall is perhaps the most famous, but not the only example of news organizations forsaking their recording of the events of the day and instead producing a product that is designed to cater to the exclusive shopper of their product. More like a catalog of praise and condemnation of alternative views.
I call it pimping.
Thank you for an excellent commentary. This underscores the need and opportunity we have to focus on real electoral and campaign finance reform.
Moyers is right- under the present methods of elections and campaign finance, we "let" this happen.
The importance of raising awareness of these issues via reading and viewing alternative news sources is also critical. Americans won't read about this in their daily newspaper or on the major channels at night.
call for all developing nations to voluntarily audit foreign debt and present it within 90 days. Example: The only audit Brazil has ever done of its foreign debt was in 1931 and it was discovered that approximately 60+% had no documentation.
Step right up, how about you sonny, you look like a smart kid. Choose a shell, any shell, but don't take your eye off it. No sonny, not that shell...hey kid! I thought I told you not that shell... step aside, step aside.
Yessirree ladies 'n gents step right up, choose a shell any shell, but don't take your eye off it....
Thanks Bill and Michael - don't let them elbow you out of the way. A megaphone would be nice.
The Banksters, the Generals, and now the health insurance corporate execs are the profiteers who stand to reap the bonanza from our current Congress and president.
The Banksters obtained their 800 billion TARP dollars,
The Generals got their 600 billion military/defense/weapons dollars,
but the health insurance execs may yet hit the jackpot of a trillion dollars!
And what are WE left with?
There is a simple implication contained in this explication: the powers that be control the machinery of power. The admonition that the Great Many must take back their inherent power doesn’t make clear how this is to be done.
If the powerful control the machinery and we can only fight back by applying to that machinery for permission, then “actions’ are only stage props for those who actually get things done. Perhaps the time has come when breaking that machinery, and all the dangers entailed, is the only option left other than subservience. I see that as one reading of this essay. If so, then a very serious proposal is made here.
Those who get things done will turn their “getting it done” weapon against any – including the people – who try to wrest some control from them. I think that it is time to read the history of mass response to tyranny and prepare for the long haul of this process.
Excellent point. The system is designed to thwart reform. That is the overriding message of this piece. It cannot be fixed; only replaced. Jefferson called for a revolution every few decades. We're long overdue.
I was looking for someone to post a comment on revolution here, and I found it.
Moyers aptly said: 'Nothing will change -- nothing -- until the money lenders are tossed out of the temple, the ATM's are wrested from the marble halls, and we tear down the sign they've placed on government -- the one that reads, "For Sale."'
Previously, he said that money does all the talking in Washington, so expecting our mis-representatives in Congress and the White House to toss out the moneylenders is like asking junkies to toss out the pushers. Won't happen.
"...and we tear down the sign they've placed on government..."
We. We. we. Until WE tear down the sign. Until WE toss out the moneylenders. Until WE revolt, either figuratively or literally, this will go on.
How do we do this? I don't know. What I do know is that we really haven't started. I really haven't started. Well, I've done a few small things, but I know I can do more. So, that's what I need to do. More. What I have been working on is building community and re-skilling for a brave new world, but I need to do more. I think we all need to do more. I think we need to be insurgents and foment some real heat. We need to spread discontent out there in Happyland and say in our own words what Moyers and Hedges and Klein and Nader and others are saying. We need to punch through the miasma of disinformation that the corporate media is spewing. We need to ally with others who believe it's time to take the next step. We need to do all this and more.
Moyers has been a calm voice in the maelstrom that is US society. In this piece, I sense urgency, and a touch of fear. He knows we're losing it. He sees a 1984 world and he's telling us we need to do more.
I'm open to suggestions.
If you see this before the post is down contact me at civilsocietyatbellsouth.net.
We need to start connecting. We need massive email lists OUTSIDE of the ones the DLC has to organize our own actions. It's time to do something more than chat online about what we need to do. Those who write on these blogs have way more power than those crooked dam lobbyists. We need to tap into the power we have. Today.
I'm curious, partly because I'm a little paranoid and partly because I'm cautious, what you have in mind. Can you connect with others? Are you an organizer? Can you give me a hint of what you have in mind?
I just read an interesting article on how RFID chips in official U.S. IDs (passports, etc.) can be read from 20 feet away (or more). We are living, right now, in an Orwellian dream. Shit happens. People write things, and unintended recipients read them. Sometimes, people are baited into saying things that get them into trouble.
I agree that the people have power. However, we are isolated by our own communications media because it is very easily used against us. We need to have methods of communicating our trustworthiness. Nothing personal against you, I'm just being realistic.
So, what do you have in mind? No specifics, but generally.
"The game goes on and the insiders keep dealing themselves winning hands."
One only needs to look at the recent case involving the (alleged?) theft of Goldman Sachs software. As Danny Schechter pointed out in his article, "The bank (Goldman Sachs) has raised the possibility that there is a danger that somebody who knew how to use this program could use it to manipulate markets in unfair ways."
Well, isn't that interesting! What the hell is the Securities and Exchange Commission doing about companies using software that can manipulate markets in "unfair ways"?
This revelation will certainly give investors more confidence in the system.....don't you think?!
Mattress-stuffing is sounding like a better idea every day.
Talk about manipulating markets - there is a great article in the Rolling Stone this month by Matt Taibi about Goldman Sachs and their roll in the destruction of the American economy. I don't normally even buy the Rolling Stone, but I got this issue just for the article.
Have you read Deepcapture.com?
That, people, is bull -- the basic nutrient of Washington's high and mighty.
No, it's us, the so-called We The People, who eat shit as the basic staple of our diet. And we don't even hold our noses any longer as we swallow it.
Well hello George Orwell. Those people Bill writes about learned from Orwell and now have us where they want us.
I'm beyond indignant. So tell us something we don't already know, Mr. Moyers.
Hi George,
Your comment shows you are the average American. They think they know it all. They think they have nothing to learn from the rest of the world. Yes, that is why we are in such a mess.
Sorry, Cayetana. I'm glad Moyer's message is finally filtering down from the Average American to the idiots.
I understand your frustration, George, but some things are worth repeating. Such as, when you're a passenger in a car that is going to run into a wall if the driver doesn't slam on the brakes. Isn't it worth repeating, rather excitedly: BRAKE! BRAKE! FUCKING BRAKE!?
Thank you, Bill Moyers. This was one of your best. Inspirational!
Moyers and Winship have described the depth and breadth of the corruption of the ruling elites all too well. But how to awaken and arouse any considerable part of the people (who seem to have mostly lost any sense of being citizens) from their apparent ADD--attention deficit disorders. The rulers spend big and hire the best to operate their weapons of mass distraction: show biz, big time sports, spectacles, gossip, scandals all in the service of what PR master Edward Bernays called "the necessary manipulation of the mass public mind".
Having experienced and been part of the high energy people's politics of the 1960s, when group after group was organizing themselves as blacks, hispanics, native tribal peoples, women, G.I.s, gays and lesbians, and a large multi-faceted anti-war movement, I wish for that same energy to resurge. People were fed up and weren't going to take it any more. Revisionists have attempted to smear all that history and effort by reducing the 1960s to nothing more than "sex, drugs and rock and roll". Reality was different and for once in recent decades people's energies and organizations had the rulers afraid of the people rather than the people afraid of the rulers. Establishment defenders wrote of "an excess of democracy" when ordinary people dared to organize and be part of decisions instead of leaving it to the elites and their courtiers.
The ruling elites' memory of that rebellious time, has been a major motivation for the sharp curtailment of civil liberties via Patriot Acts, Military Commission Acts, ending habeas corpus, ever expanding surveillance and a vast homeland security apparatus, all of which the new Obombem crew clings to and extends. Clearly as the Moyers/Winship article describes, a totally corrupt oligarchy now rules with near impunity. Laws are to be used against the non-elites only namely ordinary citizens.
As the economic crisis deepens, perhaps former consumers will again become activated and determined citizens. Fearing that dire possibility, the rulers will put ever more energy and money into the weapons of mass distraction. In a broken economy the longtime distraction of credit-fueled consumerism has ended. When will the sparks of resistance and rebellion ignite and extend?
Yes give them bread and circuses.
I agree that the plebes will soon be running out of bread and that portends a violent revolution.
There is only one solution to all of this and as far as I can tell that solution is highly problematic. It is this: that the only way we will see integrity in government is when elected servants, individually, act with honor and integrity no matter what other people might be doing.
It's called being personally responsible. It requires courage and it will only come about when average citizens possess those qualities too... for without those qualities average citizens cannot discern the difference between someone who has real character and someone who does not.
When will this happen? It can only come about when a critical mass of citizens personally commit themselves as individual human beings to perfect themselves, by aspiring to live in a manner consistent with their own best understanding of what honor, courage, and integrity is, in everything they do.
Absent that, we all will learn, or maybe not learn, by our mistakes as we fumble through life, which is what most of us do usually in a state of unconsciousness.
Actually, society has indeed progressed through the ages because there have been those who have made that commitment. So I suppose there is hope for a better tomorrow. Whether we will live long enough to see recognizable results... well, I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
http://www.gpln.com
Yes, excellent points. I see that right now the very thing that keeps us hindered is the limited field of potential which current 'servants' believe they have to work within that will never lead to such acts of 'integrity'. Instead of fresh ideas, the same old tired ones are cycled through the decision making machinery in Washington over and over and over, ad naseum. The cause of this stagnation, that in essence has come to collectively represent us, is hidden in shame by those who have no new moves to squeeze out of tired old moves. That stale blood and that ancient and dying body of our government could be revived by those who have moved beyond the veil of the limits our current leaders barely perceive as impenetrable walls, hidden beyond the space they move freely as prisoners within. Many thought that Obama was the fresh air, the one being of agitation that could be lobbed right into the middle of the stinking imprisoning mess, with all hopes to begin to clear the noxious air. But......we are waiting and agitating here on the outside.....breathing the fresh air that slaps us in the face every morning when we awake.....growing, healing, coalescing. What was it Obama said early on? Something about not being able to do it without us? I'm sure we can do it without him, but with him? Waiting for him to create change where change is aborted before it gasps it's first breath or left uncovered on the hill to be tended by monsters that lurk in the dark? Too many are still leaving their hopes with him, trapped now behind the solid walls of tired old imaginations that barely are barely awake with the sun in a dying land.
Do we need to do anything? We see the tree that once saved us, now dying, as isolated branches which are no longer fed by the roots. Every cycle we go through, the leaf canopy that once shaded and protected us, that brilliant banner waving in the breeze as we played freely below, has more threads bare. The glaring dangers of a fabric so torn begin to make us sweat. How long will we abide under such poor protection? Before we swarm out driven by the need to discover a new tree for our life, liberty and pursuit of happiness? Just a little longer? Until we know that we are not the dying tree, we are the children of the great spirit that the tree grew only to protect.
Are you dropping acid?
q
quickstepper July 11th, 2009 1:42 pm............Man, she/he has got to come down to REALITY.
Aside from the need for some paragraph organization it seemed like a fine, creative piece to me. Are you suffering from some internet-induced ADD?
Thanks pjd. When I try to get into reality as it is and out of the illusion of ego, I do not have the best skills at writing it yet. But it is very challenging to go this path and I appreciate your ability to see my purpose and share it's simple message under my mistakes.
Interesting seeing the particulars of an evening's effery in DC Illuminated. A soiree of sickness, this crew dines with Caligula.
Moyers is so cool.
Bring America Back !!!!.........Nice description of our American "reality show" going on inside the 'beltway' and otherwise referred to as the "culture of corruption" !
**But how can Moyers and Winship write on this without wondering if 'the select few' were going to get a slice of those $25,000 (or more) pies for attending the tea party??
Depending on who the select few were and are, taking such lucrative monies may or may not be legal.
**Moyers has documented the Xtreme eXtent to which Mainstream Media desires to control or influence politics, policy, and politicians. As an heiress to the Washinton Post fortunes--is not Mrs Weymouth the daughter of the famous Katherine Graham, and was not her nickname "Lolly",
at one time ??? I forget.
**If so, I think Weymouth was society reporter or social editor at WAPO under Graham. Now as Publisher she must be offering the ''select few" of DC Society a lick at the
"lolly"-pop, and a nice slice of a very expensive Pie.
And, the select Invitees were:,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,???
Yes, you have correctly identified the perp, nicknames and work history included. And many of the invitees are hiding in plain sight, Saturday night sinners, Sunday morning sitters. The same persons hauled before us on Meet the Press to frame the problem and some potential solutions are usually the folks responsible for the mess.
If you go to the caterers and hairdressers and listen, you can generally figure out who's who and where the palms have been greased. It's been a couple of decades, so I'm out of the salon loop. But if some enterprising young cub reporter wants to go "All the President's Men" that's about all it would take.
According to polls the majority are fed up, most don't know enough about the problem to understand it.
That's why we can't get organized.
I had to talk to a bunch of Republican Tea Party Protesters waving the flag on the fourth a few weeks ago.
I agreed with them! I asked; How Do We Fix This?
The reply came from their spokesperson; I just pull the Republican Lever!
These people need to understand how their NEWS, deceives them. They blame the press for being liberal because Michael Jackson makes up half of the broadcast! They are missing the point!
So true! The right and left have plenty in common. Both sides are kept from seeing that we could be much stronger together, and that most of what we want we share in common - once you get past the propaganda, anyway. The PTB are scared to death that America ever figures it out. We could be united in our common cause and put aside the social issues that can't be resolved like abortion and concentrate on getting control of Washington. Unfortunately, but foreseeable (and purposeful) as a consequence of Obama's agenda, the Right is being re-radicalized and is demonizing liberals as the only problem... as if Bush's wrecking of the country hadn't even happened.
If we get together and get our government back, we can fight amongst ourselves later!
Thank you for highlighting this shameful occurence within our system of elected representatives and their callous treatment of the "rabble".
I've been studying the political history of our nation ever since I learned about the election of our 43rd president (G.W.Bush).
I wanted facts and not rhetoric from the MSM about the function of our gov't.
There is nothing that is new in this story, it's occurence is the shocking point that the "few" as you say continue to describe their importance as representing the "many".
How wrong they are.
I will vote for an elected representative because that's the extension of my will to "Come down there and do this myself".
What am I to do about the abuses of that priviledge?
I cannot in all reality threaten, cajole or "Bully" these captains of industry for the criminal behavior that they practice.
I shudder to think about the 200 year loss of wealth and power that the French government lost in 1789 after the abuses of leadership started a revolution.
I want to believe that there is some more peaceful solution, but the fact is that we have stopped believing in an equivalent solution.
I work and I try to tell my family that we're all going to be fine.
Help me to build an America that we can all be proud of.
Stop all of this divisiveness and give the people, "the rabble", what they deserve before it's too late.
Yes, yes, yes, Moyers, the comments, yes.
But, continue to demand and advocate for single payer. Tell everyone you meet how single payer insurance spreads the risks over the maximum number of people and therefore provides the least costs for health insurance.
Advocate for single payer.
When people interact with other people we can spread an idea much more effectively than the mass media.
Keep advocating for single payer. Encourage others to also.
I am.