Chevron, Shell and the True Cost of Oil
The economy is a shambles, unemployment is soaring, the auto industry is collapsing. But profits are higher than ever at oil companies Chevron and Shell. Yet across the globe, from the Ecuadorian jungle, to the Niger Delta in Nigeria, to the courtrooms and streets of New York and San Ramon, Calif., people are fighting back against the world's oil giants.
Shell and Chevron are in the spotlight this week, with shareholder meetings and a historic trial being held.
On May 13, the Nigerian military launched an assault on villages in that nation's oil-rich Niger Delta. Hundreds of civilians are feared killed in the attack. According to Amnesty International, a celebration in the delta village of Oporoza was attacked. An eyewitness told the organization: "I heard the sound of aircraft; I saw two military helicopters, shooting at the houses, at the palace, shooting at us. We had to run for safety into the forest. In the bush, I heard adults crying, so many mothers could not find their children; everybody ran for their life."
Shell is facing a lawsuit in U.S. federal court, Wiwa v. Shell, based on Shell's alleged collaboration with the Nigerian dictatorship in the 1990s in the violent suppression of the grass-roots movement of the Ogoni people of the Niger Delta. Shell exploits the oil riches there, causing displacement, pollution and deforestation. The suit also alleges that Shell helped suppress the Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People and its charismatic leader, Ken Saro-Wiwa. Saro-Wiwa had been the writer of the most famous soap opera in Nigeria, but decided to throw his lot in with the Ogoni, whose land near the Niger Delta was crisscrossed with pipelines. The children of Ogoniland did not know a dark night, living beneath the flame-apartment-building-size gas flares that burned day and night, and that are illegal in the U.S.
I interviewed Saro-Wiwa in 1994. He told me: "The oil companies like military dictatorships, because basically they can cheat with these dictatorships. The dictatorships are brutal to people, and they can deny the human rights of individuals and of communities quite easily, without compunction." He added, "I am a marked man." Saro-Wiwa returned to Nigeria and was arrested by the military junta. On Nov. 10, 1995, after a kangaroo show trial, Saro-Wiwa was hanged with eight other Ogoni activists.
In 1998, I traveled to the Niger Delta with journalist Jeremy Scahill. A Chevron executive there told us that Chevron flew troops from Nigeria's notorious mobile police, the "kill ‘n' go," in a Chevron company helicopter to an oil barge that had been occupied by nonviolent protesters. Two protesters were killed, and many more were arrested and tortured.
Oronto Douglas, one of Saro-Wiwa's lawyers, told us: "It is very clear that Chevron, just like Shell, uses the military to protect its oil activities. They drill and they kill."
Chevron is the second-largest stakeholder (after French oil company Total) of the Yadana natural gas field and pipeline project, based in Burma (which the military junta renamed Myanmar). The pipeline provides the single largest source of income to the military junta, amounting to close to $1 billion in 2007. Nobel Peace Prize laureate Aung San Suu Kyi, popularly elected the leader of Burma in 1990, has been under house arrest for 14 of the past 20 years, and is standing trial again this week. [On Tuesday the government said it had ended the house arrest of Suu Kyi, but she remains in detention pending the outcome of the trial.] The U.S. government has barred U.S. companies from investing in Burma since 1997, but Chevron has a waiver, inherited when it acquired the oil company Unocal.
Chevron's litany of similar abuses, from the Philippines to Kazakhstan, Chad-Cameroon, Iraq, Ecuador and Angola and across the U.S. and Canada, is detailed in an "alternative annual report" prepared by a consortium of nongovernmental organizations and is being distributed to Chevron shareholders at this week's annual meeting, and to the public at TrueCostofChevron.com.
Chevron is being investigated by New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo about whether the company was "accurate and complete" in describing potential legal liabilities. It enjoys, though, a long tradition of hiring politically powerful people. Condoleezza Rice was a longtime director of the company (there was even a supertanker named after her), and the recently hired general counsel is none other than disgraced Pentagon lawyer William J. Haynes, who advocated for "harsh interrogation techniques," including waterboarding. Gen. James L. Jones, President Barack Obama's national security adviser, sat on the Chevron board of directors for most of 2008, until he received his high-level White House appointment.
Saro-Wiwa said before he died, "We are going to demand our rights peacefully, nonviolently, and we shall win." A global grass-roots movement is growing to do just that.
Denis Moynihan contributed research to this column.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
32 Comments so far
Show All2 Remarks
1. Excessive unnecessary oil derivates consumption by private citizens, which is at least 75 % of all current oil production, is the major inductor of combined pollution and human rights abuses.
Without drastically changing the western way of life, never there will by respect for man and nature.
This phenomenon is analogue to and related at the whole wall street debacle.
2. The most realistic way to apply this is the introduction, gradually in about ten years, of what we call the Panergetic Price of goods and services, includinhg all corrective and indirect expenses. See http://bodegraeve.wordpress.com/01-conceptus/panergetic-principle/ and related blog-pages.
Does anyone know a study of the real "panergetic" price of oil ?
See also, released May 2009,: at http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/index.html
International Energy Outlook 2009 with excel tables, etc.
I'm really depressed at the level of discourse re Socialism, even amongst progressives. What are the benefits of having industry in the public sector? Are there mathematical proofs that it's better for the general population? Why are there so few economists on board? Is it really more productive to have competition rather than cooperation?
We're gonna lose another generation to the libertarians if we don't make a concise, definitive argument.
The right tell everyone that capitalism has been proven but ignore the history of govt intervention in our economies, especially military technology. I suggest a short reading-list be put up on this site including "Why Socialism?" (by Einstein!!), "Conservative Nanny State," something by Chomsky- a crash course for newcomers.
> I'm really depressed at the level of discourse re Socialism,
> even amongst progressives.
That's too bad. Because the more we look at the facts the more optimistic we are about the far left prospects. The solutions all tie together and with nature in a truly beautiful way. If you want to see a big picture treatment of food/fuels/materials production done the correct way, look at permaculture info. Look at the production methods in areas that have resisted US influence.
> What are the benefits of having industry in the public sector?
It keeps the wealth from concentrating in the hands of the few.
> Are there mathematical proofs that it's better for the general population?
The burden of proof is on the exploiters, not the exploitees. Nevertheless, you can see it when you adopt the universalist ethic, the basis for all far left policies.
> Why are there so few economists on board?
Why did 130 million USans vote for elites in Nov. 2008?
> Is it really more productive to have competition rather than cooperation?
No. Cooperation is far more productive. Competition, war, scarcity, struggle, all go together. Cooperation, peace, abundance and fulfillment all go together. The more you focus left, think, and experiment, the more you will agree. And report your finding back here. Shared knowledge is part of the cooperation/abundance elements.
> The right tell everyone that capitalism has been proven
The right is lying. Their "proof" is bogus. The truth is that capitalism/elitism is favored in a chaotic environment and socialism/populism is favored in a peaceful environment. Obviously the desired environment is peace. Naturally, both civic and economic emancipation of the biosphere are taking place together.
> I suggest a short reading-list
> "Why Socialism?" (by Einstein!!),
> "Conservative Nanny State,"
Good suggestion. Try editor@commondreams.org
Thanks for answering, I actually already know and agree with your views.
My point was that we don't seem to be convincing people. Once they fall for the conservative party-line, their pride won't let them see the truth and we lose them forever. If we think from the point-of-view of someone new to politics, maybe we could make an airtight case and provide the mental self-defense they'll need.
To me that's Chomsky's genius and why he's so hated by the right.
I'm looking for the perfect essay-the "Unified Field Theory" of politics so we earthlings can get passed this stuff once and for all. Peace.
Great points. Sure, we need a frame comfortable to the political novice. It's not rocket science, it's simply the univeralist ethic, the golden rule. One need only ask "Why not the golden rule?" And provide the info needed to make the choice. It becomes a piece of cake, when the people give themselves the mandate and the info needed to apply the rule.
Sow much hemp.
We rip what we sew.
I went to David Blume's web-site, way freaking cool.
My girls say high. !!!
We gotta get rid of the federal ban first. North Dakota has passed for legalizing it and is even pushing for getting around the DEA, last I heard.
The oil companies and energy corporations are addicts, and they're such heavy users that it will take one hell of a group intervention to get them to kick the crack and stop their classic crack head behavior of breaking and entering other people's countries for their fix money.
"The oil companies and energy corporations are addicts ... "
Gimme a break. It's the users that are addicts. The oil companies are the pushers. The users need the intervention.
What Amy is describing are the effects of unchecked corporate power. Just as the major banks grew so large as to threaten the stability of the financial sector, the oil companies have become so autonomous as to threaten life itself.
Without corporate reform (i.e. dismantling), none of problems will ever be resolved.
q
Quickstepper, you are on the mark.
In 1970 my wife & I visited a friend in Ft. Worth, TX who was a reporter for the Star-Telegram and knew his way around Texas & U.S. politics. On our way to the Amon Carter museum one morning, he asked us where we thought all the "big" decisions are made for the U.S. I supposed it was Washington, D.C. He said that was the "#2 site -the really big decisions are made in the building up ahead". It was the Petroleum Club. (There are branches in many other cities.)
It was about a hundred years ago when Teddy Roosevelt pushed the breakup of Rockefeller's monopolistic, predatory Standard Oil. That breakup has been largely reversed by Congressional prostitution. So it only takes an "understanding" between a few CEO's who issue instructions to their government sluts (remember Dick Cheney?) to turn the big screw tighter.
'Bye, bye mis-American pie...'
I saw this 30 years ago (more than that really) when I consciously chose to become a small family farmer and protect the land and the poor of the world. I've been battling for my and others freedom and safety and right to live happily ever since.
YOU MOTHERF**KERS!
nedlud
As a small family farmer, you could choose to fight for legalizing hemp and allowing it to compete with oil. Hemp's a cash crop for farmers and good for domestic fuel and plenty of plastics. If you still need light sweet crude, grow plenty of algae as another cash crop. The taboo against the first one needs to be removed while the second one can be labor intensive at first.
And how much land for growing food will need to be used to grow hemp to replace oil? They did this with corn for ethanol too.
Hi zmann. 1/2 of Brazil's cars use alcohol for fuel derived from sugarcane which is grown on 1% of the land.
Caught a post reflecting your work.
It sounds triple fascinating.
It's not fair you are paid to become wiser.
joe
"Hi zmann. 1/2 of Brazil's cars use alcohol for fuel derived from sugarcane which is grown on 1% of the land. "
Yeah, they're way smarter than us.
"Caught a post reflecting your work.
It sounds triple fascinating.
It's not fair you are paid to become wiser."
And yeah, I think I have the best job in the world :-). All of my friends from college are pretty jealous of me, despite it just being an internship and low in pay.
Hemp is restorative and can be grown in rotation with other crops. It replenishes soil nutrients and can return depleted land to full arability.
Hemp also needs no fertilizers or insecticides.
A little research will show you the myraid industrial uses for the various parts of the hemp plant. It can replace trees for the production of paper.
q
So then it can be useful in place of food crops when food crops are not being grown...but that's about it without setting aside new land for it? Not quite a large piece of the solution to my mind.
zmann, I forgot to mention and I just found out that while hemp could replace crude oil in theory, it will not only be labor intensive but for the current demand, it is going to be really expensive to match the EROI unless I am mistaken. I'm not much of a farmer but I cannot deny that drilling for oil, light sweet or heavy sour, or going to war with another country to grab it all is still cheaper compared to growing our own biofuels, algae or hemp. I don't think the picture looks good when oil production peaks out globally. We will have to conserve and do more labor just to get the fuel going. Some good ideas might be using alcohol, switchgrass, or even water for fuel. If I recall, the steam engine for cars was once considered back in the early 20th century but the oil and gas companies would have none of it. I was trying to offer nedlud a suggestion in terms of the farming aspect. When I add up all the math and labor on hemp and algae based fuel, it's obvious that transporting it long distance will be another headache cost. I think that we'd be much better off with $5/gallon if that's what it takes to give us all a kick in the pants in pushing for light rail and better fuel efficiency. I don't feel comfortable about electric cars by the way since it will take a lot of electricity just to get it running short distances and then add up the traffic jams depending upon where you live and it gets messy.
lol, I can't imagine anything more expensive than going to war over oil...my concern is just that either food crops will be displaced to grow hemp, or more wilderness will be cleared to grow it.
I also forgot to mention that for hemp, it'll probably be feasible or only biodiesel engines. For gasoline engines, more complex and complicated processing of hempseed oil will be needed to make it feasible thereby adding the costs to the pump. More people will need to learn to farm and grow and process their own oil. I can only hope that peak oil doesn't hit too hard too fast or we're gonna need to speed up reforming our education curriculm to increase the training and fast.
Anyone having any doubt that we aren't already on the brink of solving all of these crises simultaneously probably hasn't read David Blumes Alcohol Can Be A Gas, nor studied his fun and informative website.
I could tell you a lot more, but get it straight from the horses mouth:
http://www.permaculture.com/
We don't have to reinvent the wheel either. Once we are informed about the viable alternatives we can drop many of our archaic doubts and irrelevant arguments.
"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete."
-R. Buckminster Fuller
Alcohol for gas looks promising. If fuel demand stays high, perhaps more alcohol can be diverted from human consumption to auto consumption. If alcohol doesn't leave much of a carbon footprint, then even better.
Thanks, I'll check it out when I have time.
Hey Zmann...
Also check out how hemp can be grown as a nutritious food source, high in omega 3 and protein...
Therefore, there is no need to displace food crops for fuel crops, both can be grown simultaneously...
The fibers are strong and serve many purposes... You can make hempbales, plywood and 2x4's with it, held together by it's own resin...
It has a four month harvest cycle, instead of 150 years like coniferous trees, and does not need to be treated with dioxin to "soften" it for making paper products... You can make clothing, upholsteried furniture, and even paints and plastics with it...
Henry ford built an entire prototype car out of hemp, even parts of the engine block, over a hundred years ago, with limited technology...
It grows anywhere, from the arctic circle to the equator, and does well in marginal or already damaged land...
It has been demonstrated that it cleans and bioremediates soil contaminated by petrochemicals and industrial waste, drawing the heavy metals up and locking them in the cellulose fibers...
While there are hundreds of medical uses for marijuana, its cousin hemp has tens of thousands of industrial applications...
When farmers can grow and process their own fuel, oil, lumber, food, and medicine in their own back yards and process it locally distribute it regionally, it will reduce everyone's dependence on complex large-scale distribution systems controlled by a few powerful corporations like ADM & Cargill, and farmers and processors can determine their own prices without the need for subsidies and commodity price manipulations by wall street...
Check out the book "the Emperor wears no clothes" by Jack Herer...
And check out what Canada is currently doing with industrial hemp...
Awesome GoldenMean. Thanks for posting that valuable contribution. Our "savior", as it turns out, is not a man, but a plant. Dig it, bro. Sow much hemp.
"Legalize it. And a don't criticize it..." -Peter Tosh
We on the far left promote small farms producing most food, fuel and materials for local markets using permaculture methods. The current US model of production is extremely fossil, military, and toxin-intensive. The people are left without exercise, fresh air/sunshine, or healthy food.
The far left approach selects the best food, fuel and material producing crops per region, so hemp works in many areas of the USA, mainly for fiber production. Permaculture practice requires manual labor which puts people back to work and solves their health problems. They are guaranteed a living wage for this work, and propaganda pushing them away from this work is suppressed.
Centrist/rightwing model: Narrow selection of annual plants, heavy fossil/water inputs plus mechanization for food production. Heavy emphasis on meat/dairy. Fuel and materials production with heavy emphasis on fossil inputs plus a narrow selection of plants. Land usage roughly 40% of total land.
Far-left model: Wide selection of indigenous perennial plants, near-zero fossil/water inputs, for food, fuel and materials production, demand for plant food promoted by full costs in retail prices, closed production cycles, enterprise size limited to ten man-powers. Land usage roughly 30% of total land.
The difference is a 20x decrease in material inputs, a 20x increase in labor inputs, a 25% decrease in land inputs, and greatly improved health of society and biosphere, as the wealth is shifted from the centrist/rightwing capital/machine-intensive enterprise to the far-left people/labor-oriented enterprise.
Plus it apparently spurs neuron growth, no kidding-
http://news.healingwell.com/index.php?p=news1&id=528519
I know several people who got their PhD's while consuming liberal quantities of herb.
And Bush apparently got his MBA while snorting coke and drinking whiskey :-). Well, I don't know the timeline, but still.
If I recall, Bush Sr when he did serve was rescued by material made of hemp. Ironic that he never bothered to make what saved his life legal.