Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Marching for Democracy in Pakistan
Imagine this scenario: What if a U.S. president, in blatant contravention of the U.S. Constitution, fired every Supreme Court justice because he didn't like their decisions, and filled the court instead with his own cronies? What if a new president was elected on a promise to restore the rightful judges to their legal positions after he was in office? What would you do if he didn't follow through on that promise?
That is the position that Pakistan's people find themselves in today.
Americans have a proud tradition of marching on Washington, D.C. when they want their voices to be heard. Now, Pakistanis are doing the same. Today, thousands of Pakistanis are peacefully marching to the capital to demand a restoration of their judiciary. The government has tried to ban the march and has arrested hundreds of political workers.
With so much focus in the U.S. on trying to stabilize Pakistan, it is surprising that so few are paying attention to Pakistan's most important pro-democracy movement in a generation. Most of our attention has been given to the war in the northwest of the country, but it is in the struggle over the judiciary that the battle for the soul of Pakistan is being fought. At the center of this struggle is Pakistan's lawyers' movement, which represents the best hope for ensuring the long-term stability of Pakistan.
The lawyers' movement began in March 2007, when former military dictator Pervez Musharraf illegally dismissed the chief justice of Pakistan. In November of that year, he sacked the entire Supreme Court and the provincial high courts as well. After years of dictatorial rule, this was the last straw, and the country rose up against Mr. Musharraf's actions.Pakistan's lawyers were in the lead, but Pakistanis from all walks of life joined the movement to restore the judiciary. I was in Pakistan for the 2007-2008 protests, and I saw young and old, students and workers, women's rights activists, conservatives and liberals all join the movement. Even the unlikeliest of people supported the cause. At one of the pro-restoration rallies in 2008, I was struck by the policemen who were supposed to be keeping a watchful eye on the participants. Instead, they flashed everyone with victory signs and smiles; they too were supporting the movement!
Pakistanis support the lawyers' movement because they understand that the rule of law is essential to the stability of a society. Providing fair, impartial, and speedy justice to citizens is one of the most basic requirements of a democracy. And no one, no matter how powerful, should be above the law. For Pakistan to become a truly stable country, we must support an independent judiciary that can stand up to abuses of power and provide a check on the other branches of government.
Unfortunately, the civilian government elected a year ago, led by President Asif Ali Zardari and his Pakistan Peoples Party, has failed to restore the sacked judges. Even worse, it has left the corrupt judges in place. This is simply untenable in a genuine democracy, which is necessary for Pakistan to tackle the many problems it is confronted with. So it is absolutely essential for Pakistan to have a truly independent judiciary.
Today, thousands of Pakistanis are again marching to Islamabad to demand the full restoration of the judiciary. On their side are truth, justice - and, I hope, the American people.
- Posted in

6 Comments so far
Show All"For Pakistan to become a truly stable country, we must support an independent judiciary that can stand up to abuses of power and provide a check on the other branches of government."
Why not just get the hell out of there?
So be it. But do the American "people" want democracy in Pakistan? What if the banned judges demand accounts for "Extraordinary Rendition" [=Kidnapping and Torture Without Borders, Destination Unknown]...?
Thank you Sahar Shaqat, for giving us a coherent definition of the political background for this grassroots movement in Pakistan. Most US media coverage focuses only upon the security/stability questions regarding the upcoming demonstrations in Pakistan rather than the underlying causes of the popular unrest.
Zardari's government appears to be lifting a page right out of the George W. Bush manual for how to handle street protests while claiming to believe in freedom of expression. He has arrested as many ring leaders as he can (including his main political rivals), and is trying to restrict the demonstrations to "free speech zones" by banning a gathering of more than four people in any public place as an "unlawful assembly."
Once upon a time, the US Constitution's Bill of Rights was a model for how freedom of assembly was supposed to operate, rather than a model for how governments could manipulate the appearance to deny the reality.
Bill from Saginaw
Pakistan has been a country with its polity interrupted by full-blown dictatorships, assassinations, and suspensions of it's constitution. So, why, when I read of mass actions like this, do I get a feeling that it is actually more vibrantly democratic than the USA?
---USAn---
For Pakistan to become a truly stable country, we must support an independent judiciary that can stand up to abuses of power and provide a check on the other branches of government.
transforming dreams in to reality is always rare,however some thing is better
then nothing, and we may improve steadly, as our direction and friends support
is in the right direction.
"On their side are truth, justice - and, I hope, the American people"
Please don't hold your breath, Ms. Shafqat. The USan people are still enslaved to an institutional suppression of truth/justice. They can't even side with themselves, because they are obligated to side with the elites, as illustrated in the 2008 elections. It may be valuable to prioritize the issue of elite class war aggression, to free USans so they can join the worldwide people's movement.