Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Invasion of the Sea-Smurfs
A little-noticed story surfaced a couple of weeks ago in the Army Times newspaper about the 3rd Infantry Division's 1st Brigade Combat Team. "Beginning Oct. 1 for 12 months," reported Army Times staff writer Gina Cavallaro, "the 1st BCT will be under the day-to-day control of U.S. Army North, the Army service component of Northern Command, as an on-call federal response force for natural or manmade emergencies and disasters, including terrorist attacks." Disturbingly, she writes that "they may be called upon to help with civil unrest and crowd control" as well.
The force will be called the chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear or high-yield explosive Consequence Management Response Force. Its acronym, CCMRF, is pronounced "sea-smurf." These "sea-smurfs," Cavallaro reports, have "spent 35 of the last 60 months in Iraq patrolling in full battle rattle," in a combat zone, and now will spend their 20-month "dwell time"-time troops are required to spend to "reset and regenerate after a deployment"-armed and ready to hit the U.S. streets.
The Army Times piece includes a correction stating that the forces would not use nonlethal weaponry domestically. I called Air Force Lt. Col. Jamie Goodpaster, a public-affairs officer for Northern Command. She told me that the overall mission was humanitarian, to save lives and help communities recover from catastrophic events. Nevertheless, the military forces would have weapons on-site, "containerized," she said-that is, stored in containers-including both lethal and so-called nonlethal weapons. They would have mostly wheeled vehicles, but would also, she said, have access to tanks. She said that any decision to use weapons would be made at a higher level, perhaps at the secretary-of-defense level.
Talk of trouble on U.S. streets is omnipresent now, with the juxtaposition of Wall Street and Main Street. The financial crisis we face remains obscure to most people; titans of business and government officials assure us that the financial system is "on the brink," that a massive bailout is necessary, immediately, to prevent a disaster. Conservative and progressive members of Congress, at the insistence of constituents, blocked the initial plan. If the economy does collapse, if people can't go down to the bank to withdraw their savings, or get cash from an ATM, there may be serious "civil unrest," and the "sea-smurfs" may be called upon sooner than we imagine to assist with "crowd control."
The political and financial establishments seem completely galled that people would actually oppose their massive bailout, which rewards financiers for gambling. Normal people worry about paying their bills, buying groceries and gas, and paying rent or a mortgage in increasingly uncertain times. No one ever offers to bail them out. Wall Street's house of cards has collapsed, and the rich bankers are getting little sympathy from working people.
That's where the sea-smurfs come in. Officially formed to respond to major disasters, like a nuclear or biological attack, this combat brigade falls under the U.S. Northern Command, a military structure formed on Oct, 1, 2002, to "provide command and control of Department of Defense homeland defense efforts." Military participation in domestic operations was originally outlawed with the Posse Comitatus Act in 1878. The John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007, however, included a section that allowed the president to deploy the armed forces to "restore public order" or to suppress "any insurrection." While a later bill repealed this, President Bush attached a signing statement that he did not feel bound by the repeal.
We are in a time of increasing economic disparity, with the largest gap between rich and poor of any wealthy industrialized country. We are witnessing a crackdown on dissent, most recently with $100 million spent on "security" at the Democratic and Republican national conventions. The massive paramilitary police forces deployed at the RNC in St. Paul, Minn., were complete overkill, discouraging protests and conducting mass arrests (National Guard troops just back from Fallujah were there). The arrest there of almost 50 journalists (myself included) showed a clear escalation in attempting to control the message (akin to the ban on photos of flag-draped coffins of soldiers). There are two ongoing, unpopular wars that are costing lives and hundreds of billions of dollars. Nobel-winning economist Joe Stiglitz estimates that Iraq alone will cost more than $3 trillion.
In December 2001, in the midst of restricted access to bank accounts due to a financial crisis, respectable, middle-class Argentines rose up, took to the streets, smashed bank windows and ultimately forced the government out of power, despite a massive police crackdown and a failed attempt to control the media. Here in the U.S., with the prospect of a complete failure of our financial system, the people have spoken and do not want an unprecedented act of corporate welfare. We don't know how close the system is to collapse, nor do we know how close the people are to taking to the streets. The creation of an active-duty military force, the sea-smurfs, that could be used to suppress public protest here at home is a very bad sign.
Denis Moynihan contributed to this column.




103 Comments so far
Show AllPerhaps Iraq is just a training ground for crowd control here?
And New Orleans, Shock Doctrine , fails in Cenmtral America, corporitists declare the uS cowed and ripe for the oligarch revllution.
Go money!!
There is no "perhaps". And then there is Blackwater, not to mention the use of foreign military under the auspices of the U.N. There has also been North American "harmonization" of militaries under the Security and Prosperity Partnership (North American Union, of which this U.S. meltdown (fraud and looting) is an incremental part of the agenda. This is real, and the push is on.
I lived in New York after 9/11.
The military never left the subways and streets with machine guns (how would that kind of gun work in the crowded subway?)
I now live in New Orleans.
The military have never left these streets either.
Lesson learned. Once the military sets up shop, they never leave.
It's called a POLICE STATE and we're living in one now. We The People just don't know it yet.
Bingo! It's called BLACKWATER.
Bush doesn't feel bound by the Constitution either.
Frankly I regard this type of suggestion as fear mongering much akin to what Bush and Congress are doing in regard to the economy.
Our economy is nowhere near collapse, in fact this isn't much different than the S&L crisis and could be solved the same way.
The comparison to Argentina is absurd and I am surprised at Amy for the comparison.
.
http://www.libertyforlife.com/jail-police/us-concentration_camp-locations.htm
Where do you live?
44 States listed…
http://www.libertyforlife.com/jail-police/us_concentration_camps.htm
.
You are such a tool tommyboy.
What if your bank restricted access to your short term investment accounts beyond what had been previously agreed upon?... or perhaps said that they would only allow 10% on the dollar?
This economy is going down... the bailout won't prevent that. The forced dividend payout is just insurance that the corporatists can get a taste up front.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/02/education/02college.html?ref=us
What evidence do you have that "this economy is going down" ? Is your claim based on actual economic data ?
joke right? What alternate universe do you live in?
The economic data I see tells me there is no real crisis like the one they are touting. I believe its just a way to recapture lost profits at our expense.
"The economic data I see tells me there is no real crisis like the one they are touting. I believe its just a way to recapture lost profits at our expense."
Oh, I agree with this assessment, at least to the degree that it can't self-correct with some real pain for all but a small percent of American... but you are only looking at a snapshot of the relative present. You don't really believe it is going to stop here, do you?
There is one remaining hurtle. The Executive needs to effectively deal with it to achieve its goal... stripping balance from America's governmental process as it has been defined for hundreds of years.
If the Executive does not have to deal with a truculent Congress to garner funds for its agenda... then it will have met all of CheneyOilCo's goals.
And this bill does just that... puts endless billions into the control of an Executive Brach appointee who can apportion the funds as it sees fit. Any oversight is pretense, as the expense of those funds can easily be classified to meet definition with just the smallest amount of spin. If you need an object lesson, take a look at what is now under the jurisdiction of "Homeland Security", how it got that way and how it is managed.
Want funding for wars? Want corporatist Dividend Payouts? Want Congressional Pork?
War is GOOD for stabilizing the economy!!! (ask CheneyOilCo and buds). Feeding greedy and corrupt corporate supporters is a great way to stabilize the economy (their bottom line). Funneling billions into the hands of those in Congress who kowtow to the Executive is a phenomenal way to stabilize the economy!!! (ask any politician within "The Party").
This is just THE BEGINNING. They will suck the Treasury dry and sell America short to the Chinese and Saudis. They already have a great start (ten trillion is no drop in the bucket)... this legislation just allows them to finish the job and continue into the distant future. There's your economy in the dumpster.
Its class warfare.
Anything that appears to be oversight and authorization outside the Executive branch is a lie. The quote attributed to Desiderius Erasmus that goes something like: "In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king" is a reference to the blinders we willing wear. Try uncovering one eye tommyboy.
IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall implement any program (snip) which office shall be headed by an Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, appointed by the President (snip).
"The Secretary is authorized to take such actions as the Secretary deems necessary to carry out the authorities in this Act (snip)".
We're screwed.
I just pray you are wrong.
Your point is valid about war being good for the economy, but whose economy. Not ours. The corporate economy has made out like a bandit and now want more.
I'd rather have a depression than keep our soldiers in a war like this. Bring them home and let the economy go into the dumpster if thats my only choice.
I agree, this could very well end in class warfare. Guess which class usually wins that one.
In any case, for now I'm a bit more optimistic than some apparently.
Well I like to think I'm not a tool so I hope you are wrong.
I don't have any short term investment accounts or long term for that matter. I have enough cash to get by for a few months in case the banks go down, though my principal bank is conservative, locally owned and has no exposure to the mess itself.
The economy is of course not going down, into a recession, you bet and the rest of the world is about to find out the fallacy of delinkage. The bailout won't have any particular effect except to make a bunch of theives whole again at Anmerican citizens expense.
But if you are right, we won't have long to wait, it would happen within the month. We'll see I guess.
"The economy is of course not going down, into a recession..."
ha!
We're already in a recession. But I agree that it will be short lived... as it will quickly slide into a depression. The "tarp" that they are throwing over the truth will rot away soon enough.
This legislation insures the dollar will be devalued further. It most likely will be the last straw that pushes OPEC to eliminate supply that is denominated on a worthless dollar.
That will start the global feedback loop.
The reason that this legislation is being pushed onto the backs of taxpayers is that the Chinese and Saudis do not want to buy more worthless paper... especially to prop up companies that they can buy for pennies on the dollar when they fail.
And they will fail... no matter how much Congress would like us to believe otherwise.
I didn't word that very well, I meant to say the economy is not going into the dumpster, but we are going into a recession. And I agree we have been in one, since around December last year is my guess.
I don;'t knowe that they can delink from the dollar. Interesting to see what they do though.
Thomas, please start paying closer attention. Amy Goodman is starting to put more of the pieces together. It happened in Argentina: it is happening here. It is global and it is matastisizing rapidly. The majority of the military is most likely loathe to participating in this scenario, but the New World Order (Global Fascism) has backup plans. "The Government is not your friend."--Infowars.com
Yes, there is fear-mongering, but FORCE is an integral component. Can you not see a pattern since 911 and the Patriot Act? It has happened over and over in history. It most certainly can happen here. There is not a government which represents We the People at this time.
Lerts all hope ya'll are wrong and I am right. The people here unlike Argentina are armed. You might not think it would make a difference, but it would.
Aside from the fact that I don't believe any politician would have much luck using our armed forces for that. Many of my old friends from Viet Nam are still serving, mostly upper tier officers, and many of the men they have trtained make up the non-commissioned officer corp. Based on that, all I can say is...its not happening.
It could go the other way however, if something like that were tried. Remember who is doing most of the fighting, the National Guard.
Yes I see the pattern developed by the lily livered cowards that have been in charge for the last 8 years, but they are on the way out. One way or the other.
You expose the underlying fallacy of this whole paranoid concept much more succinctly than I.
An armed general populace and a Military that would be very hard to turn on them.
I think this fear all comes from being "street protesters" practicing civil-disobedience and failing to recognize the special prejudice -rich college kids, anti-american, etc.- that the police and the military have against these groups.
Generalized use of repressive force against the general U.S. population?
Don't see it happening just because of some bank riots.
Don't Panic,
-matti.
Sorry, Matti, but martial law is still very much on the table. The banking crisis is only one piece of the orchestrated chaos. It could very well be another "terrorist attack, a pandemic disease--any one or more of many possibilities. The various presidential signings are there, including the secretive order of government continuity. Obama will not change anything. He will not be the ultimate Decider.
I agree the comparison to Argentina is a bit much. Last time I checked, the U.S. was just a bit larger, more populous, and more productive. Argentina goes into the crapper and some IMF Globalizer-types make out like bandits, the U.S. goes into the crapper and so does everybody else -at least in the short-term. Who's gonna buy all of China's crap? Who's gonna feed all those tens of millions that get our extra commodity crops? Did Argentina's Navy control the World's Oceans? Did Argentina have 7,500 nukes pointed at everybody? Do you think if things get too nasty the U.S. is just gonna say "sorry" and go down quietly? They push us to hard and it'll make Germany's response to the Treaty of Versailles "reparations" look tame in comparison!
There are some underlying problems with the financial sector now that are quite a bit more fundamental and dangerous than what happened with the S&L debacle, but I also agree that this does not necessarily mean there is no way to avoid collapse.
But most relevant to this article, I would like to remind everyone that we are talking about ONE Brigade Combat Team here. What is that, a couple thousand guys? What exactly are they gonna do that's so scary? And since when does the U.S. need Active-Duty Army Brigades to keep the homefront in line?
Lots of the people that expect the jackboots to march down the street of their suburb tomorrow mention New Orleans, right? So yeah, let's remember New Orleans, no Army Brigades there, just the Arkansas National Guard and some Blackwater-types. And I seem to remember them mostly hanging around and keeping down abunch of peaceful folks around the Convention Center and in the Superdome while pretty much utterly failing to do much about the gangbangers who had taken over after the flight of the NOPD.
So exactly how is this relevant, and why am I supposed to be so scared? From where I live I could WALK to Canada without ever leaving treecover or mountain valleys, not that I think I'll ever have to.
I wouldn't call this "fear-mongering" like ~Thomas More~ does, but I would say it sounds a lot like the background fear and feeling of having no control that comes with living in a place as unnatural as New York City.
There's also a lot of "Leftist street-protester" paranoia here. Sure all the folks that go out into the streets wearing masks and demanding justice from some fascist in body armor are gonna have a hard time of it. But how exactly does that translate into an Authoritarian Police State for all of the "Average Joes" in the 'burbs?
They (Police, National Guard, Army) stomp on you all because they think you are all a bunch of spoiled-rich-college kid, commie-pinko-faggots who spit on the soldiers who "died for your freedom".
Do you REALLY see them stomping on all the "Average Joes" -many of whom are veterans or cops themselves- who just want their fair shake for the benefit of a small group of rich scumbags who are so Unpatriotic that they are willing to crush our Treasury with debt just so they can stay in good with the Central Bank of China?
Puh-lease!
Don't Panic,
-matti.
"wouldn't call this "fear-mongering" like ~Thomas More~ "
I'd agree, I could have been a bit strong there. Point taken.
I of course agree with the general line of your post.
The problem with the Internets is that "tone" is very hard to get across in short-form, high speed typing, y'know?
If we were sitting in a bar when you said that, everyone would have gotten how you ment it right away.
Not panicking is one thing, matti. Panicking is always counterproductive. But, being naive about what fascism really is is quite another. Suggest you read the book of the moment, "The Shock Doctrine" by Naomi Klein.
Posting active duty troops straight off the plane from a combat zone is crazy. Non-lethal weapons my ass. We hear about scores of soldiers returning home with PTSD and how hard it is for them to return to "normal" life. They will still be in their military mindset - only now they will be suspicious of Americans, not Iraqis, etc. When the first person dies at some "crowd control" scene, I hope the media doesn't twist the truth. But I'm not holding my breath.
These troops are not nut cases. Besises, do you realize how many other things would have to happen before a President could deploy regular troops? Its not that simple.
waiting for your list...
LIST:
Stock Market Crash
Setback in Iraq
Setback in Afghanistan
Setback in Pakestan
Setback in Congress
Setback in Tax Collections
Setback
Set
S
Mr. Moore, How much do they pay you for these posts?
Not nearly enough I'm sure. Could you arrange a raise for me? It would be much appreciated.
Thomas -
I didn't say they were. My grandfather joined the army during WWII. He raised me, I lived with him on a daily basis, and I don't think he was a "nut case." That being said, he explained the mental transition period and how difficult that can be. He was shot in the chest, so he got to come home "early," but he still faced anguish.
And what part of this troop enactment do you not understand? Bush repealed the only safeguard we had against last year. It is a done deal. Blackwater has compounds in nearly every state. How does that play into this?
This is also the first "war" fought AND paid for , by the poor.
The Natl. Guard and Reserve were never intended for 18 mo. "tours of duty", and it is illegal taht Bush order it. Some of these people are on their 4th tour. They were in Junior HS when 9/11 happened.
I wish one of our state governors had the balls to "recall" them.
Vietnam vets are treated liek trash, too. Hillary Clinton wants to re-visit that. Who knows.
Most vets who cannot PROVE "service connected diability" over 80% get NOTHING!! Not even medical care. I worked at a Vet Center. It is the shame of the nation. Among many other things,, of course.
The suicide rate is the highest its ever been. Rape is growing exponentially.
Its not that these people are inherently "nuts". Its that they are used and abused, and then denied that they were!
They did, however, drop IQ standards for the Marines (also high school diploma), are allowing violent, convicted felons in (like Robert Taylor--presiding over the Abu Gharib debacle), all to pretend to the uS citizen that "recruitment is just fine".
Gawd knows they dont want a draft, and to have their precious, rich babies have to file for deferrments, which could later prove embarrassing.
Unfortunately its like joining for a 4 year hitch, you serve at the pleasure of the President. Once they are activated, the Govenor has no more control of them. At least that was the deal last time I looked.
Absolutely! Coming back and readjusting is the hardest thing I can think of. When I got back, if someone dropped a book on the floor I'd hit the deck. If someone startled me I immediately positioned. Being shot just adds to it. Your first thought is "thats hot, then jesus that hurts, then why me"
You are thinking of the 2007 pentagon bill with the alteration of the Posse Comitatus Act I think. That was repealed by Congress in 2008 and the safeguards have been restored.
This is a quick summary of the Posse Comitatus Act:
"The intent of the act is to prevent the military forces of the United States from becoming a national police force or guardia civil. Accordingly, the act prohibits the use of the military to “execute the laws. Execution of the laws is perceived to be a civilian police function, which includes the arrest and detention of criminal suspects, search and seizure activities, restriction of civilian movement through the use of blockades or checkpoints, gathering evidence for use in court, and the use of undercover personnel in civilian drug enforcement activities."
I believe there has been some erosian of it, but not anywhere enough to warrent the concern she is talking about. Simply my opinion.
From Amy's article:
" While a later bill repealed this, President Bush attached a signing statement that he did not feel bound by the repeal."
Bush says law does NOT apply to him. HE IS THE DECIDER ! ! ! !
.
.
Nader says...
"Wake up Americans! Cut the crap and take over."
VOTE NADER/GONZALEZ 2008… You’ll be glad you did and so will I…
.
He lost in 1996
He lost in 2000
He lost in 2004
Can you help Ralph lose again?
VOTE NADER/GONZALEZ 2008… McCain’ll be glad you did and so will Palin…
Unfortunately for him it does.
TM, you just said: "These troops are not nut cases."
Amy's article states: " These "sea-smurfs," Cavallaro reports, have "spent 35 of the last 60 months in Iraq patrolling in full battle rattle," in a combat zone, and now will spend their 20-month "dwell time"-time troops are required to spend to "reset and regenerate after a deployment"-armed and ready to hit the U.S. streets. "
Dude, these guys spent 3 of the last 5 years in Iraq doing "full battle rattle".
You are nuts if this doesn't frighten you.
One BCT vs. the entire U.S. Population?
I guess I'm nuts, 'cause I ain't frightened.
"You are nuts if this doesn't frighten you."
I'd have been scared to death every minute of that 3 to 5 years if I had been with them. If you show me a soldier that wasn't I'll show you a dead man or a soldier that was never anywhere near combat.
Am I scared because they have been in combat and are now here? Not at all. And they are not hitting our streets.
Concerns about the mental health of these troops is kind of beside the point, don't you think? The fact that they have been deployed here is unconstitutional, despite the spin regarding their function. Being frightened is not productive. BUT, nobody should be naive enough to think this administration, in the service of corporate interests, and fearful of the people it governs, is incapable of bringing down martial law, complete with whatever conditions they need to point to to justify it to the American people and the world. We're talking about a situation that walks, looks and quacks like a duck. Do you think it's impossible that it's a duck?
Where in the world did you get the idea that this is unconstitutional?
Why are the NRA gun nuts so quiet about this?
They are always saying how they need guns for fightin' the government--so why aint they mobilizin'?
Too busy shooting deer I reckon.
They have been trained to look the other way. In my place, Wall Street is treated as "patriotic" and as another church. Don't wake them up. They won't come to the polls. The only time they'll vote is if they're afraid they're guns are taken away. Sadly, some have been trained to vote only on the issues of gun control. I'm no fan of gun control but I finally decided to think beyond guns in 2004 when I was afraid things would get worse with another Bush term coupled with a GOP Congress. I voted for Bush in 2000, Kerry in 2004. Now, I really don't know who I want to vote for anymore or if voting is worth anything anymore. Nader looks promising but I don't know if he can handle a two party opposition.
Terrance Mitchell
Redfield, South Dakota
Shooting deer is a wise thing to be doing at the moment.
A full larder reduces one's panic response.
Oakknot
I couldn't agree more
couple of things:
during the vietnam war - towards the end of it - a "surge" was planned by the whitehouse which was rejected by the military as they felt they needed the troops on american soil for domestic security
resistance was growing
when the public realize they have been robbed by the bailout, and when their houses are foreclosed and their job disappear they may get upset - they may take to the streets to demonstrate
the government response will be to declare martial law, deploy the military to round the terrorists involved who will the be sent off the the fema prisons
read about them here, along with the powers that have already been ceded to bush to commence martial law, it an eye opener:
http://www.sianews.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1062
the nazis have landed
cheers, b