EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Maine Anti-War Campaign Nabs Resolution Victory in State's Largest City
City councilors have approved a resolution calling on Maine's U.S. Congressional delegation to oppose new funding for military campaigns in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Unlike similar measures which have come before cities and towns in other part of the country, the resolution approved 7-1 Monday night didn't question war rationale or the justness of the campaigns themselves. Instead, the resolution argues that we no longer afford the wars given the fragile economy and deep budget cuts seen in communities across the state and the nation.
The nonbinding resolution was sponsored by Councilors John Anton, Dan Skolnik and Dory Waxman. Councilor John Coyne was the only councilor to oppose the measure.
Councilor Cheryl Leeman, who works for U.S. Sen. Olympia Snowe, was not present for the vote.
In an interview Tuesday, Skolnik said he hoped the measure would increase consciousness "among four or five extremely influential people. And they are (Maine's Second District Congressman Mike) Michaud, Pingree, Snowe, Collins and (President Barack) Obama."
He said the measure also tries to demonstrate "the fact that cities and towns like ours are really hurting and the fact that the military industrial complex isn't."
Although Skolnik revised and edited the resolution down to its current form, a rough draft was written by Gary Higginbottom, a 60-year-old consultant who lives in the West End. Higginbottom, who isn't paid by any campaign or political cause, says the resolution came about "from frustration on the part of Maine people whose money is going into warfare at a time when we can't afford to pay for our schools."
Based on his calculations, Portland's share of war expenses come to $15 million a year. Higginbottom arrives at those figures by dividing the total cost of the Iraq and Afghan wars by Portland's total population.
These wars are "not paid for by some sugar daddy that has no impact on us. The cost of this is the cost we bear in taxation we pay now or indebtedness because we are paying for the wars essentially ... on the government's credit card," he said.
Through the Web site BringOurWarDollarsHome.org, Higginbottom and about 60 others are trying to get other Maine cities and towns to take a position on the issue. He says residents from Deer Isle approved a similar resolution at their town meeting this year and that councilors in Brunswick and Bath may also vote on the resolution.
Although the resolution is nonbinding -- which means it doesn't compel Pingree, Snowe or Collins to vote one way or another -- Higginbottom and others say they are hoping to highlight the war's costs at a time when city and state budgets across Maine are stretched thin.
"We are faced with major issues on how to pay for our school system, infrastructure and police, and yet $15 million going right down drain out of the economy," he said.
Although he hadn't heard about the resolution until asked about it by a reporter, Willy Ritch, a spokesman for Chellie Pingree, said the Congresswoman already opposes additional war funding.
"Congress is likely to consider additional funding for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan in the next few months and Congresswoman Pingree has urged Congressional leaders to allow an up or down vote on that funding," he said. "If given the opportunity to vote on such a bill she would vote against further funding."
Attempts to reach spokespersons for Sens. Snowe and Collins were unsuccessful after hours Tuesday evening.
Emails sent to Councilors Anton and Waxman seeking comment on the resolution weren't returned my press time.- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

15 Comments so far
Show AllThis is what happens in every Third World Country. We now are the proud recipients of "Disaster Capitalism."
Three cheers for the conscientious East Coast Progressives! Starting this dialogue may bring the reality of what our own government is doing to promote the destruction of their own country...into the frontal lobes of the citizens in this country. These wars and the take-over by the Military Industrial Complex is affecting our daily lives more then anyone realizes. Is it too late already? We'll see.
Extremely important event here. I applaud those involved, and hope the brushfire spreads. Like many other "one shot" ideas (no more lobbyists, incentives for fewer kids, improved education, making corporations responsible), this is one of those "stand alones" that could turn our ship around.
I believe when you are caught not paying your taxes you normally can agree to pay $5 0r $10 a month until you are caught up.
Unless your big time money.
Why isn't this happening throughout the country? I hope this example goes viral.
I enthusiastically applaud this resolution, although I agree with Only Anarchy (see post below) that more must be done to stop Empire and its killing machine.
The U.S. Empire of 725+ military bases must be abolished: not only does it create massive political and military instability and stir up anti-American sentiment throughout the world, it is also ruining the United States, creating stratospheric deficits and depriving the taxpayers of immense amounts of revenue that could go towards improving their quality of life, the infrastructure of the country, the quality of education, health care, social services, and so on.
The United States military budget and the maintenance of its military bases around the world are a crime perpetrated against the majority of the taxpaying population of this country by a set of predator corporations and industrial interests.
I can only applaude these folks for their forsight and character.
I live in a fairly wealthy community and the district is proposing to close many schools due to a budget shortfall.
I think the B.O. E. should be pro bono.
The article significantly underestimates the costs of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and these are dwarfed by the total the US spends on its military -- as much as the rest of the world combined.
They claim that Portland's share of the wars is $15 million. According to Wikipedia, Portland Maine's population was 62,875 in 2007. The 2007 US population was was 302,000,000 so this implies the total annual war cost is:
$15 million(302,000,000/62,875) = $72 billion. The figures I've seen are roughly double this. Here's a quote from defensetalk.com (hardly an anti-war site):
"On top of the basic defense budget of 533.7 billion dollars, the White House is requesting a further 130 billion dollars for overseas missions, including 65 billion for Afghanistan and 61 billion for Iraq."
If you take the defense budget plus the war cost you get about $660 billion which, for Portland, would be $137 million, almost 10 times the figure in the article.
Military spending is killing this country. Here in California, we can no longer afford public schools or public transit. California's state budget deficit was about $40 billion in 2008. California's share of the US military budget is about $80 billion.
Where is the debate on "guns vs. butter"? Why do we continue to fight wars 10,000 miles away against people who (at least the vast majority of whom) don't threaten us?
Civil society and our very souls are being sacrificed on the altar of war.
Right on!
This is more 'home roots related' compared to the 'happy talk' of nuclear warhead reductions, which I don't see being able to identify with because why would a nuclear weapon holding nation tell the truth about that country's weapon's programs? But here, it is the people, in another big majority, albeit a singe town in one state, that address a root of the ability of continuing useless wars and especially a 'ghost war on terror' that leaves a far too big opening for interpretation for it to be really necessary.
Cities with Peace Resolutions can be seen here:
http://citiesforprogress.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=111&Itemid=72
Whether citing money or mercy as reasons for stopping war, these have all been largely ignored