For Immediate Release
Journalists Win Victory in Freedom of the Press Case Filed by ACLU
WASHINGTON - In a win for freedom of the press, a U.S. District Court judge yesterday denied the federal government’s motion to dismiss a case against the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) regarding violations of journalists’ First Amendment rights.
In 2019, five photojournalists who were tracked, detained, and interrogated by DHS in an unprecedented, coordinated attack on the freedom of the press sued to defend the First Amendment. The journalists were all reporting on conditions at the U.S.-Mexico border. On multiple separate occasions in 2018 and 2019, U.S. border officers targeted the journalists for interrogation at the border, compelled them to disclose information about their sources and observations as journalists, and even searched through their photos and notes. The five plaintiffs — Bing Guan, Go Nakamura, Mark Abramson, Kitra Cahana, and Ariana Drehsler—are all U.S. citizens and professional photojournalists. The lawsuit was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union, the New York Civil Liberties Union, and the ACLU of San Diego & Imperial Counties in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
“I am pleased to learn of the court’s decision, which demonstrates the gravity of the government’s actions to target journalists’ work at the U.S.-Mexico border,” said plaintiff Kitra Cahana. “Journalists must feel free to cover issues of migration without fear of being targeted and interrogated by the government or placed on special lists that limit our ability to travel and do our jobs. Forcing journalists to reveal information about our work jeopardizes the integrity of our profession and the foundation of a free press.”
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-Supported
No advertising. No paywalls. No selling your data. Our content is free. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share.
But, without support from our readers, we simply don't exist. Please, select a donation method and stand with us today.
The lawsuit argues that the government’s actions violated the First Amendment, burdening journalists from conducting constitutionally-protected newsgathering and reporting by subjecting them to detention and questioning about their journalism work. The plaintiffs also ask the court to order the government to delete all records it obtained through the unlawful interrogations.
“Border screening cannot be used as a pretext to target journalists who were simply doing their jobs,” said Esha Bhandari, deputy director with the ACLU Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. “We are pleased that the court recognized that First Amendment protections apply at the border. We look forward to holding the government accountable and ensuring freedom of the press is not imperiled by border officers’ actions.”
This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.
Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.
Please select a donation method:
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) conserves America's original civic values working in courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in the United States by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.