EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- One American Who Isn't For Sale
- Edward Snowden: Saving Us from the United Stasi of America
- Major Loss to Organic Farmers as Court Rules in Favor of Monsanto
- The Judicial Lynching of Bradley Manning
- Remembering Satyajit Ray’s Hirok Rajar Deshe: On Edward Snowden, Resistance and Inverted Totalitarianism
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Poor Rich and the Scrooginess of Congress
It's at this time of the year that generous, big-hearted Americans reach out to aid the less fortunate among us — like those who've recently been knocked down by the recession and seen their incomes plummet. I speak, of course, about our nation's severely squeezed millionaires.
Yes, many in the infamous 1 percent class are no longer feeling like a million bucks. According to a new federal report, the income of these high-living swells averaged a robust $1.4 million in 2007, but after Wall Street crashed in a heap of greed late that year, their average income took a tumble. In 2009, it fell below the millionaire threshold, leaving these poor rich folks struggling to make it on an average income of only $957,000.
Also, talk about getting a lump of coal in your Christmas stocking, the share of our nation's total income taken by the 1-percenters fell from a whopping 23 percent in 2007 (the highest since the Roaring Twenties) to a mere 17 percent in 2009. How sad for them, huh?
The only balm for their little financial ouchie is they are using the slight setback to rebuke the 99-percenters of the Occupy Wall Street protests. See, say the rich, waving the federal report, our slice of the pie in 2009 was the smallest it's been in a decade, so your protest about inequality is out of date. "Get a time machine," one front man for the Koch brothers barked at the Occupy movement.
OK, but let's travel back only a few short years in time to 1980, when the top 1 percent was very happy to pocket a meager 10 percent of all of America's income. And, by the way, today's 1-percenters have had big income gains since 2009, while the 99 percent have lost income. So the Occupiers are right — the inequality is increasing — yet, shamefully, those who're back making a killing want America's hard-hit majority to feel sorry for them!
The 1-percenters and the politicos who serve them are modern-day scrooges, oblivious to the hardships of others.
"Humbug," they mutter, expecting downsized workers to be like Bob Cratchit — grateful to be given an extra piece of coal for the fire in Ebenezer's cold workspace. As you recall, Scrooge was a nasty old miser, but even he came to see the soul-destroying evil of his ways and found redemption in the end. One wonders, though — is there any hope for the Scrooges of Washington?
Congressional Republicans continue to protect nonsensical tax breaks for Wall Street billionaires and Big Oil, while demanding that programs to aid America's growing number of poor people either be slashed or eliminated. The Obama White House is fighting most of this absurdity, but it keeps trying to appease the GOP by offering to sacrifice programs that ordinary people really need. For example, LIHEAP.
Much of the country doesn't know what that is, but people who go through the long, bitterly cold winters in the Northeast know that LIHEAP literally is a lifeline for the thousands of poor families there. It's the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program, which helps the poor afford the steadily rising price being charged for the heating oil that Northeastern states rely on. Home heating oil in Maine is presently running $3.66 a gallon, up from $2.87 a year ago.
Yet, in a concession to GOP leaders, Obama has proposed whacking LIHEAP's funding so severely that average benefits this winter would fall from about $800 per home to just over $300. That's not just throwing a program's budget into the Republican shredder, it's throwing people into it! In Bangor, Maine, where the average January low is only 7 degrees above zero, the slashed benefits will buy only about 100 gallons of fuel for the typical low-income home. It takes 850 gallons for those homes to stay heated through the winter season.
Rather than literally tossing the poor into the cold, how about cutting off all heat to the White House and Capitol? Let those Scrooges feel the sting of their budgetary miserliness, and maybe they'd seek a bit of redemption from those they're hurting.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...




19 Comments so far
Show All"Rather than literally tossing the poor into the cold, how about cutting off all heat to the White House and Capitol?"
Even if we could make it happen they'd just go on vacation to the warm hideaways and gated communities. And we'd foot the bill for their airline tickets and per diem.
Instead of austerity cuts for all of us to offset the capital gains and inheritance tax cuts, how much would we save if we cut all elected salaries say 02% and dismantled their benefit packages (including retirement)?
It seems to me that elected officials should not be paid at all. It's supposed to be public service, not a "job."
Const Amnd 27: "No law, varying the compensation for the services of the senators and reps, shall take effect, until an election of reps shall have intervened." When have workers been able to protect their compensation from capital accumulation predators? What's really sad is the natural gas nec is actually being sucked up from under their very own backyards and leaking into their water supply. Beyond Shame!
++"The Obama White House is fighting most of this absurdity"++
This line was the real reason for the whole article.
Absurdity is also winning because of people like Hightower making absurd statements like this.
Birdbrain, i think Hightower means, "The Obama White House is [hoping to give the impression] of fighting most of this absurdity." :O)
I love Hightower, but i hate it when he gives Obomber a pass.
"polarbear4"
Giving Hightower a "pass" is giving Obama a pass.
Are you saying that Hightower is too stupid to know what he is writing and, if so, Why make excuses for him?
I honestly am at a loss, here, Birdbrain. Hightower has spent a lifetime mostly fighting for the little guy, and I won't throw that away by automatically dismissing him.
I know several intelligent, well-meaning people who either truly believe (still!) that Obomber is secretly on our side, or believe they must be "diplomatic" in public.
I don't know how they cannot see that Obomber is actually worse than a Republican in many respects, not the least because people like Hightower are not fighting him tooth and nail.
Lowtower uses a dumbed down Texas yokel version of John Nichols' Obama Apology formula:
.
Pick an issue ... talk about how the big bad republicans are screwing us over (which undoubtedly they are) ... gently admonish Obama for being too kind and unable to stop the mean old republicans from taking advantage of his calm and conciliatory good nature ... balance out the non-critique of O's gentle nature by saying something like "the white house is fighting most of this GOP absurdity."
.
What's truly ridiculous about this article is that Lowtower claims Obama is "fighting" the GOPs proposed cuts to programs that aid the poor and middle classes ... but in the very next paragraph he details how Obama is actually NOT fighting the cuts .... but is in fact proposing his own cuts! ..... Which he absurdly attributes to Obama's conciliatory nature ...
.
Meanwhile anyone who has been paying attention knows that Obummer gave away $800 billion in tax cuts to the rich last year ....and a few weeks later proposed an austerity budget that cut over a trillon dollars from programs that help the poor and middle classes. Yeah ... bring the "fight" to em O!
.
Don't look to Lowtower for the truth ... just a garbled bunch of gobbledygook nonsense.
Thank you Jim for speaking up against this outrageous behavior by our elected officials. Scrooge has been on my mind too as a metaphor for what's going on. But where are the Ghosts needed to make these modern-day Scrooges realize the horrendous folly of their ways? Despite the oft-repeated nods to religious observance among the Republican caucus, they obviously don't believe in heaven and hell anymore, and they could care less about the 10 Commandments.
How can the 99% become the Ghosts of Christmas past, present and future and haunt those politicians until they get the message?
That is the question of the day.
Read more on inequality at Transition Times: http://bethechange2012.wordpress.com/2011/12/20/1-99-dont-mess-with-the-rich-and-leave-inequality-alone/
Are there no prisons? Are there no workhouses?
OK, Hugo, time for Citgo to step up and renew the discount heating oil program. It's a good feeling to have a real socialist watching your back.
"And, by the way, today's 1-percenters have had big income gains since 2009"
and they know it, so they know they are lying by quoting 2009 figures
in 2009 they were afraid the government would actually do something about their immoral behavior
so they were laying low
ps how about quoting the 0.1 percent
"And, by the way, today's 1-percenters have had big income gains since 2009"
and they know it, so they know they are lying by quoting 2009 figures
in 2009 they were afraid the government would actually do something about their immoral behavior
so they were laying low
ps how about quoting the 0.1 percent
For the past six years the Venezualan government, through CITIGO, has supplied subsidized heating oil to many low-income families in the US.
They don't have Republicans there. If we didn't have Republicans here we could do the same. Unfortunately we have Republicans here. Remember the Republican Party is in truth "The Rich Peoples' Party". Or "The Party of the 1%". There are a large number of people who vote Republican because they are willing to vote against their own economic interests in favor of their prejudices of one sort or another. Some vote Republican because they own guns and are afraid the Democrats will take their guns away from them. Some vote Republican because they are "anti-abortion" and the Republicans are "anti-abortion". Some vote Republican because they are "homo-phobic" and Republicans are "homo-phobic". All of these people end up voting against their own economic interests. They view their prejudices as more important.
And when they continue to vote Republican, they generally get what they deserve...
They certainly do have Republicans in Venezuela, or the equivalent thereof. Hugo Chavez faces powerful opposition, and it doesn't all come from Washington. Who do you think owns all those TV stations that refuse to broadcast Chavez's presidential addresses?
"The Obama White House is fighting most of this absurdity, but it..."
------
As Oblahblah flies off to Hawaii for his Xmas vacation - on us taxpayers' backs.
A$$hole can't even buy his own damn ticket. And I bet him and his wife and kids don't got to worry about being sexually assaulted by TSA before they board, either.
Given the corrupt nature of American politics in this era, the mere fact of having been elected to Congress, the Senate, or the White House, or being appointed to the Supreme Court, can be understood as prima face evidence of crimes against the nation.
vote them all out. All incumbents must go. Our politicians are a farce at best. Everyone of them fighting to get reelected, so they can feed at the trough of corporate generosity. Its about time we got represented by our representatives. Vote out all incumbents and send a message, business as usual will not be acepted.