EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Rise Up or Die
- Rallying Cry: Citizens Worldwide to Unite in 'March Against Monsanto'
- A 'Nonviolent Army of Love' Rises in North Carolina to Face Down Rightwing's Assault on Progress
- The Latest Lie: IRS Targeted Conservatives
- Genetically Modified Democracy: Monsanto and Congress Move to Stomp on Your Rights
Popular content
Today's Top News
Frankenfoods in Your “Natural” Foods Store: Whole Foods or Whole Hypocrisy?
“The reality is that no grocery store in the United States, no matter what size or type of business, can claim they are GE-free. While we have been and will continue to be staunch supporters of non-GE foods, we are not going to mislead our customers with an inaccurate claim… We have advocated for mandatory labeling of GE foods since 1992…”
Whole Foods Market
Internal Company Memo 1/30/2011
“Whole Foods claim they support mandatory labeling of GMOs (Genetically Modified Organisms). Well, where are the labels on the vast array of non-organic foods in their stores that contain genetically engineered soybeans, corn, canola, cottonseed oil, or sugar beets? Where are the labels on their so-called “natural” meat, eggs, or dairy products, reared on GMO grains and animal drugs?”
Protester in front of a San Francisco Whole Foods Market,
April 11, 2011
After two decades of biotech bullying by Monsanto and Food Inc., aided and abetted by Democrats and Republicans alike in Washington D.C., a grassroots movement of organic consumers and farmers is rising up across the United States. Inspired by the success of their European counterparts in driving genetically engineered crops and foods off the market, not through an EU ban, but through mandatory labeling, several thousand protesters took to the streets on March 26 in 30 different cities, under the banner of “Rally for the Right to Know,” and “Millions Against Monsanto.” http://www.organicconsumers.org/monsanto/index.cfm
Join the Millions Against Monsanto Campaign. (photo by Flickr user martha_jean)
At the same time, anti-GMO activists have stepped up the pace of grassroots lobbying, successfully pressuring state legislators in at least 14 states to introduce bills calling for mandatory labeling of genetically engineered foods. http://www.capwiz.com/grassrootsnetroots/issues/alert/?alertid=22063501&type%20=ST
Reflecting widespread public concern over the health and environmental hazards of GMOs, http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_22875.cfm recent polls by National Public Radio and MSNBC have found that more than 90% of Americans support mandatory labeling. Mandatory labeling of GMOs, of course, is bitterly opposed by Monsanto and the supermarket lobby, who understand, as a Monsanto executive admitted, "If you put a label on genetically engineered food you might as well put a skull and crossbones on it." http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_22240.cfm
Angered by the Obama administration’s recent controversial approvals of GMO alfalfa, salmon, sugar beets, and corn, and the compromise or surrender of organic industry leaders, including Whole Foods, in agreeing to accept the “co-existence,” of GMO and organic crops and foods, organic consumers across the U.S. have decided to take matters into their own hands.
Spearheaded by the industry watchdog group, the Organic Consumers Association, and powerful alternative health consumer networks such as Natural News.com and Mercola.com, millions of health and environmental-minded consumers are starting to demand that the $60 billion “natural” products industry take GMO products off their shelves, or at least clearly label them, so that consumers can seek certified organic and other GMO-free alternatives.
In an interview at the Green Festival in San Francisco on April 9, Alexis Baden-Mayer, OCA Campaign Director, explained the strategy behind the Millions Against Monsanto Truth-in-Labeling Campaign.
“Over 90% of Americans want GE-tainted foods labeled. Why? So that we can avoid buying these foods. This is a major reason why millions of us are buying certified organic products, which preclude the use of GE ingredients, as well as toxic chemicals and animal drugs. Since the politicians in Washington apparently prefer to listen to Monsanto rather than their constituents, we need to put our efforts where we currently have the most power, in our local communities, especially at the retail grocery store level, where 50 million of us are regularly buying certified organic and so-called ‘natural’ foods.
“What most green consumers don’t understand yet, is that most of the so-called “natural” processed foods and animal products (which make up 2/3 of the sales of Whole Foods Market) that we are still buying are GMO-contaminated. Either they contain GMO ingredients like soy, corn, canola, cottonseed oil or sugar beet sweetener, or else the animals have been force-fed fed a steady diet of GMO grains and drugs.
“We need to clean up our act and walk our talk in the green and natural products sector. We need to tell natural food giants like Whole Foods or Trader Joe’s that you can’t claim to support GMO labeling, and then proceed to sell billions of dollars of unlabeled GMO food in your stores, greenwashed as ‘natural.’ We’re protesting this week in front of Whole Foods Market and Trader Joe’s to make our views on GMOs absolutely clear. Like our banners say: ‘GMOs: Don’t buy them! Don’t sell them! Don’t grow them!’ Once we drive GMOs out of our organic and natural food stores, or at least force retailers to label them, we will then be able to turn our attention to conventional supermarkets and do the same thing.”
“But this means we’ve got to build a mass movement of Millions Against Monsanto. By World Food Day, October 16 we plan to mobilize a powerful and unprecedented coalition that can pressure, and if necessary boycott, industry leaders such as Whole Foods and Trader Joe’s…”
Across the U.S. and the world, people are fed up. Moving beyond ineffectual compromise and co-existence with a greenwashed business as usual and politics as usual, more and more of us are drawing lines in the sand. Nuclear power, genetic engineering, dirty coal and other out-of-control technologies have revealed themselves for what they really are: deadly threats to our survival. Monsanto has deservedly become one of the most hated corporations on earth. It’s time to drive their evil products out of the marketplace, starting with the green or natural products sector, utilizing the most powerful tools at our disposal, public education, agitation, and Truth-in-Labeling. Get up. Stand up for your rights. Join the Millions Against Monsanto Campaign. http://www.organicconsumers.org/monsanto/index.cfm
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


38 Comments so far
Show AllSame Shit, Different Day.
Yes, until we see Obama's approval rating drop into the 20s or lower you can expect to see it get worse with each passing day. Too many Americans are ignoring Obama's regressive agenda.
It's time to end defeatist attitudes. All it brings is defeat.
maybe we should all just stop eating.... then we could at least die w/ our tissues in a deterged condition rather than in a monsanto-maculated condition. here in cambodia, we're clueless about what we're eating; all our canned, bottled, and packaged provender primarily sources from china, thailand, indonesia, and india, where labelling is scant at best. the locally grown fruits and veggies we buy at the market are saturated w/ the dung they're fertilized in, which affords a richer, sweeter, tangier, more piquant taste than monsanto's GM shitola. GM crops are sufficiently regnant, in fact globally ubiquitous, that our gut-flora and gut-fauna will either mutate in ways to promote our viscera's survival [and theirs!]... or we fade into phylogenetic oblivion, buried in the clastic rocks that millions of years hence may regurgitate our bones onto surface-facies for some more 'evolved' species to examine what remains of our contaminated skeletons.
Such UNFREE SPEECH as these labeling laws help to keep Americans stupid and unhealthy.
That's correct. How many Americans are aware that "organic" apples contain higher levels of the natural carcinogens patulin and aflatoxin?
And that relates to genetic engineering how?
Hopper: ( Conservatives/ Rightwing Wackos/ Corporations/ Lobbyists) "It's a bug-eat-bug world out there, princess. One of those Circle of Life kind of things. Now let me tell you how things are supposed to work: The sun grows the food, the ants pick the food, the grasshoppers eat the food..."
Hopper speaking to his henchmen : "You let one ant stand up to us, then they all might stand up! Those puny little ants outnumber us a hundred to one and if they ever figure that out there goes our way of life! It's not about food, it's about keeping those ants in line."
Later after the revolution:
Princess Atta: ( The People) "You see Hopper, Nature has a certain order. The ants pick the food, the ants keep the food, and the grasshoppers leave!"
- A Bug's Life (1998)
Why not have a labeling-in? Get a bunch of people, bring your sharpies and a list of GMO's and do it yourselves on the shelves, in the shops. Makes sense to me.
6 months ago a basket of groceries cost us about 125$. Last week they cost 175$. This weeks groceries, which was a smaller basket than the one six months ago, cost me 200$. I do the shopping, have for ages now. I'm not as worried about the GMOs as I am about the constant rise in prices.
No matter how high prices go, the White House and Congress will continue to understate the rate of inflation to enable their Wall Street cronies to continue getting 0% money from the Federal Reserve to speculate on commodities that will keep your food bill (and many other bills) soaring ever higher.
Understating the rate of inflation also keeps wages and entitlement payments in an ever downward spiral.
There is no such thing as safe food any more than there is such a thing as clean energy production. How do we know the labels aren't flat out lying? The Republicans are against having government agencies check on things like that. Let them eat fake cake.
RBtwthelines ---- you are living in a dream world. One of the biggest problems in the
American diet is food grown in Mexico where there is no regulation of chemistry banned in the US. Out of sight- out of mind. Imported and distributed in the US. Lotsa Luck ---- dh
Don't forget NEW SEASONS (New Sleazebags) in Portland, Oregon, which stands at the height of hypocrisy with taking absolutely no stand whatsoever on GMOs, yet pretending to be sustainably minded.
Who buys industrial food anyway?
It takes a lot of savvy to avoid industrial food unless one raises one's own, or deals directly with trusted farmers for everything. Horizon organic dairy products? Owned by Dean Foods Corporation, frequently violating even the USDA's meager organic standards with impunity. Seeds of Change gardening products and sauces? Owned by M&M/Mars, a private company owned by the radical conservative Mars family. And on and on.
CORVO: The radical conservative Mars family." Dang! I couldn't have made that one up, and oh, so appropos in a Mars-rules nation!
As for the ideal of getting rid of GM products... sorry, folks, once this genii got loosed from the genetic bottle and escaped out into the wilds, carried by wind, air, and water currents... it began to meld with everything else out there.
There is NO way to contain it. Just as there is NO way to contain the detritus drawn from off-shore oil spills (or worse), or nuclear plant melt-downs. Every one of these technologies insults life, assaults Mother Nature, and brings potential calamity of a sort that cannot be contained. To the few who profit, they rationalize such costs as those of doing business. And in America, where the key business is war, notice that similar amoral rationales are used to explain away all the collateral damage... it's a KNOWN fact that about 90% of casualites in today's wars are citizens, not "enemy" combatants, insurgents, armed rebels, Al Queda, or whatever the chosen WORD used to demonize the alleged enemy, pawn in the great game that's designed to quest after resources on a grand (if morally repugnant) scale.
Nature and Her assets are perceived in a similar manner. Those of us who eat these faux foods, even unwittingly, are just collateral damage, part of the cost of doing business. It is an anti-life paradigm, and that explains why so much emphasis must be placed on "Right to Life" (anti-abortion) initiatives to give the killers and trespassers the perfect species of moral cover for all that they do in the way of injuring LIFE.
Siouxrose: Absolutely right. And not only is there no way to contain it, but that's part of the plan: Destroy biodiversity, eliminate non-Frankenfoods from the planet, so that we have to buy everything we eat from ConAgra and ADM and Monsanto. And in the meantime, farmers whose crops are polluted by Frankenfood fields growing upwind of them get sued -- for violating corporate patents!
Hot Dog!
Not sure why Whole Foods are being centered out in this article as I have always found them to be very proactive when it comes to food quality and consumer relations...definitely head and shoulders above their competitors.
.
http://blog.wholefoodsmarket.com/2010/02/urgent-tell-the-usda-what-you-think-about-gmos-in-organics/
As a supplier to Whole Foods, and they have no clue that I participate in this or other forums, I can assure you that they regularly check on the validity of my certification as a provider of " certified Organic" products. I am forced to wonder if your disdain for them is prompted by an inability or unwillingness to pay the price associated with keeping the records and doing what is necessary to be "Organic". It ain't easy or cheap. dh
Somewhat more to the point is how little of Whole Foods' produce even claims to be organic. Anyone ever notice how much of it is marketed as "conventional"?
Not at all. Being from eastern Canada I look forward to shopping there as there is nothing comparable here. Sourcing and providing quality control by enforcing standards adds to costs. Whether Whole Foods prices are excessive that is debatable.. anytime I've been there the place is busy. They do operate on a very healthy margin which makes me wonder where the competition is. I recently noticed their their sourcing of farmed salmon from the UK rather than Maine or the Canadian maritimes. I live close to fish farming operations and as I suspected their concern was pesticides, growth hormones and antibiotics which are routinely fed to salmon here in North America. A problem on par with Frankenfoods.
You have broken the code RBTL's,
90 percent of the fake regulated food in the US is greenwashed anyway. Buttwhole Foods, Traitor Joes and others stock tons of supposedly natural food that, by law, can contain up to 40 percent GMO, cancer-causing Frankengenes.
But it's still labeled GMO free.
Natural Food is the biggest scam every pulled over on the American people.
All jmho's only.
TJ
Shop at your little neighborhood co-op: better quality and prices!
Yet another protest that MSM didn't cover.
Why on the issue of food and farming have liberals ceded the science to the conservatives? This causes no end of despair in me. If liberals want to win, then they have to be right about the science.
Why does Cummins continually confuse the issue of corporate malfeasance with the issue of the safety of GMOs? Because Cummins is an ideologue, that's why. His hatred of all things non-"Organic" is on full display here:
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/02/23-9
Why the continual lying about the nature of "organic" farming? Organic farmers regularly use pesticides, mined materials like rock phosphate and lime, synthetic materials like plastic, diesel and gasoline, and pseudo-scientific practices like homeopathy and biodynamics.
It is simply a fact that the judicious use of GMOs can reduce pesticides use, improve nutrition, and conserve soils. The papaya industry in Hawai'i was saved by genetic engineering, and diabetics have GE to thank for safe insulin.
"Tomorrow's Table" is a great book by a husband/wife team that attempts to integrate GMOs with "organic" practices. The irony is that GMOs come out looking pretty good, while organic practices look pretty meager.
Finally, why are "organic" foods not labeled as follows:
CAUTION: This food was produced organically and may contain high levels of aflatoxins and natural pesticides known to cause tumors and cancers in laboratory rats.
If GMOs were forced to be labeled, the short-term effect might be a cut in sales, but the long-term effect would be that people would begin to see outright that no one is dying or growing horns as the result of eating "Frankenfoods."
Then there should be absolutely no problem in labeling them.
I have mixed feelings about it, personally. The arguments pro/con are laid out clearly here:
http://www.ext.colostate.edu/pubs/foodnut/09371.html
GMO soy, corn, beets, etc were developed precisely in order that the plants be able to withstand being drenched with herbicides. This is stated outright by Monsanto and is at the heart of their marketing of RoundUp-Ready seeds. This has nothing whatsoever to do with subsequent use of pesticides on the crop. Bugs and disease don't disappear because of RoundUp. Pesticides must still be used. And this is in addition to the drenching with RoundUp.
It's illogical to try to defeat an argument about the safety of GMO foods by accusing organic food of being bad or expensive. The two things are not in any way connected.
"GMO soy, corn, beets, etc were developed precisely in order that the plants be able to withstand being drenched with herbicides. This is stated outright by Monsanto and is at the heart of their marketing of RoundUp-Ready seeds. This has nothing whatsoever to do with subsequent use of pesticides on the crop. Bugs and disease don't disappear because of RoundUp. Pesticides must still be used. And this is in addition to the drenching with RoundUp."
I don't disagree with this statement, except for the inaccurate verb "drenched," which you make sure to use twice. There are herbicide-resistant GMOs and there are insect-resistant GMOs (eg bt corn, cotton, etc.). I never suggested that RoundUp-ready crops reduced the use of pesticides.
It is certainly relevant to point out the errors of "organic" claims when the writer of the article, Cummins, has been so rabid in his anti-anything-but-organic rants.
And your comment represents the worst of being paid to lie and spread disinformation.
Mark Abram is yet again UNDERMINING the progressive movement, Millions Against Monsanto. Why are you so against people DEMOCRATICALLY organizing to counter Monsanto? Why do you support corporate tyranny? Why do you blur the lines and try to discredit a PEOPLE'S movement to counter a corporation that is actively trying to control the world's seed bank? Now, don't go and try to play dumb AGAIN with this last question.
You are a dishonest public relations hack! Your paycheck depends upon you lying to this forum, and worse, to yourself.
Did you know that Einstein lobbied for the ban of all nuclear weapons? Does that mean Einstein was 'anti-science'? No. It means he was against a certain technological PRODUCT of science. GMO is a technological PRODUCT of science. One can be against a PRODUCT of science while still being FOR SCIENCE. The fact that you come here to blur the lines about this issue and denounce people who are against GMO as anti-science is quite telling of your dishonesty.
Mark Abram says: "because the anti-"GMO" stance has no basis in science, and is a pure article of religious and (for some people) political faith."
-- This is total bullshit! Have you even checked out Millions Against Monsanto's website? There are plenty of links to many scientific studies that show the negative effects of GM foods. The movement against GMO's has plenty of scientific findings to back up why they are against a technological PRODUCT of science. You are trying to undermine and discredit a wonderful progressive movement by spreading disinformation and smear tactics. You are a LIAR! And since you will probably try spin and spin my message, or play dumb like the last time I called you out, I will provide links for people to see that Millions Against Monsanto is NOT anti-science, and DOES have science to back up their claims.
HERE IS ONE => http://www.responsibletechnology.org/blog/1340a
HERE IS ONE => http://www.truth-out.org/usda-approved-monsanto-alfalfa-despite
-warnings-new-pathogen-discovered-genetically-engineered-crops
HERE IS ONE => http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7277
HERE IS ONE => http://www.gmwatch.org/latest-listing/1-news-items/
13047-bt-toxin-found-in-blood-of-pregnant-women-and-fetuses
HERE IS ONE => http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/science_technology
/Health_concerns_raised_over_nanoparticles.html?cid=29293290
HERE IS ONE => http://www.gmo-free-regions.org/fileadmin/pics/
gmo-free-regions/conference_2010/press/Carrasco_soybean_PR.pdf
And, btw, the Jewish tradition labels their food products kosher because they are PROUD of their food production methods and traditions. If the GMO corporations are so proud and sure of their products then why do they fear labeling them so much? I know... that is not your job to answer. Your job is to simply spread disinformation that undermines legitimate progressive movements because GMO corporations pay your employer (possibly The Bivings Group) to do so. How much does the Bivings Group pay you to come here to spew bullshit for Monsanto and GMO corporations? http://www.monbiot.com/2002/05/14/the-fake-persuaders/