Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Teaching: The Most Noble Profession
I just heard from a friend of mine, a middle school teacher in Wisconsin. She is an extraordinary educator, one of the most innovative, inspiring, dedicated, passionate, successful, loving and beloved teachers I have ever met. I only wish I’d had a single teacher during middle and high school as good as she is. She has been attending rallies at the Capital and reported that the state and future of education in Wisconsin are looking very bleak, and that it was wearing her down. 
She missed the teacher’s convention last week for the first time in 10 years. Her heart just wasn’t moved to want to improve herself or the profession. In fact, she said with sadness, if the job market were better, she’d probably be looking. She wondered how to stay hopeful and positive when the state she was born and raised in seemed to be crumbling around her. She could have said a lot more but had to get back to work because a couple of students had come to her for some help (during her lunch break).
It is a scary thing to imagine that we are driving out the very best teachers like her. If this happens, the situation for our future really does become bleak. I encouraged her to remember what drew her to education, to remember who she is and why she does this work that, right now, seems thankless, but which is, above all else, the key to a better world. I told her that one governor and a climate of rhetoric cannot be overturned and changed without people who think deeply and innovatively to solve problems, and if she stopped preparing those thinkers and change agents of the future, then who would do this great work? I asked her to remember people like Martin Luther King, Jr. and Mahatma Gandhi and Wangari Maathai and Aung San Suu Kyi and the forces arrayed against them that they struggled (and struggle) to topple against all odds.
My hope is that she will fight with all her heart and soul to teach with her passion intact no matter what systems around her seem intractable and no matter what happens in the Wisconsin Capital. We need her – our future needs her – now more than ever.
In college a friend in medical school told me that he thought that medicine was the most noble profession. It was a strange statement, really, and quite provocative. I wondered at the time, can any profession be the most noble? I ruminated on it for a long time, and now, thirty years later, I feel ready to respond. If pressed to name the most noble profession, I would not hesitate to say teaching.
Teachers are the agents of the future. Will our world be populated by people ready and able to meet that future as creative and critical thinkers; as wise, compassionate and knowledgeable citizens; as skilled and motivated solutionaries within their professions? The answer to this question lies with teachers. More than any other profession, teaching has the power to create a healthy, just, and peaceful world (or not). It has the ability to seed our society with informed, caring and engaged citizens (or not). It has the capacity to inspire lifelong learning and a passion for knowledge, understanding, and innovation (or not). Is there anything more important than this?
Yet here we are with the media and elected officials lambasting Wisconsin teachers and decrying their huge salaries. Yes, their huge salaries, which the media have been reporting as, on average, $51K/year with benefits (good pensions and health insurance). We see middle class people pitted against each other (as in: “Public school teachers are paid so much more than their non-union private sector counterparts!”) Are these “news” reporters and government officials comparing public school (union) teachers with private school (non-union) teachers, which might be the only valid comparison? No. They are comparing public school teachers to the “average worker in America.”
Imagine if we had a public healthcare system like Canada does. Doctors there make, on average, over $200K/year. That’s well above the “average worker” in Canada. Are those doctors greedy and selfish? Why do they get paid this much with citizen’s tax dollars? They are paid well above the “average worker” because as a society, Canada thinks they deserve it. Because who would become a doctor if they weren’t well compensated for their time and preparation and responsibility? Because if you want good healthcare from competent and highly trained professionals, it costs money.
Given that I believe that teaching may well be the profession with the greatest responsibility and require the truly best and brightest, wisest and most motivated, most creative and compassionate people, the argument that teachers are overpaid because they make more than the “average worker” is not only absurb, it is also dangerous. We rightly decry bad teachers in our schools, and I am the first to agree that bad teachers are overpaid. I think they’re overpaid if they they make $30K/year. They should be fired, period, just as incompetent doctors are stripped of their licenses. But we are now doing the opposite of promoting master teaching and reducing poor teaching. Instead of seeding our schools with great teachers, many of the most creative and brilliant educators are leaving a field laden with bureaucracy, rote memorization for standardized bubble tests, increased classroom size, and now the insulting commentary from a public that wants to reduce their already inadequate wages and which seems to have forgotten who it is who has the grave responsibility of educating our children. The best teachers are fed up, and many are deciding to take their talents and skills elsewhere, where they’ll not only get paid more but where their intelligence and creativity will also be respected and rewarded. This is the great irony and tragedy of the “discussion” we’re having through the media, launched by the protests in Wisconsin against a governor trying to bust the unions. We say we want to fix the educational system, which indeed needs an overhaul not just repair, but by denigrating the profession and claiming that $51K/year plus good benefits is excessive, we are doing the opposite of creating better schools for our kids.
The truth is that we pay great teachers far less than they are worth. The master teachers out there, the ones who provide their students with the knowledge they truly need, the critical and creative thinking skills without which our future is so uncertain, the capacity for reason, research and thoughtfulness that will make them, among other things, able to parse ridiculous rhetoric and sound-bites and reject and refute them with clarity and kindness, and the passion for lifelong learning in a world changing so rapidly and so in need of positive solutions, should be paid as much as radiologists and orthopedists. Fortunately, given the state of our economy, great teachers are willing to work for what amounts to a pittance given their talent and responsibility. And we are trying to deny them this. How ignoble is that?




77 Comments so far
Show AllOur best and brightest teachers should be teaching ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.
When they graduate elementary school they should all be self learners; lifelong learners. They have the basics they will need for the rest of their lives.
From then on, let the kids put bad teachers in line! But for the first years, we need teachers who can recognize an individual child's ability and develop it. Teach to a higher standard; not to an average or so nobody is left behind. Let smarter student's tutor and learn to teach!
"Our best and brightest teachers should be teaching ELEMENTARY SCHOOL" with a class size of no more than 15.
Yes, the first three years of elementary are the most important by far.
Or preschool.
And how scary to realize that elementary school teachers are among the lowest paid educators. Even scarier when you see how many cuts there have been and will be-- 60 kids in some classrooms in Detroit after they closed half of the schools there!
Curioussteve...I think a grammar teacher would have a tough time with your poetic system...I'd like to rewrite this for you.
"It depends on what you teach. If you are teaching how to exploit others, by all means, for your maximum private greed and power, (then) 'noble' is the last thing that applies to your job description." My Mother was a special ed teacher and an English major and made me write properly...I am currently attempting to NOT do that. But when I see a good statement going haywire, I want to fix it.
Teachers of the Wisconsin, Ohio, you are teaching the most important lesson of all...THINK FOR YOURSELF AND FIGHT THE MACHINE THAT WANTS TO TAKE AWAY YOUR RIGHTS AND ALL YOUR MONEY.
If this bill in Wisc were to go through, the people of the state would some day be at the mercy of the coke-heads when they own all the power plants and can charge you what they want, shut you off regardless of problems, and pollute your air and water beyond recognition. If people of Michigan don't see the dire necessity of fighting this, then they are not as smart as they think they are, and are just as dumb as the rocks in their driveways. It will shed its collective pollution on the lake and the state.
There is a lot to learn here, and the teachers need to be teaching it in the classrooms, and walking out until it's settled.
i was a teacher for 20 years, in 2 different countries, at 3 different levels of education.
and my family is full of teachers.
but that doesn't change the truth: teachers feeling "nobler" than other professions is not gonna serve the teachers' own material self-interest, never mind the common good of everyone.
rather, that aura of "we're special" is the crux of the problem.
They aren't fighting to be "special." They are fighting for 1. The children they teach and 2. Their ability to make a basic life for themselves.
When we demonize them, we put them in the position of having to defend themselves.
When we lift them up, we put them in a position to serve our children (and, ultimately our country) well.
Well said!
Thank you for all of your patience and hard work on this thread.
where did i hear that song?
wait, i still hear that song and dance from the democratic party, how they work for the working class, and so on.
where have the unionized teachers been all these years when the children have been failing?
Why do you keep finding excuses for blaming different segments of the working class?
You are stuck in adolescence if you think teachers are part of the ruling class.
They don't give a damn about the noble profession or whether the kids learn or not. In fact, it's preferable that they never learn to think. Then they are at least as pliable as their parents, but that's beside the point. The only thing Scott Walker, his peers and the Koch's of the world care about is making a profit from private education--along with anything and everything else. Delivering a viable product is irrelevant, as long as they have a healthy bottom line. The kids, their parents and everyone else can go to hell. As soon as they've managed to privatize everything and the teachers are reduced to scrambling to simply maintain basic subsistence, you won't hear anymore grousing about low test scores--unless, of course, they are somehow tied to profit.
A nation that declares war on its teachers, as ours is doing, is merely accelerating its own destruction on the downward side of the rise and fall of civilizations. The Age of Reason that created our Constitution has yielded to a zombie-like mindset that seeks to destroy anyone who thinks rationally. Goodbye America!
Now, in the third or fourth week of this crisis, Walker's argument has focused on getting rid of bad teachers. At first he was arguing that we needed to balance the budget. When detractors showed that he had intentionally unbalanced the budget with tax breaks to wealthy campaign contributors, he changed his story. Every week, he tells a new story that gets rebutted by thinking people. Every week, it's a new deception, a new lie. Walker provides a moving target as he always changes his argument to suit his audience and his mission.
Let's face it--he's behaving the same way an alcoholic or compulsive gambler would. He resorts neither to thought nor valid argument. He relies on generating a long line of lies that will help him get what he wants. As his overseers, we need to do our job and keep him from perpetuating his addictive ways.
"Let's face it--he's behaving the same way an alcoholic or compulsive gambler would. He resorts neither to thought nor valid argument."
Scott Walker for President of the United States. You can't say he isn't representative of the majority of Americans.
Ain't that the pits?
from the article:
~ In college a friend in medical school told me that he thought that medicine was the most noble profession. It was a strange statement, really, and quite provocative. I wondered at the time, can any profession be the most noble? I ruminated on it for a long time, and now, thirty years later, I feel ready to respond. If pressed to name the most noble profession, I would not hesitate to say teaching. ~
medicine is the practice of offensive remedy to undesirable conditions...
teaching is the practice of offensive guidance to undeveloped persons...
guidance may or may not be beneficial, depending on a number of factors...
just as prescription, or surgery...
what if society needs 'criminal surgeons' more than 'educators'?
what if the problem isn't insufficient, or incorrect information, but actual cancerous, gangrenous members?
the people performing that service might have a strong claim on nobility, as far as professions go...
I don't think a large number of professions will be around much longer, as we think of them now, so these arguments become rather trite, to me, in the face of our ecological realities...
call me loco, the future looks local...and much more personally engaging...
Teachers are becoming the scapegoats of the ills of American society. Americans prefer to live in an illusion rather than to recognize the immense social destructiveness of poverty and the burden it places on teachers.
The rich are only interested in educating their own privileged children to be the elite future leaders , returning America to the European era of the Lords and the Serfs.
"Is there anything more important than this?"
As a teacher I say yes! Health comes first, therefore medicine is very important. Along with the fact that without food/nourishment/water we can't live so farming and water purification is also very important. Sanitation is also very, very important.
I can't say that one is more important than the others. I have never liked being considered as "THE MOST IMPORTANT" profession.
OYE
"Health comes first, therefore medicine is very important. Along with the fact that without food/nourishment/water we can't live so farming and water purification is also very important"
Ah, but here is the kicker....who teaches our scientists who study health, our physicians who heal people, our policy makers who protect farming and water? Who teaches all those people to read and write and think and analyze and study and heal and protect?
Teachers.
who teaches those who murder innocent people, hoard resources, and manipulate financial, legal and political systems for private gain?
teachers...
the finger pointing the way is not the way...
Um...I'm not sure I understand your point...are you saying that we *don't* as a society depend on our teachers to educate those who will become our future physicians, policy makers, scientists? And that if we erode our ability to teach those people to think and learn, that the quality of those services won't erode as well?
I'm saying teaching is the transferring of knowledge...
knowledge takes many forms, teaching, as well, and without a universal, guiding life principal beyond earning wages and 'self-actualization', it becomes very difficult to determine what is, in the long run, beneficial for any life form on this planet...
I might easily argue that many of our scientific 'advances' are currently backfiring on us...
as for policy makers, please tell me you don't actually believe in the veracity of our governmental structure? how do you argue education has any role in how our policy makers make policy? do you not understand that human nature trumps education every time? evil will out, unless good throttles it...debaters need not apply...
I'm sure you would assert that teaching children to be non-violent pacifists is good and admirable...
what if it isn't? what if that just makes them patsies? who makes these decisions? the teacher?
how do you feel about private property, and the chemical inundation of our planet? our educational system is not designed to challenge our current paradigm, it is designed to feed it compliant workers...
when everything is going badly, all apsects must be necessarily suspect...
if you want to teach anything, teach that you, me, all of us, have been literally lied to about virtually everything for quite some time, and that includes the role of 'education', in the name of societal manipulation...
what if the ultimate lesson is the consequence of the intellectual hubris of humans? the betrayal of one by another?
forgive me, but this world I see so many try to paint, of good people learning wonderful things that benefit everyone and all animals and plants, and we still get to have cars, and tv, and jobs, and fun things to shop for, and great food, and be whatever we want to be, and endless supplies of free energy and fabulous entertainment, and we all get along...
I don't see that world...
I see a world driven by violence open only to those with means, and full of people who's only claim to freedom is that they have yet to be jailed...
a world inundated by human chemical creations and devastated by human industrial activity to the point of global detriment of a timescale vastly greater than human experience comprehends...
this world needs to be directly addressed, and no one is teaching that...
are we still pledging allegiance every morning? to what?
I understand we all want to feel good about ourselves, and what we do...planetary conditions, however, are becoming so dire that we now need to seriously question whether what we have been, and have done, have actually been so good, after all...
where did you come from? why are you here?
This is a ridiculous, self-congratulatory "debate". The real problem with teachers' unions is that they don't care about the quality of teaching or teacher; they care only about the economic well-being -- and dues-paying ability -- of their members, whether dedicated or indifferent, competent or incompetent, energized or burned out.
The notion that tenure is needed to preserve freedom of expression by teachers in primary and secondary schools is a myth. It is designed to ensure job security, to make it hard to fire even an incompetent or abusive teacher. NYC's now discredited "Rubber Room", where bad teachers were warehoused while on full pay and benefits, is a disgraceful emblem of the results of unionism and the tenure system. The LIFO system, where reductions in force result in firing the youngest and most energetic teachers while protecting the burnouts, is another disgraceful result of unionism and its corrosive effects on public education.
Ohio is now the poster child for a solution! Wisconsin will soon follow suit.
There are many excellent, dedicated teachers in public schools, and that is wonderful, but there also are a depressingly large number of teachers who don't belong in education, have lost their "spark" but are several or many years from retirement and are scared of losing their jobs. Understandable, but if education is the paramount objective, and it should be, the interests of the schoolchildren should come first.
Horace.
Two things.
First- "There are many excellent, dedicated teachers in public schools, and that is wonderful, but there also are a depressingly large number of teachers who don't belong in education, have lost their "spark"
Yes, there are amazing teachers. And yes there are poor teachers. The problem is that, in Wisconsin, they are all being treated the same right now. And this is demoralizing and driving out the good teachers, which will only serve to *hurt* our schoolchildren. Which, of course, is Zoe's point.
Second-"The interests of the schoolchildren should come first." But...this is not happening, either. With our governor's budget, schools will lose over $500 in funding *per child*. There will be no way to handle this except laying off teacher, which will serve to increase class sizes as well as limit classes to only the core classes. Guidance counselors, art teachers, music teachers, etc, are being cut. I can not see how you could possibly argue that is putting the children first.
The tone of your response is exactly what Zoe is talking about. Is reform in schools needed? Yes. Will it be accomplished by vilifying the people who we have asked to teacher our future? No.
Becca
Will real reform be achieved unless the teachers' unions are driven to the brink of extinction? I doubt very seriously.
Yes reform will better succeed by involving the unions. These unions have fought for and achieved benefits for the students - materials, class sizes, teaching aides. It makes me laugh when you say that school management has the interest of the kids more than the teachers - that's the biggest joke of all. School management as a rule is something I as a parent have had to fight tooth and nail to get decent education for my kids - the teachers were also fighting for an environment that would work effectively, not just the cheapest. My experience is that especially the state level administration is all about control and cost, they really don't put the kids education at the front. Even when they test they want the cheapest simple test with black and white results when anyone who pays attention knows that test results in mixed classrooms is anything but black and white. Unions are teachers and 98% of them are in it for the well being of the kids.
The usual BS from someone who knows nothing about teacher's unions. I belonged to one for 31 years. Here are some of the issues we fought for: lower class sizes (and we won at the expense of getting more money), professional development experiences for teachers, counselors for every grade in middle school, increased support for arts education, pushing for class size breaks for teachers who have large numbers of special needs students, limiting the number of class preparations each teacher has.
Tell me how these issues are solely self-serving. A benefit enjoyed by a teacher translates into a benefit experienced by students and parents. Unions aren't in it just for the salaries and benefits of teachers--they are in it to improve the teaching/learning experience for all. Besides, how is a decent salary antithetical to making good schools? Pay teachers minimum wage and see what kind of faculty you get.
It's so easy standing on the outside being critical of teachers unions. Why don't you explore what unions ask for with an open mind rather than a closed one? You might be surprised what you learn.
Look at the faculties of the best private schools--e.g., Phillips Exeter, Phillips Andover, St. Paul's, Choate, Groton, St. Louis Country Day, Rye Country Day, Hotchkiss, St. Albans, -- are their faculties unionized? How about the private universities -- e.g., the Ivy League, Stanford, MIT. Are they unionized?
Does that tell you something?
The usual apples to oranges comparison. Do you understand the concept of "cherry picking"? It means you take the best students--the best before they even enter a private school--and then you take credit for their performance, attributing it all to the extraordinary learning experiences they received at the institution. Unions have nothing to do with student performance in such places--it's all what the students bring to the party--the intelligent conversations around the dinner table, the stories read by eager mothers or nannies to the young children, the summer camps, the tutors, foreign travel, the private elementary schools they attended. Cherry picking--a word every conservative should know.
Private schools are rarely unionized and I've already seen the long term consequences of privatizing education having been to a private school myself. As it is, most private and charter schools aren't under any government watch such as "No Child Left Behind" but wait, there's more. The military, most well known big corporations, fundamentalist religious organizations and churches, and Wall Street do a lot of private business with those schools all over the country. This is on top of outrageous government subsidization of private and charter schools the government hands out with virtually no strings attached. But that's not enough to them. Those greedy bastards just can't help but lie and jack up the prices.
Now all that money should produce smarty smart students right? In theory maybe but as it turns out, it doesn't. I should know. I've been there. The dark side about private and charter schools is not only the way teacher pay sucks to the core but the way teachers are rewarded for their militant attitude while teachers who actually care to teach are always under "scrutiny". I've witnessed the firing of 5 excellent teachers who did nothing wrong and their replacements were know-nothing frauds. I and other students could tell by the way they would treat their students with disrespect and set double standards on who could cheat and who couldn't. But that's not all. In half of my courses, I had to go to my PUBLIC LIBRARY to get instructional books and videos on algebra, history, physics, etc... and guess who were the instructors there? Well known professors from some of the best public schools and universities. What a fking irony that we students had to get outside help from public libraries and universities to make it through private school. Oh there were cheaters who didn't learn alright and I wouldn't be surprised to see you as one of them privileged cheaters "getting those grades" and learning nothing.
By the way, you forgot to mention that those private universities are OUTSOURCING to other countries, student and faculty wise. It's not about who's the smartest. It's about who can be brain-drained for next to nothing. That must make you a proud racist.
In a meriotcracy, over time, the cream will rise to the top. Smart people marry smart people, have smart children. In China, where there was a rigid but rigorous system of civil service examinations to determine entry into to government service during much of the period from the Western Zhou Dynasty (ca. 4th C. B.C.) onward, the elite Mandarin class that resulted was in large measure proof of that proposition. In time, the smart become the wealthy.
Now, we haven't had such a system for any considerable period of time. But is there any wonder that the schoolchildren in, say, Winetka IL., Ridgewood NJ, Great Neck LI, New Canaan CT, Alamo Heights TX, Betheda Chevy Chase MD and other wealthy suburbs are head and shoulders educationally above slum dwellers? It's not just money and parental influence, although those factors are important also, it's the gene pool.
Sorry, lefties. I know this is anathema to you.
Horace, Horace, Horace, (said in a teacher's exasperated tone),
I think we need for you to repeat a few years in school so that you can learn to evaluate sources of information and then to use said information in a logical and rational fashion instead of parrotting the elite's version of "reality".
OYE
Oye,
You're a teacher and I was one, too. At some point you have to give up when a student simply refuses to learn. That is where Horace is. He knows the truth--he doesn't need to ask questions because he has all the answers. Maybe it's just my age, but I am tempted to give up with such people. There are others with open minds who will listen to an opposing point of view. We should devote our energies to them.
How many people on this website actually put forth real information, or indicate they really know anything beyond spouting left-wing mantras and Marxist ideology?
Far more than you rightwing lunatics could ever bother telling the truth. America's in the toilet for listening to scumbags like you.
Oh, the conversation is now really turning intellectual (from a leftist point of view).
DROSERA: Notice Horace has no reflex to use these same pseudo-accountability standards on those in OTHER professions.
How about applying these types of metrics to politicians. Say if living standards don't improve in their districts (that can be the "standardized test"), they get fined or lose their job or committee status.
Should we apply it to CEOs? Let's start with all those bankers who took the money and ran, gave themselves bonuses, and have only continued to enjoy all the abuses an unregulated system of alleged banking/speculation leads to.
Next, let's apply it to pilots, doctors, media pundits, lawyers! and... drum roll.. the military.
Heck, if they can't "win" wars at ONE MILLION DOLLARS per soldier, per day, what the f--k are we paying for? (I am not someone who advocates FOR war; and I am 98% against the military, but hey, if only teachers--originally a largely FEMALE occupation--have to answer to these quality control standards... why stop there?)
So, Hor-ass... what do you say?
Soeee, soeee, pig, pig, pig.
I'm not aware that I identified any accountability standards other than competence and motivation. Surely they're not too abstract for you.
This is an ugly personal attack.
The poster here is doing nothing but disrupting, and the personal attacks and flamebait remarks are becoming more and more frequent.
Can the group collectively do anything to protect itself? Someone, Tom Larson I think, recommended ignoring this poster. Might that not be the way to go? If not, talking about the poster - as I am here - rather than to the poster would work. Getting into a back and forth with a person who has shown no intention to engage in good faith discussion just helps them hijack every thread.
I was trying to get a student to work through a problem when she looked up at me and said, "You mean I have to think?"
Oh Horace. I'm more sad for you than anything else. I won't argue with you any more, as your comment on slum dwellers makes it very clear that we start from very different viewpoints. I believe in the intrinsic value of all human life; if you do not, there is nothing else I could possibly say to you. Nor do I wish to continue a conversation with you. Good luck to you. If you are ever down and out in life, if your superior genes ever fail you, may someone kinder than you be there to pick you up.
Oh my, how poignant.
"Smart people marry smart people, have smart children. "
That depends on the definition of the word "smart". I could have been a cheating POS like you and gotten "all A's" to fake intelligence but that's not my style.
"In China, where there was a rigid but rigorous system of civil service examinations to determine entry into to government service during much of the period from the Western Zhou Dynasty (ca. 4th C. B.C.) onward, the elite Mandarin class that resulted was in large measure proof of that proposition. In time, the smart become the wealthy."
China didn't produce intelligence by going too rigid alone. Rigid education only gets so much mileage before its effects wear off. Eastern traditions and thinking are more spiritually oriented than religious. Even in ancient times, most truly intelligent people never made it to wealth but the caste system or whatever its equivalent was what was responsible for who could amass wealth even by illegal means and not get held accountable and who would get over-scrutinized even after earning fairly and through no cheating or crooked means.
"But is there any wonder that the schoolchildren in, say, Winetka IL., Ridgewood NJ, Great Neck LI, New Canaan CT, Alamo Heights TX, Betheda Chevy Chase MD and other wealthy suburbs are head and shoulders educationally above slum dwellers? "
They're no more intelligent than rural or urban schoolchildren. The suburbs could have been better but they're cursed thanks to privatized everything.
"Sorry, lefties. I know this is anathema to you."
You're anathema to yourself. LMAO !
I hear the leftist ranting. Do you have any actual information other than your worthless left-wing bloviating?
What a fast rightwing reactionary response coming from a shitpot such as "Horace" ! My "leftist ranting" is backed up by facts and reality so I'll proudly stand by that over your rightwing lunacy POS script ole Rupert's paying you in cheeseburgers to carry out for him. By the way, if you don't like it here, then fk off. Nobody's putting a gun to your head to come here and troll. "Horace", our resident asshat.
A real scholar that MaxPayne. I assume that monicker is short for Maximum Payne in the A**.
I agree with Becca's moral perspective about the dignity of every human life.
I've attended/worked in/and volunteered in every type of school: public in suburbs; public in poor areas; charter in inner city; parochial in leafy suburb; parochial in inner city. Teachers in better off schools work very hard, but have it so much easier than in poor schools. Teachers in parochial and charter schools are generally paid MUCH less, and morale can be very low most of the time. They often work evening jobs for extra money. The parochial and charters in poor areas have far fewer resources than their neighboring public schools. Test scores in charters & parochials in inner cities are usually the same or BELOW those in neighboring public schools.
My faith tradition (R. Cath.) tells me that "the poor have the single, most urgent economic claim on the conscience of the nation." That's why I choose to volunteer in poverty-area schools. A moral nation should not be divided along class lines, in its housing patterns, or by separate schools for poor and rich. We still have a long way to go!
Congratulations for your dedication and sacrifice. I wish all the union deadwood were like you.
Thank you, Horace.
But I do not consider them to be "union deadwood." They work extremely hard, often under very difficult circumstances .... too-large class sizes; unruly children who are very disruptive; not enough resources, not enough computers, etc. A student in one of my poverty-area schools asked Santa for a computer this Christmas. Santa did not deliver. Computers are a given in most middle and upper income families.
I volunteer because my spouse's income is adequate for our needs. My biggest wish is that volunteers would no longer be needed. But that would require a fair and just society that collectively decided that fair compensation for a day's work is a priority. Our priorities are skewed toward material wealth and class division. Sad.
So, like all the current conservatives, you want to throw everyone off the ship, and see who can swim, but some of them get life preservers and some get speedboats, and some get luxury yachts. Then when many of those with nothing drown, you say "they all had the opportunity"
Your lack of humanity is so apparent.