Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Hope Has Left the Building
If one case encapsulates the disaster that is the Obama administration, it may be the dustup over the A.I.G. bonuses last March. Recall that extreme gambling by A.I.G. Financial Products nearly crashed the world in 2008, necessitating a taxpayer bailout of $182.3 billion (and counting). Following this, A.I.G., now 80 percent government owned, rained more than $400 million in bonuses on Financial Products employees for their performance in 2008. The Obama administration, which knew of the bonuses for months, played defense for A.I.G. by unspooling a bloated Larry Summers to argue, "The government cannot just abrogate contracts."
The problem was the feds had just demanded that auto workers abrogate their hard-won contracts before Detroit got a bailout. United Auto Workers leaders complied, sacrificing "job security provisions and financing for retiree health care," plus agreeing to cuts in base pay, overtime pay, break time, raises, skilled worker positions and chopping wages for many new hires in half to $14 an hour.
Far from failures or mistakes, these episodes illustrate how Team Obama, which surfed a tsunami of corporate money and savvy branding to victory, is doing exactly what it was elected to do: redistribute money upwards. It's hard to think of a decision by this White House that would have not elicited cackling glee from the Bush administration. The number of horrendous policies] enacted by the Obama administration in barely a year boggles the imagination. What follows is by no means an exhaustive list, just a few dozen of the worst.
EMPIRE'S BACKYARD
Even Time magazine has concluded that "Obama's Latin American Policy Looks Like Bush's." While many hoped Obama would lift the 48-year-old embargo against Cuba, Obama loosened a few restrictions only for Cuban Americans. Last April, Obama declared the United States a "full partner" in Mexico's calamitous drug war. Months later, the White House slapped Bolivia with economic penalties, allegedly for not being an enthusiastic drug warrior, but more likely for pursuing an independent agenda. And there is the Honduran coup, which Obama endorsed by recognizing the rigged election in November. Most ominously, his administration inked a deal in October for seven military bases in Colombia, convenient for launching new wars against socialist governments in the region.
GREEN JOB LOSSES
Before Van Jones was thrown under the bus, Obama promised to create five million green jobs in plug-in hybrids, weatherization, renewable energy, biofuels and clean coal. Biofuels and clean coal? Okay, maybe it's a good thing this promise was snuffed. But as Naomi Klein points out, between the stimulus, the auto bailout and the Wall Street rescue, Obama had the leverage and political capital to fund mass transit and a smart electrical grid, restructure government-owned automakers to focus on green technology and force bailed out banks to fund industrial restructuring and green infrastructure. Instead, we get a White House vegetable garden the size of a New York apartment.
TOO BIG TO FAIL, TOO BIG TO JAIL
While the original Troubled Assets Relief Program was "only" $700 billion, the program's watchdog estimates taxpayer money at risk is a phenomenal $23.7 trillion. The Obama administration has been more interested in defending obscene executive pay, blessing more of Wall Street's highrisk trading, stonewalling on how the TARP funds were used and abused, and resisting real regulation, rather than prosecuting Goldman Sachs and other banks that peddled risky mortgage- backed securities while secretly betting they would plummet in value - a textbook case of securities fraud. But what do you expect from a candidate who raked in the most dough from Wall Street, real estate, commercial banks and hedge funds?
A DREAM FORECLOSED
In comparison to the bank bailout, relief for homeowners is limited to a miserly $75 billion under Obama's Making Home Affordable program. As of December, only 31,000 homeowners have received permanent mortgage modifications. The real winners are loan servicers. Of the top 25 participants, 21 were "heavily involved in the subprime lending industry." The parent companies of the lenders, which have vacuumed up more than $21 billion from the program, include Bank of America, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup. Homeowners in the program who don't get permanent help are left with wrecked credit scores while they continue to pay for homes they can't afford, which may be lengthening the crisis. Meanwhile, the number of homeowners with mortgage debt greater than the value of their homes was 23 percent as of September and could peak at 48 percent in 2011. Even modest measures, such as allowing bankruptcy judges to lower mortgages, were abandoned by the Obama administration.
HEALTH CARE DEFORM
There is a method to Obama's madness. First, his economic philosophy is to subsidize private entities to provide public goods. Second, his main tactic is to appeal to bipartisanship. (Never mind that there was plenty of bipartisanship during the Bush era when Democrats surrendered to virtually every heinous decision.) In the case of healthcare, a much simpler and more effective single-payer system was rejected because Republican support was supposedly needed. The bipartisan tactic allowed the Obama administration to replace single payer with a fake public option that was then dropped. As for the healthcare bill, it will skim $500 billion from publicly funded Medicare and Medicaid and use it to subsidize individuals who will be forced to buy for-profit insurance or pay a fine. The bill does nothing to control costs, ensure quality coverage or prevent workers from losing job-related insurance. It allows for wildly different rates based on age and region, and will deliver millions of new "customers" to insurance and drug companies and for-profit hospitals.
WAR IS THE HEALTH OF THE STATE
While President-elect, Obama was largely silent about the Israeli slaughter of 1,400 civilians in Gaza. Three days after being inaugurated, Obama ordered Predator drone strikes inside Pakistan, expanding the illegal U.S. war. Over the last year, Obama has committed another 64,000 soldiers to Afghanistan, effectively launching a new year. There are still 115,000 U.S. troops in Iraq. The use of private military contractors is surging, with 121,000 (and growing) in Afghanistan alone. Obama has continued to threaten Iran over its uranium-enrichment program. And many believe the White House is "initiating a low-level war in Yemen." Author and Ret. U.S. Army Col. Andrew Bacevich writes that Obama has effectively signed on to "perpetual war."
LABOR PAINS
Despite reportedly pouring $450 million into Obama's campaign and providing thousands of volunteers, organized labor has been unable to advance its main cause: a bill called the Employee Free Choice Act that would make it easier for employees in a workplace to unionize. The Obama administration says it is committed to passing the bill, but it has not put any muscle behind it. That may be because wealthy Obama backers, including three Chicago billionaires who own hotels, vehemently oppose the bill.
- Posted in




132 Comments so far
Show AllNice article. Well written and succinct. Obama will not have a chance at re election, and that will probably mean a Republican. Horrifying as it will be, that will probably be the Alaskan woman. We must work together against all Demo and Repub politicians. We must elect third and fourth party candidates. If we do, America may have a chance to survive. If we do not, it is Amerika all the way, and various parts of the nation should seriously consider secession. We in the Pacific Northwest should be looking at becoming a Canadian province. I am serious here.
I am serious here.
I know you're serious and I agree with you completely.
Palin as President. What a revolting idea. And we thought Reagan was bad news and Bush2 a disaster Just wait folks -- you ain't seen nothing yet!
Gary
At the rate that the United States of America has been dumbing itself down, it would come as no surprise if we did end up with Sara Palin as a POTUS. Something tells me we're well on our way to at least another Republican President, if not Sara Palin, which might spell an even bigger disaster than Reagan, the Bushes, or even Obama, who's also proved himself a horrible president so far.
No, Palin as Prez is a great idea--for hastening the end of Empire!
"We in the Pacific Northwest should be looking at becoming a Canadian province. I am serious here."
How would you handle the huge attempted influx of illegal aliens, U.S. citizens from other parts of the country? This influx would begin as soon as people realized that Washington and Oregon and maybe Idaho were about to secede and petition Canada for annexation. And this influx would include ME!!
Agreed, an excellent article.
Just vote. Be it third or fourth party.
And yes, the U.S. west coast and east cost states should join Canada. You'd be welcomed.
Why would you join Canada, rather than forming your own country?
Canada, as it is, is ungovernable.
Whereas a Cascadian nation would be small enough for the words "democracy" and "nation" to actually have meaning.
Yeah, and the history of succession attempts in this country is just so encouraging! And that was with a majority of the succeeding population supporting it, which you wouldn't get this time around. The government will allow succession right after it embraces the tenets of communism.
If China becomes THE superpower that might not be such a crazy idea.
Gary
You are right, but does anyone have any ideas about how to get an agenda through congress? If we somehow by the hair of our chins, get a 3rd party member elected to POTUS. How is that elected official supposed to get anything done, when congress would come to a halt before passing any progressive agenda?
"We in the Pacific Northwest should be looking at becoming a Canadian province. I am serious here."
Or wholly independent, it's called Cascadia, and I have the (little printed-out paper) flag on my door. It's "an independent sovereign state advocated by a grassroots environmental movement in the Pacific Northwest of North America. This state would hypothetically be formed by the union of British Columbia, Oregon, and Washington. Other suggested boundary lines also include Idaho (all or parts), western Montana, Northern California, parts of Alaska, and parts of the Yukon.
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascadia_%28independence_movement%29]
I totally agree with the secession idea, but are you sure your new country should join Canada? Aren't the political systems that come the closest to democracies those in nations with small populations, e.g. Norway (4.5M), Denmark (5M), Finland (5M), and Sweden (9M). And in Central and South America, Nicaragua has 5M, Bolivia has 8M, and Venezuela has 24M. It seems that the corrective mechanisms necessary to keep a system democratic are more easily kept in place in such small countries. And large "democracies" such as the US and India appear to have serious difficulties and are much more easily captured by private interests.
With a viable UN acting to prevent nations from bullying and abusing others, would there really be such a strong reason to be a part of a large nation? Of course today the UN is largely ineffective because of the influence of the greatest bully of them all, the US, but if a number of US states secede the US would recede in power and influence and the UN could become a more effective organization.
I think becoming a sovereign is called for. The Northwest and Northeast will soon be hammered as a resource colony (worse than we are now) when things really start falling apart. Didn't you hear they are implementing an infrastructure upgrade to turn all our forests into biofuels and take our remaining fishstocks and productive farmlands ( when the midwest is wiped out by superdroughts and dustbowls) to feed the elite and those that will be guarding them.
Canada is no great nation either. Look at what and who is running Canada. Is Canada's so called leaders any better than our corporate and jingoistic lapdogs?
I'd assume we would have martial law invoked even if we were anywhere close to succession. However, at a point we may not have any other choice than to secede.
Now seriously - do you think President Sarah is going to let you secede? Better to just move there. Or better yet, France. Maybe in some future scenario of total bankruptcy our rulers might consider the attractiveness of selling California. They'd get some quick cash while getting rid of all those liberals, gays and tree huggers
>>But what do you expect from a candidate who raked in the most dough from Wall Street, real estate, commercial banks and hedge funds?<<
Actually the University of California was the biggest donor ($175,000) but the point is well taken. 80% of donations came from large donors. Wall Street bought Obama. Hook, line and sinker.
Gary
Hope Has Left the Building
As it turns out, hope was never in the building to begin with. The building is a warehouse for Trojan Horses of slightly different styles - the Reagan Trojan Horse, the George Wanker Bush/Cheesedick Cheney Trojan Horse and now the Obama Trojan Horse. Inside all of them, however, are the assassins whose task is to rob you blind and destroy the nation.
Indeed, Amerika has become one vast warehouse of defective Trojans.
And that's not gonna be good for ANYBODY!
· Yr Obd't Servant
Exactly. "The building is a warehouse for Trojan Horses of slightly different styles..."
No matter what twist is involved in the next selection, the only possible outcome is another Trojan Horse. That is why--as insane and unrealistic as it is--I think we have to terrify our existing horses into taking steps to restore representative government.
Are any of the newly disillusioned Obama supporters planning on demonstrating in Washington at the State of the Union?
But how does any of this necessarily produce the conclusion that hope is gone?
If one gives up hope, the suspicion is that there was a subconscious wish to give up hope in the first place -- and if if that is true one must be wary of producing ones own difficulties.
The hope now is precisely that, inasmuch as getting rid of Bush didn't solve anything, liberals and progressives can see that the two-party system is itself to blame. And we need a new rhetoric not based on polemic and anger, but cooperation between Left and Right, Progressives and Conservatives, etc.
Moreover, we must work together to implement social change in some way other than asking the federal government or any elected official to do it.
A corporatist-militarist surveillance state is a synonym for fascism. The corporatist-militarists in the White House, Congress, and the Supreme Court are more obvious than ever, because they know they will never be held accountable, let alone prosecuted. Add in our global empire, and it is clear the U.S. experiment of democracy is all but ended.
Re-register Independent or Third Party. Organize for a General Strike. Divest from war profiteers. Write in anti-corporate, anti-militarist candidates where possible. Suppport peace tax efforts. Oppose military recruiting in schools. Work for single-payer Medicare for all health care. Boycott corporate, pro-war media. Get your religious congregation to speak out against endless wars.
Hope has left the building if you are an ordinary American.
If you are a Wall Street bankster, a millionaire hotel owner, a health insurance executive, a corporation that exploits cheap foreign labor, a weapons contractor, or you pimp mercenaries for a living then “Obama has been very, very good...”
Maybe that's who all these congressmen, senators and the president refer to when they say they're responding to the needs and wants of the American people.
But the Obama administration's view of itself is that it has a pragmatic and moderate middle of the road stance that is the most that can be practically done. Why should we be so angry with them? They think we will calm down and support them and the corporate Democratic leadership because we will see how much worse it would be under the far right Republican alternative. The fact is that too many people have lost so much and have so little hope that these establishment figures can do anything for them to feel that it will make a difference. Add to that the rage they feel for the Democrats that have betrayed them. They don't feel our pain now--but when they lose in 2010 they will begin to.
"White House vegetable garden" this ended up not working out so well... the veggies didn't do well as the land was tainted from toxics used as landfill from some local sewage plant. The plant at the time claimed the landfill was perfectly safe. I wonder what happened to it...
Meanwhile, you would think Obama might re-install the solar panels now - the ones that Carter put up and Reagan tore down?
There's no longer even a veneer of effort on the part of the two branches of the business party to appear as anything other than what they are, imperial corporatists that will stop at nothing to continue the plunder of resources of the US people and whatever else they can steal from around the globe.
Don't listen to Washington D.C.! They and the D.C. centered media is fraudulent and dishonest..
Reject the phony-baloney 'left-right' 'blue-red' divide.. There is such a thing as ideology, but ideology doesn't address the blatant criminality and dishonesty so rampant in US Government now.
Register as a Green or Socialist!
As they build their Shopping Malls in Commie China, factories, coal & power plants while in the U.K. their citizens bemoan their Nazi Fascist Socialist Govt.
What a hoax. And yet the hoax is pretty much the same all over. Banks & Corporations. The politicians they buy. They don't care if anyone calls their Govt a Democracy, Communistic, or Socialistic.
It's all the same lie.
Life is good. What an experience! It's always best to forgive.
Is this the 800th or the 12,000th article detailing how Obama is just a Republican in disguise? OK, now I'm convinced. And all this time I've had HOPE that he would prove to be the change we can ... Must be why I voted for McKinney, a protest vote that was never even recorded. But I wonder what all these calls to "reregister" are about. I've never been registered as a member of either wing of the duopoly, and I haven't had to register as a member of anything else, including "independent." I've just voted, and never been quizzed at a poll over what party I "belonged to." Neither Minnesota nor Wisconsin require registering with any party. At least not in my experience. And I've been voting since 1972. Are there really that many states that require registering your party affiliation? Even if one registers as independent, in this fascist political climate, it's probably assumed he's a teabagger, or worse.
Ephraim said "Are there really that many states that require registering your party affiliation?"
28 states have registration by party. How many is "that many?"
Get ready for the Right wing savior Pres. Sarah Palin. She'll bering salvation through Jesus . In others words Forced Prayer to the God of her choice or IRS fines.
I'd put my mony on Jeb Bush over Palin. He has the main party behind him, and a look at the bush family history will show that they have been in power for well over a hundred years. They won't just go silently into that good night. And everyone knows Jeb is the smart one, right?
And don't even say Americans aren't that stupid to vote for another Bush. They said that BEFORE the 2 time election of shrub. (2 stolen elections that is)
If anyone is that dumb that they don't see that they were had by bushobomber and the only change we have seen is the continuing spiral further downward as a failed nation--then you deserve what you got and you better grease it up cause they ain't done with you yet.
Gupta: "what do you expect from a candidate who raked in the most dough from Wall Street, real estate, commercial banks and hedge funds?"
These guys have to get elected/reelected, and they can't put the entire economy on the credit-card anymore. Money runs the system, and runs it for itself, NOT for the working people.
Money can still do the will of the people in our democracy, but only to the extent that the money is OWNED by the people. I believe wealth redistribution is the necessary precondition to getting in the kind of legislators who will pass bills restricting money's access to the law-making/enforcing process, such as Green Party candidates.
What I'm saying is we must first FORCE them to redistribute wealth via progressive taxation and amped up gov't prosecution of wealthy tax-cheats, and THEN force a progressive agenda through the people that can thus be elected, when money is more equitably distributed. But VOTING in a third party assumes our democracy is about PEOPLE, which it isn't. It's about money.
It's a matter of carefully applying your limited power. Given the lock-hold capital has on our democracy, what's the one issue labor can attack using human voting numbers alone? Well, what's the one issue most dear to capital, without which it hasn't the 'buying power' to own Washington despite encouraging policies deeply unpopular with the people?
Add ANY progressive issue to the wealth redistribution issue, and you just gave capital TWICE as many targets to shoot at. Add an entire progressive PLATFORM, and all hope is lost. The forces of capital will find dozens of ways of striking fear into the reptile brain in all of us: you will have divided and conquered yourselves.
Progressive taxation should be the single issue of both liberals and conservatives right now.
A bait and switch presidency.
Meanwhile, gdgoodman writes on this thread that "Actually the University of California was the biggest donor ($175,000)..." to Obama's campaign. How can a public university system (that lost millions to the Crash) legally contribute to a political campaign?
-30-
All the $ numbers are from INDIVIDUALS who work for the University or Corporations...
Employees made the contributions through the University. How they scrapped up the money with CA being so strapped for cash and gutting the school system? Maybe in the HOPE (yeah that again) something could be done by the feds to save their jobs?
Gary
Is Sara Palin "Populist" enough for ya?
She don't look so bad now does she?
She would reinstate the Bush administrations policy of lax regulation of WallStreet and corporations, because 'government is the problem, not the solution to the problem'. I just think this is how we got into this mess. Admittedly, Obama isn't doing much better, but if she got to be POTUS it would actually be written into her PLATFORM to deregulate commerce and industry so she could go there in the open rather than in the shadows as Obama is forced to do.
Paul Street has commented that it was commonly recognized (on the left) that the difference between the R's and D's was like the difference between "Coke and Pepsi." But with a Palin candidacy he noted the difference would be more like between "Coke and crack."
Sure she does. No matter how hard you try you can't
polish a turd..
An excellent article by Gupta. It is clear now that "change" was a cheap political slogan and that the majority of Democrats will continue (forever) to be God fearing nationalists who venerate free markets. The Democrat brand is essentially "sure we're corporate whores but, we are less evil."
Check out the interview of Ron Paul with Rachel Maddow:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/
If Paul ran as a libertarian/green or third party/independent for President, he could do at least as well as Ross Perot and might force real issues to be discussed a bit more in the MSM. Ron Paul is unequivocally anti-war and has led the struggle to break the stranglehold of the too-big-to-fail banks and insurance companies on our economy as well as bring democratic responsiveness and transparency to the bankers who dictate monetary policy for their benefit at the federal reserve. The reason the two party system dominates is that it is easier for big corporate money to buy off two than more than two.
2012 Election:
Obama 45%
Palin 38%
Paul 17%
4 more years of the sellout.
Fallen world, you could be right, but with an outspoken alternative Presidential candidate in the race everyday people would hear more about making real peace and social justice and other issues more relevant to their lives than with only tweedle-dee-dee Obama and tweedle-dee-dum Palin involved. Obama, the sophisticate and Palin, the daffy differ drastically in style, but both kowtow to the military/industrial/media complex when push comes to shove.
Maybe Ron Paul could get Dennis Kucinich or Bernie Sanders to be his running mate.
Ron Paul might be one of the most dangerous men in america, because a portion of what he says actually makes sense. Unfortunately, the rest of his libertarian philosophy is exactly what this country doesn't need. Faced with the prospect of having to choose between Palin, Obama, or Paul--I'd either leave the country, or shoot myself.
Yep. Ron Paul is so loopy he almost (almost!) makes BHO look acceptable. And that takes some doing.
As for Palin...
Gary
Leaving the country, or shooting yourself is not the answer. Most everyone makes a little sense at times and there is much about Paul's philosophy with which I disagree. However, you should watch the interview of Ron Paul on the Maddow show on Jan. 6 and actually listen to what he is saying: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#34738521.
The most unsustainable goals of our increasingly nationalistic and fascistic government are never-ending war profiteering by big-monied corporate interests along with their exploitation of working class people both home and abroad.
I voted for Ralph Nader and my favorite website is the World Socialist's along with Common Dreams. We all need to get back in the streets, especially in DC and raise hell like we did before and after our empire wrongfully and criminally invaded Afghanistan and Iraq. Perhaps we should all camp out on the mall and stay there awhile.
the seed,
Columbia, SC.
Ron Paul would also push to abolish all environmental, safety, and worker protecton laws and public services of all sort, and is absolutely opposed to health care, employment at a living wage, food and shelter as a right. His views are absolutely incompatable with the principles of the Green Party, USA.
Please learn more about what the US-style "libertarians" actually stand for. They are most decidedly not opposed to corporate power.
>>Please learn more about what the US-style "libertarians" actually stand for. They are most decidedly not opposed to corporate power.<<
Yeah, they just want that corporate power for their own selfish selves. To hell with anyone else.
Gary
Amen!
The Green Party has some of the work completed for us - ballot lines in most states!
1) Join the Greens and make sure you contact your Democrat reps in Congress and Senate to tell them you're bailing from their vile party.
2) Work with the Greens to build the party of We the People.
3) Recruit! We need good candidates in all states to run against the status quo.
Remember, we will not be able to pull this off without your help and support!