McCain Plays the Race Card
Having failed to convince voters that they represent a break from the tragic Bush presidency, Republican presidential candidate John McCain and vice presidential running mate Sarah Palin are careening into George Wallace territory to destroy the nation's first African-American nominee, Democrat Barack Obama.
How close? When Wallace, best known as the segregationist governor of Alabama, ran for president in 1968, supporters at a rally at Madison Square Garden surrounded black protesters and screamed - as recounted on PBS' American Experience website - "Kill 'em, Kill 'em, Kill 'em." At a Florida rally this week, according to The Washington Post, the crowd got so worked up by Palin's attacks on Obama's patriotism and the media that one supporter shouted "Kill him!" Another supporter shouted a racial epithet at an African-American sound man and added for emphasis, "Sit down, boy."
Democratic Congressman John Lewis of Georgia voiced alarm about this over the weekend.
Agence France Presse reported that the Secret Service dropped the investigation on "Kill him!" because it could not determine if the threat was actually uttered, and if so whether it was meant for Obama or Bill Ayers, the 1960s radical-turned-professor whom the right is desperate to link to Obama. But ugly innuendoes are flying in from all corners of the McCain camp.
Even though Obama long ago volunteered youthful cocaine use in his memoirs, McCain campaign cochairman Frank Keating, the former governor of Oklahoma, said this week: "He ought to admit, 'You know, I've got to be honest with you. I was a guy of the street. I was way to the left. I used cocaine.' "
McCain's brother, Joe, momentarily turned himself into Joe McCarthy. Seeing that Obama is poised to win northern Virginia, Joe McCain declared the suburbs of Arlington and Alexandria to be "communist country."
It has not yet dawned on the McCain forces that Hillary Clinton's supporters tried the Obama Cokehead Strategy and the Obama Half-American Strategy a half year ago, only to sour many voters on her. Yet here comes Palin, fronting fear for McCain by saying, "I am just so fearful that this is not a man who sees America the way that you and I see America."
The encouraging thing is that it appears that with every inflammatory utterance, McCain and Palin take a battleground state off the board - for Obama. According to Real Clear Politics averages as of the end of last week, Obama is up 14 percentage points in Pennsylvania, 10 points in New Hampshire, nine points in Wisconsin, eight points in Michigan, seven points in New Mexico, and five points in Virginia. Of the eight states still listed as toss-ups, McCain has leads in only three - Missouri, Indiana, and West Virginia. None of his leads is greater than 4 percentage points.
It has been 40 years since Richard Nixon's "law and order" campaign, 20 years since the senior President Bush inflamed his race against then-Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis with ads featuring the black convict Willie Horton, and 18 years since the late Jesse Helms of North Carolina warded off a strong challenge for his US Senate seat by African-American Harvey Gantt with the infamous ad depicting a white man's hands crumpling a job rejection and a voice saying, "You were the best qualified. But they had to give it to a minority because of a racial quota."
Appeals to race can definitely work when people have too much time on their hands. But America now faces an all-hands-on-deck crisis where huge issues appear to be trumping race. Willie Horton cannot compete with a tanking economy and plummeting 401(k) plans. McCarthyism is a game next to the carnage of a failed $10-billion-a-month war. Americans no longer laugh at Palin's lipstick difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull. The hockey mom is slinging mud from the pits. The lipstick is fading into the fangs of Wallace. A critical percentage of white Americans are saying, "No more."
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
22 Comments so far
Show Allfatduck136 October 15th, 2008 6:44 pm, you reminded me of growing up in the Midwest and the quiet racism of the 50s, even in northern cities like Chicago. (Yes, there were places where blacks knew they would not be welcome, and they didn't have any signs on the door.)
There was a bar in my neighborhood that I used to go to after work back in the early '70s. It was run by a couple from West Virginia and, while they were not bigots, many of their customers were. I wouldn't bring any of my black friends there, knowing they would be made to feel uncomfortable. Forward to the late 70s and the bar was under new ownership, had a new crowd, and my band was playing there with a black drummer without problem. One or two of the 'old guard' still hung out there, but now they kept their racism to themselves; one even tipped the band and danced to a couple of our songs.
Times have changed even more since then -- for the better.
While I think you're right about the 'code words' of the McPalin debacle, I also think that if Obama is elected, this will be the last GOP appeal to the fearful racism of the yahoos, most of whom don't know anyone with skin of a different color than their own. The barrier will be broken and it will be safe for black people to aspire to any office or position in America -- black kids will start to believe, as white kids have since the founding of this country, that they can actually grow up to be president. I believe that Obama's election really will change the way this nation thinks and there will be no going back from that progress. Maybe, one day, we really will achieve King's dream of a society where people are judged on their merits and not the color of their skin, and on the content of their minds and not their gender or sexual preference.
I never thought in my lifetime that a black man or woman would be this close to the presidency -- it's a sign that, regardless of the revanchist regressives of the GOP -- we are progressing toward a future that will free us all from the chains of racism, the shackles of hatred, and the prison of ignorance. Finally, Tom Paine's America will have a chance to emerge:
"When shall it be said in any country of the world, my poor are happy; neither ignorance or distress is to be found among them; my jails are empty of prisoners, my streets of beggers; the aged are not in want, the taxes are not oppressive; the rational world is my friend, because I am friend of its happiness; when these things can be said, then may that country boast of its constitution and government."
-- Tom Paine
To me, this is what was meant by "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" and we may get there yet. It's one of the reasons I think the election of Obama is so important; he is a step in the direction of fulfilling the dreams of our past and making us a country we can boast about in all of its aspects.
Then we really will be the 'light of the world.'
Having gone through the segregation of the 30's to 50's in the south (USAF took me out of East TX and I stayed away), listening the the McCain camp brings back some of the old memories where African-Americans men were called "Boy" and A-A women were called "Granny" or "Auntie" or some other "neutral name." When the McCain camp calls Obama "elitist," this is the 2008 code word for "uppity." Of course when a white man or woman referred to an A-A man or woman as "Uppity" it was usually followed by "Nigger."
My wife, during the first debate, picked up on the "racial cues" that McCain used against Obama -- never looking at him, never directly addressing him on any issue. She grew up in Idaho and Washington. The evidence is there for those who care to look.
The code words are there in the McCain campaign. You have to be sensitive as to what they mean. Even today when door-bellers supporting Obama are greeted with "Nigger Lover." "I will never vote for a nigger." and all this in the state of Washington, God help us.
This has been a great year! Yes! The Bankers have been unmasked! The Congress has been unmasked! The Neocons, and the Enablers have been unmasked! WallStreet has been unmasked!
I did not realize how many fascists we have in our country!!!
I wasn't even going to vote for president this year. I don't actively support Obama but where I live I'm only going to have two choices. Write ins are not allowed. After watching the way McCain/Palin are acting I'm going to give my vote to Obama just for spite. I would rather at least write in Nader but I don't have that choice.
Rickster
Could this be a referendum on Racism? Since that's the major underlying theme, clearly a deciding factor and now a campaign tactic on the GOP side, if it's strongly repudiated at the polls, maybe people will stop using it as a political motivator. Maybe the people that are not really racist, but are mouthing the words as a "Get Along, Go Along" will wake up to the fact that they are siding with a shrinking minority: Bigots.
"Obama for President. He's half white. That's good enough for me." This gives me hope (and a chuckle).
I voted for a Republican twice in my life. Once for a judge, who then quit to work at CNN, and the other was an anti-war senator. (Yes, in the 1990s there was an anti-war senator who was a Republican.) But it's never going to happen again. I am marking my absentee ballot even as we speak, well almost as we speak. There is no real pleasure in voting for the lesser of two evils, but I think come next January I'll have at least a little smile when it's Obama and not McCain.
Nader has taken the role of bomb thrower. He makes perfect the enemy of better than it is now.
This is a useful role to some extent as long as he increases skepticism but doesn't actually add to the incredible cynicism that allows the Republican strategy to succeed year after year in the south and for the past 40 years on a national level.
If half of the oppressed people who now do not vote actually did go to the polls and voted their interests, the Republicans as well as the Democrats would be pushed to the left. His previous runs however, have just been plowing the ocean, leaving no visible permanent change.
&YYY&
For real change of solid substance, vote for Ralph Nadar, he still makes sense
Barach Obama is maybe second best, because the Democrats are cravenly dense.
Obama has grovelled to the spoilt child, Israel, to be allowed to be President,
Is beholden to the media, with whom all the bribes from corporations will be spent.
He owes favours far and deep, beholden unto the secret Democratic party keep.
Those demo-rats do not want real change, but would like a puppet to trance Americans to sleep.
To be fair, he has forged his way up and through the one available path,
To this main chance, a great achievement, in this party now full mainly of chaff.
McCain and Palin are a comedy duo from the right wing, after that clown in a suit,
Mr George Bush, is ducking off the stage hit by lots of thrown rotten fruit.
So Obama should maybe win, and take up a futile task of changing the human heart.
Because human life is competing with all life in this world that is failing apart.
If you want to read Nader's words go here
http://www.nader.org/
This is an archive of Nader articles on a variety of subjects, all articulate and on subjects of interest to many Common Dream readers, but you'll never hear those views from Obama or McCain.
Support third party, don't support the corporate elite.
www.NotOneMore.US
i'm in for ten bucks: 65% for obama.
Obama is navigating a deadly minefield that will require him to be 15% ahead in the polls just to end up with a 1% victory.
If he can get past the smears, he will be subject the the Bradley effect (voters who tell pollsters they will vote for him, but won't). If that doesn't get him, the Diebolds are waiting for him with rigged voting machines.
LOL on the yard sign, Bill from Saginaw October 14th, 2008 5:57 pm, that's like my friend's 90-year-old, raised-in-the-old-south, conservative rural Republican grandmother who said, "This year I'm voting for the colored man." She added that the "damn Republicans have just fouled things up too much."I only hope there are millions like her out there.
"I am just so fearful that this is a man who does not see America the way that you and I see America."
First, be fearful.
Second, this is not about what Obama looks like (race), but rather it is about what Obama supposedly sees.
Third, everything is based upon a vision of America - American exceptionalism.
Fourth and finally, "our" shared vision of America is separate from, and qualitatively different from, Barack Obama's vision of America - so much so that "we" indeed should be fearful of him, and the change Obama represents.
Beyond the hard core GOP base habitually tuned to Limbaugh in the afternoon and Faux News every evening, will this softly bigoted attack formula work with swing voters in 2008? I don't know. But we will all know very soon.
On a light and more optimistic note, it was reported that in a staunchly Republican, rock ribbed Christian rural area of southwestern Michigan, a hand-made political lawn sign was seen last week planted by the side of the road in a local farmer's yard displaying the following message:
"Obama for President. He's half white. That's good enough for me."
Bill from Saginaw
Wow, CD sure went 100% to the Obama campaign propaganda today, didn't it.
Meanwhile, Ralph Nader has been doing some excellent writing lately. Just remember to go search the web beyond CD to find good writing that isn't Obama propaganda.
----------------------------
"To know, and not to do, is not to know"
www.samsonsworld.blogspot.com
PS ... does anyone notice the common theme amongst the Obama propaganda that its all personal attacks on the Republicans?
The Democrats can't talk about any real issues. Obama is pretty much identical with McCain on all of them. Unless you want a withdrawal from Iraq, where the Bush-McCain plan that Bush is negotiating with Iraq would get our troops out quicker than anything Obama has ever proposed.
So, for the Democrats, all you really see now is this sort of personal attack on the Republicans. It shows just how pitiful and meaningless their campaigns have become. They just rant about how bad the Republicans are, then vaguely say their candidates are better.
----------------------------
"To know, and not to do, is not to know"
www.samsonsworld.blogspot.com
And how exactly is it a "personal attack" to call out the McCain camp for their dirty tricks? You sound downright Rovian!
Agree this article has no personal attacks. Others published today are fairly elitist and offensive to anyone who isn't already in the echo-chamber. Which is a rather stupid way to "appeal" to undecided voters.
I'm thinking ~Samson~ added this postscript after reading those and failed to realize it was not applicable in this case.
But I do want to remind you of something:
Accusing dissenters of supporting the Official Enemy is a STALINIST tactic of Repression. To see it adopted by supporters of the "Democratic" candidate for "change" is not very reassuring for those of us who wait until ELECTION DAY to cast our vote instead of almost a year before.
We have this crazy thing for Democratic Free Choice and this wariness about Social Repression, y'see?
Better check on your world, Samson October 14th, 2008 3:34 pm; I think it's spinning out of orbit.
That is not a refutation.
matti October 14th, 2008 7:52 pm, it was not meant to be a refutation; it was meant as a suggestion.
Man, it's so true . . . patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel. Racists, too.
I voted for a Republican once. Never again! Never again!
-30-