EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- How the US Turned Three Pacifists into Violent Terrorists
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Revealed: How US State Department 'Twists Arms' on Monsanto's Behalf
Popular content
Today's Top News
Across the World, the Indignant Rise Up Against Corporate Greed and Cuts
Protests against corporate greed, executive excess and public austerity began to gel into the beginnings of a worldwide movement yesterday as tens of thousands marched in scores of cities. The "Occupy Wall Street" protest, which started in Canada and spread to the US, and the long-running Spanish "Indignant" and Greek anti-cuts demonstrations coalesced on a day that saw marches or occupations in 82 countries.
Air Canada employees walk in St. James Park during the 'Occupy Toronto' march in Toronto, Saturday. (photo: Mike Cassese, REUTERS) Some protests were small, as in Tokyo, where only 200 turned up; some were large, as in Spain, where around 60 separate demonstrations were staged; and some were muted, as in London, where nearly 2,000 intending to march on the Stock Exchange obeyed police who turned them back. As dusk fell, some 500 of them were kettled in St Paul's churchyard.
Containment tactics were also used by police in New York last night as thousands of demonstrators were penned behind barricades in Times Square. They had marched through Manhattan and protested outside the city's banks, withdrawing their money as they did.
Only one of the protests, in Rome, was violent. Here, among an estimated 100,000 protesters, were a few who broke away and hurled bottles, smashed shop windows, torched cars and attacked news crews. There were reports that the defence ministry had been partly trashed. Most of the disorder took place near the Colosseum, and police charged the protesters and fired water cannon. Some demonstrators fled, but others turned against the troublemakers, trying, with limited success, to stop them. Italy, with a national debt ratio second only to Greece's in the 17-nation eurozone, is rapidly becoming a focus of concern in Europe's debt crisis. But even in Germany – part of the solution to the crisis rather than the problem – around 4,000 people marched through the streets of Berlin with banners that urged the end of capitalism. Some scuffled with police as they tried to get near the country's parliamentary buildings. In Frankfurt, continental Europe's financial capital, some 5,000 people protested in front of the European Central Bank.
In Spain, six marches were set to converge on Madrid's Puerta del Sol plaza just before dusk yesterday. This is the country where, in May, groups which became known as the Indignant Movement established the first around-the-clock protest camps that lasted for weeks in cities and towns. Portuguese angry at their government's handling of the economic crisis were due to protest in central Lisbon later yesterday evening. Portugal is one of three European nations – the others being Greece and Ireland – that have already needed an international bailout.
In Stockholm, 500 people gathered to hear speakers denounce capitalism at a peaceful rally. They held up red flags and banners that read: "We are the 99 per cent" and "We refuse to pay for capitalism's crisis". The reference was to the world's richest 1 per cent, who control billions in assets, while billions around the world live in poverty or are struggling economically. Bilbo Goransson, a trade union activist, declared through a megaphone: "There are those who say the system is broke. It's not. That's how it was built. It is there to make rich people richer."
Anti-banking protests outside St Paul's cathedral yesterday drew a crowd of around 2,000. The "Occupy London" protesters gathered with the intention of taking over the plaza in front of the London Stock Exchange but were turned back at Temple Bar by mounted police. The crowds returned to St Paul's churchyard where WikiLeaks' Julian Assange spoke briefly.
The singer Billy Bragg was also in the crowd. "Today is about accountability," he said. "People want to see a change in the way things are done." He believed yesterday's protest represented a shift in the way the public views demonstrations. "I think the attitude coming out of protests here and on Wall Street has been incredibly positive," he said. "It's a desire to build, rather than smash things up."
In Canada, hundreds gathered in Toronto's financial district to decry what they said was government-abetted corporate greed which has served elites at the expense of the majority. Further protests were planned yesterday for other Canadian cities, while, in the US, marches were scheduled in cities large and small, from Providence, Rhode Island, to Little Rock, Arkansas; from New York to Seattle. In the Bosnian city of Sarajevo, there was a different tone: hundreds walked through the streets carrying pictures of Che Guevara, old communist flags and placards that read: "Death to capitalism, freedom to the people".
Turnout was light in Asia, where the global economy is booming. In Sydney, around 300 people gathered, cheering a speaker who shouted: "We're sick of corporate greed! Big banks, big corporate power standing over us and taking away our rights!" Only 200 people protested in Tokyo; and in the Philippines, about 100 people marched on the US embassy in Manila to express support for the Wall Street protests.
A group of 100 prominent authors, including Salman Rushdie, Neil Gaiman and the Pulitzer prize-winning novelists Jennifer Egan and Michael Cunningham, signed an online petition declaring their support for "Occupy Wall Street and the Occupy Movement around the world". And there were stinging words yesterday in The New York Times' leading article for David Cameron and George Osborne. It began: "For now, Britain's economy has been stuck in a vicious cycle of low growth, high unemployment and fiscal austerity. But unlike Greece, which has been forced into induced recession by misguided European Union creditors, Britain has inflicted this harmful quack cure on itself."
It ended: "Austerity is a political ideology masquerading as an economic policy. It rests on a myth, impervious to facts, that portrays all government spending as wasteful and harmful, and unnecessary to the recovery. The real world is a lot more complicated. America has no need to repeat Mr Cameron's failed experiment."
Several years after the Western financial crisis began, and with growing momentum it seems, new dividing lines – if not battle lines – are being drawn up.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

85 Comments so far
Show AllThe dividing lines are hardly new. It's just that, until recently, the battle has been largely one-sided. It took a while, it seems, for the other side to realise that it was engaged in a war and to identify its enemies with some clarity. Whether that realisation and response happened soon enough and with sufficient strategic weight to be successful remains to be seen.
Austerity is indeed a political ideology, but some of its roots lie in financial patterns (both income and expenditures) based on that ideology and deliberately designed for reinforcement purposes. Failure to counteract those patterns and their purposeful impacts at an earlier stage was quite unfortunate, but hopefully not fatal.
Talk about knowing ones enemy - check out how Becky and Oreilly are spinning the global movement. Amazing to watch how people twist and distort empirical reality to fit their worldview. And readers comments on Beck's website are almost unbelievable.
_____________________
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/marxist-revolution-beck-shows-oreilly-how-organized-effort-guides-world-wide-occupy-protests/
When dealing with "crusaders" who base their opinions on the modern equivalent of religious dogma, much rational discussion is not to be expected. I think I do detect, however, a few notes of real fear creeping into the reactions and even more hysteria seems likely as the conflict builds.
The global kettle simmers and the myriad of problems are being reduced down in the search to find the foul ingredient that has tainted the stew. The answer is being revealed as the broth congeals; capitalism.
Purge the contaminated fare.
Dump the poisoned fodder.
Find a nourishing recipe for Life.
AMEN !!!
Nice!
Certainly mega banks and corporations are the enemy that we can all agree on. However I think if we engage in some kind of doctrinaire Marxism and lump family farmers, and and small business people in with corporate dominators that is a recipe for failure. IMO the real enemy is scale, BOTH the megastate AND mega bank financed corporations are capable of heinous oppression. IMO the best outcome would be credit unions and locally charted banks funding a mix co-ops, communal gathering spaces, and small businesses like hardware stores, LOCAL non chain book stores, etc. Hugo Chavez is on the right track IMO incentavizing local co-ops, encouraging local participatory democracy, while also allowing for some level of free enterprise to exist at least in the transition period. Purist ideologies like immediately eliminating all "capitalism" (whatever that vague phrase even means) often end up with totalitarian dictatorships and "purges", there is a messsy history there, that hopefully we are all aware of here?
I strum that tune guitarist.
Good rejoinder. as rapacious as capitalism has been and it has, I would stand on the side of no absolutist answers. Often solutions can be found in the grey areas, and in the organic nature of change. Solutions are out there, campaign finance reform, taxing wall street transactions, regulations on Wall sTreet, single payer health care, a New New Deal, alternative enegies, end war movement, guaranteed shelter and food. But to dismount capitalism? I think that given our current situation it is unrealistic in the extreme in America and frankly I don't know what that means to dismantle capitalism. It might mean something in a hundred years but for now our movement should be toward societal change. Money funneled from savings in the military budget to local co ops and states and family farms is an excellent trajectory as stated above.
All is vanity
FDR's New Deal saved capitalism for the capitalists and here we are. You offer up more tweeking of capitalism, which will only prolong the suffering. Listen to the people from other continents. They are trying desperately to tell you something.
Think large, live small.
"FDR's saved capitalism. "
Well maybe so. And he and those who worked with him also provided millions of jobs.
I don't see why there cannot be a marriage between capitalism and socialism. Certainly the works of the New Deal were monumental in scale and provide for us even today.
http://newdeal.feri.org/library/
A newer deal for today would include, modern bullet transport and light rail, alternative energy programs designed by locality, single payer health care, rebuilding our water and sewer systems, cleaning our rivers and oceans. Restoring our natural habitats. I think that can exist within a regulated capitalist system from where I stand.
"I don't see why there cannot be a marriage between capitalism and socialism."--Rico
because "capitalism" by definition feeds from the capital.
Capitalism is a vague term IMO, does that mean someone selling organic produce at a farmers market is EXACTLY the same as Monsanato and Boeing if they have a bank loan and own a business? If so then the Marxist terminology is so vague in lumping different sorts of enterprises together regarding scale as to be useless IMO. BOTH the big predatory state AND predatory megacorporations can cause great damage and BOTH municipal governments supporting local collectives, and organic family private farmers selling their produce can do great good IMO. To simply say all owners of enterprises are bourgeois enemies obscure more than it reveals IMO. Would the owners of a worker owned and self managed co-op like Mondragon be bourgeois too? How far down the rathole of doctrinaire Marxist orthodoxy do we REALLY want to go? Are we really going to repeat the sad mistakes of Russian Bolshevik Communists and the Weather Underground "Maoists?" Lets not go there, and learn from history like Hugo Chavez, local co-op stores, CSAs, and OWS has done.
It's not either or, and there is nothing vague about the unjust travesty of capitalism.
Today is a new day, different than any before.
Way to avoid the question I posed, which is, is the owner of a small organic farm the EXACT same sort of "bourgeois" person to be "purged" as the board of directors of Monsanto and Boeing in your vision of a "revolution" yes or no? If it's yes you are making the same sort of category error that led to the "liquidation" of the Kulak farmers in the Ukraine leading to quite literally millions of deaths.
Fail, and badly so!
I said nothing about purging anyone, you keep saying it.
Buck said above:
"Posted by Buck
Oct 16 2011 - 11:49am
"The global kettle simmers and the myriad of problems are being reduced down in the search to find the foul ingredient that has tainted the stew. The answer is being revealed as the broth congeals; capitalism. Purge the contaminated fare. Dump the poisoned fodder. Find a nourishing recipe for Life."
I rest my case, sorry but the word purge coming from someone talking neo-Bolshevik rhetoric creeps me out. :(
You are goofy. Try leaving the lights on or get a dog.
Why don't you just admit you talked about "purging" human beings rather than resort to ad hominems? It's EXACTLY the careless use of the word purging combined with a known history of millions of dead people is why I mistrust state centralist Bolsheviks as an anti authoritarian green left anarchist.
I spoke of purging capitalism, not people. Either you can't comprehend written words or are disingenuous. Which is it?
How do you think "purging" capitalism is going to work? Captlism is composed of human beings. If you didn't mean armed coercive revolution, and expropriation, then purge is an extremely poor choice of a word with it's connotation of Stalin's gulags. :( The nice thing about about Occupy is it's NOT about purging anyone, it's about reoccupying our own communities until the oligarchic elite *chooses* to retreat much like Ghandi did.
I repeat, you're goofy. Look up the meaning of purge. Betcha' won't see Stalin mentioned.
"IMO the real enemy is scale..."
Guitarist,
Well put...Also many who work in certain professional capacities....Doctors, lawyers, engineers, and etc. etc.......We must be careful who we exclude......
The so called 99% represents a very diversified group of individuals,,,,Socially and economically....We eventually must find a common narrative uniting those who make 20,000 and those who earn 100,000 (numbers just random examples)
Once Again, Good comment.
Thomas Gilbert-
You're onto something here, but my experience and reading of history is that without a focus on understanding and eliminating classism, a 99% movement will result in a movement led by the professionals and petty bourgeoisie, in other words liberalism.
One does not need to embrace leninism in order to fight classism, but it is important to understand that the educational and monetary advantages of the professional classes can lead to a movement that highlights an increased role for government and some soft cultural changes.
The professional classes can be allies, but they must not be allowed to dominate the workers movement. That way leads co-option and diminishment for the workers movement. Without a militant workers movement, the liberal professional classes are inevitably out flanked by the 1%. This is in fact how we ended up where we are in the US today.
So while I am not one to favor "purges," a clear eyed and accurate class analysis is essential. I think that the threat of cooption is much more immediate than the danger of leninist purges. In fact, emphasis on the danger of purges is clearly divisive and unneccesary.
I hope your worries about purges out of your system here at CD and don't take it tthe streets where it might actually do some damage.
Worker self managed co-ops ensure a fair return for labor input and workplace democracy without need of a bloody top down revolution, that is the future IMO.
Noam Chomsky IMO correctly places authoritarian Communists to the right of left anarchists, as Communists embrace tope down coercive authoritarian dominator hierarchies that left anarchists do not.
There IS NO "workers movement" in this country.
You write like you just stepped out of a time machine. ;)
We have problems with Industrialism itself now.
Ridding ourselves of capital and capitalists and having the "workers control the means of production" is not sufficient anymore.
Many textbook communists need to reconnect to the original and sustaining driver behind the past movements you read about -the deep human urge for liberation and co-operation.
Once you do that, maybe dropping all the out-dated language will seem more appealing, and your contribution will be greater for it.
Just a thought.
There is some utility in having the Ghost of Revolutions Past hanging around I guess. Though it would be nice if we didn't always have to talk about that one failed one -there are others. ;)
Insightful post IMO. Kropotkin BTW DID get that scale was as important as the ownership of the means of production 100 years ago. His Fields, Farms, and Factories, and Mutual AId, are still visionary 100 years later IMO. I totally agree that industrialism itself both in it's ecologically destructive effects, and it's inherent alienation due to scale no matter who is running it, is not adequately addressed in doctrinaire Marxism. Ever Marx, said he "wasn't a Marxist," and I suspect would be appalled that his texts are treated like a bible by some rather than an ongoing sociological analysis of class based oppression that evolved as out understanding grew and society changed.
Ghosts of revolutions past indeed...
IMO you are the one being doctrinaire here.
I offer some thoughts on classism and alliances between workers and the professional classes and I get a lecture on Joe Stalin?
That's not a knee jerk, doctrinaire reaction?
Authoritarian communism is a dead letter in the US today. But I think we can agree that the class struggle lives on. You equate all centralization with authoritarianism. I reject that notion and the idea that somehow decentrlization will magically solve all the political and economic questions.
I agree with your last sentences about Marx and have never been a doctrinaire marxist or anything else for that matter; so please keep the lectures on the evils of Stalinism down to a dull roar. It's all true but I think 99% of politically aware people get that already.
"You equate all centralization with authoritarianism. I reject that notion and the idea that somehow decentrlization will magically solve all the political and economic questions. "
Joe, with the internet we crossed the threshold of the 21st Century. The architecture of the internet is decentralization. Each person participant is a leader. The methodology of change is no longer centralized leadership; therefore, unions are NOT a part of the OCW movement, however, individual union members can be if they participate. As an individual participant your views are equated with everyone's views but their currency with the movement will be based upon creative participation, not union affiliation. Individual participation is welcome, organizational participation is not because it will inevitably lead to an unsuccessful attempted hijacking. No one can impose their will on OCW, it is too diverse. Change will happen differently in different places. Rural and Urban needs will be different and change in those places will be different except for certain universal beliefs. There's no going back to the 20th Century. The power of decentralized reform has been released and is working. The needs of making order out of chaos in this age are different than they were last century. As Matti reminds us, adopt the language of the future not the ism's of the past. It is ok to hold those beliefs in centralization but do not expect much tranction in this age. Creativity is the currency of the future.. Actions will be based upon the best ideas that have been widely vetted and adopted. We are creating new lifeways for sustainable lives in the 21st Century. We are seeking unity of purpose created by the People not the 1%. Their influence peaked, they crapped their nest, and now their on their way out.
Great post I agree 100%. Very cogent and well put.
Your thinking on decentralization is more than a little hype. It amounts to:"Decentralization will heal all." But to me that's just wishful thinking.
I hope you're right but I've heard this song and dance before.
Of course there is still a workers movement! We're not dead yet. Look at Wisconsin, the Teamsters in Washindgton state,
Workers and unons are a vital component of OWS and lead the struggle for workers rights.
If talking about the workers, the working class or class struggle seems anachronistic, that may be because class has been a taboo subject in American schools and media for several decades.
I admit that the workers movement in the US is battered and relatively weak, but the correct response to that is to take actions to build the workers movement, not to deem the struggle irrelevant! Saying unions are not relevant to the modern world is an old right wing tactic and it is revealing that you would stoop to employing such obviously tainted propaganda.
BTW, I'm not the one dwelling on "revolutions past." That would be guitarist, who when I try to discuss some of the challenges of clasism and alliances with the professional classes, I am given a little lecture about Joe Stalin
You wild and edgy anarchists ought to consider giving up the poisoned and outdated terminology of McCarthyism.
Just a thought.
Sorry but you can get a class analysis and one that is more inclusive of rural poor farmers for example from Kroptokin than Marx. Marx's "vanguard dictatorship of the proletarian, the state will wither," mistake caused MILLIONS of people to die including trade Unionists and anarchists, I will NOT be silent on that, Communism is a failed ideology and unnecessary in an age of co-ops and networked intelligence. We must do it ourselves without leadership cadres or history is going to repeat itself in ugly ways. :(
I think your entire anti-communist spiel is hateful and divisive, and completely out of context. Essentially,you scream "Stalinist" at anybody who critiques your anrachist position from a working class perspective.
Do you recognize the enormous contributions to social justice made by American communists in the 30's through 50's? Or were they all Stalinist murderers also?
You come off as a McCarthyite despite your anarchist veneer.
I've never read anyone defending Stalin in these comment boards. Why do you feel the need to inject Stalinism into the conversation?
Between that and your constant condemnation of unions, I'd say your a classist in anrachist clothing.
Unions have saved OWS from extinction. Don't you get that? The AFL-CIO was crucial in the decison to back off on the "cleaning" of Zuchotti.
You are deadly paranoid about unions coopting OWS. Your attitude is divisive and anti-revolutionary. I am disgusted by the unmitigated hate that you throw at unions on a regular basis.
At least OWS does not share your disdain of the unions and has actively sought union support and demonstrated solidarity local union struggles.
Joe,
My concern is that many would fall between the cracks......
.I agree with our friend Matti when he points out that OWS is not a worker's movement...There is no worker's movement in this country
Thomas Gilbert- (A member of the courtier class) LOL
And I should add "...to our misfortune".
I wish I lived in the world that Marx and Kropotkin did. Where the problems inherent in Industrialism itself had not taken over the scene.
I admire the non-Bolshevik, non-Authoritarian worker's movements and even outright Revolutions of the past a great deal and I believe they contribute much to us today -in this Occupation thing and beyond.
But I admire them as useful examples from history not filters or frames through which to see the events of today.
To me, that is just as ridiculous as the supposed "conservatives" constant attempt to fit Koch Industries or Halliburton Corp. of Dubai into the 18th Century concept of "rights to property" that was so dear to -a minority of- our Founders.
Capitalism is central to the destruction and exploitation of the environment.
Industry and technology are not intrinsically bad. IMO, the problems stems from a society organized around the defense of the capitalist class.
Militarism, capitalism and imperialism far outweigh industrialism as the central problems facing humanity.
Marxist doctrinaire and lumping family farmers with corporate dominators? Say what?
Of course, it is much better to go into debt with a local bank. That is a terrific solution for the landless impoverished starving masses. Change the debtor, why didn't I think of that?
Non chain books stores, yeah, that's the ticket. That's why people the world over are rising in revulsion.
Straight to name calling, "purist ideology", then a confession that you don't know what capitalism is, but are sure that eliminating it will lead to totalitarian dictatorships and purges. Great. Can't be living by those nasty ideologies now, can we?
Liberals are capitalists that want more pie and deny the obvious people and planet destroying effects of their pie eating lifestyles.
I am not a "liberal" I am a left anarchist who is suspicious of the bloody history of BOTH Union busting company town Rockefeller finance capitalism, AND Bolshevik Communism as in the massacre of trade Unionists, anarchists sailors, and peasant farmers at Kronstadt by the Bolsheviks very early in the revolution under Trotsky and Lenin.
Are you a trot or other Bolshevik "international socialist revolution" Bolshevik variant Buck? That ideology is as full of fail as finance capitalism IMO.
And BTW I AM *sympathetic to a large degree to democratic socialism ala Denmark and Sweden, and Chavez's Bolivarinism most especially, however state centralist vanguardist Bolshevism though is an utter fail in my strong opinion.
*I do have problems with large scale centralized industrialism and prefer the Kropotkin model of "Fields, Farms and (local) factories, but THAT is a whole other discussion. :)
I am always delighted when I agree with you -guitarist.
The only thing I would add is that Bolshevism (in whatever form) is really just Jacobinism reincarnated and Jacobinism is just Elite Rule dressed in fancy talk.
The muzhiki understood EXACTLY who Lenin and Stalin were -just a new kind of Tsar with different clothes and stranger speeches. ;)
An astounding number of people completely ignore history when discussing the good/bad of ideologies.
Agree.
String plucker, I wasn't calling you a liberal, just making an open statement identifying some of the people that are holding us back from a new brighter day. Sorry if it looked that way.
I'm none of those things. I'm simply me. Buck
I also support Chavez and too a lessert extent the mixed economy models Denmark and Sweeden. But I'm also "sympathetic" to Cuba, while acknowledging some serious errors there regarding human rights.
What I'm not sympathetic to is anti-communism. It is it's own brand of tainted ideology.
The class struggle must be re-interpreted in the wake of advances in communication, for instance, but it is still a class struggle of the masses against an elite. the most effective mass organizations in the US are the unions, even in their current state. There is almost no competition because under the guise of anti-communism, the workers movement was infiltrated, subjected to a multi million dollar smear campaigns and eventually gutted by neo-liberalism.
So I have no interest in your anti-communist riffs. They smell too much like capitalist reaction.
You are just going to have to deal, Commies murdered even more people than Nazis, just as I would call out a racist skinhead here, so too will I call out anyone endorsing Bolshevik Communism. Both fascism and Communism are ideologies that wind up with vast networks prison camps, vast parades of marching troops, and mounds of dead bodies, FUCK THAT!
And yet no one is advocating authoritarian communism. Your comments are obsessive and out of context. In response to discussions about classism and the class dynamics of OWS, you respond with lectures about Stalinism and those evil commies..
FUCK THAT. Get a clue. The tragedies and atrocities of Stalinsim in no way refute the idea of class struggle. You clearly have a bias against industrial workers and you express that bias by going off on tangents about Stalinism, as if that is in any way relevant.
" Commies murdered even more people than Nazis" That's debatable, but in any case, Nazism was a force that tore down Germany and did little to improve that nation. Soviet communism was authoritarian and under Stalin, murderous, but it did launch the USSR into the moderrn era and Stalin did lead his nation to victory over Hitler in WW II. So the history of the USSR is an ambivalent one, but you seem blinded by your ideology and incapable of seeing the broader picture.
You can scream and see things as 100% black and white all you want. You only prove your ignorance of history by doing so.
Stay away from ism's and allow people to take ownership and be stakeholders in their own movement. Seek practical solutions. It is not necessary to name them. Ism's divide people. Unifying messages are important as the movement grows. In a WE nation everyone is included. Just allow it to be. There are forces at work here that you have no idea about. Seek a participatory balance then brace yourself for the changes.
Sound words and advice.
We all belong to this world.
OMG, did you just have a moment of clarifying insight? OWS working it out in the general assemblies is much more useful than doctrinaire Marxism.
I have them every now and again. OWS is but one component in the global paradigm and I favor them over any doctrinaire, Marxist or otherwise. New people. New ideas. New moments. New world.
"Find a nourishing recipe for Life" Not sure what you mean. The only nourishing recipe for life I can see is freedom to pursue happiness.
Of course we need an overarching structure, legal framework etc but are you saying the 'recipe for life' comes from a centralized bureaucracy?
Have you read EF Schmacher, Small Is Beautiful?
cassandra, Thoughtful response.
Centralized bureaucracy? Heavens no, governments suck, social structures don't need one. Do bee's have a government? Ants? There are more of them than us. All the governments suck. How does the word freedom ring when being govern? They contradict.
I can't provide a recipe for anyone except myself. That's why I left it open ended. I like growing food.
Your ingredients sound like a good start, except for the pinch of legal shmeagle.
I like you, so here is my take on democracy. Say there is a million people and 500,001 of them vote to outlaw peeing on trees. Us guys, all 499,999 of us, are screwed. Someone doesn't need a government to say, "Hey, can't you do that elsewhere?".
I haven't read the book, but its title sounds encouraging. Living large is a component of the capital tragedy being performed by western/modern culture. Shrinking is what they fear.
Buck