EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Democrats Abruptly Drop Spending Fight, Hand 2011 Budget to GOP
WASHINGTON - Democrats abruptly abandoned a fight over spending on Thursday and said they would instead extend government funding on a temporary basis, a move that gives Republicans a greater chance to enact the deep cuts they have promised.
The surprise agreement looked likely to end a high-stakes game of chicken that could have led to a shutdown of wide swaths of the government if Congress had not agreed on a spending bill by Saturday night.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said nine Republicans had agreed to back the bill but their support evaporated in recent days.
Lacking the votes to advance the measure, Reid said he would agree to a Republican proposal to temporarily extend government funding beyond the Saturday deadline.
Aides said they expected the measure to pass easily when it comes up for a vote on Friday or Saturday.
Like President Barack Obama's $858 billion tax deal that is poised to clear Congress, the tentative spending deal reflects the new clout Republicans enjoy in Washington after a sweeping victory in November's congressional elections.
Democrats had hoped to pass the $1.1 trillion spending bill before January, when Republicans take control of the House of Representatives and hold more seats in the Senate.
Republicans in the Senate had blasted the 1,924-page bill, which would fund everything from national defense to preschool programs, as a wasteful boondoggle that ignores voters' concerns over government spending.
The bill would have given Obama the resources he requested to implement his sweeping reforms of healthcare and Wall Street regulations, but at a level $29 billion below what he requested -- a dollar amount that Republicans who helped craft the bill had insisted on.
The bill also would have funded many programs that Obama has opposed, such as an extra engine for the F-35 fighter and some 6,600 pet spending projects, known as earmarks, that were requested by lawmakers.
FUROR OVER EARMARKS
Lawmakers have long used earmarks to curry favor with voters by steering federal dollars to their home districts. But in recent years, earmarks have figured in a number of scandals and voters increasingly view them as prime examples of wasteful spending.
Republicans adopted a voluntary ban on earmarks after the November election, which made it difficult for them to support a bill that included billions of dollars worth of earmark projects they had requested.
"If you went to 'H' in the dictionary and found 'hypocrite,' under that would be people who ask for earmarks but vote against them," Reid said earlier in the day.
Reid and many other Democrats have fiercely defended earmarks as a way to ensure that Congress retains its control over federal spending.
The two leaders have not worked out how long to extend current funding. Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell has introduced a measure that would last until February 18.
Until then, the government would continue to operate on the framework of an outdated budget that likely would make it difficult for federal agencies to cancel outdated programs and move ahead with new ones.
That could complicate efforts to implement Obama's signature Wall Street and healthcare reforms, but also place on hold thousands of more routine items like research grants.
The fiscal year began on October 1, but the government has been operating on an extension of last year's budget because Congress has been unable to pass any of the 12 bills that fund everything from prisons to scientific research -- or even pass a budget agreement that would set funding levels.
"As a result of not doing the basic work of government, here we are at the end struggling with this issue," McConnell said.
McConnell and other Republicans have criticized Democrats for focusing on other matters, such as an effort to allow gays to serve openly in the military. Democrats have blamed Republican obstructing tactics that prevent the chamber from operating efficiently.
Any measure passed by the Senate would have to be reconciled with a substantially different spending bill passed by the House.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

21 Comments so far
Show AllGasp!!!! Big surprise!!!
The fight was fixed before it started.
Joe
Do you suppose that ramming a $1.1 trillion, 1,924-page, pork-laden bill through in the waning days of a lame-duck Congress, after 61 Dem House members and candidates had been defeated in last month's election, might not have been a shining example of good government or consistency with the will of the voters?
James Carville had a few things to say:
Angry progressives are “like gnats” who won’t be able to stop Obama from being re-elected, said Democratic strategist James Carville. Carville said there isn’t a lot progressives can do to hurt the president other than “run around.”
As Andy Borowitz noted, "President Obama said he was "delighted" by his new deal with Republicans, in which he agreed to give them his lunch money."
I would only add that Obama is proving to be a much better Republican President than even Clinton was.
"I would only add that Obama is proving to be a much better Republican President than even Clinton was."
That was what I have been saying all along since the midterm. You are better off even with Dubya. You knew exactly what, when and how you will be screwed. But with Obama you don't have a clue. This tax bill would never have passed with Dubya as pres., had the Dem. fought tooth and nails to scudded it. You better hang on, the next two years maybe fatal. To many who are so cozy with Obama and the Dem., you maybe the next and I will sit back and laugh and say “I told you so.”
Obama's "signature Wall Street and healthcare reforms" are probably not worth the fight.
Obama's "signature Wall Street and healthcare reforms" are probably not worth the fight.
Under the new rules where Republicans need 41 votes to pass laws in the Senate, while Democrats need 61, it seems pretty clear which way things will go from now on.
Boggles the mind, doesn't it. But that is the agreed upon game plan.
Joe
So, if the Democrats are going to give in to the Republican agenda, why should we ever vote for Democrats?
Yup. Why bother? The Dems just give the plutocracy cover, so to hell with that, take away the cover.
Bingo!
Leave it to the clueless Democrats to keep falling for the Republican traps time and time again. In the end they'll keep on following "Barry the Piped Piper of Hamelin" to the Haunted Castle of Our Futures.
Wow, the only thing they can pass is a massive tax welfare bill for millionaires and billionaires, the cost levered onto the American people with massive borrowing from China and money printing. We ought to just acknowledge so-called "democracy" is a failure and get ourselves a China like politburo. I mean really, can they be any worse than the corporate whores we have now?
Speculate, Don’t be surprised it might happen with Obama and the Dem. Are you surprise the promised "Hope and Change" when you voted for Obama, and are you expecting such a mess were are in today? Were you the many ten of thousands in that stadium watching, cheering and crying for Messiah?
Obama and the rest of the fifth columnists in Washington are at war with the American people. Non-cooperation and control of local markets against the globalists is our best hope.
Obama may not have delivered on all of his campaign promises but he's made a big dent in them:
1. Health-care reform, even with the Republicans pulling every dirty trick in the book and then some
2. Wall Street reform, again even with the whining Republican party kicking and screaming that their pimps on Wall Street would be harmed by the bill
3. Saved millions of jobs with the auto company loans
4. Tax cuts for small businesses and the middle class
And quite a few more.
All this and with the same Republicans who caused this mess hoping he fails at every turn.
I would say that's quite impressive.
1. Health-care reform, .. This no reform! No one should profit from Healthcare and Education. Only a single payer will work. Obamacare entrenches the Healthcare industries forever. The next big blowouts will be student loans. It is much more potent than the home foreclosure.
I like to go on and correct your wishful thinking. Everything you have said is trash! If U continues to believe in Obama and the Dem. will deliver, fat hopes will only destroy this country.
Get real Obama is a liar. Everything that was wrong with Dubya, Obama makes it worst. We are still in Iraq, Afghan, Gitmo and will be there long into the future. You sound like the Black lady in a Town hall meeting on MSM, saying to Obama, "I am tired of defending you...."
WTF?
Have you lost your mind?
omg.....
Big shocker, eh?
Corporate DLC bastards!