Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Pentagon Destroys Thousands of Copies of Army Officer's Memoir
WASHINGTON -- The Department of Defense recently purchased and destroyed thousands of copies of an Army Reserve officer's memoir in an effort to safeguard state secrets, a spokeswoman said Saturday.
"DoD decided to purchase copies of the first printing because they contained information which could cause damage to national security," Pentagon spokeswoman Lt. Col. April Cunningham said.
In a statement to CNN, Cunningham said defense officials observed the September 20 destruction of about 9,500 copies of Army Reserve Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer's new memoir "Operation Dark Heart."
Shaffer says he was notified Friday about the Pentagon's purchase.
"The whole premise smacks of retaliation," Shaffer told CNN on Saturday. "Someone buying 10,000 books to suppress a story in this digital age is ludicrous."
Shaffer's publisher, St. Martin's Press, released a second printing of the book that it said had incorporated some changes the government had sought "while redacting other text he (Shaffer) was told was classified."
From single words and names to entire paragraphs, blacked out lines appear throughout the book's 299 pages.
CNN obtained a memo from the Defense Intelligence Agency dated August 6 in which Lt. Gen. Ronald Burgess claims the DIA tried for nearly two months to get a copy of the manuscript. Burgess said the DIA's investigation "identified significant classified information, the release of which I have determined could reasonably be expected to cause serious damage to national security."
Burgess said the manuscript contained secret activities of the U.S. Special Operations Command, CIA and National Security Agency.
Shaffer's lawyer, Mark Zaid, said earlier this month that the book was reviewed by Shaffer's military superiors prior to publication.
"There was a green light from the Army Reserve Command," Zaid told CNN.
But intelligence agencies apparently raised objections when they received copies of the book.
The Pentagon contacted St. Martin's Press in early August to convey its concerns over the release of the book. According to the publisher, at that time the first printings were just about to be shipped from its warehouse. Shaffer said he and the publisher worked hard "to make sure nothing in the book would be detrimental to national security."
"When you look at what they took out (in the 2nd edition), it's lunacy," Shaffer said.
The Pentagon says Shaffer should have sought wider clearance for the memoir.
"He did clear it with Army Reserve but not with the larger Army and with Department of Defense," Department of Defense spokesman Col. David Lapan said earlier this month. "So he did not meet the requirements under Department of Defense regulations for security review."
One of the book's first lines reads, "Here I was in Afghanistan (redaction) My job: to run the Defense Intelligence Agency's operations out of (redaction) the hub for U.S. operations in country."
In chapter 15, titled "Tipping Point," 21 lines within the first two pages are blacked out.
In the memoir, Shaffer recalls his time in Afghanistan leading a black-ops team during the Bush administration. The Bronze Star medal recipient told CNN he believes the Bush administration's biggest mistake during that time was misunderstanding the culture there.
Defense officials said they are in the process of reimbursing the publisher for the cost of the first printing and have not purchased copies of the redacted version.
At least one seller on the online auction site eBay claiming to have a first-edition printing is selling it for an asking price of nearly $2,000. The listed retail price for the second printing is $25.99.

50 Comments so far
Show All'National Security' = 'Don't mess with OUR money'.
Perhaps DOD should get together with Rev. Jones of Burn the Koran Day and light up a bonfire.
Hitler would have been proud. Isn't this why all those americans and others died to defeat the third reich and other fascist governments?
more "State Secret" crap!
all in the name of Notional Security.
The Ministry of Truth never died. it just got transplanted from Oceania to the Obamanation.
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
iGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
(From the Canticle of Orwell the Prophet)
ANY WAY you want to look at it, great way to hype the book....Edward Bernays would be proud.
Yes, but this is the redacted version.
next...
the banks , connivers themselves, will send notices:
"FUNDS UNAVAILABLE" ...coz you attempted to purchase or have purchased what are deemed
"unpatriotic", "threats to national security", "potential terrorist support", ....
just watch , it will happen if not already.
until one day:
"FUNDS unavailable" for FOOD...coz "due to attempted funding of potential terrorist organization" by Buying some antiwar poster somewhere, sometime long ago....or you were captured on a STREET camera or by a Neighbor's camera "comporting with a suspected terrorist", who knocked on your door distributing flyers to protest the banking industry...
and it will go on and on and on, snagging just about anyone (so long as you're not rich enough).....
>>Our country, the land of the "free," home of the brave, where democracy is more of a buzzword than a legitimate political system<<
... land of the FEAR, home of the HATE ...
I think the army just created a best seller...if this is an example of their intelligence dept. then God help us all.
I wonder if they have read the story of Pandoras' Box?
........ and I believe in Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, and the Tooth Fairy. Secrecy never accrues to the benefit of the society of which it is a part. Look what it has done for the Vatican.
Just saw this comment on Amazon suggesting contacting the publisher:
Operation Dark Heart is published by St. Martin's Press, which is owned by a bigger publisher, Macmillan, headquartered in New York. Macmillan in turn is owned by Verlagsgruppe Georg von Holtzbrinck, which is based in Stuttgart, Germany.
Macmillan's website is macmillan dot com
Pick the US site. At the bottom of the main page is a contact link which will lead you to their address, email, and phone number.
I am mortified to be told that, in the United States of America, the sale of a book can become a subject of inquiry, and of criminal inquiry too.
Thomas Jefferson
STOP using Orwellian terms. For those over 40 years of age, the word is "censorship," not the meaningless term "redaction."
Please look up the word, "semantics."
Fox is not my website of choice but they do have some additional detail on this topic:
"Specifically, the DIA wanted references to a meeting between Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer, the book's author, and the executive director of the 9/11 Commission, Philip Zelikow, removed. In that meeting, which took place in Afghanistan, Shaffer alleges the commission was told about "Able Danger" and the identification of Atta before the attacks. No mention of this was made in the final 9/11 report."
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/09/25/pentagon-destroys-copies-controversial-memoir-written-army-officer/
I think you've put your finger on the problem. I suspected something like this the very moment I heard about the Pentagon's shenanigans. Schaffer is one of those people who knows something about the 9/11 events and wants a new, that is a real, investigation.
One can only hope that the Wikileaks Uncondensed Edition of the book comes out in time for the holiday season.
Yes, agreed. It should have been safely "mirrored" in multiple places before he ever talked to a publisher. How many think this guy self-censored to the point where the book was never going to portray a truthful and complete story in any version? Maybe MIA censor here is an intentional distraction from other cover-ups.
The day Wikileaks releases some earth-shattering information I'll consider Asange and his boys to be independents. But till then I'm going to presume they're playing at disinformation and/or diversion. When Julian dissed anyone that thinks 9/11 was not as Bush said it was (and that is supposed to be the only time in 8 years that he DIDN'T LIE) I decided not to get excited about Wikileaks. It smells.
==CNN obtained a memo from the Defense Intelligence Agency dated August 6 in which Lt. Gen. Ronald Burgess claims the DIA tried for nearly two months to get a copy of the manuscript. Burgess said the DIA's investigation "identified significant classified information, the release of which I have determined could reasonably be expected to cause serious damage to national security."
Burgess said the manuscript contained secret activities of the U.S. Special Operations Command, CIA and National Security Agency.==
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Excerpt from a conference paper delivered in 1989, titled =Propaganda and Disinformation: How the CIA Manufactures History= by CIA whistleblower Vincent Marchetti, see Wikipedia. When 168 pages were redacted from his book, Vincent insisted that 168 pages throughout the new publication be kept BLANK. He wanted the reader to comprehend how much had been censored.
QUOTE ON
The real reason for the official secrecy, in most instances, is not to keep the opposition (the CIA's euphemistic term for the enemy) from knowing what is going on; the enemy usually does know. The basic reason for governmental secrecy is to keep you, the American public, from knowing - for you, too, are considered the opposition, or enemy – so that you cannot interfere. When the public does not know what the government or the CIA is doing, it cannot voice its approval or disapproval of their actions. In fact, they can even lie to your about what they are doing or have done, and you will not know it. As for the second advantage, despite frequent suggestion that the CIA is a rogue elephant, the truth is that the agency functions at the direction of and in response to the office of the president. All of its major clandestine operations are carried out with the direct approval of or on direct orders from the White House. The CIA is a secret tool of the president – every president. And every president since Truman has lied to the American people in order to protect the agency. When lies have failed, it has been the duty of the CIA to take the blame for the president, thus protecting him. This is known in the business as "plausible denial." The CIA, functioning as a secret instrument of the U.S. government and the presidency, has long misused and abused history and continues to do so.
QUOTE OFF
Trylon - leaning, speaking clearly into the potted geranium.
"Shaffer said he and the publisher worked hard "to make sure nothing in the book would be detrimental to national security."
you know what is really "detrimental to national security."?
the fact that the us goes around the world killing people and destroying economies.
ok yeah we get it "national security" equals obomber and the generals and the pentagon. anything that might harm this beast must be destroyed.
But as Wikileaks notes:
Burn all the books you want, Nazi punks. We already have a copy.
http://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/25607235096
Thank god. Publish now.
Do you still believe in freedom of speech?
Non Serviam - I will not serve.
"Do you still believe in freedom of speech?"
I can't say.
"I can't say."
Bravo. *applauds the wit*
You don't need to wonder what was censored from the book. It's in the Fox News story referenced above, just go to foxnews.com and put "Anthony Shaffer" in the search box. The story is dated 9/26 and is titled "Pentagon Paid $47,000 to Destroy Veteran's Memoir". You can also read about it in the wikipedia entry about Able Danger, the secret military unit of which Shaffer was a member. (The CNN story posted by CD is a tad thin on minor details like what was being censored.)
The censorship of this book is just a continuation of what military lawyers have been doing to Shaffer (who is a Lieutenant Colonel, not a small fry) for years. In 2005, Shaffer went public with allegations that prior to 9/11, DOD lawyers prevented the Able Danger team from sharing with the FBI information Able Danger had about Mohammed Atta. There have been official investigations of these allegations which big surprise always exonerate the DOD but there are a lot of dubious loose threads, including why won't the investigators interview key members of Able Danger, what motive would Shaffer have to lie, why have other military people corroborated Shaffer, why were the Able Danger files all destroyed, etc etc etc.
The whole thing stinks but there's no mystery about what was in the book. DOD lawyers don't want you the American people to know that Able Danger had foreknowledge of Mohammed Atta's activities before 9/11, wanted to alert the FBI, was prevented from doing so by DOD lawyers, and then when this information was given to Philip Zelikow, the Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission, he apparently did nothing with it--did not investigate--and is therefore arguably part of the coverup. And they wonder why people don't trust the 9/11 Commission Report?
Amen. There it is, in a nutshell.
Buying up and burning this book is an action in the style of Kim Il Sung. Very classy.
Joe
'There's more than one way to burn a book.'
__ Ray Bradbury
Down the Memory Hole? This will surely be a Wikileaks Best Seller
Well whack my pee pee and call me Mon Fuhrer, and just when I thought Bizarro Empire couldn't possibly get any more bizarre.
Thank you, thank you, oh THANK YOU, my brave and beloved protectors of my freedoms over there at the Pentagon. Burn those books, burn them, I say -- BURN THEM ALL!!!!
I wouldn't buy this book either.
Sounds like a psy-ops, DIA, Dept of Defense propaganda campaign to me.
Why would any author allow a book to be published after it has been "censored."
This is a lie and fraud once again.
The "first book" was not "destroyed." The second book is the "first book" and the rest is a bunch of typical Pentagon propaganda and to sell more of it with this trumped up "controversy."
I don't believe this b.s story at all.
Something ain't right about this crapola.
The JOKE IS ON YOU, NOT THEM!!! Wake Up People!
I agree, and I think they do 'limited hangout' psyops stuff like this all the time.
I suspect Wikileaks is the same kind of thing.
"Bush administration's biggest mistake during that time was misunderstanding the culture there"
Really! Sure had all of us here fooled. Say it ain't so.
Get the redaction engine out or better still the fire truck in Fahrenheit 451.
Royce
Our biggest mistake was holding off on impeaching Bush and Cheney. Digital dissent will never equate to street dissent.
Who do you mean by "our biggest mistake"? Obama openly defends his assassination list: that's where we're at. The law means as much to our politicians as the Geneva Conventions did in Abu Ghraib. Yoo for President!
Send the original manuscript to wikileaks.
Not national security - MIC security.
ABLE DANGER: Here's a good background source on some of the material that was redacted from Schaffer's book.
http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=able_danger
The History Commons also has a page on "Anthony Shaffer":
http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=anthony_shaffer
***
Lt. Col. Shaffer was featured on C-SPAN's Book TV over the weekend. He was engaging and somewhat forthcoming about the controversy surround the release of his book, but I think the most intriguing statement he made was that there will likely be breaking news about "Able Danger" within the next two weeks. Or, maybe it was just another PR tease. :)
WITCH HUNTS..
KANGAROO COURTS..
TORTURE..
SECRET CABALS..
BOOK BURNINGS..
etc...
ALL OFFICIAL AMERICAN policies...now brought to you, officially, by the Pentagon..
even Franz Kafka couldn't have imagined this nightmare...
Vote third party and party as OilyBomber is impeached.