Release of Secret Reports Delayed
Spy agencies foil Obama plan for transparency
WASHINGTON - President Obama will maintain a lid of secrecy on millions of pages of military and intelligence documents that were scheduled to be declassified by the end of the year, according to administration officials.
The missed deadline spells trouble for the White House's promises to introduce an era of government openness, say advocates, who believe that releasing historical information enforces a key check on government behavior. They cite as an example the abuses by the Central Intelligence Agency during the Cold War, including domestic spying and assassinations of foreign officials, that were publicly outlined in a set of agency documents known as the "family jewels.''
The documents in question - all more than 25 years old - were scheduled to be declassified on Dec. 31 under an order originally signed by President Bill Clinton and amended by President George W. Bush.
But now Obama finds himself in the awkward position of extending the secrecy, despite his repeated pledges of greater transparency, because his administration has been unable to prod spy agencies into conformance.
Some of the agencies have thrown up roadblocks to disclosure, engaged in turf battles over how documents should be evaluated, and have reviewed only a fraction of the material to determine whether releasing them would jeopardize national security.
In the face of these complications, the White House has given the agencies a commitment that they will get an extension beyond Dec. 31 of an undetermined length - possibly years, said the administration officials, who spoke on the condition they not be identified discussing internal deliberations. It will be the third such extension: Clinton granted one in 2000 and Bush granted one in 2003.
The documents, dating from World War II to the early 1980s, cover the gamut of foreign relations, intelligence activities, and military operations - with the exception of nuclear weapons data, which remain protected by Congress. Limited to information generated by more than one agency, the records in question are held by the Central Intelligence Agency; the National Security Agency; the departments of Justice, State, Defense, and Energy; and other security and intelligence agencies.
None of the agencies involved responded to requests for comment, saying they could not discuss internal deliberations.
"They never want to give up their authority,'' said Meredith Fuchs, general counsel at the National Security Archive, a research center at George Washington University that collects and publishes declassified information. "The national security bureaucracy is deeply entrenched and is not willing to give up some of the protections they feel they need for their documents.''
The failure to meet the disclosure deadline "does not augur well for new, more ambitious efforts to advance classification reform,'' said Steven Aftergood, a specialist on government secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists in Washington. "If binding deadlines can be extended more or less at will, then any new declassification requirements will be similarly subject to doubt or defiance.''
Obama laid out broad goals for reforming the system in May, when he ordered a 90-day review by the National Security Council. Government, he said, "must be as transparent as possible and must not withhold information for self-serving reasons or simply to avoid embarrassment.''
The review is part of Obama's efforts to make all government operations more public, including his decision to release White House visitor logs and set up a new office to expedite the release of government files under the Freedom of Information Act.
Among the revisions Obama said he wanted considered were the establishment of a National Declassification Center to coordinate and speed up the process, as well as new procedures to prevent what he called "over classification.''
But officials said an executive order that has been drafted by the White House to replace a disclosure order that Bush signed in 2003 is meeting resistance from key national security and intelligence officials, delaying its approval.
"The next phase is most crucial,'' said William J. Bosanko, director of the Information Security Oversight Office at the National Archives and Records Administration, who was appointed by Obama in April 2008 to oversee the government classification system. "It is a bit of a test. You have an administration that has committed to certain things and tried to shape the direction but then you have the bureaucracy which is very adept at resisting change.''
A key concern among intelligence agencies is that they could lose what amounts to veto power over disclosure of their secrets that are maintained by other agencies, according to several officials who have been privy to the agency comments on the draft executive order.
Also, a turf war has broken out over which spy agency should be represented on a panel set up in 1996 to hear appeals from people who are seeking the release of information. Obama aides want the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, set up in 2005 to oversee all spy agencies, to replace the CIA, much to the consternation of CIA officials, the officials said.
The White House is meeting even more resistance on its position that no information shall remain classified indefinitely. Depending on the type of information involved, the White House is proposing that virtually all classified information - not just some categories - be automatically released 25 years, 50 years, or in the case of records that involve intelligence sources, 75 years after they are created. The draft Obama guidelines, a copy of which were obtained by Aftergood, include an additional five-year extension for the most sensitive documents.
Defense and intelligence information undergoes a more rigorous review before being made public - often decades after it is generated - than more general government files that do not require officials to have special security clearances to handle them. The documents in question are considered part of the nation's permanent record, and therefore hold special historical significance. Only three percent of government records are so designated.
As the delays mount, so does the backlog of classified data to be reviewed. Aftergood and others worry that if automatic deadlines are not enforced, many documents will never reach the public because the agencies who have custody of them can continue to make the same arguments.
"The only way to get a handle on this is to allow classification to expire at some point,'' said Aftergood. "This is information that is not just from years ago, but generations ago. The new delay is discouraging because the innovations in the Clinton order are being subverted. That means even bolder reforms that some of us hope for will be that much more difficult.''
Still, even if such information is eventually declassified, that doesn't mean that the public will get to see it in a timely manner. Officials estimate that there are 400 million pages of historical documents that have been declassified but remain in government records centers and have not been processed at the National Archives, where the public can view them.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
34 Comments so far
Show AllIs anyone supprized?
I'm very afraid for your country, and your President,
that all these machinations(political& military} are a
"set-up" for a "false- flag" coup.
If Obama was for real:
Mc Chrystal would be an unemployment statistic.
Dubai- Shumbai.
Economy-Deconomy.
Hunker-bunker: Said Shit Approaches Said FAN.
It goes back even farther than the Viet Nam era. But we cannot acknowledge such things because it would destroy the myth of American exceptionalism.
A house (of cards?) built on sand, etc. etc.
We're getting into the 50-year zone since the Vietnam-war.
Many, many, many unsavoury deliberations of "All the Little Servants" (how's that for a book- or movie-title?) of Empire are about to be exposed, by automatic 50-year declassification. They and their followers are getting skittish.
The mindset from 50 years back has great relevance for today's situation (Afghanistan, Iraq, Latin America et al) and thinking. Revealing and confirming more closely what happened then will be revelatory of what goes on now.
Akin to "death by a thousand cuts" these people and agencies are now upholding "secrecy by a thousand delays".
No wonder the Obama-administration has troubles getting the documents out in public.
How anyone can continue to credibly rally in this turd's defense...
Quote: "Some of the agencies have thrown up roadblocks to disclosure, engaged in turf battles over how documents should be evaluated, and have reviewed only a fraction of the material to determine whether releasing them would jeopardize national security".
Jeopardize national security? My ass. No, actually, their asses; is what they're really talking about protecting and not U.S. [national security].
I wish they'd all stop bogusly or criminally misusing these terms, "national security", "national interest", "international relations", and similar references. They should know by now that many people know they're lying when they say that they can't disclose things due to ... any of these reasons.
The criminal gag order the Bush administration placed on Sibel Edmonds for several years was finally lifted and she gave a full disclosure or testimony on August 8th under oath; and what she says is supported by a former CIA official and a former FBI official or officer, among others. www.bradblog.com has plenty on this, including an article Brad Friedman posted August 25th for the full testimony and this includes the testimony on video, which he provided five Vimeo clips for. He also has more recent related articles and perhaps not everything he has on the Sibel Edmonds story is available in this immediate manner, but people who go to his website and scroll or page down while looking to the right-hand-side of the page will come to a subheading for articles about her. Clicking on the little that's with the following line of text opens up an expanded, within the same page, menu or index. It's definitely worth going through.
Once people know well enough about what she says and that it's now been stated under oath, we can see very clearly that when the U.S. government agencies, White House officials, etcetera, claim that they can't allow classified information to be made public due to "national security", etcetera, then they're LYING; most definitely. There may be an occasional time when they'd be truthful about this, but they evidently are usually lying and committing a serious crime. Some of these crimes are part-and-parcel of the supreme international crimes of war that the U.S. constantly commits.
And she's only one of many enough "whistleblowers" who have very important information the public really needs to know about.
Some people have broken away and spoken out to expose dark secrets of the CIA, etcetera, so we can certainly learn a lot from these people; but the government should still declassify a lot of what the agencies are refusing to allow to be declassified and obstructors should be treated according to sound legal measures. Those might need to be legislated, but they certainly could be, so they should be part of U.S. law.
Saving one's ass or oneself from embarrassment is NOT a question of "national security", etcetera; I think we can all agree. And what these people are pushing for is rather clearly against real democracy, and keeping citizens in the dark about important truths should be unconstitutional, if it isn't already that according to the Constitution.
This "secret report", much of it records of extreme domestic and international Constitutional abuses, is really about our democracy.
The fascists in these national security agencies who are blocking this declassification don't want their frequent Constitutional abuses over decades to be known by the public b/cv they desperately are trying to avoid being held accountable by our democracy.
Obama must show he's serious or we'll have to.
Winston Smith
More lies and deceit from Obama. The dictatorship continues uninterrupted. What are they hiding now?
Take a minute to listen to the videos and then think about our troops in harm's way, fighting the good fight, protecting the oil interests in the Middle East.
It is time to END these illegal (oil) wars. How about it? Sigh!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkavQvA1S9s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THZWCT65LbA&feature=related
Stop Press:- Top Ranking CIA Operatives Admit Al-qaeda Is a Complete Fabrication
http://polidics.com/cia/top-ranking-cia-operatives-admit-al-qaeda-is-a-complete-fabrication.html
In January 2007, I wrote to my alleged representative, Congressman Rick Larsen, asking why the newly Democratic controlled congress didn't begin impeachment proceedings against the Bush Gang.
His probably form answer lies below, with my answer to him. He never responded, but the one time we met face to face, when he realized who I was, he turned his back and walked away. I felt complimented.
------------------------------------------
I received the following from Congressman Rick Larsen (D-WA) regarding my call for impeachment. See my reply below.
Dear Steve and Adrienne:
Thank you for contacting me to express your support for impeachment proceedings against members of the current Administration. While I appreciate hearing from you, I want to let you know that I do not support pursuing impeachment proceedings at this time.
The new Democratic majority in Congress has achieved remarkable successes since January of 2007. We have increased the minimum wage, raised vehicle fuel efficiency standards for the first time in 35 years, passed the largest VA funding increase in American history and made college more affordable for working families by enacting the biggest increase in college aid in 60 years.
Yet we still have much work to do to address the problems facing our country. The process of impeaching an elected official is time consuming and very rarely effective. At this time, I believe that we should use the time remaining in the 110th Congress to continue to address the challenges facing our country and provide necessary oversight of the Administration.
While I do not support impeachment, I strongly support the vigorous efforts of the Democratic Congress to hold this Administration accountable for its actions. Democratic-controlled committees have already held over 500 oversight hearings on a wide array of topics, including the politicization of the Justice Department, the response to Hurricane Katrina, the Valerie Plame scandal and contractor abuse in Iraq and Afghanistan. Please be assured that we will continue to engage in aggressive oversight of this Administration as the 110th Congress continues.
Although we disagree on this issue, I hope and trust that there are many more on which we see eye-to-eye. Please continue to contact me about issues that are important to you.
Sincerely,
Rick Larsen
United States Representative
Washington State, 2nd District
First off, we doubt that there will be a 111th Congress if you people don't get rid of the Bush gang.
Secondly, We have watched C-Span, seeing you pundits orating to empty rooms so you can say what a good job you are doing. We have seen "Democrats" absenting themselves from critical votes so the necessary majority was not there. We continually see you out on the fund raising trail instead of doing the job you were elected to do.
Finally, we see you people giving BushCo whatever billions he wants to continue the slaughter in Iraq, if he will promise to please not veto your pork filled bills, to pay off your big corporate donors.
No, Rick, the only difference between Democrats and Republicans is the letter after their name. You are all the servants of the Corporatocracy that buys your souls and your votes. We the People are tired of hypocrisy and will be glad to see you go, all of you, if possible.
I have asked you, and my other two alleged representatives, why we cannot have the Constitution and Bill of Rights restored, intact and functioning, to the Halls of Government. None of you have ever replied to that question, though you are all very free with your form letters on other subjects.
I have communicated with hundreds of others who have asked the same question of their alleged representatives and they also have received no reply. Are you people too embarrassed to answer this question, or do you realize that having the Constitution back and functioning might disrupt the congressional-corporate gravy train?
We would really like to have an answer. Any chance of getting one this time?
------------------------------------------
As I said, no answer. Oh, I beg your pardon, in one other letter he said he opposed impeachment because he wasn't convinced that Bush had done anything illegal.
As you can see, nothing has changed in the last twelve years except some of the names and the raping of our national treasury has been pretty much completed, so the banksters can claim the highest profits in history and award themselves hundreds of millions in bonuses. And, of course, another million dead and dispossessed in foreign nations and our own working and middle class being driven into poverty.
Congressman Rick Larsen wrote: "I strongly support the vigorous efforts of the Democratic Congress to hold this Administration accountable for its actions. Democratic-controlled committees have already held over 500 oversight hearings on a wide array of topics, including the politicization of the Justice Department, the response to Hurricane Katrina, the Valerie Plame scandal and contractor abuse in Iraq and Afghanistan."
And out of these 500 oversight hearings, how many trials have their been held and sentences served? I can think of only one, Scooter Libby, who's sentence was commuted by President GW Bush before Libby spent even one day behind bars.
Great job Dumbocrats! Way to go. Your oversight will ensure that this kind of corruption will replay over, and over, and over.....
....until the time the People kick your fat asses out of public servitude and burn all your symbols.
camus13
How about a little help for out Weakness in Chief......
Call the heads of our many intelligence agencies into the oval office and say the following:
I want by Tuesday of this week a list of names of each and every person in your department that is holding this relase up. Do you hear me. Then each and every one of them is to be fired....and if I hear one more "I can't deliver" you will be fired.
Also since they are in violation of a presidential order I want the Justice Department to bring charges against each and every one.
Great President he is......MyChristal releases his report to the press a secret report and what do we hear....nothing. Now they don't want to release something and he folds like a tent.
Just when is this guy going to do something he said he was going to do when running for President.
This is a dictatorship, not a democracy.
duh. been like that for a very long time. most people were too busy
shopping to notice. now the chickens have come home to roost!
yeah no release your fired. obama plays the good cop and buys
himself time. by the time this battle is over he will be gone
and the next stooge whether it be moe larry or curly will be
left with this on his plate.
This is what characterizes the Obama administration. A two-layer thing. The "plans" and the reality. The two have little to do with each other. The mistake is thinking the plans are connected in a practical sense with the reality (of empire). They are a last ditch (in an historical sense) effort to stroke, in the people, the fantasies of government/corporate benevolence and "concern" and hold the public in a state of uncertainty, neither here nor there but sustained by a kindly look, an appeal to sentiment, a dangling hope.
I think it is extremely naive to think the "plans" are developed in good will but, unfortunately, are so innocent of reality that they keep being shot down or (better for propaganda value) dragged on...and on.
IMO, this "two-layer" approach will characterize the Obama administration from start to finish.
Yes, Arry, yes, I think I remember that "two-layer" thing quite well.
In fact, I remember that "two-layer" thing being explained by Obama himself several times during his campaign for president.
It's just that when Obama explained it and warned people about it, he didn't call it a "two-layer" thing --- I'm sure he called it that "Okey-doke" thing. And he warned people not to fall for that old okey-doke.
Yes, Arry, I think I even have a campaign video where Obama was warning black folks, in South Carolina, about not falling for the old "okey-doke" --- and he said they should not fall for the old "okey-doke" (or what you call that "two-layer" thing).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rtal0bsnJTQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7mH1SOlsfk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBXrqpOGLIc&NR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AII2yrwSeMA&feature=related
But now it sure looks like Obama himself is pulling that old "okey-doke" / "two-layer" thing on all folks --- wouldn't you agree?
Alan MacDonald
Sanford, Maine
Alan -- Yes, he's pulling that trick, but anyone who is hired to front the real power in the nation (and whose primary purpose is to filter reality into something that resonates with what the public prefers to believe about itself and its government) would have to do something similar. There is a disconnect that cannot be breached without admitting the ugly truth about our society, economy, and government.
The Bush administration was too naked, too obvious. The Dems come in and do their thing again.
Some may say that if Obama's "plans" continue to be negated (always "temporarily", of course) he will lose vital support. Well, he probably will lose support among many posting on CD, but there is a large group of "liberals" out there who not only draw from an infinite reservoir of wishful thinking but will fall for the "I'm an idealist but pragmatic" routine. What could be better fill the outline of the idealized "American"? Believe me, it will be played to the hilt in 2012.
I'll check your youtube links as I can. I'm out in the sticks with no broadband/DSL...just a very slow dialup. It takes about an hour to download a four or five minute video.
Obama has already covered up for the telecoms' data-mining of all of us, covered up for Bush-Cheney's lying us into war, torture, murder, rendition, perpetual imprisonment with no trial and no evidence.
So now he's refusing to declassify military intelligence documents on all of the above and it's news? At this point it isn't even a surprise.
The Audacity of Betrayal.
Malcolm X said it best.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znQe9nUKzvQ
"I think Panetta, and to a degree President Obama, are afraid --- I never thought I'd hear myself saying this --- I think they're afraid of the CIA."
Those words were spoken by Raymond McGovern in September in an interview with Brad Friedman on the Mike Malloy program. McGovern, an analyst for the CIA for 27 years has stated there are two CIAs, one that analyzes data, and the other, invisible to the public, that functions according to its own agenda.
Simply put, the American People are sheep to be sheared. Obama is just managing the farm.
'Our man" in the White House is the president whom the people of the USA chose in 2008, and he should start acting like it by taking control of his executive branch of the US Government of just get ready to have the national security complex give him his marching orders, and after that we'll have to, if we can, get a president who will act like he's the one who runs the executive branch as the US Constitution calls for. For someone who taught constitutional law at Harvard, this shouldn't be that hard to understand. If he's afraid of upsetting the big bad boys in the national security complex, he should remember Jimmy Carter reformed that gang to some degree, and even Gerald Ford seemed to make an attempt. Now it's this president's turn. If he can't handle it, he can easily be a one term president which is looking more and more likely with a foreign policy of endless and a domestic policy of taking care of the super rich and saying to hell with the rest of us. Yeah, that's a bit of a third term for W. Oh, well, aren't we 'all glad" we got this enlightened and bold leader for a president?
AD
Right you are, AD.
However, AD, as to your concern that the O-man is not confronting the global ruling-elite corporate/financial/militarist EMPIRE --- which controls our former nation-state democracy by hiding behind the facade of its two-party 'Vichy' charade of democracy --- that is a question that has not been seriously and courageously asked by any president since about 1961/1962 AD (After Death of democracy).
Those "bad boys" who you and others refer to, AD, threw down a pretty clear marker (or red-mark in the sand) after Kennedy was out of the way, and no succeeding president since has seemed to have found his voice against empire, as Eisenhower did regarding the MIC faction of the empire, and JFK did in even countermanding it in Cuba.
No, AD, hiding and mostly quietly subverting democratic Republic into Empire has been "berry, berry good to Empire" (as Chico once said of baseball), and when they needed to use a baseball bat, or some such thing, they have also been masters (one might say overlords) of hiding behind other things, like grassy knolls, and yet insuring that presidents got the correct 'bunt sign'.
Obama has certainly received the correct bunt sign from the real First Base Coach and anyway, the 'game' has now shifted in this 21st Global Century (as Luce might politely call it), so that Obama's skills (for which he was drafted), speed around the bases and pepping up the whole world's team, are what the General Manager has him totally focused on. [Apparently, despite his formidable shaking of pom-poms, ex-cheerleader dubya, was not enough of a 'transformative', post-partisan, post-racial, 'globalist' and global citizen model to serve the team's management for the coming World Championship.
Alan MacDonald
Sanford, Maine
Oh, BTW, the only presidential candidate to even mention, let alone publicly commit to confront, this EMPIRE, in say ... the last 50 years, has been Nader.
Nobody likes talking about Empire here in this American democracy --- least-wise presidential candidates. As it tends to be a "career ender", one way or the other.
0 promised transparency.
I can see right through him.
Excuses are "work" too. How dya' Obama and Mccain voters like yer' options now? We warned that a vote for Obama or Mccain is a vote for Bush's third term but who the hell listened? Shut up and take your punishment and let that be a lesson the next time ya' vote !
As I commented to the Globe:
The Globe's front page story, "Release of secret reports delayed" asks, but does not answer, what these 'secret reports' could contain, which now, nearly a century later is so dangerous to release to the American people, that they are still 'secret', nor how, and why, such secrecy is maintained so long in a supposed democracy.
The answer, of course, is that these 'secret reports' include analysis and 'techniques', used during what Luce called the "American Century" to subvert our democratic Republic into a covert empire ---- or to 'cross the Rubicon' more quietly than Caesar.
Although the time-frame of these 'secret reports' goes back to the era of Wilson (of which today's Global 'Ideas' section ironically contains an excellent book review), and which drastically accelerated during the later part of the 'American Century' (following World Empire War II), the nature of candid information and techniques crucial to the subversion of national or international democracies into empire is still very relevant in the 21st Century --- or what Luce might call "The Global Century".
Yes, America, our country, our democratic Republic, was during the politely described 'American Century' successfully and quietly converted by what Graham Greene might call a cabal of "Quiet Americans" into the American Empire --- though only a limited number of dangerous radicals like Chomsky, Chalmers Johnson, et al, impolitely use this more vulgar term.
Now, in the 21st century, the 'Global Century', the global ruling-elite corporate/financial Empire --- which controls their modern American headquarters by hiding behind the facade of its two-party 'Vichy' sham of democracy --- has continued and expanded its 20th century success by metastasizing the cancer of American Empire into its nascent Global Empire.
Naturally, information and techniques relevant to a successful 20th century empire transplant is highly valuable (and still must be kept secret) for even broader and successful use in the 21st Empire Century --- and thus it is not surprising that such "secret reports are delayed" --- forever.
What is surprising is that the Globe would place even a sanitized article about such deception on its front-page --- particularly given that empire subversion of the 'free-press' is one of the secret and seminal techniques so successfully used in the 20th century (and now the 21st) in subversion of democracy to Empire.
Alan MacDonald
Sanford, Maine
As Lord Acton said "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." What the hell is new about that. Yes the national security complex including the Pentagon and the CIA want to keep the power they've had for so long, but the president is responsible for seeing to it that this country has a democracy and accountability that the highest ideals of this country's founding fathers calls for. It's a tough job, but being a real president and really doing the job isn't supposed to be easy. Hell, don't take the job, if you can't take what goes with the job. You get to fly around on Air Force One and never have to have reservations the way plain old folks do, thus you're getting it pretty damn easy and have a big title, a nice official residence at taxpayers' expense like all presidents, and numerous other privileges and lots of power. Do something good with that power by reining the national security complex in before it completely eliminates what little democracy we have left in the USA.
AD
AD:
"Do something good with that power by reining the national security complex in before it completely eliminates what little democracy we have left in the USA."
Too late. It was a done deal on Nov. 22, '63.
Richard, right you are ---- although I think that AD is less naive than he appears in telling Obama, "Com' on big guy, dig down and tough it out".
Regarding what AD says about the perks of "flying on Air Force One", I heard a very interesting author, Steven Gillon, on C-Span's "Book TV" just yesterday.
Gillon, the author of "The Kennedy Assassination - 24 Hours After: Lyndon B. Johnson's Pivotal First Day as President", related a story he had unearthed in his research about the first person to find LBJ on Air Force One, before it took-off with JFK's body for D.C.
Apparently, LBJ was found by just this one now-dead AF General in the presidential bedroom suite, and specifically in its closed bathroom, uncharacteristically, curled up in a ball, with head covered, exasperated, and moaning, "THEY'RE going to kill us all".
If the story is true, and a 'tough nut' like LBJ was so unnerved by the apparent signal that the events in Dallas communicated, our overly polite 'community organized' who reportedly is so concerned with consensus and not offending anyone, might be excused for thinking, every time he takes a pee on Air Force One, not so much about the fabulous perks, but more about the repercussions of crossing that same EMPIRE.
Alan MacDonald
Sanford, Maine
Sources --- Brigadier General Godfrey McHugh, President Kennedy's military aide on the Dallas trip, sheds new light on the critical hours after the shooting. McHugh makes startling claims about Lyndon Johnson's behavior in the wake of the assassination.
http://justiceforkennedy.blogspot.com/2009/10/general-godfrey-mchugh-story-on-lbj.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-m-gillon/a-new-wrinkle-in-the-jfk_b_339026.html
Obey-ma obeys.
Obamopacity: It's becoming "perfectly" McChrystal clear!
boysgramps, "that's McKrystallnacht to you" --- and all of us.
"You want me on the wall. You need me on that wall."
"You want the truth?"
"You can't handle the truth."
boysgramps, it's not clear that America can handle the truth --- of the Global Empire that we have become.
It's just more comfortable to keep shopping and watching NFL and NASCAR, and let the Empire pretend to be guarding the wall, back there behind us "where the dark fields of the republic roll-on under the night."
Alan MacDonald
Sanford, Maine
with apologies to F. Scott
What the Christo-Corporate Thugs do is quickly becoming unimportant.
What would Jesus do?
What would Ghandi do?
What would Thidwick do?
Flush and start all over.
Humbaba, when you say "flush", do you mean flush, as in the toilet, or as in that big computer/communications memory in the sky?
Alan