Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Dairy Farming Crisis
WESTMINSTER WEST - Over the past few weeks, agriculture officials from Vermont and members of the state's Congressional delegation have been pleading with Washington to do something to help the region's struggling dairy industry.
Philip Ranney, owner of Ranney Farm, pets one of his cows in the pasture in Westminster, Wednesday. (Zachary P. Stephens/Reformer) Earlier this month, Vermont Secretary of Agriculture Roger Allbee met with U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack in Concord, N.H., to ask for an increase to the Milk Income Loss Contract, which provides farmers with a cushion when prices fall below a set level.
Sen. Bernard Sanders, I-Vt., wants the U.S. Justice Department to look into possible antitrust activities among the nation's concentrated dairy processors and on Tuesday, Rep. Peter Welch, D-Vt., told the House Agriculture Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy and Poultry that the state's dairy industry was on the brink of collapse.
Help might be coming, but if it arrives, it is going to be too late for one of Windham County's longest working dairy farms.
The 50 or so Jersey cows on the Ranney Farm are for sale and, after more than 200 years, the family has decided to get out of the dairy business.
The Ranney family has been working the land in Westminster West since 1796 and Philip Ranney is the seventh generation to try to support a family off the farm's high, rocky fields.
Ranney spent many sleepless nights weighing his options, but as he watched more money leave the farm every time the silver milk truck pulled away, it became clear that his future, and his family's future, was not going to be tied to what every day is looking more like a dying industry.
"It's the hardest decision I have ever made in my life," Ranney said earlier this week, before setting out to hay the fields on a rare, sunny summer day. "There's no money in this. I am in as much debt as I can handle. I don't see how anyone can make it."
The problem
Dairy farming is a notoriously volatile business and there are many reasons why more farmers like Ranney are calling it quits.
The money U.S. farmers get for their milk is tied to what critics call an antiquated and complicated national pricing system.
That system considers surplus milk powder, mega-farms in the West and Southwest with thousands of cows, and international economies, all of which have very little to do with Ranney's daily responsibilities of caring for and milking his animals.
Some experts point to a concentration in the number of dairy processors, which has left a handful of national and multinational companies in control of most of the milk in the country.
And the current worldwide economic downturn has cut into dairy sales, with national exports falling by more than 5 percent in the past two years.
Put all of this on top of the ever-increasing costs of feed, energy and living expenses, and Ranney said getting out of the dairy business was his only option.
"I am being paid less than what it cost me to keep going, and it was only a matter of time," he said. "I don't know how many farms are going to have to close before they do something."
Farmers are getting $11.28 per hundredweight and it is estimated that it cost between $17 and $18 just to break even.
When Allbee met with Vilsack in Concord a few weeks ago, the Vermont agriculture secretary asked the head of USDA to begin looking into the price support system.
Vilsack at the meeting admitted the system was not working for the nation's dairy farmers and said he would form an advisory group to recommend changes to the federal milk pricing system.
That group is coming together and an announcement is expected shortly on who will serve on the committee.
Allbee said Vilsack seemed willing to address the crisis, but he said the state's dairy farmers were in for some challenging times.
"These prices are something most farmers have not seen in their lifetimes," said Allbee. "Initially, some dairy economists said the prices would turn around, but now there is no indication they will turn around. It's very bad out there."
Allbee said the dairy crisis is his highest priority.
He called dairy processors from throughout the region to Montpelier this week to "gauge the seriousness of the situation."
"When you ask the people in Vermont what they want, they say they want a working landscape. Well, dairy farming is major part of that working landscape," said Allbee. "We have a national pricing system that is not working for our farmers and it is testing the ability of any farmer to survive."
Ranney understands that the problem has been brewing for a long time and there is no single solution.
He wonders, though, why the price in the store has remained relatively stable while his check was cut almost in half.
"Somebody has been making a lot of money during all of this," he said. "The companies are getting the milk dirt cheap. It's not just about production costs anymore."
Sen. Sanders agrees.
Sanders also met with Vilsack Wednesday and he held a conference call with reporters in the afternoon.
According to Sanders, Dean Foods, a giant multinational food corporation, controls about 70 percent of the milk produced in Vermont.
The company recorded $76.2 million in profits in the first quarter of 2009, a 147 percent increase, Sanders said, at a time when dozens of Vermont farmers like Ranney were making the hard decision to sell their livestock.
"It does not take Sherlock Holmes to figure that out," Sanders said. "They have enormous control. At a time when farmers were seeing a reduction in milk prices they were seeing a huge increase in profits."
Sanders was hopeful about his meetings with Vilsack and with U.S. Assistant Attorney General Christine Varney, head of the Department of Justice Antitrust Division.
But he said it is going to take a lot more work to save the state's dairy industry.
"It's serious and complicated and there are no magical solutions," Sanders said. "But I believe they are trying. The bottom line is that our dairy farmers are going out of business and our whole economy is suffering. It is imperative that we have a decentralized from of agriculture in America."
Solutions
Through the years Ranney has listened to the politicians, economists and agriculture experts, but all of the plans and promises got buried under his mounting debt.
He considered switching to organic production, but that sector, too, is struggling with oversupply and rising costs.
Milk prices last year shot to about $20 per hundredweight, giving him a little cushion to get his head above water, but the recent and sharp downturn quickly eliminated any money he was able to save.
During the last few months, when Ranney grappled with his decision, the news only got worse.
"The future is so bleak," he said. "You go back and forth, and sometimes you forget about the finances but then it comes time to pay the bills and there is no money. Every time the milk truck pulled in, I just watched more money leave the farm."
Ranney is a member of the Agri-Mark dairy co-operative, a group that includes 1,300 Northeast dairy families.
The Agri-Mark board recently voted to pay its members a premium above the federally set price, but that only added 30 cents per hundredweight, which Agri-Mark spokesman Doug DiMento admitted would not go very far to stave off the crisis "These are serious, dire, financial times on the farm and it called for unprecedented action," DiMento said. "We didn't want to wait, because there was a feeling that, if we waited, many members would not be around if things continued."
Rep. Welch told the House subcommittee this week that Vermont farmers need both shortand long-term solutions.
Welch wants Congress to increase the MILC support payments, saying that the moneyfarmers are receiving is not enough to keep many of them in business.
"We bailed out Wall Street and we bailed out the car companies, why shouldn't we bail out the people who grow our food?" Welch said in an interview after he testified in Washington. "Congress has to be made aware that this is a perilous time for the dairy industry and we have to react."
An increase in the MILC payments will help farmers weather this storm, but Welch said bigger changes have to happen to save the largest piece of the state's agriculture economy.
Welch said it is unfair and unrealistic to tie Vermont's milk prices to giant corporate farms in other parts of the country.
There should be regional price floors set, Welch said, and a greater effort to stabilize prices so the swings between the highs and lows are not so dramatic.
"If we are unable to provide immediate assistance we are going to see more farms go out of business," said Welch. "And once a farm goes out of business, it's not going to return."
The future
Ranney is not alone in his decision to get out of dairy farming.
In the past six months, 32 other farm families have sold their herds and there are 1,076 dairy farms left in the state, according to the agency of agriculture.
Since 2004, the state has lost 288 dairy farms.
Even large, corporate farms which have been somewhat immune to the low milk prices are starting to feel the pinch, and if there is any good news, it is that the situation may grow desperate enough to get some states to join together to demand change.
Until then, Ranney is trying to put together a plan.
He has hopes for a planned slaughterhouse in Westminster and said if things work out he wants to raise beef, pork, chicken and turkey next year.
He and his wife will likely have to find temporary work this winter and he'll assess his situation in the spring.
He plans to keep seven milkers, to sell milk locally, and 12 young heifers, so he can "get back into it" if things turn around.
His two boys, aged 6 and 3, don't know yet that the herd is for sale. Ranney said it was no small decision to stop producing milk and he always thought his sons would at least get the opportunity to decide for themselves if farming was in their futures.
"We're still hopeful and optimistic we'll be able to come up with a business model that works," he said. "We're keeping our fingers crossed. I'd love to see the eighth generation farm here."
- Posted in



21 Comments so far
Show AllI personally have no dog in this race because I don't consume dairy products. It is clear, however, that this story is just more sad evidence of the the ongoing and tragic corporate consolidation of yet another agricultural sector. Look for increasing problems with consumer dairy products over the next ten years.
Of course, all of those problems will be blamed on organic dairy farmers.
q
I know prices are too low, but the cost of feed must play a part in the equation.
If the pastures are sparse, due to inability to retain moisture, consider creating a more humid and cooler "microclimate" using the Atmospheric Vortex Engine to act as an "artificial tree" to increase cloud cover over a region.
Ref: http://vortexengine.ca
The water necessary for this during the summer could be obtained from Lake Champlain.
Vermont does not need a more humid and cooler climate. It's short growing season, little sun, and hilly ground not suitable for row crops, are why it is a center for dairy farming.
But surely other stuff could be done with the land. Maybe sheep and wool production, or goats. Goat milk and cheese is increasingly popular, and Halal-certified goat meat for the booming Middle eastern and Muslim population in parts of Canada.
"As if" global warming hasn't been affecting Vermont!
I'm not from Vermont, but in the picture included with the article, the hillside vegetation looked quite sparse to me. Doesn't mean, however, that moisture alone will solve the problem.
I don't think there is any "fix" that will make a small farm economical with 2.00/gal milk. However, I do believe there could be a number of "energy efficiency" design changes that could be made to improve production from each head and to minimize utility consumption and milk losses. Frequency variable vacuum pumps could be one of them. I(retired MIT ChE grad) would have to go and take a first-hand look. (underunderscorehog at yoohoo)
If not northern Vermont, then in the southern half of the state (or in another state) the method could be employed, if a suitable water source were available.
Permaculture--multicropping, organic, agriculture and homesteading based on nature and natural principles--may not be the whole answer but it's an absolutely necessary major part of the answer. It has to be protected from corporate agriculture and the USDA, FDA and other wholly-owned subsidiaries of huge corporations, as do our rights to practice life and agriculture as it suits us and not Monsanto, ADM and Cargill.
Just ask the Faillaces about sheep dairying in the region. Or read "Mad Sheep".
Factory made milk,
factory made eggs,
factory made bacon,
factory made corn,
Just what the factory worker needs in order to die young, and create jobs for the next generation of factory workers, who will then do it for even less of that factory made food.
our local stores have been engaged in a gradual low-priced milk war for a while, now...$1.99 a gallon is pretty standard around here (Seattle), where it used to be more like $3 or $3.50...what are y'all paying?
$4.29 Canadian in BC for 4 litres (1.10 gallons for US $3.81 or $3.47 a gallon).
But then milk, eggs and cheese are the things we get at the gas station in Blaine on the way home ;).
MARKETING BOARDS.......In Canuckistan north of the border here in WA. Those provincial marketing boards control QUOTA where the QUOTA allotment soon become the most valued asset of a dairy farmer with one farmer buying up other farmers quota etc when they leave the business.......but the spin off is that the farmers get a "fair" price for their product. Production quantities are controlled so that prices are not driven down by over production.
This is viewed as communism here in the USA because generally speaking the majority of Americans are IDEOLOGICALLY HANDCUFFED.
Yes, Canucks load up on dairy products in WA when heading back north, who can blame them .......because those diary marketing boards have the farmers interests in mind, which of course means higher prices for the farmers AND for the consumer. Remember though USA has perhaps the LOWEST COST FOR FOOD as a percentage of your income of any nation. I think it is time to be a wee bit more generous to the farmer here in the USA.
$1.99 here in Wisconsin.
The problems of local dairy farmers are many and diverse. From food prices, to urban sprawl; from legislative interference to job skill requirements. I'm afraid that Freewheelin Franklin has it pretty close to right. Here in New England, much of the pasture land has grown into housing developments because younger generations did not want to invest the labor involved in farming and took the quick cash. There really isn't the land available to grow the grass necessary to sustain large herds, so we import hay from Canada (more carbon emisions) and farmers who are trying to stick it out are being nickled and dimed to death by taxes, lowering of prices paid and growth of costs.
Perhaps we do consume too much dairy in this country, but the family farmer provided a stewardship of the land that is rapidly dying out. People buy vast tracts of land, and let the land go fallow, full of weeds followed by vermin. They don't want to sell the hay because they want 'natural' settings and also don't want the smell of manure spread to fertilize the land. The feeling that one is part of the land is no longer the norm.
I recall my grand-father and his generation talking how we kids would never know what had been lost. Now I find myself telling my grand-daughter that her generation will never know what I have known.
And life goes on.
"And life goes on."...for some better, for most worse.
And some cannot go on.
One good way of keeping business sustainable is to cap personal net worth and power direct democratically. The US has by far the most billionaires in the world and one of the worst wealth/power distributions. We need to share.
"It does not take Sherlock Holmes to figure that out," Sanders said. "They have enormous control. At a time when farmers were seeing a reduction in milk prices they were seeing a huge increase in profits."
Looks like you've been milked, buddy, and now you're whining like a baby.
Forgot where you put that pitch fork? Forgot to stand up for yourself?
The information that the media would need to put such a story in the context that people could make sense of is carefully avoided to keep the people from understanding what is really going on. The media would have to look at historical commodity price fluxuations and their causes. We don't know if dairy consumption is going down or not. We don't know if dairy supply is exceeding demand or not. We don't know if the mega-farms are dumping their dairy or not. We don't know if the processors are colluding or not. Understanding what is going on requires access to the key information and the ability to make sense of it, but the people are quite capable of making sense of it. The problem is the elites are withholding the information, to protect their oligarchy from the tyranny of the rabble.
Too bad he can't sell from the farm. Free roaming Jersey Cows = top quality milk.
He is competing with factory dairy practices where cows are jammed together in a small enclosure.
Regulations are restricting him and I am sure the lobbyists from the factory dairy are doing their best to put his kind out of business. Not Fair!
The cost of natural gas and crude dictates how much it costs to raise cattle fed grain. By grazing, he is using the sun to produce feed for his cows vs. gobbling up a non-renewable resource.
People will pay a little more to buy his superior milk if they knew this!
Noticing a bunch of cows all going the same direction on a hillside a kid (over 19 yrs.) took note.
A friend smoothly came out and said, that that breed of cow was made for hill country because their legs on the left side were shorter and they always traveled the same direction.
We almost had him convinced, but some people were laughing too hard which made him suspect something wasn't right about that.
rtdrury,
You seem to possibly neglect what the article says about cies like Dean Foods. As the price dairy farmers get for their milk drastically drops, these processing cies see their profits seriously increase, and this should not be permitted; it should be prohibited. The government could possibly, or probably, treat this sort of situation as illegal racketeering, price gouging, ..., illegal and they can call it whatever they want.
After all, these farmers are pretty much stuck, not having real choice about processors to sell or supply the milk to.
A similar thing happened with meat animal, beef anyway, farmers in the province of Quebec a few or several years ago, when the farmers saw their prices per weight drastically drop to the point of putting these farmers into bankruptcy, or else borderline, and slaughterhouse cies made much fattened profits and stores didn't sell the meat for less than before. The suicide rate among farmers in Quebec was around 10%, although I don't know if that was an increase, or if it was this high before.
Governments should provide for legislation that protects producers from middle parties and resellers gouging or trying to gouge the producers. Protect consumers and producers, and keep the middle parties straight.
My brother-in-law has raised cattle near Hope, Arkansas, for almost 25 years. These are beef cattle, not dairy cows. Now over 70, he would like to sell his herd, get out of the business and leave the state. However, the present price for small herds of beef cattle is prohibitively low while the price of hay to winter over in that area is high.
The reason why the profit for beef cattle is practically nil, I was told, is that milk profits are so low that dairy farmers are selling their cows for beef and the market is flooded. This has brought the price of beef cattle so low that he is afraid he may lose his shirt.
[Dairy farmer] Ranney "wonders, though, why the price in the store has remained relatively stable while his check was cut almost in half."
"Somebody has been making a lot of money during all of this," he said. "The companies are getting the milk dirt cheap. It's not just about production costs anymore."
"According to [U.S. senator] Sanders, Dean Foods, a giant multinational food corporation, controls about 70 percent of the milk produced in Vermont."
It should be noted that Dean Foods has a brand called "Horizon" which is sold nationally for a premium price as "organic," when it is in fact only 50% organic [in total violation of USDA rules for organic certification]. See cornucopia.org.
Perhaps educating consumers about this criminal corporation's unethical policies would help to solve the problems facing New England dairy farmers.
A lot more perspective on Dean Foods' (and the Obama administration's) part in this crisis is here:
http://www.grist.org/article/sen.-bernie-sanders-cries-monopoly-in-a-collapsing-milk-market/#preview
"Sen. Bernie Sanders cries 'monopoly' in a collapsing milk market"
by Tom Laskawy, July 17, 2009