Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
A Mutiny Among Militia Threatens Peace in Iraq After US Airstrike
BAGHDAD - A mutiny in the ranks of a key Iraqi militia credited with helping US forces to defeat al-Qaeda in the region is threatening to plunge the country back into sectarian violence.
A rebellion by some members of the Awakening Councils, a Sunni Arab paramilitary force of more than 90,000 men, could unravel the enormous improvements in security since 2007. If left unchecked, it threatens to push the country back to the brink of civil war, pitting Sunnis against Shias, who dominate the Government.
In the latest violence, a rare US airstrike last night attacked a group of Awakening Council men north of Baghdad who were suspected of planting a roadside bomb. One person was killed and two were wounded and arrested. A fourth man was not found.
The attack came days after some of the worst fighting in Baghdad for two years when Awakening guards clashed with the Iraqi Army after their leader was arrested on criminal and terrorism charges. Iraqi soldiers moved into the Fadhil district last Sunday and ordered fighters to surrender their weapons.
The crackdown alarmed other Awakening units who fear they are being unfairly singled out by the Government for sectarian reasons. Scores of Awakening guards, many of whom fought as insurgents before switching sides, have been arrested in the past fortnight, increasing suspicions of a witch-hunt.
Nouri al-Maliki, the Shia Prime Minister, said that the operation in Fadhil followed months of investigation. "The issue was not for political or media purposes," he said in a television interview.
The offensive sent a message "to those who are following the same path taken by the gang in Fadhil that their fate will be the same," he said.
The renewed violence will be greeted with alarm by the US military, which is cutting its forces in Iraq thanks to the reduction in violence. The Awakening Councils were a key part of the strategy developed by General David Petraeus, whose "surge" of US forces two years ago was credited with pulling Iraq out of its descent into civil war and defeating al-Qaeda.
One leader in the restive province of Diyala said that the Government did not trust the Awakening movement because it was made up of Sunni Arabs. "We fought al-Qaeda, so how could it be that my guys are terrorists?" said the man, who goes by the nickname of Abu Iraq (father of Iraq). "I do not trust my Government."
Awakening Councils were conceived in 2006 following talks between US and British Special Forces and other military officials with Sunni Arab tribal leaders in Anbar province - then the heart of a resistance that was tearing Iraq apart.
The Sheikhs had either supported or tacitly approved of the insurgency, but had been repulsed by the indiscriminate killings by groups such as al-Qaeda in Iraq. They agreed to recruit thousands of fighters to turn against the extremists in return for a monthly salary from the US military.
The initiative caught on and spread across the country. Insurgents who once received cash for planting bombs against the coalition forces took up guns under the payroll of US officers to protect their neighbourhoods in one of the most significant turning points of the war.
Many members of the Government, however, opposed the creation of the largely Sunni armed force outside the police and army. They remain concerned that the Awakening Councils are infiltrated by al-Qaeda and other militant groups.
Under a long-term plan drawn up by the US military and agreed by Iraqi leaders, responsibility for the Awakening Councils was gradually handed over to the Iraqi authorities. A fifth of the men were supposed to be absorbed into the Iraqi security forces, with the rest given help to find civilian jobs.
The Government took responsibility for the last of the Awakening Councils on Thursday, but little progress has been made in recruiting any of the guards, who man checkpoints in once violent neighbourhoods in Baghdad and other provinces.
Officials insist they are committed to working with the guards but budget shortfalls this year because of a drop in the price of oil, Iraq's main resource, are restricting the plans. The explanations offer slim comfort.
Abu Iraq, who commands about 1,000 men, said almost 500 had been laid off without the prospect of further employment and there was no sign that the 530 still with jobs would be accepted into the security forces soon.
"The danger is that the violence starts again in our neighbourhood. There are many guys with no jobs," he said. "This is a big, big disappointment." Making matters worse, a lot of the Awakening Councils complain that they have not received a salary for up to three months. Some guards are refusing to turn up for work and leaders warn that the status-quo cannot continue for much longer. They say they will stay at their posts without pay, but many of their men will quit.
Abu Safar, who leads a band of 100 Awakening guards in the Baghdad neighbourhood of Adhamiya, once an al-Qaeda stronghold, said a quarter of his force was on strike because of the lack of wages.
Asked what would happen if his men no longer manned checkpoints in the area, which has slowly returned to life over the past year, he said: "It would be like before. We will be back to square one."
An Iraqi Army spokesman said salaries would start to be paid again from Monday, but the Awakening guards are skeptical. "Just like everyone else, I will have to wait and see if that happens," said Abu Safar.
- Posted in

31 Comments so far
Show AllThe more we continue to believe we can make a difference through military means the more of a mess we will continue to create. This article hints at the divisions that make a real democracy in Iraq an impossibility, at the corruption that abounds and shows rather plainly the need to drastically change our strategies.
Removing our military, replacing our current expenditures on weaponry and such and, instead, focusing upon civilian needs, building roads, schools, assisting the economic development of each area within Iraq seems a much saner way to get people to shun the blandishments of religious extremism.
By the by, being that Iraq has oil revenues can they not afford topay this burden themselves?
-Removing our military, replacing our current expenditures on weaponry and such and, instead, focusing upon civilian needs, building roads, schools, assisting the economic development of each area within Iraq seems a much saner way to get people to shun the blandishments of religious extremism.
Before the US/UK takeover, Iraq was the least religious country in the region. Women had high positions in the government and as profesionals. It was safe to walk down the street. A million more of them were alive.
The Iraqis want to sell oil. Why can’t Americans just buy it like everyone else?
They also had the finest hospitals in the entire region......None guarded, all looted...Of course sanctions had decimated them already.
amen.
"The Iraqis want to sell oil. Why can’t Americans just buy it like everyone else?"
Because Bush wanted to invade Iraq and get it for free. That way, the US would be able to break the back of OPEC and then US corporations could make huge profits.
Wait a minute! What you are suggesting is what the Soviet Union was doing in Afghanistan in the 70's.......Zbigniew Brzezinski convinced President Carter that,"If, the Soviets are successful with their economic and educational program, they would then move their program to Iran" So, President Carter put up 500 million dollars to destabilize Afghanistan......Then ZB wrote "The Carter Doctrine" declaring that the U.S. had the right to use military force when its "Vital Interests" were threatened by any outside force in the Persian Gulf Area....
The "Destabilzation Program" did not stop ..... Reagan invested billions along with the Saudis to recruit an "Islamic Militant Force" of 100,000 men from 43 Muslim Countries. (Operation Cyclone)
That Islamic Force was put into a Data Base and became known as Al Qaeda.
Now, there were no Al Qaeda in Iraq as of 9/11/2001. There were no Al Qaeda in Iraq as of February 27th, 2003........Now, all we hear is Al Qaeda here and Al Qaeda there......Do these guys have any identification that shows their membership in Al Qaeda...If their names were in The Data Base, then the CIA should be able to identify all their members.
The Sunnis were the "Insurgents" that were fighting to defend themselves against an "Invasion Force".......General Petraeus got the bright idea to pay them to be a "Peace Keeping Force".....Ole' for Petraeus....But, The Shia hate the Sunnis and once the money ran out,the Shia leadership started to target that peace keeping force.....BOOOO!! The Sunni are supported by the Saudis because the Saudis are Sunnis. (So, why aren't the Saudis paying for the 100,000 member "Peace Keeping Force"? At $300 per man per month, that would be 30 million per month......Come on, isn't peace worth it?)
The "Power Elite" want to keep the battle going so that an "Occupation Force of 50,000 Combat Forces and the 100,000 Mercenaries" can remain in Iraq to protect "American Vital Interests"........
What the soviets were doing in Afghanistan in the 70's:
http://www.ciaonet.org/cbr/cbr00/video/cbr_ctd/cbr_ctd_52.html
The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan was a repeat of their invasion of Czechoslovakia. For months after the invasion, hardly a political or military expert in the world doubted that Afghanistan was now forever incorporated as a part of the Soviet Empire and that nothing short of a large-scale global war could alter the status quo. And global war was most unlikely as both super powers intended to avoid it. Some Westerners recalled the British experiences in Afghanistan and waited for a Soviet "Vietnam" to emerge, but most Westerners believed that the Soviets would ultimately prevail. Some even projected their European fears to southern Asia and envisioned a bold Soviet strategic thrust from southern Afghanistan to the shores of the Persian Gulf, to challenge Western strategic interests and disrupt Western access to critical Middle Eastern oil.
The initial active resistance by the Afghan military was confined to a short battle against the Soviet Spetsnaz 1 unit storming the Presidential Palace. However, the stunned citizens of this geographically isolated land immediately rose to defend their land. In defiance of the wisdom of conventional warfare, the citizens armed themselves, gathered into loose formations and began to attack and sabotage the superior occupying force's personnel, installations, depots and transport with any available weapons (to include flintlock muskets). Open resistance flared so quickly that only two months after the invasion, (on the night of 23 February 1980) almost the entire population of Kabul climbed on their rooftops and chanted with one voice "God is Great". This open defiance of the Russian generals who could physically destroy their city was matched throughout the countryside. The Afghan warrior society sent thousands of warriors against their northern invader.
Entry into the Maze
Communist power was established in Afghanistan on 27 April 1978 through a bloody military coup. President Nur M. Taraki, the new president, announced sweeping programs of land distribution, emancipation of women and the destruction of the old Afghanistan social structure. The new government enjoyed little popular support. The wobbly new government was immediately challenged by armed resistance fighters. The Army of the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan began to disintegrate as bloody purges swept the officer ranks. In March 1979, the city of Herat rose in open revolt. Most of the Afghan 17th Infantry Division mutinied and joined the rebellion. Forces loyal to Taraki advanced and occupied the city while the Afghan Air Force bombed the city and the 17th Division. Over 5,000 people died in the fighting, including some 100 Soviet citizens. This event may have lead the Soviet General Staff to start intervention planning. 2
Soldiers, units and entire brigades deserted to the resistance and by the end of 1979, the Afghan Army had fallen from about 90,000 to about 40,000. Over half the officer corps were purged, executed or had deserted. In September 1979, Taraki's Prime Minister, Hafizullah Amin, seized power and executed Taraki. Amin's rule was no better and the Soviet Union watched this new communist state spin out of control and out of Moscow's orbit. The Soviet Politburo moved to stabilize the situation.
HMMM not at all what I suggested I think.
That is the trouble in paying mercenaries.... When will they ever learn?
So now it is obvious that was the truth behind the "Surge"... While the money lasts!
You mean the surge isn't working?
How long does a surge last?
OK I'll take a shot at my own Question
As long as it takes to make the guy who got us into it out and put the end of surge mess onto the new fall guy.
And the Banks will loan our money for the profiteers.
We need to unite the opposition to this world War party over us.
Truth, Justice and more Peace for all of us.
Thanks for not laughing while I talk to myself.
What do you mean "not laughing"?
But that's ok, anyone who can keep the chuckle of the Car and Drive April Fools joke going is all right with me.
The potentially explosive situation between the Sunni Awakening Council militias and the Maliki government (and Shiite militias) has been deteriorating for several months.
One thing that seems to be consistently omitted from the news reporting - this article being no exception - is just what supposed "terrorist" activity the recently-arrested Awakening Council leader is alleged to have taken part in. One would think this would be a major talking point for the Iraqi government and the US occupation force PR machine, since the arrest involves prosecuting a fairly high profile local political figure. But the underlying offense remains shrouded in official silence, as far as I can tell.
Small wonder then that unpaid, striking, or laid off former Sunni insurgents are getting edgy, particularly if another roundup of detainees is also underway. I guess this must be what General Petraeus meant during last fall's presidential campaign, when he said the much ballyhooed success of the surge had brought about "fragile" stability inside Iraq. Sort of like the eye of a hurricane.
Bill from Saginaw
Who do we have to bribe now?
funny...the "surge" strategy now collapsing in iraq is being "surged" in afghanistan...sometimes i wonder if the bush-petraeus-gates-obama team doesn't know exactly what they are doing. "surge" in iraq, have some drop in deaths, right thru the election cycle, so iraq is off of page 1 and largely voided as an electoral issue (and obama gets to say "i was against the iraq war...but the surge has worked beyond our wildest expectations" and he gets to look like he has a strategy for the escalation in afghanistan that he's promised all along.)
i can see it now: surge in iraq "works" for a time, so now "surge" afghanistan. that "works" a bit, so now "resurge" in iraq. and then "resurge" in afghanistan. and then "reresurge" in iraq (except Team Obama will come up w/some new-fangled terminology. won't that be "swell"? here's some suggestions: billow, climb, deluge, eddy, flow, gush, heave, mount, pour, ripple, rise, roll, sluice, stream, swirl, tower, etc.)
man, we could keep doing this crap for decades.
Yes that's "their" long term strategy, in the meantime WE never get focused and they never get bothered.
We are watching a wag the dog scenario designed to entertain us more than anything! Meanwhile the real news stands in a blaring spotlight too bright to look at for very long, too complex to think about.
Back to Hollywood, Sports and Rush!
Obama messed up when he didn't set the course straight on the futility of sending our military and youth to hunt down people who hate us on the other side of the planet in their OWN country.
They think we are so high tech. that we can tap everybody's phones and computers and control the backlash. Common sense tells me that's impossible!
Now he will get sucked in even with the best intentions.
The surge is an illegal war crime that created nothing but more disgust and hatred of the USA. Thing is, not many in the military or the broader population of the USA who support any aspect of the surge from the war crimes to the increased numbers of troops. It is Hell on earth for these Iraqi people thanks to the Bush administration and now his unlikely progeny, Obomba.
We need to turn our entire program around. We need to apologize to the people of Iraq and Afghanistan not continue the war crimes and evil practices of Bush. The surge is a war crime not a success. We need to shut down the torture facilities and bring these poor souls to the USA where they can receive proper treatment and the full support and protections of our legal system. We need to say clearly that what Bush did was wrong and go after him and his cohorts for there many crimes against the USA and others in the world. We need to turn the people of Iraq, especially those that have fought our occupation, into our brothers and sisters. Love is what is needed.
And remember don't trust anyone that says anything like "war on terror" or "we must root out terrorism" or use the name "al qaeda" in any sentence. And those nasty little word changes (ordered by the Military in theatre or Bush political operatives in Iraq(yes actual Republicon party officials in Iraq running things during the Bush years) as an example -- press is literally controlled a lot more than one may think) like "insurgents" which literally means "rebels" or "freedom fighters" it some how just sounds more sinister. Even valid words like "cleric" when they talk about members of the Islamic clergy which is exactly the same as "clergy" or "clergyman" but then they sound different or somehow not like us even though the fundamental aspects of the Islamic religion which literally means "peace" are the same as we Christians. It's not so bad when you blow up a group of clerics in a mosque as say blowing up a group of clergy in there church even though the phrases mean the same exact thing. It's all a part of the psychological deception operation designed to allow the defense crooks to steal trillions from our treasury. As for people who use these words in their speech or writings, don't trust them one bit, they are either deceived themselves which makes them idiots or they are a member of the dark side.
Seriously try changing words in AP stories to the non-sinister sounding variants then rereading what you just read. It changes the entire affect of the story on you-- even though the words mean the same thing or you are even more accurate such as freedom fighter for militant or insurgent.
Everything that happens in Iraq is calculated, sort of like the cold-blooded massacre in the concentration camps at Gaza. You destroy their infrastructure and economy, making everyone poor. You, then, arm opposing groups and inject a small amount of money for them to fight over...the losers will die or go hungry...they are fighting for survival.
From time to time, you blow up a mosque, false-flag operation style, to make sure that there is never any reconciliation. And, so, we are "forced" to stay in Iraq and loot their resources.
Genius!
Amir
The king is dead, long live the king.
Anybody wanna bet that the planners in the Pentagon are creating a new profit opportunity in Iraq?
***
I think we've seen this sick movie before. The fact that the Iraqi Awakening is being deliberately antagonized with air strikes, withholding of pay and random arrest and assissinations reminds me very much of a quote I've read ascribeed to the Israeli terrorist/general Moshe Dayan:
DAYAN, Moshe:
ISRAEL'S STRATEGY OF INTENTIONAL TERRORISM
In Israeli Prime Minister Moshe Sharatt's personal diaries, there is an excerpt from May of 1955 in which he quotes Moshe Dayan as follows: "[Israel] must see the sword as the main, if not the only, instrument with which to keep its morale high and to retain its moral tension. Toward this end it may, no - it must - invent dangers, and to do this it must adopt the method of provocation-and-revenge...And above all - let us hope for a new war with the Arab countries, so that we may finally get rid of our troubles and acquire our space." Quoted in Livia Rokach, "Israel's Sacred Terrorism."
Source: The Origins of the Palestine-Israel Conflict, p. 15
http://www.cactus48.com/1967war.html
http://www.cactus48.com/
***
I'm also reminded of the infamous quote from Ron Suskind:
[QUOTE]
The aide said that guys like me were "in what we call the reality-based community," which he defined as people who "believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality." ... "That's not the way the world really works anymore," he continued. "We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors…and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do."[1]
[END QUOTE]
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality-based_community
***
In sum, what I believe we are about to visited with is a completely cynically organized escalation of chaos in Iraq for the sake of furthering the goal of maintaining and perhaps expanding U.S. military profiteers involvement in Iraq. I pity the poor children in America (as well as Iraq) who will be paying for the arrogant follies of their elders for generations to come. This is madness.
Obama speaks of peace, and no more nukes, but at the same time, the generals of the Bush Administration, are still useing Air Srikes against Pakistan, Iraq, and Afghanistan, and more killings. When Obama visits other countries, is it to encourage them to send in their troops to the above countries? The new blackwater gang is in Israel, and the Jews wish to strike Iran, and if they do, that means WW3 will soon be. America will jump in to help Israel, because that is also, what Obama/Bush want. More of our young will be sent. If,- like in the 30's, when America was in the same mess, as of now, Americans were drafted, and forced to go to war. The Bush regime still lurks in the shadows.
THE NEED TO DEFINE AMERICAS COLLECTIVE CONSCIENCE ONCE AGAIN
The BUSH BUNCH OF THUGS put us into Iraq and Afghanistan for only one reason to get land to build pipelines for oil and gas to flow from the GIANT TENGIZ north in the Caspian Sea. Now that is fact not fiction and is not as some say a conspiracy theory just google all you want using those few talking points and the web will teach you what you need to know. The GIANT TENGIZ is land locked and the field has trillions of dollars of reserves for Chevron, BP and a few others. Then google new military bases built or being built in Iraq and Afghanistan. Then you like me will know we have been coned by the NEO-CONS again. And it should come as no surprises to any that there remains the NEO CON fallen few yet known 5 to 7 thousands buried deep and wide in the military and political arena in DC. Now how is President Obama going to clean up that mess?
We must look at family and social impoverishment of our many Americans from ages 13 to 28 that have had profound negatives impounded on them while young. Scarring of ones goodness found in their innate conscience is a problem that we have as a nation that must be solved. Long arduous tear filled years living with lies upon lies being told to Americans to disguise the robbery from all of US in our people, jobs, benefits and the plundering of our communed treasury has left those mentioned in a state of debate ---- not knowing the good for that was robbed from them when young.
So what should we do? ---- Those of us 5 million strong and not inane to the political games should JOIN IN and form our own advocate group to lobby for us in Washington DC. To bring a real and long lasting change that will give all HOPE again to right the many wrongs that have laid in wait to destroy our younger generation to govern our nation soon.
So what are we to do? ---- A good idea is for us to form our own lobbying efforts. The concept is not new ---- the Grange did a similar thing and changed the way our federal Government worked ---years ago and they remain today in Washington DC. http://www.nationalgrange.org/
In some foreign countries advocates for the people are doing likewise, in America today many advocates to help those with disabilities are do the same.
Now FOLKS we are 5 million strong, simply saying that we must mount a front to confront the ones who use money thrown at lobbyist to get what they want that most times is against the populous NEEDS, WANTS and WISHES.
We the People in Unity
Declare
We believe that our United States of America has grown in population such that our voices in representation in our federal government has diminished to a degree that we must in solidarity form our own We the People Advocacy to lobby in Washington DC. To make our voices heard once again.
When we were a young nation of less that five million the size of our Congress and Senate had an ear to the grass roots needs of our people. Our population now is over three hundred million and the size of our Congress and Senate has not keep up with our growth. Therefore We the People in Unity declare that our city, counties states and Federal Governments have grown too centralized, too intrusive, too exclusive and too expensive.
We believe in Constitutional oversight by the people, smaller governments, Rights to Life for everyone in civil liberties, federalism, and taxes that span the great gulf of all our contributing members and resources and be assessed with equity for all.
We the People in Unity want to make a stern call to all elected and charged to govern us to end laws and programs that don't work, eradicate the laws, programs and agencies that cause harm, and cause a call from our Department of Justice to summons those that have clearly violated the basic tenets of our Laws in our Constitution to be held to account.
We the People in Unity want the power to restore the full force of ALL the amendments, in our Constitution which will bring back the power to us to govern ourselves in all needed sane sanguine and society social functions and end NOW our needless and warrant less wars ---- and in the future ----deny the use of all preemptive aggressive wars that have robbed from us our people and our communed treasury.
DWIGHT BAKER
WE NEED YOU
TO JOIN IN TODAY to have your VOICE and VOTE heard once again JOIN IN
We the People Advocacy WTPA
Contact dbaker007@stx.rr.com
If I were a sunni arab in Iraq today, and the Shia came for me, I'd make damned sure we went to hell together. The Sunni are the ones who prefer living in the 21st century...the Shia had it best back in the 8th century, and that's where they want us all to go. To refer to Islam as anything other than a cult does great disservice to 700 + years of European effort to kick thier sorry asses of the end of the continent.
Well, the Sunnis are as modern as a bunch of guys who want to bring back a succession of 7th century caliphs can be. If we're going to get 21st century here, let's kick European Christianity off the end of the continent while we're at it. This would leave the rest of us, business people and gourmets, uninterested in ethics or the source of reality, in our wonderfully peaceful, enlightened secular world of capitalists and Marxists fighting over material crap.
http://hnn.us/articles/934.html
If the members of these Awakening Council are representative of the Iraqi people, in that three hundred dollars is more precious to them than their nation's freedom and independence, putting an end to the violence comes down to simple mathematics. Specifically, to 3.6 billion dollars monthly per million bought off Iraqis. And even if three million Iraqis had to be turned into mercenaries, that would still be cheaper than the 12 billion bucks that currently are being wasted there in this military occupation. Indeed, this "buy them off" approach might do the trick in Afghanistan, and at a lower cost, since, historically, at least, the Afghans are used to a lower standard of living than the Iraqis. Thus, if three million Afghans can be bought off at, say, the bargain price of $2,000,000,000/monthly? Ending the bloodshed? Wow! Wouldn't it be worth it? One big problem, of course, is that mercenaries are notoriously unreliable (remember how fast the South Vietnamese puppet army folded after the U.S. troops pulled out). Not only that but there might be tension between the unbought off populace & the mercenaries. Then, down the road a year or two, suddenly, as in the "Battle Of Algiers", the entire nation erupts, throws out the remaining French (er, American) troops, puts the mercenaries on trial & take back their country. Alternatively, of course, the foreign troops could get the hell out of Iraq right now & save how many lives and billions of dollars?
yourstruly- "If the members of the Awakening Council are representative of the Iraqi people," The Sahwa, or Awakening Councils, are Sunni. Maliki's US backed government is Shi'ite. Of the 100,000 Sahwa, 20-40% are "spies," dormant insurgents. As the US hands over the reigns to Maliki's Security Forces, much of the Sahwa fear being turned on, Sunni vs shia-Bhagdad got mostly CLEANSED of Sunni's. The uprising in the Sunni Bhadad slum last week presages civil war as the US draws down. AQ is allegedly recruiting.....
You are right-we need to get out. Now. Completely. And call in the only good Air Atrike of the war-on that obscene embassy.
US Blues
medical marajuana will save the planet.
nomorebombs-do you live in a state w/ med marijuana provisions?
From NorCal's Hills. Where growing weed is required by law.
US Blues
How long will it take for the genuises who run these things to realize that money is not the universal panacea? Certain things just cannot be bought.
US elites don't mind corrupting the Sunnis with bribes. The more corrupt they can be made, the better as partners in crime.