Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Number of Chronically Hungry Tops 1 Billion
LONDON - The number of chronically hungry people has surpassed the 1bn mark for the first time as the economic crisis compounds the impact of high food prices, the United Nations' top agriculture official has warned.
A boy displays a placard during a feeding program inside a Catholic church in Manila March 27, 2009. Child advocates group, Akap-Bata Philippines (Hug a Child), in a statement said on Friday, disapproves the result of a recent survey released last Monday by Social Weather Stations (SWS), an independent pollster, stating that hunger situation in the country has eased from 23.7 percent to 15.5 percent from December 2008 till March 2009. Akap-Bata Philippines said that the outcome of the study is absurd especially in this time of deep domestic crisis. The placard reads "Social services not war; Food not bullets". (REUTERS/Romeo Ranoco) In an interview with the Financial Times, Jacques Diouf, director-general of the Food and Agriculture Organisation, warned that the increasing numbers of undernourished people could trigger political instability in developing countries.
"The issue of world food security is an issue of peace and national security," he said, urging world leaders who are discussing ways to resolve the economic crisis not to forget that last year more than 30 countries suffered food riots.
The Rome-based organisation estimated last year that about 960m people were chronically hungry in 2008. Mr Diouf said that had since risen and "unfortunately, we are already quoting a number of 1bn people on average for this year".
Before the food crisis started in 2007, there were less than 850m chronically hungry people in the world, a level that has been roughly constant since the early 1990s owing to the global fight against poverty and countries such as China lifting their economic growth.
Mr Diouf's assessment signals that the food and economic crisis have reversed the past quarter-century's slow but constant decline in the proportion of undernourished people as a percentage of the developing world's population.
The percentage fell from 20 per cent in 1990-92 to a low of just below 16 per cent in the 2003-05 period. But with 1bn people chronically hungry now, the percentage has risen to almost 18 per cent.
As a consequence, the FAO's director-general proposed ditching the UN's Millennium Development Goal of halving the number of the world's undernourished by 2015 and replacing it with a target of "eradicating hunger by 2025". He said to meet that aim, the world should learn from the mistakes of the 1990s, when investment in agriculture fell sharply, paving the way for the surge in food prices of the past two and a half years.
Mr Diouf is pressing world leaders for a summit in Rome in November to tackle the roots of food insecurity, rather than to continue reacting to every crisis with ad hoc measures. "The food crisis is not over," he said, warning that although international benchmark prices for major agricultural commodities such as wheat, corn, rice and soyabean had fallen from last year's peak, they remained almost 30 per cent above the 2005 level. He added that domestic prices in developing countries had not tracked the drop in international prices as their crops had been disappointing.
Now, he said, "the financial crisis is worsening the situation by increasing unemployment, limiting the credit for trading [agricultural commodities] and lowering remittances, which in poor countries were used to purchase food".
"Combining all the elements we are in a very unstable situation," he added.
At the proposed summit, Mr Diouf said that world leaders should commit to investing in agriculture, particularly in the developing world, as the rise in the world's population from today's 6.5bn people to 9bn by 2050 will mean the world needs to double its current food output.
He added that leaders also should agree to revive the FAO's Committee on World Food Security, elevating it to ministerial level to "allow policy decisions [to] be made".
Mr Diouf said that several heads of state and governments already back its idea of a summit in November to tackle the food problem. Previous summits, however, have yielded few policy results.
- Posted in



13 Comments so far
Show AllWe need to focus on LOCALIZING both domestic and foreign food economies. Schumacher college invited a 'think tank' of prominent thinkers (including economists) to address the current economic crisis, building on the idea of a Green New Deal based on tenets of Ecology, Economy, Equity and Ethics.... Check it out at www.e4declaration.org or read the current issue of Resurgence magazine (out of the UK but available in plenty of independent bookstores in the US).
In all honesty the US doesn't give a rat's hiney. Those people can find some way of feeding themselves or die early because we aren't going to help them. A country that can't manage to budget the food, health care or housing security standards that Cuba has isnt' somebody to turn to for help.
Sorry kids; no help here.
The hungry pay for our dinners. Bubble capitalism leads inexorably to mass die-offs among the poor. It is calculated into the mathematics of greed. 'I will have a thousand times as much, so that a thousand have nothing.'
I wish the poor would come and starve right on the dining room tables of the rich.
No, uneducated children having children, ad infinitum lead to mass die offs. Their world can't support such a population, and our world, the world of educated compartmentalized bloggers, can't understand their circumstances.
This issue makes me sound so insensitive, but the simple fact is the Earth has too many humans right now! It is not sustainable! Our fish stocks are depleted, water is becoming a global issue, and the food supply is being run by idiots like Monsanto without regard for long term consequences.
Hunger is caused by poverty, which is caused by unequal distribution of resources, which is caused by power-mongering among wealthy and military fools.
BIRTH CONTROL is the only answer. Feeding these billions of starving people will just mean they will breed billions more to feed, a never ending cycle.
China's One-Child-Per-Family Policy Prevents 400 Million Births, Official Says
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com
/articles/56392.php
If China can do it so can India, South America, Indonesia, and Africa. The entire freaking world can. By reducing the worlds population we reduce the demand for it's limited resources and thus cut down dramatically on global warming.
Why can't you progressives see that? Oh, I forgot this is all bushes fault, the repulsakins fault, any ones and everyones fault but a liberals, progressives and those breeding all these children.
A total ban on birth would be even better, say for 20 years. Then the world should go into the one child mode for a few hundred years. China has the right idea, it just doesn't go far enough. If we don't do it, nature will do it for us, and millions, no billions will suffer. A world with few children that were treasured by all would be a wonderful thing.
I completely agree. Birth Control is it. Put contraceptives in these people's charity food. The last thing the world needs is another billion people who only eat and produce methane... which leads to global warming.
Bush is definitely to blame here, not solely, but he certainly compounded the problem. He did his best to shut down any and all US govt. sponsored birth control programs.
Capitalist agriculture has played a major role in global food shortages
In the 1970s we "subsidized" farmers to overproduce; the surplus going into salt caves and school lunches - remember the orange cheese wedges.
Still had a surplus, which the tax payers had paid for - turn it into food aid and feed the world - Public Law 480 and the World Food Program swing into gear. US shipping benefits and we get credit for feeding the world.
Only problem, we put local farmers out of business. We could ship food from Iowa to Dar es Salaam, cheaper than the local farmer could produce and ship from Iringa, the "bread basket" of Tanzaania. (Substitute Ouagadougou or Kinshasha or Kigali)We handed out scholarship to the elite who got hooked on Mac Burgers and Fries and who had an interest in substituting a western diet for boring old indigenous food.
We put the local farmer out of business. There used to be lots of work for his kids who were well fed from the land. They had to produce more kids to poduce more food. Now they can't afford to grow crops and feed the kids.
During the height of the Ethiopian famine in 1985, I was visited by a white South African who was selling agricultural implements in a big box - one per family - And guess what ...the natives can use the boxes as coffins.
The ever lovely face of capitalism - and Mr Wolf, have you had your vasectomy yet - I suggest a do it yourself kit.
trucking food across continents- how is that energy efficient-- we must localize food.
China does not have as serious a problem with hungry children as India-- why- because each family only has one child and that one is the center of the family and the whole family feeds the child. GOOD!
The Catholic Church is completely irresponsible in their attacks on birth control. They have to be some of the most sadistic people on the planet to be encouraging hunger and poverty the way they do. When they encourage life that they know damned well is going to starve to death. It is beyond belief how these people could say they are for life? We need more birth control instead of allowing these people's voodoo philosophies to reign supreme.
Most European Catholics completely ignore this rule. That has been the case for decades. Italy, France, Spain and Ireland have low birth rates, below the replacment rate and similar to their Protestant neighbors.
The danger is to poor Catholics in India and Africa who do not yet have employment opportunities, education, nutrition, obstetrical care and pediatric care. When a woman has prospects for a job or career, reasonable assurance that infants will survive, and legal access to contraception, the birth rate goes way down.
But I say if the Pope doesn't want to have children, he should not. Most Popes have followed that practice.
Joe
Years ago, the main source of birth control in Kinshasa, Zaire was the Catholic Relief Warehouse.
Tons of food aid, crates of birth control - none of it official...but there none the less.
AIDs has been the main driver of birth control. STD control is far more important than birth control.
The main problem, the men leave the farm for the city and the military, take up with the bar girls and pick up AIDs. They come back home several times a year to repopulate the family. Guess What ...no protection...lots of AIDs.
AIDs, Malaria, Tuberculosis all hit during the rainy season when all of the labor is needed. With most of the work force out of commission, the work does not get done and a vicious cyle of hunger and poverty set in.
It has nothing to do with population control and everything to do with disease control - we ended malaria, yellow fever, samllpox and polio in the US..Why can't we do it in developing countries?
We are too busy balming the church and the politicans and ignoring the root causes of poverty, starvation and malnutrition.
One of my friends, whose sister is a nun, told me that she has nine friends who became nuns. She told me that nuns who participate in the community overwhelmingly support birth control after seeing the difficulties people have providing for large families. Those whose major activities are in convents oppose birth control.
Perhaps every priest, bishop and cardinal should have to spend time in medical facilities in poor areas where STDs are rampant. Seeing things in person can change minds. Example - liberation theology in South America.
Clerics have to get out there. When you are economically supported, have no children to care for, and all you see on a daily basis is pageantry and dress-up, you are not based in reality.
Joe