Hidden Homeless Emerge as US Economy Worsens
SACRAMENTO, Calif. - Emergency shelters brimming with homeless people in California's capital are quietly turning away more than 200 women and children a night in a sign of the deteriorating U.S. economy.
The displaced individuals on waiting lists at St. John's Shelter and other facilities often turn instead to relatives or friends for temporary living quarters, perhaps moving into a spare room, garage or trailer. The less fortunate might sleep in their cars or a vacant storage unit.
They are the hidden homeless. And their ranks appear to be growing as rising joblessness and mortgage foreclosures take their toll in Sacramento and other U.S. cities, experts say.
U.S. President Barack Obama recognized the trend in his televised news conference this week, saying, "the homeless problem was bad even when the economy was good," and he vowed to bring greater government resources to bear to deal with it.
"It is not acceptable for children and families to be without a roof over their heads in a country as wealthy as ours," he said.
A "tent city" of up to 200 homeless in Sacramento was thrust into the media spotlight last month as a symbol of the battered U.S. economy. California authorities said this week they would shut down the illegal settlement and find other shelter for its residents, most of them chronically homeless.
Homeless advocates say they expect such encampments, which already exist around the country, to spread as the housing crisis worsens and shelters fill up.
"I think there's a slight trickle of people who've been at risk of homelessness who are winding up in tent cities or knocking on shelter doors," said Michael Stoops, director of the National Coalition for the Homeless in Washington. "I expect a tremendous increase in homelessness over the next couple of years."
Stoops, who has worked with the homeless for 35 years, said the newly dispossessed often retain some income and seek initially to downsize or find cheaper accommodations.
WORST NIGHTMARE
"Their worst nightmare would be winding up on the streets, in a tent city or a shelter," he said. "That's the last stage. They will do everything they can before that happens to them."
Maria Romero, 52, who held a series of low-paying jobs over the years before steady work became hard to find, said she lived out of her automobile for a year before reluctantly moving to St. John's Shelter in January.
"I'd rather be by myself. My car was my own space," she said, adding she would never consider living in a tent city.
"It wouldn't be safe, especially for a single female," said Romero, a high school dropout forced by circumstance to live in a car or shelter more than once in her life.
Her experience illustrates the complexity of homelessness in America, where the most economically vulnerable are often the first to fall through the cracks during hard times.
The latest national figures, in a January report by the National Alliance to End Homelessness, actually showed a 10 percent decline in the homeless population two years ago -- from about 744,000 per night in January 2005 to nearly 672,000 per night in January 2007.
But 36 of the 50 states reported increases and homeless advocates worry that the national trend will be reversed because of the deepening recession and housing crisis.
As of 2007, the report said, 42 percent of homeless people in the United States, and 70 percent of those in California, slept on the streets, in cars, tents or abandoned buildings.
The "Skid Row" area of Los Angeles is thought to have the nation's highest concentration of homeless, with more than 5,000 counted in that 50-block area in 2007.
Experts say it typically takes six to eight months to go from losing one's home to turning up at a shelter doorstep. Some already have noticed more than a trickle.
RUN ON THE SHELTERS
"I've never seen it like this before, and I have 30 years of experience working with the homeless," said Darlene Newsom, head of the UMOM Day Centers emergency housing project in Phoenix, Arizona, where the number of homeless families seeking services has doubled in the past three months.
Loaves & Fishes, a Sacramento charity that supports the homeless, now provides a free lunch to about 650 people a day, up about 10 percent from a year ago, but private donations to the organization have been flat.
"We are struggling to keep our doors open," director Joan Burke said.
Nearby St. John's Shelter, which caters to women and children, has been running at or near capacity for months -- filling roughly 100 beds a night -- with a waiting list well over twice that long, case manager Kellie Dockendorf said.
This is up from the daily average of 80 women and children turned away in 2008. And getting in can take up to 45 days.
The mix of clientele is changing too, she said.
"We're getting a lot more working people. We're getting more people with education. We're getting a lot more people who are working part-time or not getting enough hours to pay their bills," she said.
Keysia Bell, 38, had made a living as a caregiver for the elderly until full-time work became harder to find.
After a period of paying to stay with friends or relatives for weeks or months at a time, then renting a house she could no longer afford, she ended up at St. John's two months ago with her 17-year-old and 10-month-old daughters.
"I'm out of a job. I'm out of a place to stay. I have a baby daughter, and it all just became overwhelming," she said.
(Additional reporting by Tim Gaynor in Phoenix; Editing by Doina Chiacu and Mary Milliken)
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
48 Comments so far
Show AllFor decades, during economic downturns people could turn to welfare. That "terrible" program enabled them to obtain enough aid to keep their families together and a roof over their heads until options could be found. This saved many, many lives, protecting citizens from potentially life-threatening existence of homelessness in American. And there was no "trap of dependency"; of the largest welfare program, AFDC, some 80% of recipients voluntarily quit welfare in under five years. That's an outstanding success! When periodic downturns occurred, the aid available was just enough to keep families from losing everything.
When gov chose to raid public funds to cover the costs of a quarter century of massive "tax relief" for the rich, we were too indifferent to learn that their arguments to justify this were false. That's a true tragedy, and we see the results today.
When people hit on hard times today, there is no safety net, and they simply crash. Many don't get through it in one piece. They lose everything they have worked for, and far worse, they lose their families. Those who manage to hang on will find that it's much, much harder now to get a foothold, to rebuild a measure of security for their families.
We did this to ourselves. Our political leaders told us that welfare -- social insurance -- was a scary monster, and we said, "Eeek!"
The wealthy and the corporatists in both parties are responsible for this mess. Everyone needs to support Obama NOW just as we did to elect him. I follow alternative News Media as a retired well educated (social asciences)woman. We need to petition and hold the current administration's feet to the fire. If we don't, the corporatists win at our devastating loss. The stimulus package still won't be enough according to all economists including the Nobel Peace Prize winner in economics--Paul Krugman. We need to charge the corporations and all those making over $250,000. If you are homeless, camp out in front of your state capital and demand to be heard especially if your Congressman is Republican or a corporatist Dem. Blue Dog.
I know one thing---my husband and I will be putting signs up to turn in a wealthy neighbor--a V.P. from Citicorp if the people break into rebellion. However, these people have the latest automatic weapons and unscalable fences surrounding their mansions.The signs will say "Corporate Citibank CEO lives here" with arrows to his home.
Annabee
This is so sad! I wish I had a job & I believe I would donate to my local homeless shelter. If shit don't turn around soon, I might be in the homeless line.
Where's the rich & famous when you need them? Where's Warren Buffett? Madonna? Oprah? Obama?? Julia Roberts? All these millionnaires & not one is doing anything to help!!!
Disgusting. Hopefully, they'll lose all their millions & see how they like living hand to mouth. Greedy bastards!!!
And for all those who keep their noses buried in American Idol......SHAME ON YOU!
Tons of out of work home builders + tons of people with out homes + tons of bank managers that rig the system against home ownership = a ton of horse sh*t
Exactly!!! You have hit a nail on the head. Our financial system does not allow for co-existence unless there is a monetary benefit to all parties. If there is no money, what is the answer? Bartering? Or a willingness to combine resources, talents and expertise for the common good.
The "common good" has no value on Wall St. therefore the point is moot. (Unless Wall St. doesn't exist) :).
Instead of helping the losers on Wall Street, the US should be helping the people that have their lives destroyed by these financial psychopaths.
capitalism in america at it's core necessitates that the working poor develop urban/suburban survival skills in the 21st century. people either learn the skills or they parish or languish in our prison-industrial complex.
900 years ago a person had to know how to survive in the wilderness for a myriad of reasons. however, b/c people lived in a symbiotic relationship w/ the land (at least in many places around the world, like in north america where the mound builders grew corn and squash along the mississippi river). most people were aware of these skills.
what does a person need to survive today in a post industrial 21st century setting? (using the most rudimentary standard - our standard - work/$/bread - an extension of the standard adopted 7-8000 years ago when we adopted an agrarian model)
our death culture has detached itself from reality to such a degree that it (society) refuses to acknowledge the external costs of a post-industrial society: the ravished forest, polluted oceans, poisoned fields, the hostile concrete jungles called cities, the broken masses, the mandated servitude to an elite that manages (behind closed doors) to make everything keep marching along at the pace of a military march, 6/8th time.
so the working poor (homeless, potentially homeless), should familiarize themselves w/ basic urban-suburban survival skills. i believe these 'skills' should be taught in public schools in 8th grade (remember home econ).
which govt agencies should a person turn to ?
how does a person deal w/ law enforcement w/ot an address ?
where does one find shelter ? - (cemeteries, marginal green spaces, abandoned buildings - auto's w/ open doors)
where does one find food ? - (dumpsters, panhandling, soup kitchens).
how does a homeless person develop the psychological tools to cope in a society that stigmatizes people based on their economic status ?
it's similar to a complicated simulated online video game for the participants, and like competitive video games there are many that never make it to level 22 (apt, fast food job, used car) let alone level 31 (overpriced mortgage, medical insurance that doesn't provide care, car payment, credit card payments, etc..).
why should anyone be surprised this is what america has been reduced to, considering our support of death squads around the globe (also feeding on the blood of the most vulnerable)?
what i find interesting is the resilience of the american people on the lowest rungs (marx's lumpen proletariat). they already understand the primary survival skills. they are capable of becoming the army of the people or the army of the religious right.
but the middle class (credit cards, gated communities), they can not fix their sink or landscape their yards (let alone dumpster diving) - these skills were
abandoned long ago.
these skills (survival skills) need to be reintroduced into our modern lexicon. to be fully human a person should be capable of meeting basic needs (although complex today), the ability to survive in any setting (water,fire,food,shelter), all of us should study the lessons of the homeless as we may wake up in FEMA camps one day.
our comfortable standard of living (all of us are conversing over computers) ultimately is responsible for these human disconnects.
also 'hidden homelessness' is an oxymoron in america. for despite the MSM's desire to pretend their isn't a pandemic of homelessness, (as well as crack addiction, methamphetamine addiction) in america - the local newspapers and courtrooms provide ample evidence to the contrary.
entrenched poverty (including periodic episodes of high rates of homelessness) is an intrinsic part of our capitalist society. a few win, many lose.
how does one of the most progressive cities in corporate america deal with it ?
pamphlet handed out in berkeley...
http://www.berkeleyfreeclinic.org/download/Homeless%20Survival%20Guide.pdf
the most honest account of homelessness i've found on the web, that looks at the issue objectively, provides advice to people in such a circumstances...
-- Survival Guide to Homelessness --
http://guide2homelessness.blogspot.com/2004/10/im-not-bum.html
{ "I've been thinking about writing this book, a guide to living well, for years. People think it will be easy to be homeless, that it is a lazy choice. Nothing could be further from true. Homelessness is very hard work. Homelessness can be very uncomfortable until you solve some basic problems. It is vital, for instance, to have a place of concealment. It is vital to assure that you will be warm, and to provide for safety, and for hygiene, and for communications, and even for a source of income. If you are newly homeless, you will not be meeting all of these basic needs, and to the extent that you don't, you will pay for that. This book will teach you to meet those needs effectively and fast." }
the table of contents...
{ Introduction to the Project, Controlling Desperation, Get Comfortable Lying, I'm not a bum! , Advantages of Homelessness, The Car Cover, Parking, Hygiene on the Road, Truck Stops, Shelters are for Someone Else 1, Shelters are for Someone Else 2, Employment, Staying Warm, Keeping Cool, A Word About Violence, Addictions, A Message to Homeless Teens. }
¡Ya basta!
...peace...
iowablackbird, nice post. all true. place of concealement particularly. i've never understood why people cluster in homeless camps. i was homeless. It was hard, then i said hey, pretend like you are snow camping in yosemite. i found an xlnt spot god couldn't find, built a righteous camp. And only an owl and I lived there until I got on my feet. Things are good and now I can help homeless people now and then. Rad.
I see - no money in the Trillions of dollars Bailout for the residual effects. Real smart. Go Congress!!!
There was a story on the local news here in So. OR about a big tent city in Sacramento, and it certainly looked like families to me, that was being shut down. The Governor was saying they were being relocated to the State Fair Grounds where there was running water and (toilets) available, and there would even be available shelter for their pets. This guy has been rising higher all the time in my esteem. Not sure how Californians feel about him though.
In a just world the taxpayers bailout money would be going to the homeless. The bankers and wall street speculators would be living in refrigerator boxes. Phil Gram, Lawrence Summers, Bill Clinton, Alan Greenspan, most of congress and the rest of the criminals that engineered deregulation which allowed this to happen would be in prison. I would love to see Paulson and company breaking rocks in prison stripes. STOP BAILING OUT THE WEALTHY.
You can only be a slave if you choose to be. Naomi Wolf so purposefully said that a protest is only effective when it stops traffic. To effect real change you have to understand the nature of laws. They are rules set down by a tiny minority to enslave the majority. We see with our own eyes today that the ruling elites aren't bound by them, are they. We are watching the middle classes wealth be stolen from them and handed up to the tiny minority. They aren't going to give it back, it has to be taken. Every middle class American should read the works of Mohandas Ghandi. He, one man took India back from the British Empire by simply refusing to cooperate with their laws. No violence, no threats just quietly and steadfastly refusing to cooperate. This whole sordid mess reminds me of an old story about 2 Roman senators. The younger one was frustrated that he couldn't find a slave when he needed one. He mused that publically marking slaves would be a good Ideal. The older wiser senator said 'Oh No" that would be a bad idea because then they would see how many of them there really are. Everyone knows injustice when they see it. Everybody knows that a hard working family thrown out on the street because of factors beyond their control isn't fair while the people responsible receive billions in taxpayer money. When enough people refuse to cooperate the ruling elite are powerless and their laws are meaningless. When you receive an eviction notice, ignore it. When the police show up be very polite and stay out of their way. As soon as they leave drill out the locks and move back in. They might be called back on a trespassing complaint but in many states will need another court order. 10 people do this and they'll ignore it. 1,000 people and they will probably try to make an example of a few. A million people do it and and the system will collapse, there aren't enough policemen. Stop paying taxes. Again, 10 people and nobody cares, thousands and they'll try and make some examples, but millions and the system collapses. You want out of Iraq and Afghanistan then stop obeying orders to deploy. 100 is business as usual with court marshal's and discharges. Thousands and there will be rumblings in the Pentagon. hundreds of thousands and the war will end immediately. Waving signs in "free speech zones" isn't going to help. The whole reason the free speech zones were created is so that you couldn't stop traffic. They are also created so the Media can point their cameras in another direction and not cover the protests. If we force the media to cover us, then all the slaves will
realize how many of us there really are.... America, if you want your country back, you have to stop traffic.
Fred in Boston
thank you fred for speaking the truth... especially.
'Stop paying taxes' ... and ...
'America, if you want your country back, you have to stop traffic'
http://www.warresisters.org/
... peace ...
Mr. Fred, WONDERFUL POST....let us all find a way to join together AND MAKE IT SO...it's never too late. I'm sending your comment to my address list. The journey of a thousand miles starts with the first step....Everyone on CD, PLEASE DO THE SAME!
I agree, great post!
Part of the refusal should include economic boycots of corporations and credit cards. And - I encourage people to opt out of the new TV system.
I have done all this. I Have not bought anything that was not localally made since george W. bush told us all to "go shopping" after 911.
It gave me great pleasure to cancel the credit card from the bailed out bank; especially when they raised late and overdraft fees as soon as they got the taxpayers money.
A general strike is called for.
Vast numbers of homeless living in shelters, tent cities and on the streets and these numbers will only grow in the coming months. The number of households will undoubtedly shrink this year as the "fortunate" move in with family or friends. The unfortunate will not have this opportunity. All this in the greatest, richest country on the planet. It is a national disgrace.
Try and find a tent city or even a slum in Sweden, Denmark, Norway or any other "socialist/commie" country in Europe.
Richest... perhaps in GNP and hypocrisy, but not in compassion or sense of community. Greatest... yes, if you think sharks are the greatest animal in the world.
what these homeless people really need is an old fashioned gospel tent revial.
I send money to our downtown homeless mission. The economic problems have brought more families to them. According to them, the average age of those needing meals is 9. Do you really think that a 9 year old needs to go to a revival? They could, of course, make use of the tent.
Most cities of any size have homeless missions. Please check with them and try to give them some support.
What do you mean? "an old fashioned gospel tent revival?" You've lost me. I hope you're not suggesting these people are suffering due to moral depravity and need the "Old Fashioned Gospel Hour" or some other such nonsense. If you are... you're nuts!
If you ever watch the 700 Club (Pat Robertson's corporation) (which I did watch on occasion just to learn what was happening behind the scenes in DC, and the world) this theme prevails in most of their "stories" about people who've turned their lives around. "Just have to find Jesus."
This has been happening since the 1990's, mid and possibly earlier, but is apparently coming more to "light" today, for I guess understandable reasons; it's happening more than before. It was happening during the 1990's. As a computer professional I remember having read of stories like this article tells of, minus the tent cities though, back in the 1990's; hi-tech. professionals of decades of experience needing to switch from living in apartments to their cars, though not all of us could do that for some of us still had loan payments to make on our cars and therefore had to return them to the loan-providing banks, like in my case, which meant park benches or cardboard boxes for living quarters, or having family somewhere else with a room to spare. Today the situation is evidently worse, more general, and given the situation was bad before, it's therefore only worse today.
Well, the Obama administration gave $163mn to AIG for bonuses and this apparently caused some msm "news" media scandal reporting, but the real story was kept hidden. The Obama administration is apparently giving not $163mn, but $183 billion to AIG "conterparties"; a little "something" the administration apparently wanted to keep the public uninformed about. Meanwhile Americans are looking for cardboard boxes to live in on the streets. Okay, some can afford tents. So what?!
Well, if you get caught trying to sell marijuana to try to feed your children, then just tell the law enforcment that it's not marijuana, but eucaplytus, say. The occasionally uninformed police officer might believe you. Otherwise, expect to be separated for maybe 25 years from your children.
Welcome to the USA.
Women should be put in cheap hotel rooms.* They are about 1/4th of the homeless.
Men should be offered a place to sleep at night if they are not wasted. 100 men w/ mats can sleep on a small gym floor. If they choose not to, a place on county property by a stream should be allocated for camping. Once these pieces are in place no one need sleep on a sidewalk or in the rain.
*At NO cost! ALL these dives would make deals w/ the city, a few rooms for a break here or there. Like they don't get shut down, most not being up to code and all...."damn, look at this, the whole building probably is gonna need to be re-wired." "We have lovely rooms for free to help the Homeless who we care very much for yes."
Hooverville? How 'bout Bushville or Grammville (after former Cong. Phil Gramm, "father" of this economic disaster)
We have been here before. See Dorothea Lange's, "Migrant Mother" or Salvador Dali's
"Soft Construction with Boiled Beans - Premonition of Civil War" for examples.
Our government spends trillions on foreign investors and not a damn dime on taxpayers.
One evening as the sun went down
And the jungle fires were burning,
Down the track came a hobo hiking,
And he said, "Boys, I'm not turning
I'm headed for a land that's far away
Besides the crystal fountains
So come with me, we'll go and see
The Big Rock Candy Mountains
In the Big Rock Candy Mountains,
There's a land that's fair and bright,
Where the handouts grow on bushes
And you sleep out every night.
Where the boxcars all are empty
And the sun shines every day
And the birds and the bees
And the cigarette trees
The lemonade springs
Where the bluebird sings
In the Big Rock Candy Mountains.
In the Big Rock Candy Mountains
All the cops have wooden legs
And the bulldogs all have rubber teeth
And the hens lay soft-boiled eggs
The farmers' trees are full of fruit
And the barns are full of hay
Oh I'm bound to go
Where there ain't no snow
Where the rain don't fall
The winds don't blow
In the Big Rock Candy Mountains.
In the Big Rock Candy Mountains
You never change your socks
And the little streams of alcohol
Come trickling down the rocks
The brakemen have to tip their hats
And the railway bulls are blind
There's a lake of stew
And of whiskey too
You can paddle all around it
In a big canoe
In the Big Rock Candy Mountains
In the Big Rock Candy Mountains,
The jails are made of tin.
And you can walk right out again,
As soon as you are in.
There ain't no short-handled shovels,
No axes, saws nor picks,
I'm bound to stay
Where you sleep all day,
Where they hung the jerk
That invented work
In the Big Rock Candy Mountains.
................
I'll see you all this coming fall
In the Big Rock Candy Mountains
Big Rock Candy Mountains
Harry Mcclintock
Hey, homeless person sleeping under white plastic: WAKE UP AND RISE UP!
Sneaker, you forgot to demand a donation before the person leaves.
To anyone that was alive in the "dirty Thirties"
these reports are not surprising.
In those days we had hobo jungles (camps) riding the rods,
hobo king and queen and many more creations of the times.
Can't remember seeing many back sacks etc. and no dope or guns.
Te police never had phase-rs or gas and the like, but used clubs and doberman pincher dogs.
them were the good old days
Just as there were shanty towns during the Great Depression called "Hooverville's," so should the new American townships be named Bushtown's.
I disagree. Bushtown sounds too much like a brothel. We shouldn't insult the homeless, no matter how appropriate the name might be.
I guess Dicktowns wouldn't work then either.
AAHHH!!!! NOW THAT'S APPROPIATE!
I think the current emphasis on keeping housing values high is ridiculous. Overpriced housing IS the problem - and has been for some time. All of the ills that the rich complain of - houses sold for nothing down to people with no credit - were certainly present in the post war period - but those people were able to keep their homes and improve their situations, because the cost of housing was low, and stayed low. The more prosperous among us have to decide whether what they want is a HOME in a good society, or some huge gains from the sale of their house in a few years, in a society that is rotting from the bottom up.
Art: the most dangerous gateway drug of all. Go cold turkey or turn in your parents at
http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Trailer/8989
We can ALL live without ART!
at some point, existing lots and infrastructure will be seen as communal shelter, rather than property, and will be shared...how much agony and bloodshed will be required to reach that point? will folks with large homes consider renting or donating rooms, even to family or friends? How much struggling does one observe while sitting comfy before helping? I keep coming back to the psychology of our situation, and this notion of 'deserving' or 'not deserving' the basics of life is one we must surmount...there has long been a stigma that life's goal is 'success', that 'hard work' and 'brains' result in success, and that 'failure' must mean a lack thereof...this is not so at all...house-sharing must become common...there will not be many with money for renting or buying when the earth clamps down on capitalism...sharing what already exists, especially shelter, water and food will be the way to go...and planting food, planting food, planting food...how do we learn that what we have traditionally viewed as successful behavior has, in reality, been incredibly destructive, and that what we have traditionally viewed as less than ambitious is much more harmoniously aligned with nature...
Jeevee
There's always an EXCUSE for more war, instead of taking care of our desperately poor!!
As BeForKids mentioned, there is no shortage of homes. Instead there is a shortage of non-greedy, compassionate financial institutions. I have read news stories recently of groups of investors snapping up properties in bulk because of declining prices. Anyone want to bet whether these investors are willing to go to the former occupants and give them back the keys? Anyone want to bet that most of these investors work for or also invest in banks and other financial institutions that are being "bailed out"? The financial system may indeed be imploding, because of the flimsy house of credit slips its built out of, but the wealthy are not hurting.
...the wealthy are not hurting. Yet.
No, they are, having lost much of their money in the stock market, but they're still wealthy. Unlike those who were never wealthy, and are now in poverty.
>>No, they are, having lost much of their money in the stock market, but they're still wealthy. Unlike those who were never wealthy, and are now in poverty.
It depends what you mean by hurt. Losing "Virtual wealth" that never existed in the first place is hardly painful.
I once owned Worldcom shares as they were a firm that had bought the company we worked for. Prior to that MCI had given employees various stock purchase plans via payroll deductions.
On "paper" i lost 30,000$$ when Worldcom was shown to be a fraud. I suffered no pain at all. My standard of living did not go down.
It may be felt when you retire though.
The US is amazing. It is here that we have at once an explosion of empty houses and homeless families sleeping under blankets in the streets. That's how capitalism works.
When the people fear their government there is tyranny,
when the government fears the people there is liberty.
~ Thomas Jefferson
When the people fear their government there is tyranny,
when the government fears the people they've overdone tyranny.
Obama's acknowledgement of the homeless problem--"the homeless problem was bad even when the economy was good"--reads like a disclaimer for him and his administration, i.e., it was pretty much ALWAYS an issue, therefore it's not as important as you might believe.
But this is part and parcel of having a president gifted by his ready, facile explanations and rhetorical skills than the ability to actually create imaginative, innovative social reconstruction programs. He'll hire a quote-unquote expert--with his hand down the front of Wall Street's pants--who will then offer a token gesture to forestall civil disobedience en masse. Consider:
"It is not acceptable for children and families to be without a roof over their heads in a country as wealthy as ours..."
Oh, really, Barack? For God's sake, do not be concerned that you might belabor what is fairly obvious to a twelve year old. When Obama traffics in platitudes like these you can count on the likelihood of him not intending to do a thing to effect real change. That is, instead of action--needed, EMERGENCY action--, we got a soundbite. Wiki tells us what we are paying for informed comments from Obama:
"President Obama currently earns $400,000 per year, along with a $50,000 expense account, a $100,000 nontaxable travel account and $19,000 for entertainment..." [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_President#Salary]
Where's the value?
Dean Taylor, thanks for this brilliant concept of "government by soundbite" which seems to capture so much of what Obama "government" is about. I was so impressed I selected it as my "quote of the day" for the daily www surfing I do to put up the headlines for my website, The Sun State Activist: http://www.sunstateactivist.org/
"It is not acceptable for children and families to be without a roof over their heads in a country as wealthy as ours..."
Oh, really, Barack? For God's sake, do not be concerned that you might belabor what is fairly obvious to a twelve year old. When Obama traffics in platitudes like these you can count on the likelihood of him not intending to do a thing to effect real change. That is, instead of action--needed, EMERGENCY action--, we got a soundbite"
Uh, and CEO's who run their businesses into the ground get $30 million severance packages. Why the hell are you whining about $600k for the President? Millions of Americans make way more than he does.
If you would bother to (re-)read the comment, the point being made is that OBAMA--NOT some corporate powerbroker--is in a position to effect change for the homeless (REMEMBER--the article being commented upon refers to Obama's quote-unquote response to the prevailing crisis in homelessness), but he can manage only a MEANINGLESS bit of data for the MSM.
ALSO...
The reference to the income is by way of contending that there is a GENERAL lack of decisive, conscionable, executive management on his part--vis a vis his reaction to, e.g., the Gazan crisis, his appointees, his ill-conceived media appearances and comments, the outrageous decision to send 21,000 more troops to Afghanistan (on top of the 38,000 already on the ground), etc. This point, too, is readily apparent to an alert reader.
Unplug the TV, go off by yourself, and re-think what it is you have to offer by way of a contribution to the forum...
There are not just tent cities in my State Capitol, but all over the Golden State. From San Diego, through Los Angeles, and all the way up to Humboldt they have appeared. I see these people often, and I do not feel anger but sympathy for them. I also don't understand how you can blame Obama for being callous and not caring about them, when he clearly wants to solve this problem. "It is not acceptable for children and families to be without a roof over their heads in a country as wealthy as ours..."
What is wrong with this statement? Nothing as far as i can tell. If you want to talk about Presidential Callousness towards the homeless, you only need to go back to the previous occupant of the WH. From listening to Bush, you would think that this problem never existed!