Afghan Civilians Could Bear Brunt of Increased War
KABUL - Afghan civilians will bear the brunt of an escalation in the Afghan war this year as thousands more U.S. troops deploy unless more is done by NATO forces and Taliban militants to protect them, a top Red Cross official said Monday.
Civilian casualties in Afghanistan are "significantly higher" today than a year ago, and an intensification of the conflict this year could mean that consequences for many more Afghans will be "dire in the extreme," said Pierre Krahenbuhl, the director of operations for the International Committee of the Red Cross.
"The daily lives of people living in areas where the fighting is taking place are being disrupted, be it because of airstrikes, night raids, suicide attacks, the use of IEDs, or because of intimidation and the population being pressurized or co-opted by the different parties to this conflict," he said.
The U.N. last month said 2,118 civilians died in the Afghan conflict in 2008, a 40 percent jump over 2007. The world body said insurgent attacks caused 55 percent of those deaths, while U.S., NATO or government forces caused 39 percent of the deaths. The remaining 6 percent were caused in crossfire.
The NATO-led force said Monday that an operation in Helmand province on Feb. 23 killed eight civilians. A joint NATO-Afghan investigation found that militants used civilian houses and religious facilities for "terrorist activities" in Sangin district when they ambushed a NATO patrol, a statement said.
"Regretfully, as a result of this engagement eight people were killed and 17 people were injured. There were also casualties inflicted on the enemy," the statement said.
Krahenbuhl met with Gen. David McKiernan, commander of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, and Maj. Gen. Jeffrey Schloesser, commander of U.S. forces in eastern Afghanistan, over the issue of civilian casualties.
Krahenbuhl said he emphasized to the American commanders the "constant obligation" to distinguish between "those participating in hostilities and those who do not." Both American generals were receptive to his concerns, he said.
Krahenbuhl also met with Taliban representatives during his six-day visit and told them of the "severe impact" that suicide attacks in crowds, the use of roadside bombs and rocket attacks have on civilians.
Taliban attacks have intensified the last three years, and militants now control wide swaths of countryside where there aren't enough NATO or Afghan forces to maintain security. President Barack Obama announced last month he was sending 17,000 additional U.S. troops to bolster the 38,000 already in the country.
Taliban attacks, such as suicide bombs and roadside bombs, often kill and maim dozens of innocent civilians, while the intended targets - international or Afghan military forces or Afghan officials - escape relatively unscathed.
"Unless more is done in different ways by the different parties to the conflict ... to respect their obligations under international humanitarian law, the ICRC fears that the Afghan population will bear the brunt of the announced escalation and that consequences for many will be dire in the extreme," Krahenbuhl said.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
5 Comments so far
Show AllI assume the chickenly, right wing Associated Press (all the U.S. press is right wing with the least of their right-wingedness occurring in the statement implicit in every inch of all their coverage: "I'm not liberal, I'm not!") wrote the headline to this story: AFGHAN CIVILIANS COULD BEAR BRUNT OF INCREASED WAR.
The author, Rahim Faiez, certainly didn't write it. His first words are "KABUL-- Afghan civilians will bear the brunt of an escalation..."
Reader, do you understand the difference? "Will" not "Could."
For evidence, observe and listen to testimony by "The Winter Soldiers." But do you even know, reader, who The Winter Soldiers are? Do Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Richard Holbrooke? Anybody with a computer could put the phrase in a search engine and immediately experience testimony on the subject of American atrocity to civilians in Afghanistan.
I supported Obama enthusiastically. I still have a lot of regard and hope for him. But, I am so troubled by his stances on Iraq and Afghanistan. Please consider signing my Peace Grandmothers petition to him urging immediate withdrawal from both countries. You needn't be a granny to sign. All are welcome. Please copy and paste into your URL the following -- then sign and distribute to your friends:
Peace Grandmothers Out of Iraq and Afghanistan
Many thanks. Joan Wile, author,
"Grandmothers Against the War: Getting Off Our Fannies and Standing Up for Peace" (Citadel Press, May 2008)
I am so sick of this shit. Of course civilians will suffer and die. Soldiers too. Isn't it obvious by now?
CAN WE IMAGINE ANY OTHER WAY TO SOLVE PROBLEMS BESIDE BOMBS AND GUNS, GUNS AND BOMBS? WE ARE MONSTERS.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKwS32rqTMs
Joe
Note how the headline tones down the article's intended message: "would" versus "will" used in the item's topic sentence. At least the editor didn't stirp that out or change "will" as is done so often.
Stop USA's ethnic cleansing of Pushtuns NOW!