Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
British Government Urged to Introduce 'Omni-Standards' For Food
Expert calls for a comprehensive labelling system integrating all available information of the environmental, health and social impact of food
The UK government should develop a comprehensive set of standards covering all aspects of the impact our food has on the environment and society, according to an influential food policy adviser.
Omni labels: How complex labelling could be done. (Image: Sustain) Prof
Tim Lang, who coined the term "food miles" and is an adviser to the
cabinet office, said that consumers are baffled by conflicting advice
about food. He said the government should set up an independent body of
experts to integrate information on all aspects of food's impact,
including how healthy it is, its environmental effects and the social
consequences of the way it is produced.
This could be translated into easily accessible information on food labels for consumers such as "food flowers" in which each petal indicates a food's impact in a different area.
He acknowledged that this would be an extremely complex task, but said that consumers wanted reliable information. "The classical approach to this is to let prices and the consumer decide. But health and environment, justice and equity are all surely reasonable and decent aspirations," Lang told the British Association Festival of Science in Liverpool, "We need a food system to improve standards across a variety of equally important fronts."
He hoped that his proposed "omni-standards" would help consumers to navigate contradictory information. For example, the nutritional evidence for eating fish is very strong and the government advocates eating two portions of fish a week. However fish stocks are in crisis and overfishing is having a significant ecological impact. "Which evidence do I listen to and shape my behaviour by?" he said.
Similarly, green beans from Kenya are good for you and if they are Fair Trade they may help the local economy where they are grown. However, he said each green bean stem has 4 litres of embedded water and they must be transported thousands of miles.
Lang said that at present, scientists and NGOs often focussed on only one part of the problem. "Actually we are part of the problem. We've got to come together and start piecing information together," he said.
Communicating the information to consumers will not be easy, but he said packaging could have basic data in the form of a graphical representation of a food's social, health and environmental footprint. More information could be made available via interactive screens in the supermarket or online.
Lang acknowledged that the practicalities of putting together a panel of experts to formulate the standards would be fraught with difficulty. One issue would be whether NGOs should be included directly.
"If I was off the record and there weren't microphones here I would say something more interesting," he said.
"I think there are very interesting tensions within government I will say very tightly - very interesting nuances between the various departmental chief scientists of their various positions."
- Posted in

7 Comments so far
Show AllThis would be a welcome change from having to read the labels in the store.
It's best to grow local food for many reasons. Shipping is a big cost but an even greater cost is growing things in the wrong place. Tomatoes from the South Pole or bananas from an Israeli desert make no sense. Nor does subsadizing Big Agrabusiness to drive poor farmers out of business.
While my wife shops, I read lebels and ask embarrassing questions.
If this allows the consumer to know whether a food is GMO, I'm all for it and it's about time! How can we import this to the US?
This is a good start toward full costs. Putting full costs in the retail prices aligns our economic interests with our overall interests, making it much easier for us to uphold our civic and moral responsibilities.
"If I was off the record and there weren't microphones here I would say something more interesting," he said.
"I think there are very interesting tensions within government I will say very tightly - very interesting nuances between the various departmental chief scientists of their various positions."
Translates to: they are bought and paid for.
When you eat locally you also benefit from antibodies the plants have in defense to the same diseases that we are exposed to in our local community. We can thank free trade for GMOs going to Europe. US said that not allowing GMOs to be sold in Europe was preventing 'free trade' free exploitation. The FDA was under investigation a year back and more than half of the employees felt that the FDA didn't live up to its own standards and was not making sure that food and drugs were actually safe.
Health is a result of food, literally you are what you eat, it should be the law that all gmo products are labeled even better illegal for consumption.
Boycott Monsanto