To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) leaves the U.S. Capitol after a vote on September 27, 2022.
"Lol good," responded Public Citizen's Rick Claypool, mocking the corporate lobbyists' complaints.
Healthcare industry lobbyists who are used to exerting significant influence over legislation and committee activity in Washington, D.C. are fretting that they may see their sway diminish after Sen. Bernie Sanders—a vocal opponent of K Street's outsized power—takes over the Senate's top health panel in the new Congress.
Politico reported Tuesday that "multiple lobbyists representing health insurers, pharmaceutical companies, providers, and health systems" expressed concern that "they're going to have to 'bank shot' their advocacy to get their messages across—lobbying other lawmakers on the committee and getting into the ears of progressive policymakers and left-leaning organizations."
"Sanders' well-chronicled antagonism toward lobbyists has some concerned they'll be unable to blunt criticism of their clients' profits or corporate executive salaries," the outlet continued. "They are anxious Sanders might seek to revive policies like importing drugs from Canada and other nations, an idea loathed by drugmakers."
Michaeleen Crowell, a lobbyist with the firm S-3 Group who previously worked as Sanders' chief of staff, said it "will not be business as usual for K Street" with the Vermont Independent at the helm of the powerful Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee.
One lobbyist said healthcare industry influence-peddlers are particularly concerned about how Sanders—a longtime champion of Medicare for All and congressional action to sharply reduce prescription drug prices—will wield the committee's subpoena power.
"Subpoena authority is certainly something that gets people paying attention," Rafi Prober, co-head of the congressional investigations practice at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, told Politico, which noted that "it's almost certain that health executives will be called to testify before the committee—a reputational risk for corporations."
Last month, Sanders said in an interview with CNBC that subpoena power should be used "intelligently and judiciously."
"Given the fact that we are looking at an unprecedented level of corporate greed, that we're looking at union-busting, that we're looking at extremely high prices in healthcare, prescription drugs that are caused by the greed of the industries—I think we have to take a hard look at these issues," Sanders said. "And if using subpoena power becomes necessary, then that's something we can do."
Rick Claypool, a corporate power researcher with the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, had no sympathy for lobbyists' complaints about the incoming chair of the Senate health panel.
"Lol good," Claypool tweeted in response to Politico's reporting on lobbyists' worries heading into the new congressional session.
Craig Holman, Public Citizen's Capitol Hill lobbyist on ethics and campaign finance, told Politico that "the prospects of a Sanders-led HELP committee are refreshing and exciting."
"The chairman will give everyone their due, including lobbyists representing the public's interest, without being swayed by campaign cash," Holman said. "Sanders' new leadership position will help build some equity between the influence of the haves and have-nots."
"We're looking at extremely high prices in healthcare, prescription drugs that are caused by the greed of the industries."
Sanders is set to become chair of the Senate HELP Committee as the Biden administration moves to carry out provisions of a new law that, over the next few years, will impose modest constraints on the pharmaceutical industry's vast power to set and raise prescription drug prices, which are significantly higher in the U.S. than in other wealthy countries.
By 2026, Medicare will for the first time be required to negotiate the prices of a small number of expensive prescription drugs, a change that Sanders has advocated for years—though he criticized the Inflation Reduction Act provisions as inadequate.
Big Pharma lobbied aggressively against the Inflation Reduction Act and, in concert with its Republican allies in Congress, is currently working to obstruct implementation of the law.
Merith Basey, executive director of Patients for Affordable Drugs Now, said in a statement Tuesday that "2023 marks a momentous year for patients—millions of people in the U.S. will begin to feel the impacts of the historic drug price reforms in the Inflation Reduction Act, both on their health and well-being as well as in their wallets."
"While we're delighted to begin the year knowing that millions of people on Medicare Part D will now have their insulin copays limited to $35 a month and will have access to free vaccines, we acknowledge that there is so much more to be done," said Basey. "This is just the beginning."
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Healthcare industry lobbyists who are used to exerting significant influence over legislation and committee activity in Washington, D.C. are fretting that they may see their sway diminish after Sen. Bernie Sanders—a vocal opponent of K Street's outsized power—takes over the Senate's top health panel in the new Congress.
Politico reported Tuesday that "multiple lobbyists representing health insurers, pharmaceutical companies, providers, and health systems" expressed concern that "they're going to have to 'bank shot' their advocacy to get their messages across—lobbying other lawmakers on the committee and getting into the ears of progressive policymakers and left-leaning organizations."
"Sanders' well-chronicled antagonism toward lobbyists has some concerned they'll be unable to blunt criticism of their clients' profits or corporate executive salaries," the outlet continued. "They are anxious Sanders might seek to revive policies like importing drugs from Canada and other nations, an idea loathed by drugmakers."
Michaeleen Crowell, a lobbyist with the firm S-3 Group who previously worked as Sanders' chief of staff, said it "will not be business as usual for K Street" with the Vermont Independent at the helm of the powerful Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee.
One lobbyist said healthcare industry influence-peddlers are particularly concerned about how Sanders—a longtime champion of Medicare for All and congressional action to sharply reduce prescription drug prices—will wield the committee's subpoena power.
"Subpoena authority is certainly something that gets people paying attention," Rafi Prober, co-head of the congressional investigations practice at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, told Politico, which noted that "it's almost certain that health executives will be called to testify before the committee—a reputational risk for corporations."
Last month, Sanders said in an interview with CNBC that subpoena power should be used "intelligently and judiciously."
"Given the fact that we are looking at an unprecedented level of corporate greed, that we're looking at union-busting, that we're looking at extremely high prices in healthcare, prescription drugs that are caused by the greed of the industries—I think we have to take a hard look at these issues," Sanders said. "And if using subpoena power becomes necessary, then that's something we can do."
Rick Claypool, a corporate power researcher with the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, had no sympathy for lobbyists' complaints about the incoming chair of the Senate health panel.
"Lol good," Claypool tweeted in response to Politico's reporting on lobbyists' worries heading into the new congressional session.
Craig Holman, Public Citizen's Capitol Hill lobbyist on ethics and campaign finance, told Politico that "the prospects of a Sanders-led HELP committee are refreshing and exciting."
"The chairman will give everyone their due, including lobbyists representing the public's interest, without being swayed by campaign cash," Holman said. "Sanders' new leadership position will help build some equity between the influence of the haves and have-nots."
"We're looking at extremely high prices in healthcare, prescription drugs that are caused by the greed of the industries."
Sanders is set to become chair of the Senate HELP Committee as the Biden administration moves to carry out provisions of a new law that, over the next few years, will impose modest constraints on the pharmaceutical industry's vast power to set and raise prescription drug prices, which are significantly higher in the U.S. than in other wealthy countries.
By 2026, Medicare will for the first time be required to negotiate the prices of a small number of expensive prescription drugs, a change that Sanders has advocated for years—though he criticized the Inflation Reduction Act provisions as inadequate.
Big Pharma lobbied aggressively against the Inflation Reduction Act and, in concert with its Republican allies in Congress, is currently working to obstruct implementation of the law.
Merith Basey, executive director of Patients for Affordable Drugs Now, said in a statement Tuesday that "2023 marks a momentous year for patients—millions of people in the U.S. will begin to feel the impacts of the historic drug price reforms in the Inflation Reduction Act, both on their health and well-being as well as in their wallets."
"While we're delighted to begin the year knowing that millions of people on Medicare Part D will now have their insulin copays limited to $35 a month and will have access to free vaccines, we acknowledge that there is so much more to be done," said Basey. "This is just the beginning."
Healthcare industry lobbyists who are used to exerting significant influence over legislation and committee activity in Washington, D.C. are fretting that they may see their sway diminish after Sen. Bernie Sanders—a vocal opponent of K Street's outsized power—takes over the Senate's top health panel in the new Congress.
Politico reported Tuesday that "multiple lobbyists representing health insurers, pharmaceutical companies, providers, and health systems" expressed concern that "they're going to have to 'bank shot' their advocacy to get their messages across—lobbying other lawmakers on the committee and getting into the ears of progressive policymakers and left-leaning organizations."
"Sanders' well-chronicled antagonism toward lobbyists has some concerned they'll be unable to blunt criticism of their clients' profits or corporate executive salaries," the outlet continued. "They are anxious Sanders might seek to revive policies like importing drugs from Canada and other nations, an idea loathed by drugmakers."
Michaeleen Crowell, a lobbyist with the firm S-3 Group who previously worked as Sanders' chief of staff, said it "will not be business as usual for K Street" with the Vermont Independent at the helm of the powerful Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee.
One lobbyist said healthcare industry influence-peddlers are particularly concerned about how Sanders—a longtime champion of Medicare for All and congressional action to sharply reduce prescription drug prices—will wield the committee's subpoena power.
"Subpoena authority is certainly something that gets people paying attention," Rafi Prober, co-head of the congressional investigations practice at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, told Politico, which noted that "it's almost certain that health executives will be called to testify before the committee—a reputational risk for corporations."
Last month, Sanders said in an interview with CNBC that subpoena power should be used "intelligently and judiciously."
"Given the fact that we are looking at an unprecedented level of corporate greed, that we're looking at union-busting, that we're looking at extremely high prices in healthcare, prescription drugs that are caused by the greed of the industries—I think we have to take a hard look at these issues," Sanders said. "And if using subpoena power becomes necessary, then that's something we can do."
Rick Claypool, a corporate power researcher with the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, had no sympathy for lobbyists' complaints about the incoming chair of the Senate health panel.
"Lol good," Claypool tweeted in response to Politico's reporting on lobbyists' worries heading into the new congressional session.
Craig Holman, Public Citizen's Capitol Hill lobbyist on ethics and campaign finance, told Politico that "the prospects of a Sanders-led HELP committee are refreshing and exciting."
"The chairman will give everyone their due, including lobbyists representing the public's interest, without being swayed by campaign cash," Holman said. "Sanders' new leadership position will help build some equity between the influence of the haves and have-nots."
"We're looking at extremely high prices in healthcare, prescription drugs that are caused by the greed of the industries."
Sanders is set to become chair of the Senate HELP Committee as the Biden administration moves to carry out provisions of a new law that, over the next few years, will impose modest constraints on the pharmaceutical industry's vast power to set and raise prescription drug prices, which are significantly higher in the U.S. than in other wealthy countries.
By 2026, Medicare will for the first time be required to negotiate the prices of a small number of expensive prescription drugs, a change that Sanders has advocated for years—though he criticized the Inflation Reduction Act provisions as inadequate.
Big Pharma lobbied aggressively against the Inflation Reduction Act and, in concert with its Republican allies in Congress, is currently working to obstruct implementation of the law.
Merith Basey, executive director of Patients for Affordable Drugs Now, said in a statement Tuesday that "2023 marks a momentous year for patients—millions of people in the U.S. will begin to feel the impacts of the historic drug price reforms in the Inflation Reduction Act, both on their health and well-being as well as in their wallets."
"While we're delighted to begin the year knowing that millions of people on Medicare Part D will now have their insulin copays limited to $35 a month and will have access to free vaccines, we acknowledge that there is so much more to be done," said Basey. "This is just the beginning."