Common Dreams NewsCenter

Net Roots Nation

 
     
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives
   
 
     
 

Discuss this story Discuss this story Print This Post Print This Post E-Mail This Article
 
 

Californians Sitting on Toxic Couches - Report

by Aaron Glantz

SAN FRANCISCO - Most of California’s furniture contains toxic chemicals that have been linked to cancer, birth defects, hormone disruption, and neurological and reproductive dysfunction, according to a report released today.

The so-called halogenated fire retardants are particularly harmful to infants and children, said Friends of the Earth, the nonprofit citizens group that tested 350 items of furniture in stores and people’s houses.”We found that two thirds of furniture sold in retail stores and 50 percent of furniture in people’s homes contain high amounts of halogenated fire retardants,” said Russell Long, the group’s vice president. “So for the typical consumer that may have five to ten pieces of furniture in their home, their home is full of these chemicals.”

The report, titled “Killer Couches: Protecting Infants and Children from Toxic Exposure,” also includes information on other studies, which have shown that most Americans who undergo testing have halogenated fire retardants stored in their bodies, with babies and children showing the highest levels.

Researchers say that infants and children are the most vulnerable to the effects of halogenated fire retardant chemicals, which travel through the placenta and breast milk. Levels of these chemicals in breast milk have increased 40-fold since the 1970s.

When halogenated fire retardants burn, they turn into dioxin, one of the most dangerous chemicals known to man. Dioxin accumulates in the human body and can be passed down from generation to generation and is present in mother’s breast milk.

Halogenated fire retardants also emit a dark smoke that can reduce visibility for firefighters and expose rescue workers to extremely toxic and cancer causing chemicals.

California State Assemblyman Mark Leno of San Francisco has introduced a bill to ban the chemical in California. The bill is named in honor of Leno’s daughter, Crystal Golden-Jefferson, a firefighter for the Los Angeles County Fire Department who died from workplace-related non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Leno notes that the state barred the chemicals’ use in children’s pajamas a generation ago.

“These fire retardants were removed from children’s pajamas in the 1970s because they were found to change children’s DNA and likely be carcinogenic,” Leno said. “Now we have these same chemicals in many of our most intimate household products.”

Leno’s bill passed the State Assembly, but fell one vote short in the California Senate. The bill is backed by state fire fighters unions, environmental groups, and furniture manufacturers.

It is opposed by chambers of commerce, multiple departments in Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s administration, and the chemicals’ manufacturer, which is represented by the Washington, DC- and Brussels-based Bromine Science and Environmental Forum (BSEF).

Documents on file with the California Secretary of State show that, faced with the potential banning of its product, BSEF spent nearly $7 million lobbying the California legislature last year in a successful bid to kill Leno’s measure.

“We felt we did rather well,” said Leno, “considering many millions of dollars were spent by the bromine chemical industry dressing themselves up as ‘Californians for Fire Safety’ with a multimedia campaign that included full page, full color ads in many newspapers, multiple mailings to constituents across the state of California, and television and radio advertisements; and despite that barrage of misinformation we came just two voters short of sending it to the governor.”

In letters to key legislative committees, BSEF argued that Leno’s bill “jeopardizes public health and safety by forcing manufacturers to switch to unspecified alternatives that do not have the same established history of use and which must comply with an as yet undefined flame resistance standard to be established by the Bureau.”

They also argued that it will “likely result in reduced levels of fire safety for the citizens of California,” a difficult assertion to sustain considering the bill’s support from multiple fire fighters unions.

Groundwater, drinking water, ambient air, oceans, and ecosystems have also been contaminated by halogenated fire retardants, which are now being detected in wildlife throughout the world — in areas as remote as the Arctic Circle.

Some of the highest levels have been found in harbor seals and aquatic life in the San Francisco Bay.

These compounds have also been found in dairy products, meat, poultry, and fish.

© 2008 One World

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Technorati
 

9 Comments so far

  1. bandido February 27th, 2008 11:41 am

    Another instance of the corporate poisoning of the environment with a fraudulent excuse for uninhibited greed.

  2. tonkatsu February 27th, 2008 1:27 pm

    A much better solution: Begin a program to install the same quality and type of Fire Sprinkler systems in private homes as are required in commercial buildings.

    Properly installed, they would save thousands of lives and actually Reduce property damage.

    That’s WHY they are required in commercial buildings.

    Real Estate developers would, of course, scream bloody murder over the issue because it would cut into their profit margins …

  3. curmudgeon99 February 27th, 2008 3:29 pm

    How can we test for it ourselves?

  4. KEM PATRICK February 27th, 2008 11:04 pm

    Wait until you get cancer, __ a perfect test.

  5. rtdrury February 28th, 2008 1:03 am

    Try furniture from local materials made in local shops. Protect your family’s health, and build the political/economic power of people with localism. A great fiber for furniture cushions is help. Grow hemp in your back yard and thumb your nose at the “authorities”.

  6. Joe Toxic February 28th, 2008 1:35 am

    Can I trade my couch for a FEMA trailer?????

  7. sLiMsHaDy February 28th, 2008 2:57 am

    AAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaAAAaaaaahhhHHHhhhhhh!!

    EVERYTHING about the USA turns out to be TOXIC, from its TRUE history, to its economic model. From its educational system to its foreign policy. Even the damned FURNITURE!

  8. ralph 442 February 28th, 2008 1:30 pm

    In life there is a certain amount of risk. We can often lesson that risk by new approaches or products, say seat belts in cars.
    What we must guard against is do we cause more harm in the long run by trying to eliminate the potential problem. In this case fire is a negative although relatively rare, but the solution, halogenated fire retardants are worse because they effect everyone to a greater or lesser degree.

    Areas where this ‘over compensation’ are most prevalent is in the medical/health field, and so called military defense industries.
    By dosing our bodies with countless drugs and medications (just listen to the drug adds on the evening news) for every little illness or discomfort we weaken our immune systems. This can lead to an overall downward cycle in our health in which we become increasing dependent on powerful but dangerous medical drugs and associate medical treatments (surgery etc).
    In the case of so called ‘national defense’ we (the U.S.) now has between 7-8 hundred foreign military installations in some 130 odd countries. We are bankrupting our treasury while neglecting our infrastructure and citizenry, which will cause us to crumble from within. In addition we are pissing the rest of the world off by our bulling imperialistic ways and thus losing friends and allies and making new enemies.

    When we try for total security 100% of the time we become prisoners of our own making and suffer the consequences: neurotics, paranoid, hypochondriacs, hyper aggressive, or just plain ugly Americans.

  9. barksnotbites February 29th, 2008 11:22 am

    F(*@K.

    I need to get a non-toxic couch. PRONTO.!

Join the discussion:

You must be logged in to post a comment. If you haven't registered yet, click here to register. (It's quick, easy and free. And we won't give your email address to anyone.)

 
   FAIR USE NOTICE  
  This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
 
 
Common Dreams NewsCenter
A non-profit news service providing breaking news & views for the progressive community.
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives

© Copyrighted 1997-2008
www.commondreams.org