Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Bill Black’s Top Ten Ways to Crack Down on Corporate Financial Crime
Ninety-five percent of criminologists study blue collar crime.
Five percent study white collar crime.
Of the tiny minority who study white collar crime, ninety five percent focus on the individuals who rip off the corporation.
We are left with a small handful of criminologists – think Edwin Sutherland, John Braithwaite, Gil Geis – who have studied or are studying – corporate crime.
That would be crime by the corporation.
Bill Black is one of the most prominent of those living corporate criminologists.
His specialty – control fraud.
Control fraud is when the CEO of a company uses the corporation as a weapon to commit fraud.
Bill Black is a lawyer and former federal bank regulator.
He’s the author of the corporate crime classic – The Best Way to Rob a Bank is to Own One: How Corporate Executives and Politicians Looted the S&L Industry (University of Texas Press, 2005.)
Black says there are steps we can take as a society to control corporate crime – in particular financial crime.
In an interview with Corporate Crime Reporter last week, Black laid out his top ten.
Number ten: Hire 1,000 FBI agents.
Pass legislation (HR 3995) introduced by Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur that would fund the hiring of 1,000 FBI agents to investigate white collar crime.
Number nine: Appoint a chief criminologist at each of the financial regulatory agencies.
“Each agency needs someone who understands white collar crime,” Black said. “If you don’t understand fraud schemes, if you don’t understand how accounting is used to run these scams, you will always have a disaster in the making.”
Number eight: Fix executive compensation.
Black would tie executive bonuses to long term corporate performance.
Number seven: Target the top 100 corporate criminals.
“We need to do a top 100 priority list – the way it was done in the savings and loan crisis,” Black said. “The FBI, the Justice Department and the regulatory agencies got together and put together a list of top 100 companies to target. There was a recognition that these were control frauds. The top executives were using seemingly legitimate savings and loans as their weapons of fraud. And that is why any serious look will tell you the same thing about this most recent crisis as well. The criminal justice referral process has collapsed at the agencies.”
Number six: Regulate first.
“When
you desupervise or deregulate an industry, in fact you are decriminalizing control
fraud. The regulators are the ones who make the bulk of these cases. I’m
not saying they can do it alone. In the current crisis, the FBI had no meaningful
support from the regulators. You have regulators denying they were regulators
and saying that there could be no fraud because the rating agencies were handing
out high ratings. That kind of naivete is ideologically driven. You will not
have effective prosecution with that kind of regulatory regime.”
Number five: Bust up the FBI partnership with the Mortgage Bankers Association.
“Now we have the FBI standing with what it calls its partners – the Mortgage Bankers Association,” Black said. “But the Mortgage Bankers Association – that’s the trade association of the perps. So, the FBI is partnering with the perps.”
“The result is – we have seen zero prosecutions of the specialty non-prime lenders that caused the crisis,” Black said. “The mortgage bankers are going to position themselves as the victims. This has been so successful that the FBI now has a mantra. They are saying there are two kinds of mortgage fraud. Fraud for profit and fraud for housing. And neither of them is control fraud. They have effectively said – control fraud is impossible. Even though it was the entire story behind the savings and loan crisis, the Enron wave, and the creation of the most recent housing bubble.”
Number four: Get rid of Ben Bernanke as chair of the Fed. Replace him with Nobel prize winner Joseph Stiglitz.
“Ben
Bernanke should not have been reappointed as head of the Fed,” Black said.
“He was the most senior regulator. And he was an utter failure. Under
President Bush, he was President of the Council of Economic Advisors. So, he
was a failure as a regulator. And he was a failure as an economist.”
Number three: Get rid of too big to fail.
There
are about 20 banks that have assets of $100 billion or more. They are considered
too big to fail. “You do three things,” Black says. “First,
you stop them from growing. Second, you shrink them (to below $20 billion in
assets.) You create the tax and regulatory incentives where they have to shrink
below the level where they pose a systemic risk. And third, you regulate them
much more intensively while they are in the process of moving from a systemically
dangerous institution to a more leaner, smaller, more efficient, less dangerous
institution.”
Number two: Create a consumer financial protection agency headed by Harvard Law School professor Elizabeth Warren.
“The
sine qua non for success as a regulator is independence,” Black says.
“So, it’s a very bad sign that Congress is moving away from an independent
regulator.”
“As we speak, news is breaking that they are moving away from housing
the regulator at the Treasury Department. Now they are talking about putting
it at the Federal Reserve. The Fed is an independent regulator. Unfortunately,
it’s an independent anti-regulator. I called putting it at the Treasury
a sick joke. Putting it at the Fed is also a sick joke. They are both recipes
for failure.”
Number
one: Fire Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, Office of Thrift Supervision
chief John Bowman, Fed chief regulator Patrick Parkinson, and Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency Chief John Dugan.
“Tim Geithner was testifying before Congress a couple of years ago,”
Black said. “And in response to a question from Ron Paul (R-Texas), Geithner
said – ‘I have to stop you right there – I’ve never
been a regulator.’ Well, that’s true. But you are not supposed to
admit it.”
“Can
you imagine. This is the President of the New York Fed, testifying about the
greatest failure in banking in the history of the nation. And he is so completely
out of it – the mindset of capture is so complete, that he says –
I’ve never been a regulator. This is the ultimate capture. You don’t
even think of yourself as a regulator.”
“Ben Bernanke in October 2009 appointed Patrick Parkinson as the top supervisor
at the Fed,” Black said. “He’s the guy who, under Alan Greenspan,
led the Fed charge against Brooksley Born when she wanted to regulate credit
default swaps.”
“Patrick Parkinson, on behalf of the Fed, testified that credit default swaps should be left completely deregulated.”
“The reasons? If we regulate them, they will flee to the city of London. We should be so lucky, of course.”
“And two, fraud can’t happen in credit default swaps, because the participants are so sophisticated. This is the most astonishingly naive model of white collar crime by people who know nothing about white collar crime and don’t study it at all.”
“John
Dugan’s sole priority and all of his passion as OCC director has been
pre-empting state efforts to protect us from predatory lenders,” Black
said.
“And John Bowman should be fired,” Black said. “The OTS got
in bed with the industry most openly.”



12 Comments so far
Show AllWOW! Why isn't this Man in a Position of Power?!? He "Tells it like it is"
Special Prosecutor, maybe?
These are all great idea,s, and that is why NONE of them will ever come to pass. Gov't doesn't DO g9ood ideas anymore. If one shows up the republicans especially, though with the help of some dinos, will destroy it.
We have had this stupid idea for generations that those who are rich CAN'T POSSIBLY be crooks, they are RICH! And CLEARLY, being rich places one above the pettiness of greed and avarice that the standard street crook is eaten up with. That basic idea is 180 degrees out of touch with reality. If these people were so honest and upright, then how did they get rich in the first place? When you see that MOST of them got family money, that doesn't automatically lead to morality to me.
The fact is that the rich are pulling off more crimes than any street thug could possibly dream of. They have robbed tens of millions of citizens, where most street crooks rob people one at a time. Who does the REAL damage to society?
I have, literally for decades, had NO love or trust for the rich in this country. I have seen them as what they have recently proved themselves to be: Greedy scum bags who hate everything but their own money. They will run over their own mothers and grandmothers to make a profit. They should be put in jail and kept there.
Nationalize the banks. They provide nothing for the majority of us, anyway, and they keep proving time and time again that they cannot be trusted to BE anything but crooks. Give them an inch, they will take 100 miles, and make YOU pay for it. We're tapped out, there is no more water in the well. They STOLE IT ALL.
Learn your history, the banks have been the biggest thorn in our sides since this country was founded. Time to stop letting them police themselves, when we do that, WE are the only ones who EVER go to jail. The old boys club makes sure that they never do. Time for laws to apply to EVERYONE, ESPECIALLY those who have robbed us blind.
Here, here! Part of your comment is a variation on Balzac's quote: "Behind every great fortune there is a crime." Wall Street and the banks prove the truth of that daily. Unfortunately, the Obama Administration seems wedded to the idea of returning the pieces on the board to the same position they were in before the 2008 crash. That's not going to work, as Michael Moore, Matt Taibbi and others well know. The bankers and brokers haven't learned a thing -- they are degenerate gamblers who are still playing with the same marked deck they used to cause the '08 meltdown and they won't stop until they lose every dime. I'm afraid that's what it will take to wake up the country -- a total economic paralysis worse than the Great Depression. As Hunter S. Thompson once said, "Big doom come soon." Too bad we can't bail out of the consequences, but we're all in the same boat financially.
Michael Moore: "There's Going to Be a Second Economic Collapse..."
http://www.alternet.org/news/145920/michael_moore:_there's_going_to_be_a_second_economic_crash_(and_glenn_beck_can_'f--k_off')
Matt Taibbi: "Wall Street's Bail Out Hustle"
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/32255149/wall_streets_bailout_hustle
sierra7
“And two, fraud can’t happen in credit default swaps, because the participants are so sophisticated. This is the most astonishingly naive model of white collar crime by people who know nothing about white collar crime and don’t study it at all.”
Anyone who watched the "masters of the Universe" from the major banks testifying before Congress last May (I think it was May) 2009 and has EACH and EVERYONE of them admit that in the econometric mathematical models they had structured for the housing market they DID NOT TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION OF A MARKET DECLINE!!!!
If that doesn't cool your goose, I don't know what will!!
Jail them all!!
Hiring 1,000 more FBI agents without changing the attitudes of those agents regarding treating white collar crime as "crimes" but as, just maybe, "adjusting the system" will do nothing.
The latest Supreme Court ruling re-affirming corporations as individuals just gives them more latitude to commit more crimes.....How come they are not prosecuted under criminal law??????? (as individuals are)
I'm at the point where I'd support the Tea Party nuts just to break the monopoly on power the Republicans and Democrats have. We NEED a 3rd party, and a 4th. If the Tea baggers succeed where other fringe parties have failed and actually win a meaningful percentage of seats in Congress then I think it'd open the doors for other 3rd parties.
This stranglehold of the Republicans and Democrats MUST END. I think we'd do better with non-partisan politics like for city council anyway. I just don't see the need for national parties any more. What benefit do they provide?
Best Way
Impeach Obama
The judgeship for a vote should be enough.
Watch Fox News much, miriamac March 5th, 2010 6:36 pm? That particular Obama smear is egregiously false. Read this: "Right-wing media continue baseless smear that Obama is 'offering judgeships to secure health care votes'"
http://mediamatters.org/research/201003050035
Aside from that, what good would it do to impeach Obama -- do you seriously think Biden would be any different? Or would you prefer someone else entirely, perhaps a Republican with a 'spotless' ethics record such as Sarah Palin? (Since you appear to be a wingnut, and wingnuts habitually miss this sort of thing, let me explain that the word 'spotless' was meant sarcastically.)
.
.
# 1, 3,4, & 7 are a good ideas but if he really wants to fight corporate corruption he'd talk about creating opportunities for more cooperatives like Mondragon in Spain:
http://www.yesmagazine.org/issues/the-new-economy/mondragon-worker-cooperatives-decide-how-to-ride-out-a-downturn
http://www.mondragon-corporation.com/language/en-US/ENG/Frequently-asked-questions/Co-operativism.aspx
But I guess that goes beyond this mere reformist agenda doesn't it?
The story I tell from my time at Nasdaq during the dealer price-fixing scandal is of teaching SEC interns during discovery what they should be looking for in my files. They barely had their chair seats warmed before moving on to Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, etc.. "Self-regulatory" has always been, and always will be, a joke.
What??? And not fire all those thieving CEOs???