EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Prescription for a Real Healthcare Debate
How Corporate Media Have Ruined the Health Care Debate
The debate about health reform is clearly in critical condition, with the prospects for President Barack Obama's proposed "public option" looking increasingly uncertain. The U.S. is the only industrialized nation where insurance for primary healthcare is largely in the hands of private corporations, but despite overwhelming public support for a greater government role in health insurance, pundits are now advising us that even Obama’s modest proposal of making private insurance corporations compete with a public insurance fund may have to be scrapped.
Sen. Max Baucus (D.-Mont.) -- the politician who played one of the most powerful roles in shaping this debate -- would seem at first blush an unlikely man to diagnose the ailments afflicting our health reform debate.
After all, many people will recall that when several doctors asked at a recent Senate hearing why "Medicare-for-all" -- a reform option that many citizens and healthcare professionals see as the best tool for fixing healthcare -- was not on the table, Baucus responded by asking for more police.
Yet as the NYT reported, Baucus has since:
Conceded that it was a mistake to rule out a fully government-run health system, or a ‘single-payer plan,’ not because he supports it but because doing so alienated a large, vocal constituency and left Mr. Obama’s proposal of a public health plan to compete with private insurers as the most liberal position.
After all, what better way to diffuse the fearmongering about Obama’s plan being a "Trojan horse" for the right’s favorite boogeyman -- "socialized" medicine -- than provide the public with accurate information on Medicare-for-all and its benefits? After all, a single public fund that would provide all Americans with healthcare coverage, much like Medicare currently provides for seniors, is seen by many experts as the most effective way of achieving the goals of healthcare reform: reducing costs while expanding coverage.
What better way to counter the pundits’ insistence that Obama "compromise" with industry-backed politicians than by pointing out that the "public option" is already a serious compromise, given that most citizens and physicians actually favor "single-payer” -- a more comprehensive and progressive option. After all, a recent New York Times/CBS poll (1/11-15/09) found that 59 percent of respondents said they would prefer that"the government in Washington provide national health insurance," rather than leaving health insurance to private industry. Meanwhile a recent survey (Annals of Internal Medicine, 4/1/08) found that 59 percent of physicians also support single-payer.
Of course, the insurance lobbies and many politicians have never wanted to talk about single-payer.
But it is largely the media’s fault that Obama’s plan has come to be seen as the most liberal position in the debate. For the corporate media has long shut single-payer and its advocates out of the discussion.
A recent study by FAIR found that of hundreds of stories about healthcare in major outlets earlier this year, only five stories included the views of advocates of single-payer -- none of which appeared on the TV networks.
Now
more than ever, it is crucial that the public have information about
the full range of options for healthcare reform -- including Medicare-for-
That is why the media watch group FAIR, filmmaker Michael Moore, former MSNBC host Phil Donahue, Harvard medical professors David Himmelstein and Stephanie Woolhandler and Quentin Young of Physicians for a National Health Program, Obama’s longtime physician David Scheiner, actors Mike Farrell, Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon, and Donna Smith of the California Nurses Association are calling onto the TV networks to include single-payer in their coverage of healthcare reform.
You can read their letter to ABC, CBS and NBC -- and add your voice to this effort to bring about the broad debate on reform options that is so essential to fixing the broken U.S. healthcare system -- here:
On
Tuesday, July 28th, FAIR, Physicians for a National Health Program, Healthcare
Now!, Code Pink, the Private Health Insurance Must Go Coalition and the
Raging Grannies will be delivering this message to the NYC offices of
ABC News -- the network that disinvited Obama’s longti
A version of this article appeared on Alternet.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


34 Comments so far
Show AllThe majority of the American people have wanted universal healthcare since the 80's. The time is now to draw the line in the sand. Any politician that runs for office regardless of party that supports universal single payer healthcare has my vote any other position than that and I will pass thank you. Also, I have made a point of NOT donating blood and taking the donor sticker off my driver license. If you couldn't afford to have your own blood put back into you, then you should not donate either. Make your refusal to support for profit medicine with your body products loud and clear every time you go to the doctor or talk to a politician. We are done bleeding for the rich.
The last time I donated blood I asked the nurse if my blood was being sold. She said she knew nothing about that.
Vote third party as soon as you can.
I will vote for any candidate that supports universal single payer. Russ Feingold (D - WI) is my only DC rep who supports Universal single payer. All the other self-serving crooks lost my vote.
I just signed the petition in the article. If you Click on where it says "here" and you can hear Obama's Doctor who wants Medicare for all... Please sign since it will be a long time to wait to vote 3rd party.
The Doctor wants us to put the pressure on his patient. Write, Send, and Call for it all.
Don't need no stinkin' "real healthcare debate" which is NOT actually about health care in any case! And you sure as hell don't need a "public option" that is "already a serious compromise, given that most citizens and physicians actually favor 'single-payer' -- a more comprehensive and progressive option."
The ONLY debatable question is whether the U.S, has any right to call itself a democracy in any sense of the word, let alone "the greatest democracy on earth" worthy to impose itself globally as such on unwilling recipients elsewhere.
Any such clear and unambiguous public mandate as current support for single-payer health care would simply be implemented by any truly democratic government, not debated and compromised ad nauseum for the benefit of non-human corporations and their paid sponsorship that aren't even a part of the actual health care delivery system for that matter.
Since when are compromises with non-constituent interests any part of the democractic process anyhow? I don't recall any mention of the Athenian Greek originators of the concept consulting the either Trojan horse or the Persian fleet when deciding whether to build the Parthenon and how to finance it.
In fact, there may be one other debatable issue more critically important even than health care or any other. If your government is not a democratic institution and does not represent the wants and wishes of its human electoral constituency, by what right does it continue to hold office and exert any legitimate power at all?
Our leaders only have the loyalty of the military and police forces to exert their power. As long as they have vicious "patriotic" pshychopaths to enforce their authority, they will cede no power. Only the blood of revolution will refresh the tree of liberty.
Well, if your military has also abandoned its sworn oath to the democratic constitutional principles of the U.S. republic in favor of loyalty to transient political "leadership", I guess you're pretty much up the proverbial creek without a paddle. In those circumstances, even the outcome of a popular revolution would seem questionable and problematic.
Sounds to me not much different from the much despised military dictatorship of a banana republic -- except some of them revolt anyhow.
Put yourself in the place of an eighteen year old with a rifle. Basic training has told him to follow orders. Common decency tells him not to fire on his fellow countrymen.
Not all will make the same choice. It could end like Kent State or all Hell could break loose. God save us from such an outcome.
The outcome of popular revolutions are always problematic. If only people would listen to each other. They don't. They won't. They never have and never will.
REFORM,n. the improvement or amendment to what is wrong, corrupt (the American College Dictionary REFORM, n. the improvement or amendment of what is wrong or corrupt.... (Congressional Dictionary)
Democracy can be turned into totalitarianism More easily and quickly than any other form of government. The constitution need not be changed, the bill of rights can remain in place, and all the trappings of democracy retained.
These are forms which embody freedom and democracy. Once the substance of freedom and democracy have been dispensed with the forms mean nothing.
Public opinion, the cornerstone of any democracy, can be manipulated by fear. 'We cannot protect you without the necessary tools'.
Once the public is brought on board a bloodless coup there is no one to whom an appeal can be made. Voices for real reform can be allowed to be heard as proof that the freedom of speech is not gone, and to disarm any clamor for a reduction in the prison population, an end to torture, an end to senseless war, and taxing the middle class into poverty.
Once the richest ten percent have everything, including all forms of mass communication, the police can be unleashed, the most repressive laws possible enforced, and everyone will still celebrate their freedom, wave the flag, and then go home to a dinner of potatoes and bread in a cold house.
Nobody will dare admit to their poverty. This is the land of opportunity. If you are poor it is your own fault. All the world loathes a loser.
And again, this is NOT about "healthcare" reform, it is about "health insurance" reform... a big difference. What is being proposed is a plan to enrich more private corporations, by forcing people to get insurance or pay more taxes. We have the monies to provide free health care (less elective treatments) to every man woman and child in this country. The mandate is in the preamble to the Constitution, which says that we should 'promote to the general welfare'... AND we already have socilaized medicine for our elderly (medicare and medicaid) which seems to be working fairly well. Yeah, it could use some fine tuning, but for the size of our population, it's been an okay system.
Addressing how medical care is paid for without addressing the problems of conventional medicine won't solve our health problems. Why settle for drugs and surgery for the masses when we could be healthy?
Just in............
By DAVID ESPO AP Special Correspondent
07/27/2009 3:33:54 PM
After weeks of secretive talks, a bipartisan group in the Senate edged closer Monday to a health care compromise that omits a requirement for businesses to offer coverage to their workers and lacks a government insurance option that President Barack Obama favors, according to numerous officials.
Single payer? Not even a public option! UNACCEPTABLE! TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE!
Define Freedom and Nietzsche:
Considering that you have stopped donating but are still medically eligible, I hope YOU never need blood. What makes you think it only goes to "the rich?" If you had ever worked in a hospital, you would know otherwise. People on Medicaid get transfusions too! (FYI, I just donated last weekend.)
* * *
As a longtime opponent of government and corporate centralized control (especially the collusion of the two under authoritarian administrations like Bush-Cheney), I have never supported "single-payer" healthcare, but a better safety net for those in need.
We will never get decent healthcare reform (or anything else) from the current government, which is corrupt in the extreme. If we want to reform healthcare, we first need to reform the GOVERNMENT.
The ONLY way we will ever be able to afford healthcare reform is to stop funding wars of aggression and other adventures of the military-industrial complex.
We can only counter the corporate disinformation and $$$$ in the pockets of our government officials by demanding we join the 20th century ( no less the 21st) by bombarding our posts and asking all of our friends, friendly acqaintances, and relatives to do the same. Oops, by "bombarding our posts" I meant our fuckin' Congresspeople!
Sorry to say it but in the end were going to be given a reform that is really just nothing more then a huge robbery handed to the Private Health Dogs from the taxpayer. Another Wall St. fiasco and were going to be told it's all that's possible. This reform will actually make things far worse for all of us and far far better for the health Ins. Industry.
I agree completely, and that in turn will hasten the final condition which leaves the poor (by then we all but the top 20% will be poor) no alternative other than bloody revolution.
God save us from another reign of terror a la the French revolution.
I am afraid for my grandchildren. Everything points to the rich becoming richer and ever more rich until the poor, starving and without shelter, submit to their instincts for survival and instigate a bloody revolt that will be difficult to reign in.
And the cycle starts again.
There has got to be a better way.
If there is one of you ruling class members reading this you know it has to happen unless something changes.
People with influence, please listen to us. It's in your own best interest.
So talk to them about it.
I sent the following to every member of the Senate Finance Committee:
"I can't believe that the finance committee is going to drop the public option from the senate health care reform bill. Without a public option, at minimum, there is no reform.
True reform would require a single-payer system, but I understand that Congress is far too myopic to consider the long-term benefit of the public in general, especially when Congressional members' campaign funds' financial health might be at stake.
If Congress passes legislation without a public option, then I suggest you disband both houses entirely. You can save us all the expense of paying for the charade you call the "legislative branch."
This failure can be called nothing short of contempt of constituency."
Well said. Thoughtfully and carefully worded. Certain to be ignored.
Change does not come from Defeatism.
Knowing that JH did the right thing is an inspiration in itself.
We really need to stop this talk about health care reform. It ain't happening nor will it, not in America. The oligarchs have won the game and we are now expendable.
"We really need to stop this talk about health care reform."
This kind of defeatism is music to the ears of the "oligarchs."
I wouldn't be surprised if this commenter is an agent of the HMOs.
It is reality not defeatism. The oligarchs own the system and we are now expendable. Climate change, bird flu, perpetual war, or any other excuse to allow citizens to die is allright with them. They have the money and we are an inconvenient population. They want us to die. The only question is how and when. The lack of health care is just one more nail in our coffin. Realistic thinking is a necessary element of a survival strategy. Pollyanna is a path to death.
Stone July 28th, 2009 8:47 am....If accepting that you are expendable as a policy of government is reality, pray tell, what is defeatism ...suicide?
Your "realistic" thinking is tantamount to surrender.
Your "realistic" thinking is not a solution, it is part of the problem. It discourages any action to counter the problems.
Doing nothing will GUARANTEE the triumph of barbarism. That is a certainty. The "cash value" of your attitude is to roll over, spread your cheeks, and invite the oligarchs to have their way with you.
There is at least a small chance that resistance can turn back the tide of barbarism, as it has countless times throughout human history--freeing the serfs in Europe, freeing the slaves in the United States, ending child labor, forming labor unions, winning the right to vote for women, ending segregation for African Americans, ending the Vietnam War, the French Revolution, the American Revolution, the Cuban Revolution, all the independence movements in the Third World.
Your attitude shows an abysmal ignorance of history, a sovereign misanthropy, and a de facto complicity with the very crimes you claim to abhor.
It's better to die on your feet than live on you knees. You evidently prefer the latter.
I have Medicare and I feel everyone should have it too, but people should not give themselves every excuse to do nothing and it is sick for citizens to be like that.
The Senate will soon be debating and voting upon the Health Care Reform Legislation reported from the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pension (HELP) and Finance Committees. Senator Sanders will offer S 703 as a substitute amendment to this legislation. I urge you to vote in favor of the Sanders amendment. It marks a combination of the most efficient, progressive, and cost effective way of paying for health care through public financing and maintains our system of providing health care through private health care providers. The Sanders substitute amendment allows Americans to go to the doctor of their choice and choose their medical treatment without any interference from a third party. Many studies have been made over the years that show there are enormous cost savings that accrue from a single payer system such as that prescribed by S 703. This amendment provides an effective way to control skyrocketing health care costs while covering all Americans. Please support the smart, comprehensive, and humane health care policy embodied in Senator Sanders’ amendment, S 703.
"When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty." ~ Thomas Jefferson
It's all corporate media. Add public broadcasting to the list. All of it is bought and paid for and run by individuals who know they would be fired if they told the truth.
here's the situation we are out of money and a government
with no integrity spine or moral compass!we do not matter what we do. massive public demonstrations in washington until we
regain their attention!
as someone without health insurance who recently sustained an injury that made it necessary to make my way through the hellish labyrinth of 'health care' for the uninsured, i have to say it is astounding how ignorant folks are about the scamming of the insurance industry and the effect that their poisoning of the world of medicine has had upon patient and caregivers alike. i see medical professionals burning out, trying to maintain their sanity in a system that requires a continuous onslaught of nonsensical edicts from management designed to cover the ass of the institutions they work for, and which place unrealistic demands on understaffed, overworked docs and nurses who, if they're honest, will confide are making actual healthcare a lower priority than profitability in a catch-22 scenario that can make your head spin. as a patient with a nasty fracture in my foot, i spent over 10 hours waiting in lines, getting misdirected from place to place, witnessing every sort of passing-the-buck and burnout behavior from sullen to panicked to clearly frazzled or angry in my 'caregivers' and wound up with a procedure done incorrectly by a well-meaning but thoroughly fried practitioner who i finally got to pay attention to me for 5 minutes and actually DO something about my break..... now i need to go in to undo the botched job she did (and did because she gave a damn that i'd been waiting for so many hours, foot throbbing on crutches, and someone somewhere had dropped the ball making an additional several-hour-long wait likely before her shift ended. i feel terrible that she'll likely receive hell about it.... one of those cases of 'no good deed goes unpunished'.... my friend who hung in there with me the whole day was astounded, as was i, at the chaos and stress both staff and patients have to go through when most in need of care and healing. between my vicodin fogged naps i've got to figure out how to get my 'bulky jones' cast redone and write my letters to obama or reps or whoever about 'my story' which is likely tame compared to many people's.... remembering back to my public schoolteaching days and supposedly 'good' insurance, i honestly don't know which is worse, being insured or being uninsured as far as the insane rigamarole hoopjumping, but it's clear that the uninsured are subject to more endangerment of their health in the longrun since it's considerably more speed-focused and mechanistic.... the staff all seemed to be suffering from some kind of air-traffic-controller syndrome of some kind and, though good people all, incapable of slowing down and being present or compassionate with THEMSELVES, let alone with the patients.
We probably won't get genuine health care reform until we have journalism reform. Or, more accurately, until we finally get something that passes for genuine old fashioned worn shoe leather investigative journalism by our media.
Signed: Lawlessone [for more irreverence, see resistence-is-possible.blogspot.com]